Top
200°

EA Claims Battlefield 4 Is "The Best FPS Out There, Period"

SegmentNext - "Even with less than impressive singleplayer campaign, EA claims Battlefield 4 is The Best FPS title".

Read Full Story >>
segmentnext.com
The story is too old to be commented.
HelpfulGamer1055d ago

Bring back Bad Company already. XD

ghostgamer_0071055d ago SpamShowReplies(1)
alpha_ice_19061055d ago SpamShowReplies(3)
joe901054d ago (Edited 1054d ago )

Ghosts hold the torch for best FPS about at the moment..

DeadRabbits1055d ago

720p no thanks!

Titanfall 2 1080p 60fps (Bonus Original Maps) on PS4!

JsonHenry1055d ago

Or Titanfall @1440p (or across 3 screens, or @ 1080p in stereoscopic 3D) and ultra settings on a PC.

You don't need an Xbox1 to enjoy this game. Remember that!

Legacy2121055d ago

lmao alright boss well youll be missing out when it releases have fun waiting 2-3 years IF it comes to ps4

infectedaztec1055d ago

Hearing Sony fanboys try to turn missing out on Titanfall into a good thing is hilarious. I'm reminded of Cartman when he's excluded from Stans treehouse "C'mon Kenny we'll build our own club"

PockyKing1055d ago

Since when did the graphical power of a game, especially resolution, make a game good?

JsonHenry1055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

@PockyKing

You're right. They don't make a game good. But they do make the presentation, the clarity/fidelity, and overall feel of the game better.

If I am going to play a game that is available on more than one source I am going to play on the platform that has the best graphics, the highest FPS, the best options, and the best control input method. (or at least the best platform available to me, I understand not everyone can or wants to afford a high end gaming PC)

So no. It doesn't make it good. But it does make it better.

Megaton1055d ago

I assume you play all your games at 240p, PockyKing, since it doesn't matter what games look like.

XB1_PS41055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

@PockyKing

Well said+

The Last of Us was 720 at 30fps. It was an incredible game, that looked amazing. No one cared that it wasn't 1080 60fps. The resolution overshadowing the game is a tumor on gaming that needs to go away quick.

I'm not saying that I wouldn't want 1080p 60fps, but a game not having it, doesn't change the way I look at that said game.

Off Topic: To be completely honest, this 720-900-1080 debacle hasn't affected me in the slightest. My Pc monitor is a 34" television (1368x768) that I use for my console/tv/pc.

Irishguy951055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

Good post, shows how retarded you and 15 other people are.

Titanfall is the most praised FPS revealed so far this year(even more so than Destiny). **** Killzone, **** battlefield, **** cod(Especially Cod). Titanfall will dominated the multiplayer versus FPS games. I believe Destiny will be a superior game, however it's more of a co op game, not a versus game.

I will be playing it on my 360, I don't give a **** about graphics when a game with this good gameplay comes out.

Also, graphics matter, they are simply not the most important part of gaming. Ever. Titanfall exceeds standards graphical levels for 2013 and nothing more. I like when good graphics are there. If they are average graphics then I don't care about them. Great graphics are merely a bonus. FPS is vastly more important than having 'GREAT' graphics.

Edit - please it was hardly shocking. Anyone who agree's is just as guilty of thinking titanfall being 720p means you should wait for Titanfall 2

DeadRabbits1055d ago

@Irishguy95

Listen up A bhuachaill beag you can insult me but NOT the good folk who vote up or down other users! Shocking personal attack on us all!

Omegasyde1054d ago

Doesn't Battlefield have more players + vehicles (no mech of course)...

CaptainPunch1054d ago

I wasn't aware graphics made a game good.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1054d ago
TheFallenAngel1055d ago

Lol call of duty with robots. Didn't killzone 2 had robots too? Titanfall is just being hyped way out of proportions. Its just call of duty.

Irishguy951055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

Yeah I loved jumping from wall to wall and up on buildings in Cod. That was very fun.

Uncharted fans site the use of height and climbing as a bonus for the game over Gears, I happen to agree with them, adding vertical mechanics to a game is good. Titanfall is taking that to the maximum level with the varying vantage points and hoping around the map.

edit-
Evilsooty..have you played Planetside 2? It's alright. Decent game, ambitious but nothing special.

I haven't seen one preview where the player wasn't ecstatic about how great the game is. I don't even care about the Titans, I care about how well Respawn have done the movement.

aiBreeze1055d ago

Quake 3 and CS 1.6 are better FPS games in terms of gameplay mechanics than BF4.

webeblazing1054d ago

Yes yes n hell yea lol I would put tf2 in there to

evilsooty1055d ago

Planetside 2 says hello.

bumnut1054d ago

Planet side 2 is shit, the evidence is in the empty servers

evilsooty1054d ago (Edited 1054d ago )

Meh, I'll stick with hundreds of players and vehicles fighting in a persistent world with multiple objectives and you can carry on enjoying the dumbed-down Battlefield (compared to the older PC games)with its supernova sun and small maps.

bumnut1054d ago

I have played since BF 1942, BF4 is far from perfect but planet side is boring.

Psychotica1054d ago

I tried several times, I just can't get into it. Just boring to me.

Destrania1055d ago

Until Killzone Shadow Fall launches. Actually I'm looking forward to playing both next weekend!

Eonjay1055d ago

Yes, I have been more impressed by Killzone than Battlefield. COD is dead and Titanfall is running the Source Engine from the 1980s.

BX811055d ago

Kill zone can't stand up to bf4

Destrania1055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

That's your opinion. Killzone will have a story I'm excited about. Both play differently. Both have fun MP. That's why I'm getting both.

BX811054d ago

@ destrania, true just my opinion but damn I loves me some bf4. I did have fun with kz3 multiplayer for a while. I just didn't care for a lot of the maps and crappy spawn camping. Bf3 was really bad for base killing though.

Detoxx1055d ago

Killzone is not gonna be better then BF4.

You can do stuff in BF4 you can't even dream off in Killzone

Eonjay1055d ago

I do agree BF4 looks good, but I doubt it will run a smooth as a shooter designed specifically for the PS4.

jukins1055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

like having an amazing single player and multiplayer (co-op included, free dlc) experience in one package for $59.99 as opposed to just a multiplayer game for the same price and being gutted $10-$20 for map packs?

yep your right killzone will never match that oh wait!!

disclaimer: Im getting both but I feel like killzone will offer a better overall game, bf4 will be great but I think alot of people are wowed basically by player count and map destruction. while impressive those things could become old and tired rather quickly.

Detoxx1055d ago

@jukins

BF4 multiplayer alone is something any FPS can't come close to.

And look. If it wasn't for the fact that KZ:SF DLC is free, very little people would buy it. They give it for free so people continue playing the game.

bub161055d ago

sorry but battlefield is just as bad as cod. bf4 is no different to bf3 lol, going the same way as cod