The first screenshots of the Xbox One version of Titanfall have been shared on the Beyond 3D forums, the first instances of pixel counting done in the same boards indicate the same resolution of the beta, 792p.
I'm more concerned with the framerate. Respawn said framerate is king, but the beta had some pretty big drops, especially when inside the titan. It wasn't constantly fluctuating, but it was a little distracting imo. If the final res is 792p, meh, not too big of a deal, 900p would have been nice. But the game is fun enough that i can accept 792p, but if the framerate isn't great that will directly affect the gameplay. So fingers crossed for locked or very near constant 60fps for the final game.
If the game is great, it's great, regardless of resolution, that's for sure.
Definitely. I would even take a drop 720p if it meant better framerate. @Gareth Exactly. The final res of the game isn't even on my mind at all, i just want 60fps.
Well I'm not concerned at all since any drops it may have had went u noticed by ME, I spent every moment besides when I was either at work, sleeping, or time with my kids playing the beta and it ran smooth as hell. Every single friend I know who tried it had the same experience so I'm just itching for the game to play it again. The over analyzing of pixels and framerate this gen just further proves to me that I don't care unless it affects the gameplay.
792p ? Like in 1200x792 ?
@pedro I think it's 1408x792.
A game that looks as dated as Titanfall should not run at 792p. If you are not concerned about "next-gen experiences" I am not sure why you're even interested in the XboxOne and PS4. Ryse is still the best example of what the XboxOne is capable of, graphics wise. I bought Titanfall for PC but it sure as hell isn't for the graphics I feel like I am buying a late last-gen title. A fun looking last-gen title but a last-gen title nonetheless. More games will show what the XboxOne is capable, like Ryse did, but Titanfall isn't it. I am sure Witcher 3 will look quite good on the XboxOne and the new Halo team did a great job with Halo 4 so I feel Halo 5 will probably be a true next-gen title for the XboxOne. I hope the same for Quantum Break. Titanfall is massively overhyped from my perspective -- at least as a next-gen title. Personally I am way, way more excited about Infamous as a true next-gen title in the short-term.
Wow, the level of disagrees with this statement is shocking. I see you have more agrees, but still. They are essentially saying that if the resolution is bad in a game, the game is ALSO bad. HOW ON EARTH COULD ANYONE THINK THIS? Or even disagree with what Abriael said? If a game is fun, who cares its resolution? Does that mean all games on previous generations are bad now that they don't have 900-1080p? Well, guess I need to brain dump my fond memories of Goldeneye, Ocarina of Time, TimeSplitters, StarFox, and Super Mario World. Those games resolutions are TERRIBLE, as well as their graphics. They certainly suck now right? /s OT though. I hope for Respawns sake the resolution and framerates are what they promised. It's their first Current Gen game (feel weird typing that), and they need to deliver on their boasts. Even if I personally won't be buying the game, I would like to see it do well, and performance is part of that.
I think smooth play is vital. With so much going on at once that will be the key. With Titans blasting, people climbing walls and all sorts of gunplay and explosions going on, will it be smooth and how will the latency play out.
I think you are confusing lag spikes (happens in all online games, due to connections) with frame drops.
Lol, im not confusing anything. I saw framerate dips, i know what a framerate drop is when i see one. In case you think im lying - http://www.youtube.com/watc... "Preliminary performance analysis of the Xbox One beta. Titanfall aims for 60fps, but drops frames and exhibits screen-tear when the engine is under stress. Occasionally the distribution of torn and complete frames is rather strange, so we're carrying out further research, but the major takeaway is clear - intense action causes significant performance drops in this beta code." So, fingers crossed the final build is more stable. If you didn't notice them, that's great, but i did.
Lol! I know a framerate drop when I see one. Classic.
The beta was butter smooth, so I imagine the game will be since they kept the same resolution
It wasn't. You just didn't notice the dips. I guess not noticing isn't particularly a bad thing....but for people like me who are sensitive to it, it's annoying. Check the framerate analysis in the link i posted above for proof.
Yeah, there were a few, but it wasnt enough for me to care. The only time I get mad because a game isnt high frame rate is when it is a PC game and that is my fault for not upgrading
NERDMAN67"The beta was butter smooth" LUKAS"It wasn't. You just didn't notice the dips. I guess not noticing isn't particularly a bad thing....but for people like me who are sensitive to it, it's annoying" NERDMAN67"Yeah, there were a few, but it wasnt enough for me to care." hmmmmmm maybe i just misinterpret butter smooth.
I meant that most of the time it had no performance hiccups for me, only occasionally, like when getting into a titan. Or when I had netflix running at the same time on my other TV
4K on 360?
Seriously, this looks nothing like a next gen game. I'm sorry if my comment hurts anyone here and I'm not trying to troll or anything but truth be told, with so much hype created by Microsoft and trying to pass this as the second coming of Christ for next gen, this is pathetic... http://cdn.dualshockers.com... BTW, in the gameplay side of things, jump to the minute 2:30 here... http://youtu.be/dlujVLEGBzw Looks familiar? Ha! Very original Respawn, bravo! I just don't see anything in this game worth getting excited for. The graphics, the gameplay, it's all been there done that from last gen. A sincere question, would this game create hype just by itself without the help of Microsoft's ridiculous marketing? I Don't think so.
But you said you were not trying to troll.
I agree that it doesn't look "next gen" visually, in fact i would argue it looks pretty ugly in some screenshots and if you would have told me that was a next gen game before next gen started, i wouldn't have believed you....but the gameplay is where it's at for this game. I doubted it too, before i played it for myself. Now i can't wait for it. Im bored of BF4 now, TF will replace it.
You're absolutely right. If it wasn't for Microsoft's ridiculous marketing, a game by Respawn, an unknown group of developers with no past record of game development experience, would have gone unnoticed. The gamers who played the game at game shows and in the alpha/beta wouldn't have enjoyed the game either if it wasn't for all the marketing hype. It's sad that people will misinterpret your truthful comments as a silly attempt at trolling. After all, your comment history is spotless.
Everyone knows it's ugly but no one cares. Wait for Halo for graphics
Well don't post then and go back to playing contrast until a game comes out for ps4
I agree with your comments. This game at its core is a shooter. Just like the other hundred shooters out their.You fire a weapon, you get into the Titan and fire a bigger weapon. The jet packs all cool but we've seen jet packs in other games and they do the same thing push you above the ground your standing on. All of the things Titanfall has was seen last gen and some of the cool things 2 console gens ago. Vince Zampella says the 360 version is pretty close to X1 version and I'm guessing here but i'd bet their will be more than a few that say the 360 version looks better than the X1. My point, you are right there is nothing about Titanfall that says next gen. That's a Microsoft sales pitch. One of many to get people to buy the X1. Titanfall looks like a fun game. And for me it'll be a fun game on the Xbox 360 if I get it.
No, you're right. It's on part with the PS3/360 versions of COD Ghosts, which is on part with COD4 Modern Warfare. It's a very very old engine that needs to be replaced.
Angry bro? People play sleeping dogs, true crime and saints row even tho I think Gta was pioneer? Why are there so many flappy bird knockoffs? O wasn't flappy bird a knock off? And I summoned my Titan in binary domain and used up a lot of my wall run powers, also why is it that in platform ears u jump on enemies heads like didn't Mario start that? Why why why? Why u mad?
Higher resolution than Killzones multiplayer then.
Oh this will be interesting...
Framerate looks rock solid in the most recent youtube leaked videos.
youtube videos only display at 30 fps...
True, but you will still see framerate drops. In youtube videos you can see stutter in any game that has stutter. The uneven frame delivery will still be noticeable.
What did cboat say the resolution would be? Edit: 790 is closer to 720 than 900 or 1080 but I forgot about the textures thing he mentioned... hey atleast its 1080p on pc!
720p and that the alpha textures were final.
What this guy said.
.... he said the alpha was final ...he was wrong (way wrong) get over it.
720p. He was wrong.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was the same as the beta. I'm more interested in how people work this stuff out?
I thought respawn already confirmed the final version will have a higher res than the beta.
http://attackofthefanboy.co... Yeah they did I guess they couldn't get much more out of the xbone in time! (Probably the bottlenecking) The textures are also confirmed to be the same as the betas so it should look pretty much the same as the beta itself! Cboat said weeks ago 720p with alpha textures And on release its 792p with beta textures thats not that far off In my opinion since respawn were talking about 900p... again these leakers seem more trustworthy than the developers half of the time even if they are wrong sometimes!
Respawn never mentioned 900p.
If being wrong on both statements means that leakers are trustworthy... ... then Pachter must be the all-knowing fountain of truth.
@creatchee Um yes, Respawn specifically mentioned they thought they could get it up to 900p. http://titanfallblog.com/20... But even on PC at 1080p with insane textures, the game still looked decidedly last gen. Was it playable graphics, sure. But 792p, normal textures, and framerate as low as 34 frames per second...ouch.
Be that resolution does not matter now, because the game will have a resolution update day one, 850mb
Where does CBoat's claims fall into all of this? And does this mean that there will be drops in framerates while in Titan's, like in the Beta? Questions asked, but yet disagrees and no response! This in fact shows great insecurity.
He said the game was being knocked back down to 720 and the textures reverted back to the Alpha crap versions.
So the textures that you see now arent the crappy alpha ones ? Well i am glad i didnt see the beta then cos the ones that they have now are terribad.
Who cared about this? Resolution doesnt matter anymore, look at killzone's multiplayer, still a good game.
except killzones mp wasn't good...
Yea..no most people that I've seen say that KZ MP sux.Is cuz they can;t kill sh*t without their little"AIM ASSIST". KZ is the only true next gen FPS. OT:I thought this was a given since the beta was close to release??
I can kill just fine, game still isn't good lol and yeah no shit its the only true next gen fps because its the first to be made soely for next gen. Lol
KZ:SF MP rocks. I have no problem with no aim assist. Probably why I end up at or near the top after matches. But then again I do that with BF4 as well and that has aim assist. It's funny that so many people who don't know graphics, and spent so much time downplaying them, suddenly know what 1080i is and that it is somehow below Titanfall. That's been the newest one. That Titanfall has better graphics then KZ:SF. That's like saying Pong is better looking then Super Mario Bros on the NES.
lol no 1080i has been around since 720p. Anybody can see kz looks better but the res could be higher on titanfall
just a few more days left, although im an avid ps4 supporter its still great to see people hyped and ready to play an anticipated title on their own console of choice
PC can run at 1080p or even 2160p Get a PC
I figured so close launch that what was in beta was going to be close to final build.
defo play this on pc if you have the hardware
Well to play it at normal textures, 792p (or closest PC resolution), and accepting dips as low as 34 frames per second..... Lots of old PC's can run the game. You don't need even a decent PC. Just about any 5-7 year old PC is capable of running this game if it was halways decent to begin with or if you upgraded the graphics card at all. This game is simply not demanding of PC's. It's a Source engine game.
What about the 360 version? does anyone know something about?
Rather xb1 than pc for this so I don't have to look at origin not long now.
I want to disagree, but I hate Origin SO MUCH!
792p? Guess the 900p "possibility" wasn't possible.
well all i know is if the game is like the beta but with a lot more content, then ill be as happy as a fat boy in a doughnut shop!
OMFG that is a fking ugly game.
It's using the Source Engine from June 2004...10 Years later...Can't be ran at 1080p 60fps on Xbox One... http://static.gamespot.com/...
As long as it looks as good or better than the beta and runs smoother I have no issue with the final resolution. I certainly will be curious to hear the true final resolution from the mouths of Respawn which I am sure we will hear come Monday at some point but really it matters little for me. Cant wait for Tuesday.
http://www.twitch.tv/presst... If my eyes are deceiving me here? The resolution looks higher than 792p on x box 1? This is one guy streaming the final version now, the game just looks much better than the beta.
Ever since the XB1 came out, I now hear of these other obscure video resolutions.But I want 1080p only tho...
Doesn't matter, still looks and runs great. Its been proven several times, that at this level...resolution doesn't matter that much. Esp being that on this game max PC settings barely look better than XB1 version.
Only because it's using the Source engine. Which was good for Half Life 2, back before there even was an Xbox 360.
still looks like an ugly hl2 era game, but at least hl2 had some personality