70°
5.8

Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 Reviewed | AusGamers

AusGamers has reviewed Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 and writes:

It’s a tragedy to see Lords of Shadows 2 arrive in this form. Rather than focus on what made the first game so much fun, the designers seem to have totally misunderstood what gamers wanted from the sequel, and delivered something that was utterly alien to the first game.

Read Full Story >>
ausgamers.com
brich2333704d ago (Edited 3704d ago )

I been playing this game, and I agree with any of the 6 or below reviews. This game starts off really good, and then its gets really boring, story is confusing, combat is decent but not better than Devil May Crys reboot combat which I just beat the day before this came out. The enemy Ai is annoying too, they take too long to beat even in easy. I did start the game on normal and realized it was too boring to even be trying. So what I been doing after 5 hrs of boredom is running past my enemies. They dont even chase you and are slow.

I would not recommend this game even if it was free.

starchild3704d ago

That's complete and utter BS. All you've proven to me is that I wouldn't trust your taste in games if my life depended on it.

I'm about 8 hours in and it only seems to be getting better. And so many cool things have happened already . The combat mechanics are brilliant. They force you to actually develop your combos, which isn't true of most games.

Your last sentence is a pure joke. Even if somehow you hated the combat and the narrative, the game is overflowing with beautiful scenery and has an amazing soundtrack and voice acting. It would be worth exploring at least for those things. And that's assuming the other elements were complete crap, which they are not.

CrossingEden3704d ago (Edited 3704d ago )

Sorry but this game doesn't hold a candle to DmC combat, DmC has way more options and is way more fluid, does this game even have frame or jump cancelling.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
^proof of my claims
LOS 2 does have that sense of badassery though, ripping out hearts and eating them whole=very badass

SamPao3704d ago

It's not like every game need them anyway...

Summons753704d ago

Old DMC sure, you have a point but the new one was awful for combat. Clunky and skilless with no focus on combos, hell it auto switched weapons for you so it was mash attack to win. At least LOS2 has you focus on combos and switch weapons instead of playing the game for you.

lOS2 >>>>>>> NT DmC

Morpheuzpr3704d ago

I'm sorry but all the noobs that has entered gaming have ruin it. Everything is made thinking of the noobs, or casuals as they like to call them. Back in the day if you wanted to be good at a game you had to put in the work, now the games practically play themselves (COD).

OT: The game is good. The story is confusing but I've seen worse, heck Dante's Inferno wasn't as good of a game and it received better reviews than this.

3704d ago Replies(1)
razrye3704d ago

I'll have this game and thief in about a hours time. Not listening to any reviewers, but gamers have been saying that it starts off slow but the last half really ramps it up in story and boss fights.

shadowraiserx3704d ago

I been playing this game and actually ,the first one bored me faster,it was a good game but it was a lot like GOW and the narrative make me sleepy, boss fights were like GOW and SOTC but this time they manage to make it feel less like those games the only thing with 2 is the story is confusing at first but the game is getting better ,the other thing that bothers me was the design they make in creating the enemies,they look like meh generic and uninspired.
But the My little pony in the first CLOS was bad too.

ShockUltraslash3704d ago

Thee so called professional reviewers dont even know how to play videogames.
I just got the game, and the sheer volume of content blew me away, and I have not even played 20%. This game expands upon EVERYTHING the lat game did good. It is not the game's fault that these blind reviewers cannot even FIND the content created by the developers.
The imbecile actually complained that there ts TOO MUCH TO DO in combat, well I guess too much information is unsuitable for people that have underdeveloped brains.

210°

Lords of Shadow 2 Is Castlevania's Most Underrated Title

From memorable boss fights to chilling lore revelations, here's why Lords of Shadow 2 may be the most underrated Castlevania game.

Gamerking821290d ago (Edited 1290d ago )

Well i enjoyed my time with it and thats all that matters too me, i could not care less what others thought. Please bring 3 out Konami or at least a 1 and 2 remasters.

morganfell1290d ago

Same here. I own it on PS3 and PC and love the title. The soundtrack is amazing and the tone they paint for the character of Dracula with Robert Carlyle's great voice work is perfect.

mrsolidsteel201290d ago

Same here, I’m a huge castlevania fan, have all of the games. Even the remake that was made on the Wii.

And I have the PS3 and PC versions of both games as well.

darthv721290d ago

They look really cleaned up on the xbo through bc. The LoS games are some of my favorites.

Bennibop1290d ago

Have been playing 1 and 2 on PS now and it's definitely better than i remember

FreeckyCake1290d ago

Castlevania: Curse of Darkness is way more underrated than this one

bananacrust1290d ago

it was ok. but the hide and seek BS was some of the dumbest stuff in the world.

moriarty18891290d ago

great game. have it playable on my xbox one thru BC.

rgraf771290d ago

I remember the intro being fun an action packed. Then the game became "OK" with a lame hub system and sneaking around as a rat. The modern time frame levels weren't the great either. Lord of Shadows 1 was much better and I wish they had continued with that formula.

Show all comments (20)
gangsta_red1515d ago

I'm a huge Shantae fan, but this selection is weak. It's official, MS is definitely skimping on GWG in favor of GP.

I mean...I guess LoS 2 is cool.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH1515d ago

Don’t you mean it’s “your opinion “ that MS is skimping on GWG? I happen to like LOS2 and will be glad to play through it again. And GP is a PAID service don’t you think that a PAID service should offer better quality games? Yes yes I know XBL is also a paid service but that’s a different conversation

gangsta_red1515d ago

No it's an actual fact. Every comment I leave is a fact.

"And GP is a PAID service don’t you think that a PAID service should offer better quality games?"

Yes, I actually do think that a PAID service should offer better games, but as you also made mention and casually dismissed XBL is a PAID service and don't you think a PAID service should offer a better selection of games?

djl34851514d ago

@gangsta_red

XBL is a paid service for ONLINE SERVICES aka online multiplayer. The free games given every month is just a bonus. Stop bitching.

1515d ago Replies(1)
micdagoat191514d ago

all 4 of these are pretty good games. Not sure what ur talking about

1514d ago
Christopher1515d ago

Finished Batman TEW a few months ago. It was the second worst TT game I've played. Really didn't enjoy it.

I hope those that do play it get more enjoyment out of it than I did.

darthv721515d ago

Sonic generations and LoS2.... hell yeah. My 360 has been itching to play these.

nevin11515d ago

As a non Xbox gamer, why are the free games availability scattered around.

I mean Batman is available the whole month

Castlevania is available March to the 15th

Shantae is available starting March 16th

Sonic is available the 16th-31st.

Has always been like this?

shabz6661515d ago

Yep it’s always been like this. It was weird then and it’s weird now

SpeedDemon1515d ago

Yeah its been like that. They do 2 games at the 1st of the month and then the other 2 on the 15th, some of the games are available for longer periods, it's depends on what they work out with the publisher .

Smellsforfree1514d ago

You just have to "claim" it from the store within those time frames so it doesn't matter that much to people who are interested, but I agree it is kinda weird.

autobotdan1515d ago (Edited 1515d ago )

Awsome!! Great games!

Show all comments (25)
230°

Terrifyingly Bad: A Look Back At the 3D Castlevania Games

If you decide to play a Castlevania game, make sure it's in 2D. Unfortunately, the series has never been able to make the jump from 2D to 3D successfully. Publisher Konami has tried. Six times in fact, but whether trying to build it in-house or with a third party developer, they never captured the essence of the series or make a good game for that matter. So just to be sure you know what to look out for, here are the six 3D Castlevania games that have been made.

isarai1648d ago

I loved the hell out of lords of shadow, lords if shadow 2 had its moments but just didnt leave as much of an impact on me as the first did, still loved it though. They are both great games IMO, maybe not the best "Castlevania" games but great games in their own right.

RememberThe3571647d ago

Yeah that first game was legit good. Really wish they hadn't taken a step back for the second, this series really looked great in 3D.

AK911647d ago (Edited 1647d ago )

According to one of the former devs of Mercury Steam the higher ups kept interfering with the sequel to the point where the game was nothing like what the dev team had envisioned for the sequel so we got the mess that was Lords of Shadows 2.

PhoenixUp1648d ago

I enjoyed Lament of Innocence and Lords of Shadow. They were entertaining titles and I wouldn’t mind trying Lords of Shadow 2 on PS Now.

Just because a game isn’t GOTY worthy does not mean it’s not worth playing. You could do a lot worse than those exceptional titles.

Abcdefeg1647d ago

Curse of darkness was ahead of its time

Hedstrom1647d ago

I really liked lament of innocence and Lords of shadow! Havent tried the other 3d games. But ive played most of the 2d games!

gangsta_red1647d ago (Edited 1647d ago )

I don't know why Castlevania: Lament of Innocence gets a bad rap. It was one of the best in the series at that time and really was a compliment to the Devil May Cry 3rd person style of action that was getting popular at that time.

I rented it on a fluke and was seriously surprised on how good it was. So much so I went out and bought a used copy of Curse of Darkness and instantly returned that trash.

The problem with Nintendo 64 games is they all tried to mimic the Mario/Zelda 64 style of gameplay and how could they not with that whacky ass N64 controller. Almost every game outside of Nintendo's own felt horrible and incomplete.

Show all comments (26)