Top
150°

Are the Xbox 360's graphics better than the PS3?

The Xbox 360 has been out for a year already, with developers having had plenty of time to get used to programming for it. Now the PS3 launches, with most developers only having PS3 dev-kits to create games with. While the PS3's graphics will improve in future games, there's one game out there that definitely looks better on Xbox 360. Is this bad news for Sony?

Read Full Story >>
itwire.com.au
The story is too old to be commented.
Shin_Akakage3996d ago

I would like to add..in this article there is a comparison of First Gen x360 title Ridge Racer 6 and First Gen ps3 title Ridge Racer 7. In the months leading to launch just like devs had little time with PS3 kits...Devs had little time with X360 kits last year. So this comparison is pretty fair. But just like all side-by-side comparisons you will have people with different opinions. In this article it says X360's RR6 is better looking then RR7 on PS3. But again...this is one opinion. There is a link to a side by side comparison in the article. Watch it a view it for yourself.

LAWMAN3996d ago

Within minutes there will be fanwhores screaming about which system is better . . .

Shin_Akakage3996d ago

Its safe to say that most of us that read the news on this site are actually gamers. While our individual maturity levels vary...we are all gamers. Sure fanboys will take this topic and run with it proclaiming victory or staunchly defending their console of choice. Alot of the videos floating around the net with side-by-side comparisons often make the claim that it is unfair to compare games being released on ps3 and x360 because x360 is in it's "second generations of games" while all ps3 games are first generation. I submitted this article because it is a comparison of 2 first generation games...by the same developer. meaning we'd get a more accurate look at how the 2 consoles compare with one another. At the end of the day it is still the games available on the console that will make it "better" than its competitor in the eyes of the consumer. Last gen I had all three consoles and I plan to own all 3 next-gen consoles eventually. There are (or will be) games on each console that I want to play. I am a gamer...not a fanboy. Gamers are fans of good games...more than they are of consoles.

power of Green 3996d ago

I don't have time and dont want to spend hundreds of dollars on games for three consoles a month so i picked the console/company i trusted and better suited me needs when it comes to function, service and type of games. I guess gaming/internet terms dont mean much in real life.

zypher3995d ago

if circumstances dictate that you can only have one game console, and you choose according to who you believe is the best then thats completely understandable. but what separates someone like that from a fanboy is that a fanboy will wholeheartedly align him/herself with one company, and completely SLAM what he/she assume to be the competition with one-sided, uneducated logic.

power of Green 3995d ago

I base my opinions on lots of reading and when somebodies twisting the truth i cant help but comment on it. I think that's a little more valid vs wishful thinking and turning a blind eye to the facts. So if some one has a prefference they should not comment?, do you read what these Sony fans say? one cant help getting the facts out.

Tut3995d ago

power of green II,
What if the news you are reading is already twisting facts to display something that isn't necessarily true or false, but a half-truth? That is the essence/beginning of most debates on this website... shoddy and half-assed journalism.

Tut3995d ago

lol why would you come and disagree with what I said in the post above? In case you didn't know... the majority of ALL major news outlets produce articles with "half-truths" in order to control what the public believes. Don't believe me? Do some research on CNN and FOX news, they are the most blatantly biased news sources around.

So again, why would you disagree with my above comment if even the most popular and highly-respected news sources do the exact same thing for the exact same reason?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3995d ago
Deceased3996d ago

THE 360 IS MORE POWERFUL AND IT IS VERY EVIDENT EVEN THIS EARLY ON. Call of Duty 3 for xbox 360 at 60fps vs. call of duty 3 for ps3 at 30fps. Xbox 360 has a way higher framerate in Tony Hawks Pro Skater 8 as well. The proof is in the pudding.

http://www.wii60.com/videog...

Marriot VP3995d ago

how many times have I got to tell you that the proof is in the taste, not the pudding.

marionz3995d ago

i havnt even seen one ps3 texture that can hold its own against a xbox 360 texture, even early games like cameo, i love the tile floor in the throne room! looks real! anyway yes i fully believe the 360 is superior to the ps3 in many ways, sony fanboys dont like that? JUMP IN!

marionz3995d ago

i havnt even seen one ps3 texture that can hold its own against a xbox 360 texture, even early games like cameo, i love the tile floor in the throne room! looks real! anyway yes i fully believe the 360 is superior to the ps3 in many ways, sony fanboys dont like that? JUMP IN!

Sphinx3996d ago

...they both have pros and cons... but are relatively equal. There, I said it. Oh, yeah, but the 360 costs less... and is readily available... and has more games.

FordGTGuy3996d ago

-OS takes 22%+ of the CPU power.
-Development for the new hardware is required to relearn development and development tools.
-Blu-Ray reads in volume and the rom in the PS3 drive reads slower then the 360's rom.
theres alot more things I can't think off the top of my mind.

Show all comments (35)
The story is too old to be commented.