With the hype surrounding The Order: 1886, Sony Insider 'Thuway' tackles comments revolving The Order's FPS
What other reason would people tout the res and FPS? There's a difference when an exclusive runs at 30fps and a mulitplat where one runs at double the frames at the same visual fidelity. 30fps will still be the majority choice. I don't know why some gamers don't know that, in the closed console space, devs will almost always choose better visual fidelity at the cost of FPS.
I'm feeling this game will be 30fps. I do need to add that the ps4 runs games at higher framerate/Res and higher fidelity. Most people who've played tr on both conses at saying the ps4 version looks noticably better.
@edonus: Problems with your first paragraph. There's so many I'm just going paragraph by paragraph to reply. If you read the previous comment, you would be able to tell that I was talking about xbox one, as I was replying to it. Second, Ryse doesn't have the highest fidelity. Lower framerate, Res, AA, etc than KZSF. Not to mention, both RYSE and Forza have a lot less going on in the background than KZSF (very little AI in ryse). I should have put Framerate and resolution, I know they're different things. I was just using them to prove the same point, so I lumped them into the same category. Also, you say slight difference. TR: higher framerate and (probably) res on ps4. Battlefield: higher textures, AA, Res on PS4. COD: higher everything except framerate. AC4: Higher res, and probably other things, but there aren't many comprisons I've seen. Every game that's yet to release that's commented on the matter has said the PS4 version will look better. Those may only sound like slight difference to you, but those differences are twice as hard to run. Second paragraph: How does the ps4 only look better in "very specific ways" than the xbox one? Seriously tell me. "tons of factors" means nothing. I actually provide specific detail. If a game runs better on certain platforms, it just runs better. There's no if and or buts about it. Also, TR doesn't run at a "slightly higher" framerate on the ps4. The Xbox one version runs anywhere from 18-30fps, averaging at about 26-28fps, depending on the video. The ps4 ran 34-60fps, with an average just over 50fps. Not double, but pretty close. Not to mention, most people that have played both versions say that the ps4 version appears to have a higher res. The reason the framerate is capped is the xbox one version would hover around 28-34fps most of the time, causing stuttering. I agree that the media has herded us to only look at those two factor, but that's because they're the most easily comparable. Every 3rd party game I've seen has had basically higher everything (res, detail, etc.) on the ps4 version. I think what you were getting at earlier with "tons of other factors" was there are other details than framerate and res. But if the ps4 and xbox one were the same power, why would they make the xbox one have lower res, and the ps4 have lower detail? That makes no sense. Sorry dude, but you have to acknowledge that the xbox one is completely inferior to the ps4. My vgchartz name is lt_dan_27 if you want to go further with this.
So wait. Now 30fps is good and is a choice they made right? Hahahahahaha... oh you PS fans. You so crazy. So I guess it was design choice for Ryse to hit at 900p... that's just bad X1 hardware, but these guys choosing to go at 30fps.. that's just choice. Love it. Love that Thuway is becoming this "always correct" PlayStation Champion. Love how the article calls him a "Sony Insider" Exactly. Pro Sony.
Got to love the covert console war.
The point is the Xbone isn't capable of higher framerates at 1080p resolution, the PS4 is. So keep trying to justify your purchase if you want to, but you still chose the least powerful one. So you might as well quit grasping for straws. It's pathetic.
Love Thuway! Way to defend.
He's actually right too lol
im getting a ps4 but come on most of the games cant even stay at 60fps most of the time. They just drop down to 30,40 fps/ Dev should lock it at 30 fps
so is the order confirmed not to be 1080p?
Idk but they did say "full HD" and 30fps
Im pretty sure the final res will be 1920x800p due to the 2.40:1 aspect ratio. The image quality will still be the same as a 1080p image though due to game not being upscaled.
@tee_bag242 It's not damage control, when you're correct misinformation. If people were actually intelligent on here instead of being childish and acting their age instead of their shoe size, then people wouldn't have to constantly correct them. It amazes me how ignorant some of you kids can be. Just a waste of brain cells.
Lol the quality will be the same? 1080p =1920x800p lol PS fanboys spin every look at the comments below how 1080p and 60fps only matter with multiplats
You really don't understand do you. Look up the difference between 'aspect ratio' and 'resolution' before you go and make yourself look a fool in another article about this. And yes, the only reason 1080p/60fps has any relevance is because it is the perfect representation of the difference in power between the PS4 and the X1. The whole conversation has been subverted by X1 owners in order to divert attention away from the obvious power difference. Anything to avoid facing the truth.
lmao like when xbox fans said 900p was better than 1080p remember those days aww good times, except in the order the game keeps the 1080p pixel density just with a different aspect ratio so yes the ORDER:1886 is Full HD 1080p is that so hard to understand.
I love how confident people like you sound when it's apparent to people who actually have knowledge on these matters see how little you know of what you talk about. Listen closely. The Order 1886 runs at 1920x800p, the aspect ratio is 2.40:1 hence the black bars at the top and bottom of the image. Each pixel inbetween those black bars are at 1:1 meaning each pixel has it's place, no upscaling. Therefore the image inbetween the black bars will have the same image quality as a native 1920x1080p image which also has 1:1 pixel ratio. So the size of the playable area won't be the same, but the image quality IN that playable area will be the same. Please just do a Google search before commenting next time. You give X1 fans a bad rep.
Lol most multiplats aren't even good looking 2 a game that is made only on one console like UC series GOW series TLOU and GT series as proven ps3 exclusives all r 720P and shits on every 3rd party games and 360 exclusive as well. So even it's 1920x800P I can tell u it will end up being the best looking game of this year till ND and SSM make their games and being blown away by them.
Now its not about native 1080p its about have the pixel density the same as 1080p lol spin spin I Dont really care its just funny how much each side bash each other and spin their words for their beloved company. Try being humble and stfu and enjoy the games.
Wow, it doesn't matter how many times someone tells you that it is full hd you still don't TRY to comprehend the differences. Ignorance by choice is just idiocy.
Its 1920x800 so it is technically NOT full HD but it will be the same as watching a bluray movie with black bars above and below frames, so it will still look full HD lol sorry for the confusion
Actually, HD is about pixel count by its very definition, not aspect ratio. Just like reature films that choose those black lines, it doesnt magically make it SD. Its still HD by definition.
I'm beginning to think this Ashan Rasheed's real alias Kanye West.
The FPS argument is only valid it seems when comparing games on both systems it seems. But when its a sony game that runs at 30FPS its all good. Based on what I read on this site on a daily basis. 30 FPS should be unacceptable on any next gen game??? Or is it only unacceptable when its a XB1 game??
DR3 runs at 720p and 30fps and falls below 30fps would you consider that acceptable? if you do then don't worry about the Order.
Game runs just fine. It's fun as hell to.
DR3 I never encountered any slow down at any point. Have you?? Or are you just reiterating misinformation that people like to put out there as fact. Lets say it does indeed dip below 30FPS at points in the game. (which I havent experienced. Is it dipping below 30 to the pont thats its unplayable?? As far as worrying about The Order. I dont worry about any game. I like games and I am keeping my eye on THe Order and all titles as I want to buy a PS4 and this game is on my radar. My comment about 30 vs 60 FPS is based on the fact that SOME...not all tout 1080/60 for the PS4 as the end all to be all. But when a game is NOT hitting that. It is A-OK! No problems here. Me personally I dont care about the RES or FPS. As long as the game looks and plays as the DEV intended then I will except that.
@AShley "DR3 I never encountered any slow down at any point. Have you?? Or are you just reiterating misinformation that people like to put out there as fact." Smfh did i say it has slow downs fact it goes below 30fps think im lying look it up :/.
To be fair, capcom stated it was running on the old DR1 and DR2 engine. If they used the Deep Down next gen engine, DR3 would have preformed much better
I've played DR3 for over 50 hours. Not once has the frame rate appeared to drop. The review builds and the conference builds may have dropped below 30 fps, but from my play thrus it appears Capcom patched this appropriately on Day One.
'Or is it only unacceptable when its a XB1 game' ...if its a multiplatform game where the other console is pushing more, yes. It would be stupid to chastise 30fps. You'll leave yourself open for ridicule when a game has to run at that rate BUT if theres a difference between multis of course there will be blood....this is n4g