According to Microsoft Phil Spencer, low resolution of games running on Xbox One are mutual decision of developers and Microsoft and is based on what's the best and right experience.
oh man.. lol
I just realized why Microsoft avoided calling their new system "Xbox 720". They knew already...
Is it to late for these guys to stop talking about the numbers? i know its a hot topic but it will keep being a hot topic as long as they keep talking about it. Id like for people to get off the numbers train and back on the games train. Meaning talking about the games in development and new ideas for upcoming games and release dates for games coming out. since i dont play with numbers, that is why the games are more important....to me anyway. i never once let specs dictate to me if a game was good or not. I let my own personal experience tell me that. And you guys (all of you who are more fixated on the specs) are ruining the potential for that experience when the day comes for me to plug in the ps4/xb1. Even these PR monkeys arent doing any favors with all this talk.
Nice dude lol
This guy is sounding more like Reg from Nintendo more all the time.
Watched the whole interview out of curiosity and lol'd pretty hard at this part :D http://youtu.be/f8CfywZF8rE... Sessler definately deserves the title goofus of the year.
I want 1080p graphics with amazing game play!! That's what is expected of next-gen consoles. I'm sick o and tired of people saying well it's not all graphics its game play. BullsH!t, its both!
Yes, I want it all also. However, these first wave games will not give us that. Whether it is PS4 or X1, the devs are under time constraints and are learning the hardware. I look at the lives of the PS3 and the X360 and am confident that it will get better and better for us.
I agree. I understand it's 2013. I understand people (including myself) have 1080p tvs and would like all my experiences at that resolution, but there are limitations with launch titles on New hardware. In time, the developers will be up to par. People act like 720p is standard def. 4k seems miles away from affordability, unless u want a no name brand and zero content for it. And who wants 3tb movies? I wish satellite/cable providers would catch up to 1080p. I wish quick internet would be available in my area. Like Phil Harrison said about having the technology, it's just unevenly spread. I would like it to catch up to current standards.
If we compare this to the Metro interview with Rubin the other day the questions Sessler asks here are so trite and sterile. He needs to take lessons from Paxman or that scary Easter Island head from CNN crossfire.
Translation: we made the same mistake we did in 2005. We rushed a console to the market in time for Christmas.
same mistake here with the xbone 720.
Theyre (microsoft) telling us this shit because of expensive demographic research that found that the majority of the gamers don't know what 1080p (native) on a video game (because none of the consoles run any games in 1080p w/ an exception of wipeout for ps3.). Now microsoft is slowly releasing info about resolution, they know it's not good news because of the PS4 capabilities. What does microsoft do? They take the demographic research of "most gamers don't know what 1080p (native) on a video game. " basically that means that console gamers dont know what they're missing and microsoft is taking advantage of that fact. Only individuals who know what 1080p gaming is are PC gamers or anyone who got their eyes and hands on a quality PC gaming machine @ high to max options w/1080p 60fps. That is pretty much the only way you will know what its like unless you can get your hands on COD Ghost (PS4) or Forza 5 to experience true native 1080p @ 60fps (which most of us haven't except those who went the events.).
I bet you that the vast majority cannot tell the difference between 900p and 1080p on a 50" TV. I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be able to either!
Im a pc gamer, i play all games @ 1920x1080/60fps. Yes, there is a significant different even between 1600x900 (yes thats the exact res for 900p). In fact as time goes on and more 1080p games are released, the contrast of 1080p to 720-900p will easily be noticed the more the players eye/brain is cultured to it. I do understand why you would say that i wouldnt notice the difference, because you never had experience with a true 1920x1080 (exclusively found only on pcs currently) Count the difference - 1280x720 vs 1920x1080 1600x900 vs 1920x1080
hats off to you mr spencer. ..good talk
last gen MS - our ports are the best we have the best looking games Next gen Ms - its about the experience not the graphics
Why act surprised when PR folk engage in PR-speak. Isn't their job after all? It is almost as if we want MS to pull out a 60 second spot during the Super Bowl, declaring that the X-1 is crap.
All about the One experience. 720p is the experience add some cloud and we have an game. ^~^ Poor Xbox fans.
Sometimes it might help you get more detail, but when the other version looks better, runs better, and at a higher resolution you end up getting a sub par experience.
Yes mate you keep telling your self that, lets forget you hardware can't handle it
Imagine if they actually invested in better hardware, those "experiences" could have also been even greater.
Ryse in 1080p 60fps with all the effects and details cranked up, dead rising 3 1080p 60fps with all the details cranked up, etc. Ryse looks amazing as is, but it's unfortunate to dream how much further they could have done with a more powerful system. What we see is good, it could have been mind melting great instead.
The problem with that is that MS have repeatedly indicated that their console delivered the best "experience". That kinds of claims only invites criticism.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.