The awe-inspiring campaign from PS3's launch lineup continues as all-new breathtaking, adrenaline inducing screens appear from this excellent racing title.
...look at the "LAST PIC" folks, it just reminds me of 'Cars', as the game now typically looks as good as a CGI movie in quality...and its just PS3 launch yet ! CG-flick 'Cars' here: http://dynimages.synacor.co...
wow breathtaking graphics! cant wait for it.
It does look like CGI. Probably because it is prerendered CGI. I wonder what it really in game and what is prerendered video. Sony is known for misleading with prerendered video. Look at Fatal Inertia.
lol, you mean microsoft. many ppl have played motorstorm, and they say all it is awesome, look at ign. and yes the game looks like cgi, but it is realtime! go search a place where they have ps3 and play that game, and i gaurantee you will buy the ps3.
I will search for a Target here that has the PS3. If it is as good as people claim and better than the 360 I will try to get a PS3 before the end of the year. By the way this is the ingame shot (last shot is CGI): http://www.gamebrink.com/fo...
im drooling over here while envying all the lucky japs gamers who already get their ps3 and the american gamers that will get to buy the console soon...
LIkE CG!!! I hope My PS3 doesnt freezes like my 360 did when I put Gears of War for half an hour on it. Good graphics means nothing if the hardware is crappy as hell.
its not the hardwares fault because my 360 used to do that with elder scrolls and when they finally patched the game it stoped freezing(to bad it was after i got tired of playing it but my bros still like to play it)
The last one looks like CG, but it's hard to tell because of the camera angles, but the rest of them look like the ingame footage I've seen of the latest builds on display. I hope they use the extra months they have for the NA release to make a really badass online mode. #3, Fatal Inertia is Koei, not Sony.
u say the 360 has crappy hardware??? that sure as hell is not wat crossplatform developers such as epic and ubisoft, etc are saying. According to epic, the ps3 isnt even capable of handling Gears of War: "Since Epic is working with the PS3 hardware and the Xbox 360 hardware could Gears of War ever work on the Playstation 3? “256 MB of RAM makes a huge difference. There is no way we could ever do Gears of War on 256, we had trouble fitting everything on 512MB. We pushed the 360 to the limits.” Another member from Epic’s team chimed in with the fact that there are currently more Playstation 3 programmers than Xbox 360 programmers. 'It (the PS3) is in our future. We always had plans for the Playstation 3 and an engine already runs on it.'" http://www.siliconera.com/i...
Why are you such a fanboy. Im not saying anyone is better. Jesus Crist you are an A$$hole. im saying the 360 is crap, because it is. The Gears game is amazing and maybe the PS3 cant do it. But im not talking about that. Im talking about the hardware freezes. The 360 is crappy. Now after my system died I Can tell you. Also if you dont like FKyourself!!!!!!!!!!!
all u ever do is bash the 360 relentlessly, as well as insult anyone who doesnt agree with u, "Jesus Crist you are an A$$hole...Also if you dont like FKyourself!!!!!!!!!!!" <--so thats wat i get get for not agreeing with u eh? take a good look at wat i said, notice i said nothing to actually offend u, i just simply stated my disagreement with u and backed myself, that is all, the name-calling is completely uncalled for.
You've posted that quote about 10 times, and each time I have to correct you. That quote came from an interview where Epic talked about why they talked MS into adding 512MB of RAM on the 360 instead of the 256 they were going to use. That quote was not a reference to the ps3! Some idiot blogger just took it out of it's context and mischaracterized it. If you don't believe me you can search for the original interview and see for yourself. And the ps3 DOES indeed have 512MB of RAM. Saying it has only 256 just shows how little you know about it. If you don't stop posting this same crap over and over and parading it around as truth, when others have shown you repeatedly that it isn't, then I'm going to start marking your posts as spam/offensive due to your blatant fanboyism.
cg.the game comes close.and if it had more time to be produced i'd say it would atain that e305 look.after seeing the detail in fatal inertia,i'd definitely say it could.but unreal engine 3 can only do so much.making some parts of your own engine is better.
wow, u really need to learn to calm down, I never said the ps3 has only 256mb of ram, cus obviously 256mb gddr3 ram + 256mb XDR Main ram = 512mb total ram, yes, that is true, i never denied that, nor did i ever try to cover that up, in fact i actually mentioned that before: Yes, ps3 has 512MB RAM, but it's split, Sir Nathaniel - 07 Nov 2006 19:03 | Let him/her speak the RSX has access to only 256MB, so it can only deliver 256MB textures, that is a big reason why the ps3 CANNOT handle Gears of War. Since Epic is working with the PS3 hardware and the Xbox 360 hardware could Gears of War ever work on the Playstation 3? “256 MB of RAM makes a huge difference. There is no way we could ever do Gears of War on 256, we had trouble fitting everything on 512MB. We pushed the 360 to the limits.” Another member from Epic’s team chimed in with the fact that there are currently more Playstation 3 programmers than Xbox 360 programmers. As I said before, I am not at all trying to insult u in any way, but the thing is, why should I take the word of ppl who have always been viciously bashing xbox and its fans over the words of developers? Why do I keep reposting some quotes? cuz they still havent been proven wrong, words of fans do not rule wats fact or fiction, only official sources do that. "That quote came from an interview where Epic talked about why they talked MS into adding 512MB of RAM on the 360 instead of the 256 they were going to use."<--you're right on that one, if it werent for epic, MS would have made the stupid mistake of giving only 256mb ram to the 360, that wouldve sucked. I am not out to get u, just the rlly pathetic ones like gametime and a few others who pisses off their own fellow ps3 fans with childish comments--theyre the ones who rlly gives ps3 fans a bad name, dont be like them, ur better than that. I admit, some ppl on this site have pushed me to my limit n made me use foul language and namecalling, but it happens t everyone on this site.
The part I take offense to is that yes, if changed to take advantage of the ps3 hardware (as all ports must do) Gears would run on the ps3. The 512MB is split, but the RSX has access to ALL of it, and the architecture has the necessary bandwidth to make it work just fine. And that quote is completely out of context. Notice how the question isn't in quotes, only the answer. A blogger made that question up and then took Epic's statements out of context to justify it. You can take the word of the developers, but what the developers have said isn't what the article you read implies. In the original interview Epic only comments that Gears isn't possible on a 256MB 360, only the 512MB one that was the final model. There was no original mention of ps3. The ps3 was brought into this by a blogger (not the interviewer or interviewee) who took that quote and misrepresented it to try and prove that Gears couldn't run on a ps3. That is how it has been proven to be false, because a) the ps3 gpu has the ability to use all 512MB of RAM, and b)Epic has not made the statement or even implied that Gears couldn't be made to run on the ps3. SO STOP REPEATING IT!
The game looks good for what the dev are able to do on a PS3 but not as breath taking as people are acting. The Hype has been sucked out of the PS3.
stop arguing bout the graphics anymore i say both system has capable doing good graphics . but in terms of processing power, PS3 got it all 3x more power than 360
"PS3 got it all 3x more power than 360"--bullsh!t and u know it
"bullsh!t and u know it" That's exactly how I feel after reading almost all of your posts Nate. I also see you haven't responded to my response. Typical.
idk why even bother doing this, ul just call whatever i say BS anyway, even if i were to post a link from sony itself admitting that the ps3 is inferior to the 360. Have u posted any links from official sources that actually prove my sources wrong? -No. Has sony already proven some of the downgrade rumors wrong? -Yes. Did sony ever deny any of microsofts or ATI's statements, or any other official statements declaring the 360's superiority over the ps3? -No. If the ps3 really were superior to the 360, would sony have already stated why and laid out all the facts by now? -Yes. There, now that we have that straight, I still expect that you will instantly deny all of this when it is so far still pure fact. U have the nerve to call me and others fanboys when u urself are also a fanboy? Thats kinda hypocritical isnt it? I'm a fanboy too, but at least I'm man enuf to admit it.
(My Comment about Motorstorm.) I think Motorstorm is going to be a great buy It looks both fun and graphically stunning. P.S. Did you guys (Sir Nathaniel & kmis87) just waste basically all your comments on each other?(Excluding kmis87's first post.) I believe so. Did you just create an arguement that has nothing to do with this topic? I believe so. Could this be considered Unrelevant? I believe so. Why do I have the feeling that I need to click on that Spam/Offensive link?(Which btw has another reason "Unrelevant" in the small box afterwards.) Well I won't for now.. but c'mon guys really.. if you want to argue about PS3 and 360 make your own web page with your own false reports and argue on another page where no one has to read through all your crap just to get information that's about the main topic. I hate reading through all this mumbo jumbo just to see what people have to say about the TOPIC!
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.