1030°
Submitted by EBTpickle 337d ago | news

Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition Framerate Confirmed

iGR: "For those who’ve been contemplating the purchase of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition for either Xbox One or PS4, this fact could, and should affect your decision." (PS4, Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition, Xbox One)

Alternative Sources
« 1 2 3 »
Kayant  +   337d ago
DF's Faceoff will sure be interesting to see ;)
Lukas_Japonicus  +   337d ago
As i said in the other article, i would much rather have 60fps without the power hogging hair TressFX. But if it's a stable 30 then it's all good.

"tbh if I had the hardware to max it out I would rather play the PC version."

If you have a good enough PC for tressFX and 60fps then you might as well, it's super cheap on PC too.

Edit: What with the disagrees? You people prefer fancy hair to 60fps?
#1.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(49) | Disagree(29) | Report | Reply
Kayant  +   337d ago
tbh if I had the hardware to max it out I would rather play the PC version. I don't like the new face to me it's more of a *downgrade* than up and the other improvements don't seem like a big deal to warranty the asking price currently.

But yh I second that tressfx is nice but not at the cost of half the framerate if they could get it to run well at 60fps.
WalterWJR  +   337d ago
The disagrees are probably from your assumptions that TressFX is a hardware hog. It used to be in it's very early stages but now it hardly makes any difference.
Hatsune-Miku  +   337d ago
Is it 1080p at 30 fps in order to have parity on both xbox one and ps4 because the ps4 by fact is 50% more powerful than the xbox one.
AliTheSnake1  +   337d ago
The hair TressFX is so ugly and out of place, After going through mud and dirt, her hair looks like she just got out of a salon, with fans working around the hour all over her head.

For the 30fps and 60fps thing. I prefer 30fps. Because we all know, Nextgen only games will Have to be in 30fps. So why spoil yourself by getting used to 60 fps in a third person game? (Going from playing in high frames to playing in low frames is not easy, PC gamers' constant FPS bitching is a proof)
#1.1.4 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(28) | Report
hkgamer  +   337d ago
its console gaming, most devs will rather pish for graphics and effects rather than 60fps unless the gameplay will really benefit from 60fps.

i would have purchased this game if it was 60 fps, but i guess i give this a pass, or buy it digitally when it is cheap.
DejectedJeff  +   337d ago
No, i didagreed because youre satisfied with a 60 dollar port that csnt even run at above 30 fps
Lukas_Japonicus  +   337d ago
@Dejectedjeff

Way to assume there buddy! For one, im English, so it will cost me £37 to buy new (£17 with my Amazon discount card). Secondly, no where did i say that i was satisfied with paying full retail.

" that csnt even run at above 30 fps"

DOESN'T run at 60fps, not can't. As i explained below, the devs make the decision of 30fps with effects or 60fps with less effects.

Learn to read.
Skip_Bayless  +   337d ago
It's 30 frames to keep the consoles even. Thanks X1..
AliTheSnake1  +   337d ago
You know what's funny about this?
If the game ran at 60 fps. People will complain about how bad the graphics are.
Aleithian  +   337d ago
I didn't "disagree" with you, because your statement is your opinion, but I do in fact disagree with you. For me, I'd rather than the fancy hair than the 60fps. I've been gaming for decades - I can deal with 30fps. But fancy hair is new and innovative, and increases the immersion for me as I play the game.
jc12  +   337d ago
people always disagree on this site...seemingly for little reason most times other than to just disagree...
Army_of_Darkness  +   337d ago
"the lack of 60FPS alongside the 1080p resolution makes the definitive edition much less attractive. This may act as a deal breaker for those who have been thinking about “double dipping” on the title. It’s also harder to justify the full retail price-tag when resolution is really the only upgrade."

That's exactly how I feel... I really was hoping for 60fps@ 1080p, that would have convinced me to play it again... oh well, Deal broken for me.
#1.1.12 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report
vigilante_man  +   337d ago
Two things are clear here:

1) It seems to be like a HD-remake (Or Super next gen HD) and those games always sell for at least half price if not less than new games.

2) If the fps and resolution are the same on PS4/XB1 then they have gimped it for parity sake. We all know which machine is the most powerful now.

You can not please all the people all of the time so stop trying. Max out the game for each platform and get a bit of self-respect!
SharnOfTheDEAD  +   337d ago
Despite the frames and what not, I'd happily pay full price again for the DF Edition because it is a good game and was one of my fav titles from last year. Honestly anyone in 2 minds about this should try it out. Tomb Raider at it's finest. If your judging on buying a game because it's 30 or 60 frames.... well.... you have my pity
JsonHenry  +   337d ago
This is 30fps WITHOUT certain lighting effects and and Physx.

TressFX really made the character model seem more real though. The blowing in the wind or moving as she moved made for a much more cinematic feel.
1upgamer99  +   336d ago
I don't do PC gaming much anymore. Too much hassle, but If my PC could handle it I would rather have 60fps...

I feel like the developers are lazy. I mean common "definitive" version at 30fps on perfectly capable hardware. I don't care if the PS4 is more powerful than Xbox1, I am sure both could have handled 60fps.

I am not buying this game anyway, been there done that. I am not even that impressed with the enhancements, and the asking price for an upgrade to a game I played not long ago, does not seem worth it.
Play2Win  +   337d ago
Jesus Gentlemen ...

you don't need 60 FPS for this game while playing with Pad. I play this bad boy on PC with 60 FPS just because it feels much better with mouse and keyboard. But be glad it is 1080p with nice graphics. Sweet locked 30 FPS are good enough.
starchild  +   337d ago
Of course you don't "need" 60fps to enjoy a game. But then again you don't "need" to play videogames at all.

Just because you don't need something doesn't mean it isn't better to have it.

Every kind of game is better at 60fps than 30fps. The temporal resolution is much clearer (i.e. how well you can see things while there is motion on screen, which is most of the time in a video game). And the latency is much lower therefor the controller response is much quicker and, well, more responsive.

I do think going for 30fps is still the better trade-off for most console games. Doubling the framerate literally doubles the power needed to run the game.
Lukas_Japonicus  +   337d ago
For once, i agree with starchild when he says that every game will be better at 60fps ( but i also agree with your point that not every game NEEDS to be 60fps. I also agree with starchild when says that 30fps will be the best trade-off for many console games.

PC gamers get the luxury of 60fps for every game (if they have a good enough PC). Whereas consoles devs are going to have to decide which is more important, 30fps with bells and whistles or 60fps with less bells and whistles. Personally, i care much less about 60fps third person games than i do first person games.
#1.2.2 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report
Back-to-Back  +   337d ago
30fps? lol go f#ck yourself square enix.
Studio-YaMi  +   337d ago
Well,the game is an action adventure,it's not an fps game where frame rate matters most,it's a third person shooter,a visual upgrade @ native res is more appreciated than frame rate in this case tbh as long as it's at buttery smooth 30fps.

Although it would have been nice to have both,but I guess it's down to limitations of hardware.
#1.3.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(6) | Report
wtopez  +   337d ago
@studioyami

There's nothing "buttery smooth" about 30 fps. Maybe for a Gif file.
SugarSoSweet  +   337d ago
NO WAY IN HELL am I paying full 60 dollars for this
AsheXII  +   337d ago
Good thing gamers can wait for a price drop. Crazy, right?
Ashlen  +   337d ago
At least until games are only released via streaming...
LocutusEstBorg  +   337d ago
Then that drop shoud have been even lower since the initial price shouldn't have been 60.
liquidhalos  +   337d ago
Join me in a few months getting it from the discount bin
azshorty2003  +   337d ago
I don't see a whole lot of incentive to buy it at all honestly. Sure, Slightly better graphics, but without the 60fps, I dont know.
Sony_Fan  +   337d ago
Seriously its 2014,the fact that PS4 can't do acceptable framerates for lastgen games is pathetic.
ambientFLIER  +   337d ago
Locked 30fps is very acceptable and smooth, and it has nothing to do with being last gen. It's been improved to where it looks like it's running on a PC.
windblowsagain  +   337d ago
Seriously.

Both XB1/PS4 IS 1080p - 30fps.

PS4 has twice the POWER of XB1 and could do 60fps no problem. It's either to keep parity or Ms has thrown a few quid their way.
angelsx  +   337d ago
Another next gen game 30fps.Cmon . .
Lukas_Japonicus  +   337d ago
I think we will see a lot of this in this gen. Devs will decide what's more important in their opinion, 30fps with effects such as 4k textures, tressfx, 1080p, subsurface scattering, increased particle effects etc etc...or 60fps with less effects.

Not saying i agree with the devs in this instance, just telling you to expect it. To me, it depends on the game, i enjoyed AC4 at solid 30fps...but i don't think i would enjoy BF4 half as much as i do if it was 30fps (hated it on 360/ps3). It's all about compromising with the tech you have.
#3.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
ThePope  +   337d ago
What was the Framerate on the PS3 and 360? I played it on the 360 and thought the game was brilliant.
Lukas_Japonicus  +   337d ago
@Pope

Which game are you asking about?

Battlefield? If so, it was definitely sub-30fps. It was horrible. Whereas GTA5 is also sub-30fps a lot of the timer and i can play that game for hours on end. It's just way more important for me for an FPS to run at 60fps than a TPS.
#3.1.2 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report
Sony_Fan  +   337d ago
its 2014, 30fps in 2014 is just plain sad.
Lukas_Japonicus  +   337d ago
Whatever you say "Sony fan".
#3.1.4 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(6) | Report
plaZeHD  +   337d ago
Are you trying to defend this?
Lukas_Japonicus  +   337d ago
@plazeHD

Did you even read my comment bro?

"Not saying i agree with the devs in this instance, just telling you to expect it"

And then another quote from my comment above -

"As i said in the other article, i would much rather have 60fps "

Some people have serious reading problems on this site.
#3.1.6 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Deadpoolio  +   337d ago
What is it that people like you don't grasp that a game doesn't need to be 60fps unless it requires fast twitch, which Tomb raider certainly does not..
someoneagain6  +   337d ago
You can't even twitch on a controller. Turn up the sensitivity on the joystick (if it's available) and make your character do a 360 degree turn instantly. You can't.

Over time, games have had to be designed in a way that compensated for this. That's why most modern third-person shooters chest-high walls and cover mechanics, so you can take your time aiming.
Irishguy95  +   337d ago
Tomb Raider was WAY better at 60FPS than 30FPS. I lowered the GPHX on my PC to get 60FPS. Same goes for Mass Effect(Didn't need to lower graphics for that though). Mass effect is MUCH better on PC than the consoles.

Before ME I didn't think 60 FPS mattered much for Tps. But yes, yes it ****ing does.

It's not about 'needing'. Its about which is better and TPS are alot better with 60FPS too

To be honest I believe the fact that I played TR 60FPS is one of the bigger reasons I thought the game was better than Uncharted series

Btw, Tomb Raider on PC was pretty demanding for a multiplatform game. For example, my PC wiped the floor with Skyrim and Mass effect. Tomb Raider though, not at all. The recommended requirements are quite a decent amount above the Next gen consoles. GPU needs more power, CPU needs alot more power. I'd say it's a feat to have this game running at 1080P with a solid 30FPS
#3.2.2 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report
Eyeco  +   337d ago
Except that it's not a next gen game, it's a LAST GEN F***ING PORT SMH, there is zero excuse for this, no way in HELL am I spending $60 on a LAST gen port that can't even run in 60fps.
#3.3 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
AliTheSnake1  +   337d ago
Watch Dogs, AC4, Thief and most nonexclusive games for the next two years, should all be in your logic :( LAST GEN F***ING PORT SMH), and most of them run 30 fps on ps4. But you WILL spend that 60 bucks on that watch dogs, won't you ? now go ahead and shake your F H
#3.3.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(4) | Report
LocutusEstBorg  +   337d ago
It's actually a downgrade of the PC version.
webeblazing  +   337d ago
You do realize y'all so called next gen game features have been done on PCs for the longest. This game is next gen stop hyping up games like we haven't been seeing graphics like this. I do agree about $60 is too much for a late port
starchild  +   337d ago
You act like it is surprising. I don't understand why, since MOST next gen console games are 30fps.

And Tomb Raider's visuals on the PC at high settings are right up there with any next gen console game I have seen. If the definitive version is as good as that, or even better in some ways, it is not at all surprising that it can only run at 30fps on next gen consoles.
_LarZen_  +   337d ago
You honestly think that developers will pick higher fps over higher visuals? What do you think sells better to the average costumer?
DC777  +   337d ago
Agreed. While it doesn't bother me much while playing the fact that we still have 720p and 30 fps games in 2014 when 1080p has been the home tv standard for years now is pretty lame.
specialguest  +   337d ago
30fps will forever be present on console gaming. Leave it up to devs and they will more than likely choose graphics over framerate. Back in the PS1 days, there were games that ran at 60fps like Bloody Roar. It's been said before many time, 60fps is always possible, but devs will not sacrifice graphics due to hardware limitations.
#3.7 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Nephesh  +   337d ago
They just lost my purchase!
ExitToExisT  +   337d ago
lol..
djtek184  +   337d ago
A no buy for me. Was hoping for a 60fps.
Are_The_MaDNess  +   337d ago
already played this game in 1080p @60 fps..... last year.
meh
_LarZen_  +   337d ago
Me to on my PC at max settings. It is a incredible beautiful game.

But there are assets in this version that is in no other version. Everything from a remade Lara Croft to little details like the wind and vegetation that move.

Enough reasons for me to pick up what is a great game and play it one more time on the PS4.
DoctorJones  +   337d ago
Call me crazy, but if I wanted to enjoy the game again I'd just play it again on my pc at 60fps. I don't think the 'extra assets' and wind details would be enough for me to pay again.

Why anyone would want to pay through the nose when they already own the game is beyond me.

EDIT:Also - If they make this available as an upgrade to buy for pc in the future, won't you feel like a bit of a fool? Or would you buy that as well?
#7.1.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
yezz  +   337d ago
@DoctorJones

I agree. Those very little improvements are really not that impressive if the game still runs at 30fps. This isn't why I bought a PS4..
Back-to-Back  +   337d ago
with TressFX too :)
CapsLocke  +   337d ago
Lol.
GentlemenRUs  +   337d ago
Unacceptable...

My mind is set now, No point in buying this...

In no earth is this worth full price with some polished animations/textures.

Guys, If you can, Stick to the PC/PS3/X360 versions.

EDIT: Last-gen game on Next-gen hardware still 30fps isn't good enough...
#9 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(13) | Report | Reply
jmac53  +   337d ago
I know my purchasing decisions are based off of frames per second. I skipped The Last of Us because it only had a paltry 30fps.
Eyeco  +   337d ago
The difference being The Last Of Us is a LAST GEN game...LAST GEN, released on 7 year old hardware, Tomb Raider is also a LAST GEN game designed for 7-8 year old hardware, being re-released on brand new hardware at 60 dollars with the tagline "Definitive" yet it run's in 30fps, Killzone SF looks light years better, yet GG has that game running in 60fps, AC4 another last gen game for some strange reason runs at 60fps 1080p on PS4 and it looks better graphically, THERE IS NO EXCUSE .

It blows my mind when people complain about PC Elitists, especially when dev's pull sh!t like this, right now PC gamers are laughing because they payed LESS for a version of game that run's 1080p 60fps, I understand not every game is gonna be 1080p, 60fps this gen, but if we're porting last gen games there should be zero excuse for this.
Chrisgamerguy  +   337d ago
Glad I held off buying this for 360. The version is going to be much better graphically.
clmstr  +   337d ago
Not definitive enough for me to pay 60$ for this.
Oschino1907  +   337d ago
@GentlemenRUs

What about people who haven't bought it yet or played it at all, or those who beat it and traded in long ago?

It's also another game for next gen systems. Plus it has more then just "polished animations/textures" and includes all the DLC with even more extras.
#12 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Meltic  +   337d ago
The game is good. Much action and good hunting etc. Cool stuff. Cant imagine how the next gen looks. But overall wait for it to dropp in price. Give it 1-2 months and save Money for the upcoming next gen games. Thief,infamous,watch dogs MGS and more
Outlaw1986  +   337d ago
I'd wait but the next game I'mkinda interested in is Thief and that dosent come out for another month after this. Plus I held off on buying this game last gen so now I feel like I'm getting a good deal with all the DLC. Also there will be no way to get the cool art book packaging if you wait for a price drop.
Meltic  +   337d ago
the game should cost max 30$

NOT MORE

END OF THE STORY.
DeadMansHand  +   337d ago
That, sir gives me an idea....you can only charge 1 dollar for every frame rate. 30 fps is 30 dollars and 60 fps is 60 dollars. If it's 30 and dips to the 20s then charge 27.50.
hkgamer  +   337d ago
lol... do t want to buy a 120 fps pc game then >.<

but with that concept then every dev would be aiming for 60fps
jcnba28  +   337d ago
So much for "definitive version"...
CrossingEden  +   337d ago
So it's 30fps, the standard for games. Most of you people can't tell the difference between 60fps and don't pretend that you're so used to 60fps that 30fps looks bad to you. Infamous second son is 30fps but that's ok, I have no problem with the STANDARD.
@The_Infected
COD isn't a graphically intensive game. So it's not hard for them to achieve 60fps. Gamers on next gen have to choose, higher graphical fidelity or smoother gameplay. And honestly it depends on the game. I'm sure no one will be complaining when the next uncharted is revealed to be 30fps in exchange for the graphics.
#15 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(17) | Report | Reply
The_Infected  +   337d ago
While I want 60fps I think FPS and racing games need to run at 60fps to be fully enjoyable. 3rd person shooters ect. Don't matter as much IMO.
#15.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
someoneagain6  +   337d ago
COD isn't graphically intensive by design. Visuals were compromised to keep the framerate high. What's wrong with raising the standard? There's a GPU that costs about the same as the XBO that can run the new Thief at 4K, and these "next-gen" consoles can't even push 1080p/60 on a last-gen game. Lol.
Nerdmaster  +   337d ago
"Most of you people can't tell the difference between 60fps and don't pretend that you're so used to 60fps that 30fps looks bad to you"

You're kidding, right? Difference between 30fps and 60fps is gigantic. And yes, 30fps does look bad. I stopped playing Dragon's Dogma on PS3 because of the terrible resolution and framerate. Well, not only because of that, the game was simply a little boring, but the technical limitations played a big part on my decision. After playing so many RPGs on PC with 1080p and 60fps (and often in 3D), PS3's 720p and 30fps is unbearable.
KillerPwned  +   337d ago
Already having this on PC and running it at Max settings well over 60FPS. I won't be needing this game but I will say when I can find it for cheap I would get it just to play on consoles. Since its such a great game.
darksky  +   337d ago
I don't know what pc you have but with my i7 3770@4.3Ghz and Radeon 7950 (overclocked to 1200MHz)I get about 37fps maxed(4xSSAA) on the built in benchmark.
I don't expect the PS4 version to get 60 fps easily if an i7 can't even get there without dropping some details.
#16.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
starchild  +   337d ago
I have almost the same setup as you, except with an i5 2500k instead.

4X super sample anti-aliasing is massive. I've never considered anti-aliasing settings as part of the basic graphical settings.

When I say I can run such and such game at Ultra settings it doesn't mean that I am running it with 8xSSAA. I can use SSAA through RadeonPro or the Catalyst Control Center but I don't think it is reasonable to have to max out SSAA in order to say you are maxing out a game's graphics.

SSAA is very demanding and it's basically there when you have a lot of performance surplus and you want to get the most pristine image quality possible.

The console versions with their post-process anti-aliasing don't even approach that kind of clarity and fidelity.
adorie  +   337d ago
Is this game cpu dependent at all? Cause I dont remember that it was. I want to reinstall it at some point.
weirdo  +   337d ago
i am so getting this! looks much better than the pc version p.s. not trolling, thanks.
Corpser  +   337d ago
The more demanding games on ps4 are not running at 1080p 60 FPS ,bf4, ac4,infamous ss,the division,killzone sf (campaign), ff14, witcher 3, thief, So people shouldn't be surprised at this point
#18 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
wishingW3L  +   337d ago
but this is a last gen game and that's what makes it so disappointing.
#18.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
AliTheSnake1  +   337d ago
@Corpser
BF4 is 60 fps.

@wishingW3L
Most of the games he mentioned are also last gen games. Most of the nonexclusive ps4/X1 games in the next two years (in your logic)are last gen games.
ambientFLIER  +   337d ago
You people are beginning to sound like a broken record. It's a last gen game that looks on par with next-gen games. So 30fps is understandable.
Play2Win  +   337d ago
BF4 is 900p on PS4 with poor Anti Aliasing and last gen draw distance.

They pushed the visuals on Tomb Raider because the levels are mostly pretty limited in space. Although the limited power made them sacrifice the framerate.
EXVirtual  +   337d ago
Wasn't planning to buy it to begin with, but I expected 30fps. It isn't the end of the world for the game, but I can see ppl losing interest.
I'm I think this game is just a cash grab. Not that much effort being put into it, really.
At least it'll look nice. Having said that, am I the only one who isn't all that impressed with Tressfx?
#19 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Riderz1337  +   337d ago
Wow I can't wait for next gen. Better hair > 60 FPS.

/s
sandman224  +   337d ago
30 frames? I'll pass! My plasma likes to run 60 frames when it comes to gaming.
#21 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
GamersHeaven  +   337d ago
Lame ill wait till it drops down 20$.
OutcastMosquito  +   337d ago
How can a game be called the "Definitive Edition" yet not have 60 FPS? They should have just called it "remastered edition".
Qwagy UK  +   337d ago
I was considering buying this title but since this is only 30fps I think not. Poor show!
thezeldadoth  +   337d ago
i still don't know why you "next gen console" gamers are expecting 60fps/1080p. when will it sink in that you will not be getting that very often in any sort of graphically intensive game. the boxes are just not that powerful. if you want 1080p/60fps ultra settings, build a PC, otherwise quit getting upset for not having it.
Visiblemarc  +   337d ago
I think part of the problem is that when people read 30 fps they think about "30 fps" games that dip to like 15. Locked 30 is alright.
wishingW3L  +   337d ago
true. 30 frames "locked" was/is the biggest lie of last-gen.
AnEwGuY  +   337d ago
Yeah, IMO some games just look weird in 60 fps. The COD franchise always looked a bit odd to me, when they started locking it into 60 fps ; BF 3 and 4 look/play much more natural, IMO. It's the same way I feel about Blu-ray movies...especially on the new LED HDTVs...and how strange live action movies look, compared to cinema.

Now, if TR:DE is 30 fps AND has screen tearing and poor AA, then THAT would be a deal breaker for me.
Play2Win  +   337d ago
You know why CoD is one of the best selling games ever created?

Because the freakingly locked their framerate to 60FPS at all costs. That gives you a feel of playing which is outstanding for FPS. They always cutting down effects etc. just to get steady 60 FPS.

Well, with Ghosts on PC they've been f@@@ing things up.
BattleTorn  +   337d ago
I actually really want to play this game, considering I didn't last year...

But I simply can't pay $60 for it.
UKRsoldier  +   337d ago
If you never bought this game on any other platform, then why the hell would you have a problem paying full price for a brand new experience??? Especially considering it's the best version and includes all the DLC...

It's not your business what platforms they release it on and what they charge, as long as it's new to you…you're getting the full package, so shouldn't you pay full price?
#27.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
tigertron  +   337d ago
I'm a little disappointed that it isn't 60fps, but I'm pleased it's 1080p. I'm not cancelling my pre-order for this bit of news.
wishingW3L  +   337d ago
these "next-gen" consoles are so disappointedly weak. =/
EXVirtual  +   337d ago
I personally think it's laziness.
I mean, Yakuza Ishin runs at native 1080p at 60fps on the PS4. In the beginning of a new gen, devs tend to use brute force on the hardware. Not making use of it. Later on, devs will feel the need to actually optimize and stuff. It happens every gen.
Sometimes, it all comes down to the devs. Not to mention this is a last gen port.
#29.1 (Edited 337d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
tracy18  +   337d ago
This game is just brute forcing the new hardware, not making use of it. This is designed for last gen.
In this genre there is nothing wrong with 30 fps. Of course 60 would be better, but if it's rock solid 30 with no input lag, then the lack of 60 not taking away the immersion. Anybody who skipped this game last gen should go and buy it. It is nominated for GOTY for a reason.
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

The Talos Principle: World C Walkthrough and Puzzle Guide

34m ago - Need some help on that pesky puzzle in World C of The Talos Principle, here you are find out and... | PC
30°

Far Cry 4 Review - Comin' Down The Mountain | TGF

34m ago - It’s not a perfect experience, nor is it a new one, but it’s still enjoyable nonetheless. | PC
40°

Warframe – Operation Eyes of Blight

36m ago - Operation Eyes of Blight comes to Warframe, a message from the Lotus reads - "Vay Hek is making h... | PC
20°

Become A Badass Female Cop In Sci-Fi Comic Book / Combat Racer Hybrid SXPD

36m ago - Little Chicken has released its combat racing / comic book hybrid SXPD on Android following its a... | Android
Ad

Win a PS4!!

Now - Join us on Filmwatch to find out how you can win a free PS4 this holiday season! | Promoted post
20°

Heroes of Handheld 74: Unmechanical scrapped on PS Vita, Cancelled Metroid & Frozen saving the DS

36m ago - Episode 74 of Heroes of Handheld the podcast dedicated to Handheld Gaming. This week one half of... | PS Vita