SegmentNext - "Even with less than impressive singleplayer campaign, EA claims Battlefield 4 is The Best FPS title".
Bring back Bad Company already. XD
Ghosts hold the torch for best FPS about at the moment..
Best fps out until Killzone Shadow Fall
Yes, until Titanfall
720p no thanks! Titanfall 2 1080p 60fps (Bonus Original Maps) on PS4!
Or Titanfall @1440p (or across 3 screens, or @ 1080p in stereoscopic 3D) and ultra settings on a PC. You don't need an Xbox1 to enjoy this game. Remember that!
lmao alright boss well youll be missing out when it releases have fun waiting 2-3 years IF it comes to ps4
Hearing Sony fanboys try to turn missing out on Titanfall into a good thing is hilarious. I'm reminded of Cartman when he's excluded from Stans treehouse "C'mon Kenny we'll build our own club"
Since when did the graphical power of a game, especially resolution, make a game good?
@PockyKing You're right. They don't make a game good. But they do make the presentation, the clarity/fidelity, and overall feel of the game better. If I am going to play a game that is available on more than one source I am going to play on the platform that has the best graphics, the highest FPS, the best options, and the best control input method. (or at least the best platform available to me, I understand not everyone can or wants to afford a high end gaming PC) So no. It doesn't make it good. But it does make it better.
I assume you play all your games at 240p, PockyKing, since it doesn't matter what games look like.
@PockyKing Well said+ The Last of Us was 720 at 30fps. It was an incredible game, that looked amazing. No one cared that it wasn't 1080 60fps. The resolution overshadowing the game is a tumor on gaming that needs to go away quick. I'm not saying that I wouldn't want 1080p 60fps, but a game not having it, doesn't change the way I look at that said game. Off Topic: To be completely honest, this 720-900-1080 debacle hasn't affected me in the slightest. My Pc monitor is a 34" television (1368x768) that I use for my console/tv/pc.
Good post, shows how retarded you and 15 other people are. Titanfall is the most praised FPS revealed so far this year(even more so than Destiny). **** Killzone, **** battlefield, **** cod(Especially Cod). Titanfall will dominated the multiplayer versus FPS games. I believe Destiny will be a superior game, however it's more of a co op game, not a versus game. I will be playing it on my 360, I don't give a **** about graphics when a game with this good gameplay comes out. Also, graphics matter, they are simply not the most important part of gaming. Ever. Titanfall exceeds standards graphical levels for 2013 and nothing more. I like when good graphics are there. If they are average graphics then I don't care about them. Great graphics are merely a bonus. FPS is vastly more important than having 'GREAT' graphics. Edit - please it was hardly shocking. Anyone who agree's is just as guilty of thinking titanfall being 720p means you should wait for Titanfall 2
@Irishguy95 Listen up A bhuachaill beag you can insult me but NOT the good folk who vote up or down other users! Shocking personal attack on us all!
Doesn't Battlefield have more players + vehicles (no mech of course)...
I wasn't aware graphics made a game good.
Lol call of duty with robots. Didn't killzone 2 had robots too? Titanfall is just being hyped way out of proportions. Its just call of duty.
Yeah I loved jumping from wall to wall and up on buildings in Cod. That was very fun. Uncharted fans site the use of height and climbing as a bonus for the game over Gears, I happen to agree with them, adding vertical mechanics to a game is good. Titanfall is taking that to the maximum level with the varying vantage points and hoping around the map. edit- Evilsooty..have you played Planetside 2? It's alright. Decent game, ambitious but nothing special. I haven't seen one preview where the player wasn't ecstatic about how great the game is. I don't even care about the Titans, I care about how well Respawn have done the movement.
Quake 3 and CS 1.6 are better FPS games in terms of gameplay mechanics than BF4.
I miss 1998 too dude!
I still play 1.6 occasionally
Yes yes n hell yea lol I would put tf2 in there to
if you live under a rock, then yes.
Ugly as sin though..
more like killzone sf noob
Planetside 2 says hello.
Planet side 2 is shit, the evidence is in the empty servers
Meh, I'll stick with hundreds of players and vehicles fighting in a persistent world with multiple objectives and you can carry on enjoying the dumbed-down Battlefield (compared to the older PC games)with its supernova sun and small maps.
I have played since BF 1942, BF4 is far from perfect but planet side is boring.
I tried several times, I just can't get into it. Just boring to me.
Until Killzone Shadow Fall launches. Actually I'm looking forward to playing both next weekend!
Yes, I have been more impressed by Killzone than Battlefield. COD is dead and Titanfall is running the Source Engine from the 1980s.
Kill zone can't stand up to bf4
That's your opinion. Killzone will have a story I'm excited about. Both play differently. Both have fun MP. That's why I'm getting both.
@ destrania, true just my opinion but damn I loves me some bf4. I did have fun with kz3 multiplayer for a while. I just didn't care for a lot of the maps and crappy spawn camping. Bf3 was really bad for base killing though.
Killzone is not gonna be better then BF4. You can do stuff in BF4 you can't even dream off in Killzone
I do agree BF4 looks good, but I doubt it will run a smooth as a shooter designed specifically for the PS4.
like having an amazing single player and multiplayer (co-op included, free dlc) experience in one package for $59.99 as opposed to just a multiplayer game for the same price and being gutted $10-$20 for map packs? yep your right killzone will never match that oh wait!! disclaimer: Im getting both but I feel like killzone will offer a better overall game, bf4 will be great but I think alot of people are wowed basically by player count and map destruction. while impressive those things could become old and tired rather quickly.
@jukins BF4 multiplayer alone is something any FPS can't come close to. And look. If it wasn't for the fact that KZ:SF DLC is free, very little people would buy it. They give it for free so people continue playing the game.
From the man with a BF avatar.
sorry but battlefield is just as bad as cod. bf4 is no different to bf3 lol, going the same way as cod
No thanks. Single player gamer.
Me to and when I play Multiplayer games, its local Multiplayer. So BF4 fails on both fronts.
Well they're hardly going to claim that BF4 is the worst FPS out there.
Killzone looks better but Counter Strike and Unreal are better than this slightly improved COD clone with destruction.
Self-praise is no praise. Let others say if that's so.
They just showed what others said.
can't argue with that
Battlefield 4 is the best
I agree BF4 design is unmatched, just fix them bugs and no one will argue this claim.
Well if they fix the god damn connection/crashing online ,and you can actually level up! Sure it could be quite good. But until they fix it you cant even play the game :/
well, there's an objective viewpoint if ever i heard one. end sarcasm mode. ^_^
BF4 is very good but not perfect IMO. At the end of the day it all depends on personal taste. I like tactical and semi-hardcore gameplay, that's why I prefer BF4. Some people are fond of Killzone type shooters. Others like CoD. That's just how it is.
killzone for sp, bf4 for mp. both look beautiful
Metro: Last Light is better than BF4. It has something that BF4 lacks, character.
Last Light is one of the best single player experiences. Period.
You can do way more in BF4 than any other FPS right now. I think it's the best military FPS. I played Killzone online more this gen. For me KZSF will probably be my go to FPS. At the end of the day it's all about opinion. Enjoy what you like.
I'd say it is this or Planetside 2, talking the multiplayer space. That said, I never put the in the amount of time elsewhere that I did Battlefield 3.
Bold claim EA. The MP is probably the best out "right now" as for best FPS... uh no. I can think of about 50 FPS that I would rather play and I like Battlefield.
I'm not saying Bf4 is the best. But I'd like to know the name of these 50 shooters that are better? Lool cod 1-20 in that list? For multiplayer shooters BF is unmatched. I don't care for Singleplayer in shooters it's just boring u run out shooting AI wow great. Only Halo 1 & 3 made it right.
I'm a PC gamer. CoD isn't even in my collection. BTW I'm a Battlefield fan and I own all of them, I just think there are better FPS.
Imo the multiplayer is the best out there but no to story mode, I think killzone is gonna be great
Crysis has the best single player. COD is still the best at co-op play and accessibility. Battlefield has the best production values and team emphasis. all in my opinion of course.
lol i stopped reading at crysis has the best single player.
so you comment on things you dont read? well your not too bright, are you? Lol its called a personal opinion. maybe when you hit puberty, maturity will set in and you'll understand what those are. haha
and for now they are correct. bf4 is great and the mp is finally done right on consoles with the full pc experience.
I think Gears of war had the best single player experience and online experience. I think a minority of people disliked it because this game required some skill to play. You couldn't just pick it up and destroy everyone on it. Even the storytelling from Gears 1 was amazing. Just watch this video proves my point. Its dated now in terms of graphics afterall it was the first gears. http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Hah, never played Crysis 2 or 3 clearly.
Tribes Ascend is way better than this broken game.
Red Faction, Half Life 1, Quake 2 etc are way better.