170°
Submitted by WonsAuto 610d ago | review

Batman: Arkham Origins Review - Stealthy Box

"Prequels are tricky territory, but also the only feasible route for a game not developed by Rocksteady, as they probably have a corkboard in their studio lined with plot points and yarn dictating what they want for the series moving forward. WB Montreal’s hands were tied, but the result is still a tremendous disappointment." - Joe Garcia (Batman: Arkham Origins, PC, PS3, Wii U, Xbox 360) 4.5/10

23Breach  +   610d ago
Still haven't played this game, but boy is that writer attractive.
_QQ_  +   610d ago
either you are a female ,gay or blind, because i only clicked on the article after reading your comment and was extremely disapointed. If you are a either of the first two i still think you must be blind.
#1.1 (Edited 610d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
23Breach  +   609d ago
Neither, just messing with a friend
DareDareCaro  +   610d ago
4.5/10 just broke my freeflow combo...
legionsoup  +   610d ago
Low score for hit-bait. Podunk sites trying to make a name...
DavePSU  +   610d ago
Yes, out of the 24 reviews the site has done, THIS is the one we chose to create a low score for in order to hit-bait! You caught us, lol.
antz1104  +   609d ago
Lame ass review, easily the best game in the series.
Alex_Boro  +   610d ago
Strongly disagree with this review. Overall it's what I expected, more of the same, although still a lot of fun to be had. At lowest, I'd give it a 7.
Heavenly King  +   610d ago
The game is awesome easily an 8.5/10. I find it on par with Arkham city, and it even surpass it in some aspects.
wollie  +   610d ago
I agree with everything this article says, I found the writing in this game pretty horrible.
Sadist3  +   610d ago
The game is excellent. It's pretty stupid to give a game a low score because it's. It developed by rocksteady. That's not relevant, the game is really good, I like it better than Arkham city. People need to stop being followers, and make their own opinions. It's a good game, but because other people give it a low score just because it's not developed by rocksteady, everyone else wants to follow suit. Buy the game, you won't be disappointed.
thricetold  +   610d ago
Another reviewer who knocked that game because rocksteady didn't make it. Lol the game is as good as city and definitely better than AA with better boss fights. more of the same which nowadays is at least a 7 or 8. Can't wait to see what they give cod and bf4 which is also more of the same imo.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Batman: Arkham Knight Review - ThisGenGaming

21m ago - It’s here, the last game in the Batman trilogy from Rocksteady Studios who made it clear that thi... | PS4
40°

PlayStation Now Turned My Awful Samsung Smart TV Into A Fun Gaming System

28m ago - PlayStation Now is a neat little service. Sony purchased Gaikai a few years ago and turned it int... | Tech
Ad

5 Ways to be a Terrible Game Designer

Now - Here are five of the most troublesome yet common ways that designers screw things up for ourselves, our teams, and our projects. | Promoted post
40°

Brothers Pledge $20,000 To Shenmue 3 To Bring Exposure To China’s Schools For Underprivileged Kids

1h ago - "Twin 35-year-old brothers have pledged a total of $20,000 to the Shenmue 3 Kickstarter in order... | Culture
40°

Her Story: Creepy VHS Mystery Tour | Gamemoir

1h ago - In our review, Bryan discusses why Her Story is far more than the sum of its parts | PC
40°

Could Allison Road be the most terrifying game in the making?

2h ago - "Konami’s Silent Hills may be a thing of the past now, but thanks to the gameplay trailer that su... | PC