This the the first review for the Xbox 360's hottest game of the year.
90%, awesome. But, then again, who didn't expect high scores for this game, besides the Sony/Nintendo fanboys?
I could have wrote a better review and I've never even played the game..
Yeah because your review would have been about it sucking...Ok so anyways but this is awesome news and I'm going to be the first to say it but "I FUC*ING TOLD YOU SO" <<(thats to all the haters and doubters) now that felt good, everyone knew this game was going to be awesome, and theirs confirmation one, let's just wait for all the other reviews now
I actually kind of agree with him! My question is did this site actually do a review of the game because it sounds more like a preview to me? This game will only score 10's and 9's without a doubt but this review just sounds kind of out of place! I mean seriously everything they said we already knew except for the cover jumping so this review holds know credibility in my book! Why is everyone so hostile over other opinions on this site?
That was one lame review.. Probably because the reviewer was just dying to get back to playing GOW. lol
u r so lame its unreal. grow up . there u go sony fan boys tut!!!
WOOO HOOOO, man I can't wait to curb stomp my friends and brothers back home over XBL. and this is hardly a creditable website, they don't talk about really anything specific, only rehash what we already know about the game. I have my doubts.
Yeah, makes you wonder if they even played it. I'll wait for GameRankings... just like I do with every other game.
The Truth, DJ, Jin, Enforcer, and other sony extremist stating that Gears of war can't live up to the hype. ha ha ha ha...Who ever doubted MS and Epic after the E3 showing and beyond is clearly a clouded fanboy. I guarentee 10 out of 10 reviews on more than one site when the game gets released. I assume IGN and Gamespot with give it mid 9's. But the average will most likely be 9.5 or up. Watch and see. The game of the year. WOW.
"The Truth, DJ, Jin, Enforcer, and other sony extremist stating that Gears of war can't live up to the hype." Funny thing is, you didn't quote any of us, and I don't remember stating "Gears of War can't live up to the hype." If you're going to make accusations of that level you better have physical proof. I wouldn't speculate on the average of its final scores just yet.
Because you talk alot of crap on this site and i have never seen you produce any physical proof or links to back up all the [email protected] you say.
sorry to say it chaps. but that is a small website. With no reputation. Why would they get Gears first? You can tell there is no solid info that couldnt have been gathered from anywhere else...
That's one crappy review. They probably don't have the final build - it's a small site and everything the guy talk about is far too vauge. Wait until the real reviews (Gamespot, IGN ect) come in. By crappy review I don't mean crappy game. I'm expecting Gear to get at least 85% at the minimum. But the review itself is trash.
Sometimes smaller sites get the first review. A swedish site called Gamereactor had the worlds first Oblivion review, and are still first from time to time.
4 days untill the big JOKER is on the table.
Why is everyone getting mad at #2. You have to admit that the review wasn't that extensive, and it looks like it actually might have been made up based on known information about the game like #6 seems to believe. I'd much rather see an IGN, Gamespot, or best yet, a Game Informer review score, but I expect them all to be somewhere in that 9 range. How can #4 call into question the veracity of this review and get agrees but #2 does the same and gets disagrees? And for #4, between curb stomping and chainsawing, there's gonna be a lot of trash talking going on over Live. It's gonna be sweet.
But it is hard to tell when people are being haters at this point. I expect 9+ too kmis187
He hates everything MS stands for. He's not out to defend the truth or to comment on things he likes about the PS3 he's just a MS basher that might be the reason.
im sorry to have to be the one to bring the truth down on you fools. But on this site, you's are all haters! either you hate the PS3 or you hate the 360, but either way, you are a hater. And then if that wasnt enough, you's turn around and hate the hater for hating your beloved system. I for one do not hate the 360 or Sony or the PS3, or MS. But i do hate the 360 fanboys on this site and I own the 360, and do not plan on buying a PS3 (if I dont buy them when they first come out then I never buy them) I have owned systems since the Atari 2600 and have never bought a system after launch, but rather always on launch. So in other words, will probably never own a PS3. And P.S. Power Of Green, you shouldnt be accusing anybody else of being a hater, for you are one of the biggest haters on this site and I can tell that you are very young too. At least THammer, while being also a very biased fanboy, sounds more mature
I call people out when they lie or when i have a opinion about a artical(rabbid fans go crazzy if you don't sugar coat sheeit), that kid(#2) makes up BULSHIT to bash MS there a difference. Should i sugar coat my opinions on a gaming site lol; would i be bias if this site was an all xbox website lol this is my first and only site i visit from the days of the old site. you hate people that hate, and you hate the haters ????. Don't worry about what the fuc i say at least you will know that im not making up sh*t and there lies the problem it's a flaw in my pesonality. Move on fool what you said has nothing to do with games and is not in response to anything anybody said now pat yourself on the back and move on please. Thank you. It was I and other like TheMart, Thammer1, Realdeal and others that help this site be as tolarent as it is, you can't lie when people are countering the truth. kmis87 asked why and i gave him an awnser why people were confused about his motives. WTF is wrong with you at least come to at me as a man on the issues.
Dantesparda to an extent I have to agree with power of green II. Even though some of the guys could be labeled as FANBOYS (Whatever the hell it really truely mean isn't relevant.) At least they have something that they feel passionate about. Whether if be Xbox360 or PS3 at least they stand for something. You on the other hand are just slamming people (perhaps to make yourself feel bigger.) Also, young people have opinions just like older people. Get past the fact that they haven't been around as long or using their own lingo, and try and see their point. To disgard someone simply because you feel they are young is kinda immature in itself. Anyway, you're just bouncing around being an equal-opportunity butt nugget seamingly just to piss people off. So, since you are riding the fence and don't like, dislike, love, or hate anything why not just read for the shear entertainment and no come to the temptations for display your superior prowess.
I dont disrespect him because i think he's young, but rather because i think that he sounds immature, there is a difference. But if you were smarter you would know that. But i dont slam people to feel better, but rather because it is sickening what i read on this site half the times. And the fanboyism on this site has run rampant, and it sickens me. And whats even worst is that I own the 360 and its the very 360 fanboys that sicken me the most. You people are just completely and utterly repugnant. You's are by far more fanatic than the PS3 fanboys, and i dont even care about that system. i just need the posts less and just stick to the articles, and I dont stand for nothing because im not enamored by the 360 or any system for that? Hm, thats funny, you should get out more, than think its so good to be so in love with your system. youre right, I dont love it, I've been around doing this sh!t for along time, and seen alot (heck just about everything) and am not so easily impressed. sorry! Stop being such blind loyalists. Comptetion is good and is the best thing for us. Kapeesh!?
You totally miss my point, just as you always seem to do. You're right, you don't seem to hate systems or have any loyalities to a system. You appear to get more enjoyment out of blasting people for expressing their opinions. You use words like you people and constantly group people into your very own self developed stereotypes. Which is fine, you have a right to express your feelings. And with that being said, I will respect YOUR feelings and right to speak and leave you alone. Have a great life, and take something for the sickness that everyone is causing you.
..."Against (Con): Doesn't cure cancer" lol
I totally laughed at that too.
haha yah I caught that too. This review is obviously bogus.
They're getting angry 'cause they all know Resistance: FULL OF MAN can't compete with this.
You better hope a launch game cant compete with the best looking game the 360 has to offer. Oh yea but people have already compared it.
"You better hope a launch game cant compete with the best looking game the 360 has to offer." Dont worry. It doesnt.
The games are in different ball parks even if they had the same score they are from two different genre's. If Tekken got a 9.0 and Virtual Tennis got a 9.5 would people say "VT" is better. (Don't work does it. lol / 11.2 you do have a point, but back to 11.1 games scores are more than skin deep VT will score high for a Sports/Tennis game and so on. You reall will have to compare Halo 3, Huxely, and many more to RFOM.
So what does RFOM have to do with GOW? I never thought the days would come when Xbox fans starting acting like Sony fans! Well I mean almost like Sony fans but still not that bad!
5 more days...
I have never even heard of this website before. I'll stick to IGN, Gamespot, and OXM for reviews. Although the score was pretty good, the review was trash.
Sorry but this isnt a review.
GOW would suck. I just said, not much is going on in the videos and that I prefer R:FOM over this game. I expect this game to be in the high 9's, anything less, i will just laugh.
Does that mean you love halo then? cause resistance seems to be just a cheap halo ripoff...
Halo? Really? RFOM struck as a rip off of COD with some aliens thrown in.
I mean similar as in it's the exclusive, system-selling "killer ap." (though both still have aliens) Don't get me wrong, I think Resistance looks like an awesome game. There are a bunch of playstation games that look awesome (just not as many as in xbox, in my opinion). My problem is with people like Jin (people that are complete tools for their system of choice), who hate and trash talk good games simply because they're exclusive to the opposition. I find it hypocritical when fanboys like Jin, who probably trash talk halo and every other xbox FPS, act like they're excited about Resistance. The only reason he likes it is because it's exclusively on HIS system, which is pretty pathetic.
Isn't good for your health. Should we click on your user name and see if your telling the truth. lol
Atomic is an excellent magazine. Just because it's not as well known you shouldn't discount their opinions. In fact, in many ways I trust their opinions more than the bigger sites. It's a bunch of geeks just telling it like it is. So many of those longer articles tend to rehash a lot of things like the back story or they talk about the development process etc. This article just spoke about the gameplay mechanics (including some minor issues), how many weapons you can carry. Then they addressed the graphics by mentioning how impressive they are (what else do you need to know?) and the impact of motion blur and depth of field. It's a review without the waffle and meaningless crap. Although, I wouldn't have minded more information about the multiplayer portion of the game.
I totally agree. Bigger sites/magazines like IGN always give predictable scores. Even to crap games. Just take a look at IGN's NFS: Carbon review, that game should not get a score of 8.2. A racing-game with that much framerate issues is'nt acceptable.
Ok, folks, now I've been noticing this for a while, but the Marcus Fenix you see in these pics is not the same Marcuz that we have now. The Marcus Fenix that we have in these pics is the original Marcus Fenix that looks a lot more white to me, than the new Marcus Fenix that we have now, which looks a lot more Mexican-ish to me (and no there is no racist undertones to this, as I am hispanic myself), but notice that the differences. And another thing, the pictures we have here are not actually the real games graphics (oh I know I am going to get flame for this by all the ignoramus' and the famboys), while they do look close, they are actually better than than final games graphics, these are probably the Development Kits graphics (which always tend to be better, due to things like more RAM for debugging and such things like that). But dont get me wrong, I am not trying to down the games graphics in any way. I think that this game has some of the best, if not the best graphics ever! PC and all (although Crysis is the real best graphics out there as far as Im concern, that sh!t is real!). But I gotta say Cod3, & RFOM & Motorstorm, and I would have said RSV too, but after seeing the demo, I gotta say, I am not impressed at all, but all those other games I would have to say give it a good run for its money. But I'll save my judgement for when I see them. Oh and P.S. I also think that Zelda and RedSteel for Wii look good too ;-). Heck I even like Metroid, I just cant deny that framerate, now thats 60fps TheMART
but then i remembered when i was in bootcamp. i never realized how heavy a pillowcase could be. anyone who has gone through it knows what i mean. i feel that very shortly the wii will end up like the track and field powerpad for nintendo. you start out running, then you get tired, then you sit on the floor and use your hands to hit the buttons and run faster. it's one thing to sit with a controller when your arms are resting in your lap. try playing with your arms straight out the whole time for hours. there will either be a lot of people getting in better shape, or a lot of people having heart attacks and strokes trying to play super mario 123 and 1/3.
This guy doesn't have a review copy. And even if he did, his writing is so bad nobody would give a fcuk what he thought of Gears anyway...
Good review, but not surprised about the score. I'm expecting between 9.0 and 9.5 from all the major websites and magazines. The review was weird because it's an obsure site, and I would think that the major sites would have their copies first. I was hoping for some more details on the story and whatnot, but it sounds like a great game nonetheless.
guys my name is a parody of biased 360 fans.. I'm a 360 owner and have no plans to buy a ps3.. it's amazing how many of you are idiots (99%) this isn't even a review you dumbass retards, I don't know why you have to make everything about the ps3 and the 360
I get multiple "Disagrees" just for calling it what it is: a fake-ass 'review' written by a brain-damaged mongoloid who wanted a few hits to his site before the REAL reviews start coming in. Most of the people who're on this site are goddamned morons who can't help but turn every talkback into a console c0ck-waving contest... Only an idiot would believe that an *Australian PC* website would be the first to review a CONSOLE game that's under NDA wraps for reviews until Nov 7th. *shakes head* [email protected]
or what ever. Okay lets see what the big names review that game at. Good or bad I will buy it.
That wasn't a really "legit" review. It sounds like the guy played it for a few hours at an event and just wrote a rehash of what everybody already knows. Tell me when IGN or GameSpot has a review up.
It sounds to me like he doesn't even have a game. Either that or he just doesn't know what people (I, at least) want to read in a review. We KNOW the graphics look good.
next week is going to be heaven for my xbox 360...hd-dvd, gow, cod 2...then the week after ...rb6...luvin' it....ps3 who?
ll i agree on one point, cod2 could be halo2 , just replace soldiers with aliens, and master chief, same exact game, and resistance will fall into that category, most fps games are the same. Now to this review, i take it thats its a fake, nothing new was said and looks like all the previews up to now. Also I hate sites that rate in 8's 9's and 10's without the ability to give a game 9.2 or 9.6 it takes a game below its actual score for no reason. Anyway I dont trust this review at all and will wait for major sites and the game players themselves to rate it.
ANYONE with a oz of sense would know (from time) that GEARS is EASILY the game of 06 AND well into 07 TOO!!! if you ain't prepared for hard facts, you'll have to wear your hard-hats!!!
watch their head blow up. I love it. 9's and 10's all around. I love it
Only credible websites such as IGN Gamespot Gamespy and Game rankings really count but still 9/10 is a good rating.
True. I expect to see 9-10 on GameSpot, and they're usually more realistic with their reviews. Regardless, this is most likely going to be the top game of the year on any system.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.