400°

The Last of Us: Naughty Dog Talks About the Remaster; "Lion's Share" of Studio Busy on PS4 Uncharted

The Last of Us Remastered is not a secret anymore, and today Game Director Bruce Straley and Co-President Evan Wells talked about the title, the reception from the fans and what you can expect from graphics and features on PS4.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
bleedsoe9mm3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

sucks the naughty dog is wasting their time on this port and not working on the next project after uncharted , was hoping a port studio would be doing this
@ILive seems like wasted talent if it slows down their next new ip by a year

ILive3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

Im pretty sure that they are discussing new IPS. But for now, a ps4 uncharted is just too exciting to pass on. Just imagine the new level they could take it. Uncharted 2 and 3 still remain the best looking games ever created. I expect the same for uncharted 4, with an evolution to the gameplay. I think its gonna be awesome. Don't get me wrong though, a new IP would have been more than welcomed.

3666d ago
SpadeX3666d ago

So we care about the looks only now?
imo, Uncharted has advantages in both visuals and gameplay.

GarrusVakarian3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

"wasting their time", he says.

Lol. Bringing one of the most loved and critically acclaimed games of all time to the PS4 while simultaneously working on another one of the most loved and critically acclaimed franchises of all time, Uncharted, is far from "wasting their time".

bleedsoe9mm3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

naughty dog shouldn't be bothering doing the next uncharted then they should have just ported uncharted 1 2 and 3 , and you'd be happy . TLoU was awesome and i not want to wait for their next project .

GarrusVakarian3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

"naughty dog shouldn't be bothering doing the next uncharted then they should have just ported uncharted 1 2 and 3 , and you'd be happy"

Lol wut. The reason i am happy is because they are doing this AND a new Uncharted. if they dropped the new Uncharted to do ports of the old ones, then i wouldn't be happy. Bringing the best of the PS3 while making something new for PS4 is what they are doing, i think that's great.

sagapo3666d ago

Doesn't suck for me. I don't have a PS3 but a PS4, so now I don't have to miss an excellent game ;)

Jaqen_Hghar3666d ago

actually you'll have to miss a lot of excellent games this just means you'll have to miss one less. A man encourages you to get PS3 for the Ratchets, HD collections, Uncharteds, Heavy Rain, MGS4, Journey, Sly 4, and of course Infamous 1 and 2 among many more.

sagapo3666d ago

@ Jaqen_Hghar: that's the choice I made at the time. But the only games I missed out on for me PERSONALLY are the Uncharted series (wich I can play at my friends house) and Last Of Us. The others you mentioned will be great games as well, but don't appeal that much to me.

Hicken3666d ago

Sucks that you think they're not pretty much done with this, and able to be working on something else already.

If a port studio was making the game, you'd complain about them not handling the game personally, and would say it was just gonna be a cheap low quality cash grab.

bleedsoe9mm3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

great for people who didn't own a ps3 , not for loyal sony owners who already played last of us

@Lukas_Japonicus yes wasting one of the best studios in world's time on a port

godofboobees3666d ago

Who says they're wasting their time? Are you an employee there?

MasterCornholio3666d ago

More like your wasting your time trolling PS4 articles. Your comment history is proof of that.

:I

seanpitt233666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

I agree they should be putting all that effort in to making TLOU2 on ps4 i have finished this game a numberous of times on the ps3 and it was breathtaking but I would prefer a new game for £50 than a game that I have already played and got just with prettier graphic and more fps.
If they did a £10 upgrade then fair enough but I would far more like naughty dog to spend there precious time to make new experiences and give this project to a different port team.

Hicken3666d ago

Well, unlike Xbox owners, it seems, Playstation owners don't really mind Sony making sure as many people as possible get to play awesome games. We're not so selfish as that. That's why we complained about the horrible drm practices on a rival console: for your sakes as much as for our own.

You don't hear Playstation gamers blowing off people with worse internet than our own. We don't brush off privacy issues. We don't shrug off the restriction of used games just because we personally only buy new.

So I think we'll be fine with this.

Thanks for your concern, though.

starchild3666d ago

Don't worry about that. Naughty Dog is an amazing studio. We should just be happy that they are bringing us two incredible games.

SoulSercher6203666d ago

You do know they have TWO teams right? The TLOU team have no effect on what the Uncharted are doing. And they are not pouring all their resources into their remastering.

The_Dude3666d ago

Bleedsoe9mm,
you have valid points. But I'm pumped naughty dog is bringing this masterpiece (TLOU) to the PS4. I never experienced TLOU on PS3, I only had a Xbox 360 :(

press-start3666d ago

same as me i didn't own a ps3 last gen only a 360 so to me its a brand new game.

I even watched the whole of the walkthrough for this game knowing i was not gonna play it because i was not gonna buy a ps3 i tend to invest in one console a gen(don't have time and money 4 both) but I had to see what the fuss was about once i started watching i couldn't stop lol that's the only game i have ever watched a whole walkthrough for it was like a movie to me.

so to play this game in full 1080p hopefully 60fps and all the other bells and whistles that comes with it plus all dlc,maps, etc I am more then happy to pay the asking price.

doe that's just my 2cents on the matter

GW2123666d ago

Same. I am really pumped about this too. I owned a 360 last gen and have both consoles this gen (I prefer my PS4 to my XB1 right now but I digress). I was actually able to play the Uncharted series with my buddy so this was the only ND game I missed out on.

MeLoveRamen3666d ago

They are not wasting their time one team is remastering this game and the other is working on the new Uncharted so you are still getting a new game from naughty dog, and who cares if it slows down their next ip by a year. You will have plenty of games to tide over until their next game after uncharted, you still have media molecule, sony London, sony bend, and Sony Santa Monica which i believe are on the same level on naughty dog

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3666d ago
Agent_hitman3666d ago

lol $60 remastered version, unacceptable..

GarrusVakarian3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

Lol, $60 remastered version of arguably one of the best games of the last generation with ALL of the DLC (worth $30 alone)and extras.....

Man, what a rip off. /s

Go troll elsewhere.

BEASELY3666d ago

Lukas comes in for the bodybag.

No_Limit3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

@Lukas_Japonicus,

Dude, you were the same person that said the Tomb Raider Definitive version is not worth the full retail price even though that game has upgraded graphics and all the DLCs as well. What made you changed your mind?

You said this below:
"I saw a lot of whiners with TR Definitive Edition and im still seeing a lot of whiners for this. *Nobody* is forced in any way to pay $60 for this game. If you don't think a remastered version of this game with all of the DLC and extras is worth $60 then just wait a month or so for it to drop in price."

and yet, you were an opponent against TR on your earlier post? What is the deal here?

http://n4g.com/news/1430578...
Lukas_Japonicus
"No Discounts or Upgrade Options Will Be Available for Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition"

Then no purchase will be made by me for Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition.

No doubt it will be half price or less on Amazon in no time.

Edit @ Lukas Below,

So, let me get this straight, you called out Agent_hitman for being a troll because he basically said in his view that he don't think the TLOU remastered version is not worth his $60, which is bascally the same as not willing to pay $60 for it; and yet, you feel the same way about Tomb Raider and is not willing to pay $60 for it yourself. Anyway you look at it it is a choice and Agent_hitman choice is to not get the game if it is $60, so there is no need to call him out for being a troll. Don't think that is kind of hypocritical on your part? BTW, Agent_Hitman has a PS4 and is a PS fan if you take a look at his posting history so he has every right to be upset if he thinks the price is too high for a console that he owns.

GarrusVakarian3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

@No limit

"Dude, you were the same person that said the Tomb Raider Definitive version is not worth the full retail"

You are twisting my words, i did NOT say it wasn't worth full retail price, i said *I*...ME, would not be paying full retail price for it, which fit's into my entire point about this being a choice that no one is forced to make. Learn to read before calling me out next time. Your entire argument falls flat on it's face just because you tried to twist my words.

And if you would also be so kind as to find my other comments regarding Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition where i stated that it's up to people whether or not they want to buy it again for $60, i would appreciate it, you know, create some balance here.

"and yet, you were an opponent against TR on your earlier post? What is the deal here? "

Exactly....*I* was an opponent to it. What are you finding so hard to understand here? The comment that you dug up from months ago wasn't me saying "this game is not worth $60, nobody should buy remakes for full retial, they're a rip-off"...it was me saying *I* wasn't going to pay $60 for it. My comment below that you also quoted directly backs up that opinion that it's all personal choice if you want to pay $60 for it.

For TLOU remastered, i do think $60 is worth it....for TR:DE, i didn't, but for both of those games i have voiced the opinion that it's purely up to the individual if they how much they want to pay for it. Simple as that.

GarrusVakarian3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

@No limit

Dude, look at the way Agent Hitman wrote his comment, look at his bubble count, how could he be anything but a troll?

The "opinions" of trolls matter now? He doesn't even take into account the fact you get everything included with the season pass for that $60. Just a textbook troll comment. He isn't "upset".....are you kidding me?

Omar913666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

Sorry Luckas, I'm gonna have to give it to No_limit on this one. You did sound like a hyprocrite. By your logic, no_limit is a troll because he has 2 bubbles. shoot by your logic I'm a semi-troll because I only have 5. Agent_hitman simply gave his opinion which is exactly what you did as No_limit pointed out. What if he is a troll? so what? his comment gave no indication of that. It was just his opinion.

Just trying to call it out here, because not everyone can be as fortunate enough to get 20 bubbles like you do (yes I'm a little jelly lol)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3666d ago
Abriael3666d ago

With all the DLC. Pretty acceptable.

MidnytRain3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

Weren't people ripping on Tomb Raider for being 60 bucks?

Destrania3666d ago

@MidnytRain

It's people's choice to buy a game for full price at release. I didn't buy Tomb Raider until it was on sale on PSN for $30, and even then I never finished it. I also didn't buy the next-gen port (my choice). But TLoU (one of my all-time favorite games ever), I'll easily buy a PS4 version at release because I know it'll be just as mind-blowing as the PS3 version was when it released. And it's also good for people who made the transition to PS4 from X360 and never played it that they're releasing it on PS4.

starchild3666d ago

Yeah, seems like a good deal to me. It's probably the best game I played on my PS3 and I would love to play an enhanced version on my PS4.

mkis0073666d ago

Or how about critical and public mass acclaim? That makes it pretty acceptable too.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3666d ago
ILive3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

Let's see the upgrades the game received first. But I think they should have price it in the 39.99 range. Going by naughty dogs rep, I'm pretty sure the upgrades will be more than adequate, likely jaw dropping.

Rickgrimes953666d ago

I would feel much better about spending 60$ on this then the 60 I spent on tomb raider ps4 having already played both on ps3

Alex_Boro3666d ago

lol I remember everyone complaining about Tomb Raider Ps4 being $60 but this gets a pass to the same people who complained? Im going to get this but I can tell there are a lot of hypocrites here.

eferreira3666d ago

point out these people then with proof

GarrusVakarian3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

Who are those same people? Can you list them by name?

I saw a lot of whiners with TR Definitive Edition and im still seeing a lot of whiners for this. *Nobody* is forced in any way to pay $60 for this game. If you don't think a remastered version of this game with all of the DLC and extras is worth $60 then just wait a month or so for it to drop in price.

You have 2 groups of people, those who have played it and those that haven't. For the group that hasn't played it yet, i see no reason why they would whine at the $60 price tag, you are getting a graphically updated version of one of the best games of last gen with every single piece of DLC for the same price as the vanilla version from last year without the season pass.

Alex_Boro3666d ago

Lol I'm not whining about it @Lukas_Japonicus. Just pointing out that Tomb Raider gets so much shit for charging $60 while pretty much everyone accepts TLOU. I can't point out a specific person, but I do recall a whole lot more people complaining about tomb raider.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3666d ago
TomRL3666d ago

No mention of framerate? Confirmed 30fps.

PrinceOfAllSaiyans3666d ago

They have said they're working for 60FPS !

TheFallenAngel3666d ago

There's some tweets from them saying they are targeting 60fps.

LKHGFDSA3666d ago

yeah they would of proudly mentioned 60fps if they had it.

cfc783666d ago

Uncharted 4 is definitely where it's at for me but i think tlou remaster will be a great time filler until it's out,still hoping a uncharted remaster trilogy comes out sooner rather than later but i wouldn't want it put infront of new release's.

MidnytRain3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

For quality's sake, this probably should have been on the PS4 to begin with...

MasterCornholio3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

The same could be said about Titanfall on the PS4.

But look at what happened. Last year PS3 owners got a game that won over 240 GOTY awards. And your saying thats a bad thing?

Thats why your trolling.

P.S Why do you care about graphics all of a sudden? Didnt you say that gameplay was the only thing that mattered?

MidnytRain3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

- Your first comparison isn't even close to being the same. I don't even know where Titanfall came from...

- Did not say this

- *conclusion on something I did not say*

- Don't even know what you're talking about

My conclusion: Your post is lunacy

LKHGFDSA3666d ago

should of came out in 2011 or 2012 IMO.
though having the delayed release date allowed for the polish that makes the game so good.
and releasing it for PS3 before the PS4 came out showed people that PS has good games, it really made the PS3 a well accepted platform which helped the PS4 sell.

So the timing was pretty perfect in a way.

Show all comments (62)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
shinoff2183493d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012493d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee493d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard493d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal493d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12493d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard493d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red493d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot493d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90493d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot493d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow493d ago (Edited 493d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90493d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno493d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot493d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow492d ago (Edited 492d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright492d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow492d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright492d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow492d ago (Edited 492d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 492d ago
ChubbyBlade493d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno493d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183492d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 492d ago
dmonee493d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012493d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee493d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012493d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com