Top
600°

Sledgehammer’s Next Gen Call of Duty “Pretty Big Jump” Graphically Over Ghosts, Insider Says

Now that the news about the next gen Call of Duty by Sledgehammer Games slated for the fall are out in the wild, rumors about what it’ll entail are starting to trickle down the grapevine.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Thatguy-3101286d ago

We'll it's Next Gen. I expect it to be graphically better. I'll keep my expectations low though.

Utalkin2me1286d ago

Well technically it wouldn't be that hard to be alot better graphically then Ghost.

TomShoe1286d ago

No one ever bought Call of Duty because it was a looker.

They just need to make the gunplay great. I loved Black Ops II and dumped hundreds of hours into it. Then Ghosts came and I don't play it all. Playing feels like a grind and a camp fest. You can't make big plays either because you die too quickly to do that. Still, since they made MW3, which was a good game in it's own right, I have hope.

Pixel_Enemy1286d ago

Could it be?! A new engine? One that will be rehashed over and over this whole new generation?

yezz1286d ago

@TomShoe

You're right but the game looks and feels so dated that there is almost no point to buy it for the new consoles..

There really needs to be a signifigant graphics upgrade and I'm not just talking about textures.

Utalkin2me1286d ago (Edited 1286d ago )

@TomShoe

Well this article is about graphics and not gunplay. And you first comment backs up what i just said.

But honestly Cod4 had all the hype graphics, gunplay, it won best graphics that year. And they have ridden the exact same engine for years. And really it is just the same old stuff same old assets and same old gunplay.

Dmagic1286d ago

cod when it came out was pretty good graphics wise it made me learn what 60fps looked like.

guitarded771286d ago

I disagree Utalkin2me (with all due respect). Ghosts looked pretty craptastic on next-gen. When compared to Battlefield and Killzone, it looked horrible on both a visual and technical level. The overall models, textures, etc were easy to see... but even more so, the static environments, and clipping through plants, etc were about like the beginning of last gen in quality. I posted vids from PS4 of BF, KZ and Ghosts, showing plants in the environment. I would walk through them and Ghosts would just clip and look like crap. I also looked at the plants in all three games up close, and they were generations (Yeah, I said generationS) apart from Ghosts to BF/KZ. If there isn't some serious increases in the next CoD game, even the unschooled in the gaming community will notice when put up against the games which are using the more powerful tech.

Utalkin2me1286d ago (Edited 1286d ago )

@guitarded77

You must mistaken me and my comment for someone else. I know Cod looks average as i have stated, besides when "COD4" first came out it looked next gen and gameplay wise. And as i said before they took that same engine and wore it out and it looked like the same thing over and over and no big improvements. And it looks below average even on next gen. Am i missing something?

Kleptic1286d ago

TomShoe...completely correct for the past few years...

but you're kidding yourself if you think no one bought CoD 4 for being great looking at the time...with performance to match...

Problem is that was late 2007...and not one CoD has had the same effect since...

curtis921283d ago

Well... respawn failed with titanfall. Looks worst almost.

ssj271283d ago (Edited 1283d ago )

@tomshoe
Is easy to spot that you are new into gaming or a kid..

COD4:mw was one of the best looking games at the time it launched.. that is why it got so popular, plus the diversity of gamemode and options, it was a fresh game indeed. Sadly they keep reusing the engine that got very outdated right away, that engine had very huge lag even when you play split screen, one thing shows in one screen but the timing and what shows on the other screen is totally wrong and that is very easy to tell when you watch the kill cams.

The gumplay and controls are very over rated, remove auto aim and you have very bad and outdated control's.

Someting Killzone Shadow Fall is not been talked is about how amazing the controls are and there is not Auto Aim in them. I'm amazed on how precise they are.. but i still think killzone 2 controls are better if the lag and dead zone are fixed, the heavy feel in kz2 controls and feeling of firing each gun in it is unique and perfect.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1283d ago
The_Infected1286d ago

Titanfall > CoD

No matter what CoD does it's just shit anymore.

MethCupcakes1286d ago

Are you being serious? Tell me you aren't being serious. Titanfall looks like trash, and I don't really care what the phantom disagrees say. I looks like the same crap with soon to be OP mechs. I've seen the game play in person, and Let me tell you.. ITS THE SAME GAME. Tell me, why are you really hyped for this game? Is it because the other half of infintyward is making it? Trust me I'm no fan boy when it comes to branded pieces of metal and plastic.

The_Infected1286d ago

That's your opinion. Titanfall is the most hyped game in a long time and it look GOOD and FUN. Who cares about if the graphics aren't OMG WOW.

cyber_daemonx1286d ago (Edited 1286d ago )

All you xbots ever do is bring Titanfall into every article. 'No matter what CoD does it's just shit anymore'. What even if the developers add mechs, parkour, bots, drop the player count to 6v6 and make it run at 720p.

strigoi8141286d ago

yet EA manage to make your TitanFall appeal and play similar to CoD oh yah except it has mechs. sadly COD nowadays is set as a standard on reviewing fps games lolz, so anything that dont play and feel like COD it will get lower ratings..

Oagoz1285d ago

Titanfall honestly looks like shit. 6v6, 720p, Bots, and you can't shoot through walls. Fuck titanfall.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1285d ago
TAURUS-5551286d ago

hopefully they will make it 12v12 cuz 9v9 is kind of last-gen.

UnHoly_One1286d ago

That makes no sense at all.

How can a player count be "last gen"?

Fighting games are 1 vs. 1, I guess that's old fashioned, too, huh?

The proper player count is whatever works for the game's design.

More =/= Better

ZombieKiller1286d ago

Hear that guys? It will have better graphics next gen!

Why does Call of Duty get all the GOOD features?

I'm sorry, I am trolling. I can't help it, COD is a joke anymore. Before the disagrees, put it into perspective: It costs more money to play COD annually (assuming you want the full experience) then it does for an XBL AND PS+ account combined. Not to mention the decreasing quality...
In all seriousness, I think Treyarch needs another year to make this "new" COD game awesome. I have always said it should go away for a year. Finally, it's happening (kind of). Now they have the time they need to make the game function nicely...hopefully.

tawak1286d ago (Edited 1286d ago )

they been saying that since black ops and ghost, the only big jump people seen is the jump of sales downward.

OhMyGandhi1285d ago (Edited 1285d ago )

I want them to have the balls to say, "it is going to be photo realistic" or something equally outlandish. Saying "pretty big jump in graphics" is such a weak statement.
could you imagine ANY other studio stating that?
imagine Naughty Dog or Sony Santa Monica saying, "it'll look (a bit) better then our previous games."

I have nothing against Sledgehammer, but I actually like it when a developer tries to hype up a certain aspect of their game to ridiculous levels. It raises the stakes. It forces them to deliver the best possible product and protect that claim, and subsequently, their reputation.

kewlkat0071285d ago

What about the gameplay?

Oh yeah the PS2 games will have better graphics then PS1...

King-u-mad1285d ago

How about they just gives us COD4 back... That's the only one that really matters as far as modern combat goes. Classic 3-5-7 Kill streaks only... with the ability to only get them one time only in 1 life. Give us all the original maps. And design new ones. If you are going to rehash the same bullshit just give me the same game... EA Sports does it all the time... Madden... The only they actually tweak is graphics and the core system. You don't see them trying to bullshit me with a Madden: Superbowl Warfare, Madden: World at Bowl or Madden: Quarter Back Ops... To make me think it's a different game... when it's not. If you are going to make the same game over and over... make the best one you had and update it... Cod4... duh...

I know there are others who can agree with this lol. Not everyone, but if you get the point you can agree.

ssj271283d ago

Do keep your expectations low, unless Activision get a new president that demands top quality back into the IP...
Plus untill Activision actually star hiring true, goo and experienced talent to bring quality back into it.

I think COD is done and it will die little by little, they have no true talents into their studio's any more.

I guess that is why they got a smart deal with bungie.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1283d ago
-Foxtrot1286d ago

Now, now...it's not just about graphics guys...if it plays the same then it wont matter

You can't polish a turd remember, so dont think a new lick of paint will make it next gen

Abriael1286d ago

Well, "they said" it's gonna be a "new era" for the franchise.

Detoxx1286d ago

They said the same about Ghosts.

Deividas1286d ago (Edited 1286d ago )

Then again, COD developers did think that "Fish A.I." was new and exciting tech....So i wouldnt hold my breath for this.

tokugawa1286d ago Show
-Foxtrot1286d ago

They say that about every new COD game, they also said that Ghosts used a brand new engine and it didn't

Abriael1286d ago

Hence the airquotes around "they said."