Watch a HD comparison video between Titanfall on Xbox One and PC.
What is the benefit of these comparisons? feel so pointless
Yeah they are. Btw the team said it was possible for fulll 1080p update after launch. http://www.videogamer.com/x... In case anyone was wondering.
I played the beta on Xbone and I honestly couldnt complain about the resolution
I want to see a 720p vs 792p comparison to see the difference between the xbone and 360 versions! Those extra 72p's are costing 500 bucks!
@DeadRabbits I'm sure the 360 will be more like 540-600p, upscaled to 720p. The XB1 version matches PCs with GPUs that cost $250 by themselves, so I'm not complaining: http://n4g.com/news/1471580...
@Ulf Lies, those GPUs in that benchmark are running TitanFall in 1080p with 8x MSAA, both of which the XBO version isn't close to doing, and only the top 2 GPUs which I might add are well above 60fps cost $250, meanwhile everything else is around $150 or less and still outperforming the XBO with the exception of the APU and the Integrated graphics. @Alextdarling There are several reasons. Some people do it just to troll (fanboys). Some people do it just because they generally like knowing and comparing the differences gets their site hits (lensoftruth). Meanwhile some people use this is get a good read on what performance levels to expect from the hardware going forward (myself). It's not always cynical. @Angelic Did you read/know the sacrifices they'd have to make to reach 1080p? Who on earth would want 1080p just for the sake of having it, at the cost of no AA which means jaggies EVERYWHERE. Possible or not it's stupid to have the game look a complete mess just to hit 1080p, it's not a showcase as it is. The only ones that make sense are the 792p with MSAA (most likely 2xMSAA), and 900p with FXAA (slight blur for higher resolution) which again a bit counterintuitive considering 792p to 900p isn't a big jump. OT: The PC version obviously benefits from the higher resolution, it has much better AA, and textures are a tad better. My guess is 792p @ 60fps, 2x MSAA, Mid-High settings.
@ABizzel1 I would like to see a comparison between the ps4 at 1080p and the pc at 1440p because it can and does run at that resolution. We never see these reviewers cap the ps4 to 720 or 792p like like the do with the pc and 1080p
Considering the game is already struggling to maintain 60fps, even occasionally dipping to single digits at 792p, don't ever expect the game to be updated to 1080p. If 60fps is their goal then it would actually make more sense to lower the games resolution to 720p for a more consistent framerate.
Facepalm at ulf again. Xbox One's framerate tallies up to what an R7 260X does there. http://media.gamersnexus.ne... Near 60FPS average, 1 percent minimum > than 33FPS Except the R7 260X runs the game 1920 x 1080 which is virtually TWICE the resolution of Xbox One, and 8 x AA, which is 4 times the AA samples (performance) of Xbox One. In addition the PC version on max will have NO screen tearing (unlike Xbox One) plus having subtly superior lighting effects. Minor, but hey, it's there. What makes it all the more hilarious is that the 260X costs less than £100/$130. How on earth you think Xbox One is matching a $250 GPU is a mystery when a $130 one is destroying it on Titanfall?!?!?!
@AngelicIceDiamond - They never said 1080p they just said they were gonna increase resolution so that sites just guessing and the games struggling really badly now at barely 720p.. There's no way it can do 1080p unless they cut it to 30fps. You can patch in things like bug fixes and minor enhancements but a resolution change that big and the changes needed to optimize the game after launch?? Just not possible.. Not to mention the xbox one cannot handle 1080p with these kind of graphics we all know its true by now..
Abizz no idea where you're getting your resolution information...but a game natively rendered at 1920 x 1080 with NO AA is still superior to a game at ~720 with 2x AA, in terms of tangible aliasing...higher native resolution gives 'free' AA...it would hardly have 'jaggies everywhere'...especially from a a typical console viewing distance...1080 still benefits from MSAA, but far less than something at around 720...where its an absolute requirement... no argument...if Respawn could've got the game to render at 1080, they would've...I'm tired of all these arguments that devs are just 'choosing not to'...the xbox one can't do it...the PS4 can only do it some of the time...disappointing, yes...but its the way it is this gen... the consoles are a 1/3rd of a year old...just accept it...they're not 1080/60fps devices for all modern games...
So the game is having serious framerate problems dipping to single digits with just 792p and you people seriously expect higher with better results? When it comes to the Xbox One, all logic... http://static.tvtropes.org/...
Looks like a game from the end of the PS3/360 gen, not really pushing anything. It'll be fun for people though.
That's definitely true. Sure doesn't push any boundaries in the graphics department. However the art direction is certainly much better than IW (Or technically Respawns) previous games. And the real point of games is to have fun. And I enjoyed the beta. Not enough to buy it, but the point is if people enjoy it, they will play it. So kudos to them for making a fun game. Hope it does well.
With the quality of the player. I can spot texture and AA differences.
I spotted frame rates (when panning up and down the tower) and a couple video tears as well on the X1 version. Overall though it's what most would expect the differences would be.
the trees are what really stood out to me. That and distance rendering.
You don't buy that game for graphics. Poor on both. Anyone seen the 360 version yet?
Games like this a fast and news a high frame rate. It's not fun playing a slide show.
I noticed a lot of German in both comparisons... that was my only concern. I kid, I kid. Seriously - I played the PC beta on the highest settings and have 0 regrets on the decision to buy it on the XB1.
The lighting seems a tiny bit better on pc but that's about it.
Will always be better on pc but I like playing my consoles more.
why? can you name one reason why? and before you post your list I suggest you google search and see if a PC can do your reasons before you assume it can't.
This used to be true. Not so much these days with vendors targeting consoles and so tuning their games to console hardware specs. This is just another console port to the PC. No one should really expect much from the PC version since it is not made to take full advantage of the latest PC hardware. Star Citizen should show us what true PC gaming is since it's the first all PC game to come out in years. I will be getting the PC version of this game since I have yet to see a game worth my spending $500 on a console that wants to replace my cable box yet will not allow me to record shows. Anyway, I miss real PC games. I will eventually get The One and the PS4 but it will likely be another year before I do.
This game is not known for graphics. Graphics are pretty poor actually.
Yeah I couldn't tell if the Xbox One looked decent, or the PC version was just very underwhelming. Still, playing this on the PC. Can't wait to go home from work and start playing this puppy.
whoever has a 360 already and bought this to play on xbone is either dumb or really really dumb.
Or was planning on getting an xbox one anyway and figured why not get it when the biggest game is out right now? I have two friends, one got the titanfall bundle last night and the other is waiting till the 21st, when he gets his bonus at work, to get the titanfall bonus. Both have been on Live 7 years, 1 year long then me and they just were waiting for this game till they purchased the console. A lot of 360 users will be upgrading and now is literally the best time since launch. 360 is on the way out, it was last gen. Xbox One is the new console, so that doesn't make people dumb. Think before you type, you can come across real ignorant.
oh really? think before i type huh? okay *thinking*.................... .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . ........................... you butt hurt because i was just stating the fact they both look identical? why dish out $500 just to buy it on next gen when it's not even a big graphical leap? i'd rather just buy it for 360. looks the same to me.. not even mind blowing graphics. that's why you would be "dumb" to go next gen on it. hottest game out? not really. to kids like you that are stuck in the mainstream fps yes, then maybe. and oh yeah, cool story bro on your 7 years of gaming on LIVE.. you've just unlocked an achievement for that, bravo! have fun playing against dumbfounded bots.
Why would someone pay TWICE for a new release? Now is not the best time to upgrade a console. The best time is when the price actually DROPS. Now everyone has $500 to burn. THINK!
Judging by the way you type and the words you use, I'm guessing you're about 17 years old. Lets take a look at your response piece by piece, shall we? "you butthurt because I was just stating the fact..." - Uh, what? Where did I say anything like that? I purely gave you another scenario other then what you listed. People who wanted to buy an Xbox 1 who have 360's and desire to get Titanfall see a bundle like that, why not pull the trigger? It's like saying why would anyone upgrade to a PS4 at launch when they had KZ and Knack, then a bunch of multiplats? People upgrade for many different reasons, I upgraded because I am a tech guy and love new electronics. Others wait for games or bundles. "Hottest game out? not really. to kids like you that are stuck in the mainstream fps yes." -uh, what? What game is more anticipated that is currently released? I guess all the great reviews and constant articles means this game isn't a big deal. I guess I am a kid because I like Titanfall? You know, the same game that people twice your age are reviewing as a MP changer and a breath of fresh air to the genre? I guess we are all kids because we like fps? That makes a lot of sense, great concept you got there. Reading comprehension works wonders too, I never said I was on live for 7 years, I clearly said two of my friends. The point being, they are Xbox supporters and plan to upgrade to X1, Titanfall was the pushing over point for them. Don't worry, I'll enjoy playing Titanfall while you enjoy playing your, eh, umm, eh, well Infamous comes out next week so I guess that is something...
WTH is this? There's no action going on in this comparison vid. They might as well compare the box art while they're at it.
what would the ps4 version look like
Pretty much the same. Except 1080p. And depending on how much they're willing to optimize; textures equal to the PC version, and 4xMSAA / 2x MSAA + FXAA.
The PS4 version looks all black, just plain black.
Thank you sir for a little humor in all this negativity.
Yeah, they'd still argue that the black screen is 1080p! Can't win with that bunch.
Ok we know the PC is higher rez and has better bells/whistles but being honest... I think especially in that video the xbox one holds up pretty well comparatively.
It holds up because it's not a very high bar to reach on pc , the biggest difference I can see so far on a friends pc because I'm not getting the game is the fps is far better on pc even with a low card like my friends gtx 650
This game is amazing on PC at 1080p @ 120hz
Screw res hike - fix the damn screen tearing first!
I don't get video comparison at all, everything is compressed and when you put it full screen it look like garbage either way. Plus you can't tell much about how smooth it is. Played both version and the pc one in 1440p crapped all over the xbone version.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.