170°
Submitted by WonsAuto 388d ago | review

Batman: Arkham Origins Review - Stealthy Box

"Prequels are tricky territory, but also the only feasible route for a game not developed by Rocksteady, as they probably have a corkboard in their studio lined with plot points and yarn dictating what they want for the series moving forward. WB Montreal’s hands were tied, but the result is still a tremendous disappointment." - Joe Garcia (Batman: Arkham Origins, PC, PS3, Wii U, Xbox 360) 4.5/10

23Breach  +   388d ago
Still haven't played this game, but boy is that writer attractive.
_QQ_  +   388d ago
either you are a female ,gay or blind, because i only clicked on the article after reading your comment and was extremely disapointed. If you are a either of the first two i still think you must be blind.
#1.1 (Edited 388d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
23Breach  +   387d ago
Neither, just messing with a friend
DareDareCaro  +   388d ago
4.5/10 just broke my freeflow combo...
legionsoup  +   388d ago
Low score for hit-bait. Podunk sites trying to make a name...
DavePSU  +   388d ago
Yes, out of the 24 reviews the site has done, THIS is the one we chose to create a low score for in order to hit-bait! You caught us, lol.
antz1104  +   387d ago
Lame ass review, easily the best game in the series.
Alex_Boro  +   388d ago
Strongly disagree with this review. Overall it's what I expected, more of the same, although still a lot of fun to be had. At lowest, I'd give it a 7.
Heavenly King  +   388d ago
The game is awesome easily an 8.5/10. I find it on par with Arkham city, and it even surpass it in some aspects.
wollie  +   388d ago
I agree with everything this article says, I found the writing in this game pretty horrible.
Sadist3  +   387d ago
The game is excellent. It's pretty stupid to give a game a low score because it's. It developed by rocksteady. That's not relevant, the game is really good, I like it better than Arkham city. People need to stop being followers, and make their own opinions. It's a good game, but because other people give it a low score just because it's not developed by rocksteady, everyone else wants to follow suit. Buy the game, you won't be disappointed.
thricetold  +   387d ago
Another reviewer who knocked that game because rocksteady didn't make it. Lol the game is as good as city and definitely better than AA with better boss fights. more of the same which nowadays is at least a 7 or 8. Can't wait to see what they give cod and bf4 which is also more of the same imo.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories

Never Alone Review - Against All Odds | Awesome Games

1m ago - Joe from Awesome Games writes: 'Gaming doesn’t have the best reputation when it comes to represen... | PC
10°

'Far Cry 4' Is A Card That Ubisoft Can Only Play Once

6m ago - Forbes: I’ve recently taken some time out of saving the world and romancing elves in Dragon Age:... | PC
10°

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 Receive Surprise Price Cut, Now Street Below $800

9m ago - Is the best offense a good defense, or is the best defense a good offense? We're not sure, though... | PC
20°

Dragon Ball Xenoverse Hands-On | Gamereactor UK

15m ago - GR-UK writes: "After the huge disappointment that was Battle of Z, it is great to see that Dragon... | PC
Ad

Blood & Blade Giveaway

Now - Join us in celebrating the release of Blood & Blade with a key giveaway for in game gems. | Promoted post
10°

RuneScape Charity Breaks Previous Record

16m ago - Jagex's second annual Well of Goodwill event has shattered last year's record with time left to g... | PC