930°
Submitted by mynameisblair 329d ago | news

Resident Evil Creator Says PS4 And Xbox One Are "Almost Identical"

Shinji Mikami, creator of Resident Evil, currently working on the last game he’ll direct – The Evil Within – says “There’s no real difference between them,” when referring to Sony and Microsoft’s next generation machines in this month’s Edge magazine. (PS4, Xbox One)

« 1 2 3 »
majiebeast  +   329d ago | Well said
“We only need one console. Why do I have to make two versions of a game? And when Xbox One was first announced it had lower specs than PS4, but now they’re almost identical.

“So either will do.”

Did i miss this Xbone specs bump? I can only think that he means identical in architecture.
#1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(137) | Disagree(41) | Report | Reply
Ultra  +   329d ago
The CPU & GPU speed increased, thats what we know of. Maybe the developers know more what we don't on final devkits.

Besides the Jaguar APUs, both architectures are just the opposite. One relies on offloading/balancing for steady fps and the other relies on brute raw performance.
#1.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(38) | Disagree(54) | Report | Reply
cleft5  +   329d ago
It's the "almost" part that makes me go with the PS4. Still I wish the Xbox One people well.
#1.1.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(74) | Disagree(17) | Report
Jaqen_Hghar  +   329d ago
yes a man is sure Sony, the HARDWARE MANUFACTURER, didn't balance their system at all. Hell PS3 was the least balanced system like ever and it still had better looking games than the easy to develop for 360 so a man can venture a guess as to what'll happen now.
Elimin8  +   329d ago
You know what they say about 'almost'! It doesn't cou.....? But on a more serious note.. Both will be fine..
Gozer   329d ago | Trolling | show
MorePowerOfGreen   329d ago | Trolling | show
Pogmathoin  +   329d ago
Specs are great, but games are greater... GTA 5 on PS3, but looks amazing on both systems. Great time to be a gamer, bottom line, let the fanboys duke it out over trivial things, me too busy playing the actual systems soon!! Just over 1 month left!!!!!
christocolus  +   329d ago
its funny when ms said this no one believed..they released dev kits to most developers very late and even then the hardware, os and drivers wernt even close to being finalized...ms has been saying this .every game so far ms has shown all started on the very early dev kits..since then ms has done a lot of upgrades to os, drivers and even the hardware..but even at that games like ryse and quantum break are amazing even with the 10% gpu reserved for kinect..we know ms will release more of the gpu to devs but imagine what games made from the ground up using finalized dev kits will look like and now that developers are gettin their hands on the more recent dev kits theyv started realising just how powerful the xbx one really is... well shinji also hinted a while back that he would love to develop a horror game that uses kinects heart monitoring feature, looking forward to that too.?...
WrAiTh Sp3cTr3  +   329d ago | Well said
"Still I wish the Xbox One people well."

We'll be fine...
gaffyh  +   329d ago
It's to do with the architecture, and they are almost identical in that sense, the only real difference is the RAM and the way you manage the data transfer on that. In terms of specs overall, PS4 is clearly significantly more powerful in every aspect, anyone that argues against that is a fanboy, plain and simple. It's not the same as PS3 vs 360, 360 had certain advantages in key areas, plus PS3 was notoriously difficult to code for. This time PS4 is more powerful in every technical spec, and both are using the same architecture = PS4 multiplats are VERY likely to look better.

/truth

/don't cry.
#1.1.9 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(36) | Disagree(35) | Report
XboxFun  +   329d ago | Well said
Interesting...

And yet another 3rd party dev saying that both consoles are almost identical and no significant differences in both.

And yet we get the spin committee saying that he has to say this due to livelihood or he doesn't want to get on MS's bad side.

So who do we believe?

I mean we can't take MS's first parties word because N4G claims it's all PR. Sony's first parties say the same thing and it's considered the gospel.

How many devs do we have to hear from who are all saying that the two consoles are pretty close with no real significant differences?
UnHoly_One   329d ago | Off topic | show
Freedomland  +   329d ago | Intelligent
Quote from article,

"He’s obviously speaking in terms of development, rather than specifications, and it sounds as though they’ll both be more in line with PC architecture, making it easier to port these games due to the similarities with development"

Don't make it complicated, it's actually really simple.
Skips  +   329d ago
@Gozer

"I just look at how Ryse puts the entire ps4 line up to shame graphically"

Going by most previews about how in actual gameplay, Ryse doesn't even feel next gen (gameplay wise and visually). The look on your face when it gets nothing but 5's and 6's will be hilarious. lol Ryse will be MS's Lair for sure.

And I like how most people here are missing the part where it says identical in architecture, not power. XD
#1.1.13 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(36) | Disagree(22) | Report
corvusmd  +   329d ago
And the ESRAM nearly doubled the bandwidth speed
Deadpoolio  +   329d ago
Oh my god a 6% speed boost after it was downclocked to stop the system from frying itself...Lets stop pretending that the 0.06% boost is something significant and puts it on the level of the PS4
UltimateMaster  +   329d ago | Intelligent
READ ARTICLES!

“We only need one console. Why do I have to make two versions of a game? And when Xbox One was first announced it had lower specs than PS4, but now they’re almost identical.

“So either will do.”

~He’s obviously speaking in terms of development, rather than specifications, and it sounds as though they’ll both be more in line with PC architecture, making it easier to port these games due to the similarities with development.

That's what the article says, damn, all this argument to which has the better specs could have been avoided with a 10 second read.
redey3   329d ago | Trolling | show
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
@Freedomland & @UltimateMaster

hmmmmm,
he's not talking about specs
his talking about development

didn't notice that part
thank you
now it make sense
#1.1.18 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report
u got owned  +   329d ago
@UltimateMaster

"He’s obviously speaking in terms of development, rather than specifications, and it sounds as though they’ll both be more in line with PC architecture..."

NO! if you read the quote from the article you posted is clear he's talking about specs, not architecture... here...

“We only need one console. Why do I have to make two versions of a game? And when Xbox One was first announced it had LOWER SPECS than PS4, but NOW they’re almost identical.

He is clearly talking about specs.
#1.1.19 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(5) | Report
miDnIghtEr20C_SfF  +   329d ago
@XboxFun....

Amazing how it's Devs with their names out there that say that too... but it's the unnamed Devs who say something different.

Easy to talk bad when nobody knows who you are or work for.
CommonSense   329d ago | Off topic | show
black0o  +   329d ago
it's politic .. he can't downply any console since he wants to sell he game to both camps
clouds5  +   328d ago
@Cleft5: So that negligible difference in performance is the deciding factor for you? Not the controller? Not the games? Not the price???

WTF.
nukeitall  +   328d ago
@black0o:

"it's politic .. he can't downply any console since he wants to sell he game to both camps"

True, but devs with a name doesn't have to say anything at all.

There are numerous AAA dev already saying Xbox One and PS4 is pretty similar in power with minor differences in strength.

Guess that balance talk wasn't sh!t after all, and it shows. Ryse looks among the best games out there, and Forza 5 is 1080p at 60fps and not aimed at 60fps and running at 30fps like DriveClub.

In the end though, these specs don't matter. If it did, PC would be king cause nobody beats PC almost ever!
#1.1.24 (Edited 328d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(3) | Report
Mohlest   329d ago | Spam
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
he indeed mean identical in architecture...i think ?!
both are using the same specs
since both hardware are from AMD
but with ps4 ofcourse using the better specs
(the much stronger GPU and the GDDR5 unified RAM)

also keep in mind
this is a 3rd party dev
he can't say one is weaker than the other
but it's ok since we have the offical specs for both
#1.3 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(25) | Report | Reply
Death  +   329d ago
So a third party dev that is not dependant to either console isn't a relieable source, but a first party dev is more accurate? That's interesting since Microsoft claims that they have more processing power, but fans discount that as fantasy. To be clear, if Microsoft claims higher specs, they are wrong. If third parties say both systems are almost identical, they are wrong. If Sony claims more power, they are right since they are "official"?
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
@death

1.no you are wrong
3rd party devs are much more dependant on both consoles
because their goal is to get money from both xb1/ps4 owners
so they will never say one is better than the other
this is a simple PR from 3rd party dev....he didn't put any facts to back his comment if you notice

2.MS don't have higher specs and i don't know where did you get that from
both can claim what they want
i don't believe any PR fromboth Sony & MS
look at FACTS only
i look at the Offical specs from both MS and Sony
and that's all what i need to know about which is better and more powerful
and any one with brain can know that ps4 having
50% more powerful GPU and much faster/better RAM
means it's the more powerful system

you can deny it all you want, hit disagrees like that change Facts lol, believe any PR you hear to feel better
but this is a simple FACT
#1.3.2 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(27) | Report
Death  +   329d ago
Believe me, I don't get off on specs like some seem to on this site. Microsoft claims to have something like 2.04 peak tflops with the speed increase and eSram. Sony is claiming 1.84 tflops. I don't personally believe Microsoft can sustain 2.04, but do think they can hit peak power close to that of Sony. I also don't believe Sony can sustain 1.84 since I'm still under the impression the GDDR5 will limit the CPU side of the Jaguar core to atleast a small degree. The GPU looks to be taking in some of the CPU load to help. Getting both consoles to work with a sigle memory source isn't an easy task since neither GDDR5 nor DDR3 are optimal for both a CPU and GPU. I think at the end of the day both companies are taking two different routes to come up with the same solution.
JamieL  +   329d ago
@ Death
Nope you're wrong.
Sony4Life, power of the Cell, P2P is better than dedicated servers now, paying for MP is fine too, 8GB of GDDR5 Bee-ach, exclusives, apps not behind a pay wall, no camera=choice, Move's better, Sony had it first(no matter what you're talking about), Vita+PS3= better than WiiU. Anyone who thinks anything other than this has no business on this site, or right to live at all to be honest. Jump on the bandwagon or die.
andibandit  +   329d ago
P2P is better than dedicated servers??????

Yeah right, host migrations and inconsistent lag is the bane of multiplayer gaming
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
@Death

MS claim 2.04Tflops ....with 7790 GPU?! 0_0 lol XD
and you believe that ?!
they took out 10% of the GPU for Kinect and OS
sony didn't need to take out any thing from GPU since PScamera is not need for the console
that make the xbox GPU is even weaker than it already is
it was after the overclock 1.31Tflops but after they took 10% it fall back to 1.17tflops
that make PS4 GPU 56-60% more powerful
unless you have a link for sony talking out some of it GPU for not need things like PScam ?!
also read this
http://gamingbolt.com/ps4-g...

as for the RAM as @snp said below:

"PS4's GDDR5 supposidly taps out very close to it's theoretical max - 176GBps. In the real world the Esram taps out at 140-150GBps bandwith. This is without hypothetical where the GDDR5 provides dynamic solutions and the esram could theoretically prove of insufficient quantity and become a bottleneck."

like he said Esram infact become
a Bottleneck
developers won’t take them long to get their engine up and running with stable performance on PlayStation 4 while Xbox One required a lot more optimization to get up and running properly
so i think it will end up harder to work with
and it already much weaker than ps4

the CPU will not have any issue utilizing all the available bandwidth on ps4. After all, the data fetched by the CPU is simply being copied into the CPUs cache for processing. As long as said cache is faster than the RAM, there won't be a bottleneck.
going with GDDR5 was a better choice
also read this
http://www.amd.com/US/PRODU...
no matter how you spin it GDDR5 is the better and more faster Memory
and AMD confirm it as well
even 512GB GDDR5 is better/faster than 1GB DR3
ps4 have no flaws what so ever
and not a single developer is saying any thing but praise about ps4 hardware
can you prove it wrong with LINKS?!....no you simply can't

also this article is not talking about Specs
it's talking about development

FROM THE ARTICLE :
"He’s obviously speaking in terms of development, rather than specifications, and it sounds as though they’ll both be more in line with PC architecture, making it easier to port these games due to the similarities with development"

both have PC architecture which make it easier to port these games due to the similarities with development.

in the End
because i'm really getting tired of repeating myself for every xbox fan who still can't accept PS4 is the more powerful system
you want to believe what ever help you sleep the night and ignore the offical specs and facts ?!
ok cool ...what ever make you happy
#1.3.6 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(11) | Report
ambientFLIER  +   329d ago
JamieL

"@ Death
Nope you're wrong.
Sony4Life, power of the Cell, P2P is better than dedicated servers now, paying for MP is fine too, 8GB of GDDR5 Bee-ach, exclusives, apps not behind a pay wall, no camera=choice, Move's better, Sony had it first(no matter what you're talking about), Vita+PS3= better than WiiU. Anyone who thinks anything other than this has no business on this site, or right to live at all to be honest. Jump on the bandwagon or die."

That made me lol :) Nice job
#1.3.7 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(6) | Report
u got owned  +   329d ago
@Ezz2013

sorry dude, but where in the quote he's talking about development. Read carefully again, not the article but Mikami's quote:

"We only need one console. Why do I have to make two versions of a game? And when Xbox One was first announced it had L O W E R S P E C S than PS4, but N O W they’re almost identical."

He is clearly talking about specs, not development, the guy who wrote the article is the one saying he's talking about development, when Mikami clearly mention S P E C S on his quote, but you guys believe whatever make u sleep better at night ;)
#1.3.8 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
@u got owned

that quote was from the article not from me
also
this won't change any thing from the FACTS i said
which you ignored....hmmmmm,i wonder why ?!
all i have seen in this topic on this
(pro-sony site lol yeah right)
is stealth disagrees with the FACTS i posted and every single person already knew about them from the offical specs
and no one dare to prove it wrong with LINKS to back him up
i only believe in FACTS from the offical specs
i leave PR for you guys

damn!! i'm out of bubbles
#1.3.9 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report
insomnium2  +   328d ago
Jamie, jamie, jamie....smh...

It's tough being a MS fan after all that happened last gen and upcoming gen so far. I feel for you.......
#1.3.10 (Edited 328d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report
JamieL  +   328d ago
@ insom
It must be even worse to automatically deny myself a whole group of games over some childish schoolyard bias, and put so much stock, and my own idenity into a TOY!!! I am sorry, but I think your attitude is the disease in this society, you’re the sad one because you think this imaginary MS vs Sony war actually exist, and is SOOOOO important. I'm a fanboy because I call out the most immature behavior I've ever seen grown men partake in, but in your head you're 100% right no matter what facts or objectivity may come into play.

Me -open minded, likes games not systems, calls out juvinile ridiculous "views" that he thinks are pointless= Fanboy
You - Close minded, hateful, loyal to 1 BRAND, no objectivity, with the view that unless the package says Sony it's garbage= True gamers

If that’s the case I'll be a fanboy any day.
KNWS  +   329d ago
The XB1 has a better CPU than the PS4 (about 10 to 15% better) thats going to help the XB1.

GPU is better with the PS4 ( better visuals) graphics)but not by much

In regards to memory i don't think its conclusive yet.

8gigs of GDDR5 is better than 8gigs of Dddr3 for graphics. GDDR5 has twice the bandwidth. Reason to how this 50 per cent better claim came about

But lot people forget the 32 MB ESRAM the Microsoft has also. It has a separate bandwidth closely matching the 8 gigs OF GDDR5 the PS4 is using. On paper the XB1 has more memory bandwidth, but its not unified.

Also exclusive to XB1 (Direct 11.2X) this will enhance graphics.
majiebeast  +   329d ago
You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. Just stahp!
monkeyDzoro  +   329d ago
LoooL
CGI-Quality  +   329d ago
I'm guessing you don't understand the specs of these devices. Let's begin with that CPU difference - any source?
Brazz  +   329d ago
1º) we still can't say nothing of CPU, there are no oficial clock/cache or any "final number" for ps4 and X1, plus, no dev have come to say "xbox one have better CPU". we can't even start to think all the modifications done by sony and mirosoft. even if there is a diference, it will probably be minimal

2º) same as above, but... there are a lots of people sying that the diference is big, some say 20%-50%, it's not oficial, but there are lot's of reports from devs. and other "insider" of the market... if this get a confirm. than this will be a big advantage for Ps4.

3º) Gddr5 vs ddr3 + Esram > let's be fair, i'm a huge defender of the gddr5, and i talk a lot whit some friends about the advantages of gddr5 over ddr3 + Esram. the thing is... yeah, for users this isn't that big of a deal... Developers will have easyer time whit Gddr5, and ddr3 + Esram will need more work, but in the end (if the developer put some work in this) the thing can work great for both. Gddr5 is something great for devs. (make things more easy), but ,if the dev. want, they cando the same whit X...

4º)that point is kind of... interesting... ya see, Directx isn't good.... i dare say that opengl is better. do ya know why? because openGl is open and have the heads of likes of Nvidia and AMD in it! sure, Directx is better than openGL if you use it on windows, but be sure of this, when things come to consoles, that things are done from "the metal" (basic code level) and there is no "windows" to work for directx, openGL will have the upperhand.
imt558  +   329d ago
WTF are you talking about? 150 MHz more CPU clock in XO is nothing. And it's not 10%, it's 9%.

OpenGL 4.4 say hi to DirectX 11.2
Jaqen_Hghar  +   329d ago
What the? 10-15% better is going to help when it's Xbox but 50% better won't help PS4 by much? Also GPU is the most IMPORTANT part of the gaming equation. Just ask any PC gamer.
Kayant  +   329d ago
"On paper the XB1 has more memory bandwidth, but its not unified. "

On paper also according to major nelson the X360 has more bandwidth then both consoles --->

"Xbox 360 has 278.4 GB/s of memory system bandwidth. The PS3 has less than one-fifth of Xbox 360′s (48 GB/s) of total memory system bandwidth"

http://majornelson.com/2005...

Also if you think the Laptop CPUs in XB1 & PS4 matter this gen that much then looool. PS3's Cell is more powerful than both same can be said for X360 probably. Both consoles have similar CPUs so the upclock done to the XB1's will make a different but not as much as you think. Also PS4 CPU clock speed might be have also received a upclock but that is speculation for now as the clock speed is unconfirmed since the leaks. The GPU will be more important.

Direct 11.2X might be exclusive to XB1 but PS4's API support DX11.2+ features http://www.gdcvault.com/pla...
#1.4.7 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(7) | Report
Volkama  +   329d ago
I dunno, typically when a PC gamer buys a higher end card they also overclock their CPU to avoid bottlenecking it. And we're talking in excess of 4ghz here, there wouldn't be much point in investing anything into graphics with a 1.75ghz CPU on a PC.

The CPUs on both systems still look like the weak link, but nobody has really complained or complimented so hopefully it's a non-issue.
AndrewLB  +   329d ago
People don't seem to understand that some of the GPU power gap will be closed because of how much more efficient the Xbone's DirectX API is than the variant of OpenGL found on PS4.

Plus i'm certain M$ will have a more efficient operating system thats highly optimized. OS's are what they do for a living.
IHassounah  +   329d ago
DDR3 isn't for graphics.....
xXxSeTTriPxXx  +   329d ago
No, just no.
corvusmd  +   329d ago
I love how you are getting downvoted for just using logic, and the Sony trolls can't handle that. Speaking the truth always seems to piss them off. Don't worry, Nov 15th is almost here and we will all get a small break when they play their 20 hours of KZ....then it's just 6 days and we won't ever have to hear them again.
Deadpoolio  +   329d ago
Um please learn what your talking about before trying to talk specs....No the CPU in the One80 is not better, I believe they are actually the same......and we know for a FACT that 8gb of GDDR5 IS WITHOUT A DOUBT better than 8gb of DDR3...And NO 32mn of Esram does NOT put it in the realm of GDDR5, not on paper and not in reality...Stop believing the crap that Xbots keep pulling out of their asses
Eonjay  +   329d ago
A lot of the components are the same, but the architectures are wildly different. Xbox One uses ESRAM and DDR3. PS4 uses GDDR5. This means memory is managed differently on different consoles. The Xbox One has a faster CPU. The PS4 has a more powerful GPU. The Xbox One has a more powerful audio chip for processing Kinect. The PS4 has doesn't have a mandatory camera. Xbox uses Direct X. PS4 uses OpenGl and PSSL. They are both shades of black.

So its all about context. But, its is practically impossible to have these two machines give identical max performances. Physics always wins.
#1.5 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
fghtrer3fb5erg  +   329d ago
WAit a second, what do you know about the ps4 cpu? as far as we all know sony has only talked about the gpu and the second chip.
Eonjay  +   329d ago
Excellent question DatRamboX

Actually we know because we understand the technology that AMD says the Jaguar CPU is based on. They are actually the same in both systems, but Microsoft Up-clocked their CPU because they felt that they needed to give developer more power.
Dusdg  +   329d ago
We do know that the Xbox one does not have to use any cores to process any audio as the shape chip will be doing it all. The ps4 on the other hand has to use the CPU to do most audio processing before it sends it off to its audio chip.
Eonjay  +   329d ago
@Dusdg

If you are pinning you hopes on audio; you are lost.
IRetrouk  +   329d ago
@dusdg,
You are wrong, the ps3 does have an audio chip, how about using google to go find the proof, cause u know, it is out there.

Got bored here you go.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/w...

Click on hardware and have a wee read.
#1.5.5 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
ballsohard2013  +   329d ago
Wasnt it found that the X1 had a stronger CPU? Also that Ps4 had 8gb GDDR5 vs 8gb GDDR3 + 32MB ESRAM giving X1 more bandwidth? Also whats the impact of Direct 11.2x on x1?

I think many ppl on both fanboy sides exaggerate. Graphically i dont think its possible that in the next 10-15 years you will really see that much better unless you're talking about 4k gaming. Give me the best graphics pc game which most consider these: Crysis 3, Crysis 1, Modded Skyrim, Battlefield 3, Arkham City, Witcher 2 and the Modded GTA 4. After you look at these... its safe to say ps4 & x1 will approach those levels.

Besides theres not enough developers with gifted personnel to push the boundaries of the imagination or even the hardware in front of them. I would never have thought GTA5 would be possible on Ps3/x360
#1.6 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(20) | Report | Reply
KNWS  +   329d ago
Sony fans never research and thats their problem. They hear their console is 50 per cent better and they think thats the truth. I don't knock the PS4 its a good console, just like the XB1

An article on Edge Online discusses just what these hardware differences mean, and that more raw power might not be enough to give Sony a big advantage in the next generation.

“DDR5 is basically 50 per cent more powerful than DDR3,” says Anton Yudintsev CEO of Gaijin Entertainment. “But the memory write is bigger on Xbox One. So it depends on what you’re doing. PS4 is more powerful, but you can’t just write to the memory, you need to read sometimes.”

“They maybe have a little more GPU,” says Lobb. “We have eSRAM [embedded memory] and crazy bandwidth to that eSRAM. Which is going to be better in the long run from a developer? We’re going to see as the games go head to head. A lot of it will come down to – as always – which exclusive teams push a piece of hardware best.”

These exclusive teams are the ones that are working with the first party games on both consoles. We aren’t likely to see huge differences in fidelity between third party games across both platforms, the major differences will be found on the games that are exclusive to each platform.
snp  +   329d ago
-----
“They maybe have a little more GPU,” says Lobb. “We have eSRAM [embedded memory] and crazy bandwidth to that eSRAM. Which is going to be better in the long run from a developer? We’re going to see as the games go head to head. A lot of it will come down to – as always – which exclusive teams push a piece of hardware best.”
-----

'maybe have a little more GPU'... there's no 'maybe' about it? Who is this 'Lobb' fellow? Off to do my research..

ed: Ken Lobb of Microsoft? For real? This is the guy we're quoting to vaguely suggest no empirical advantage to the PS4's hardware? With his quote sourced and placed, somewhat misleadingly ('mischievously' even) under a quote a far more sanguine one from a genuine third party software rep - with no mention that Lobb is an MS employee - to make it seem like an independents analysis. Not cool dude.
#1.6.2 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(16) | Disagree(5) | Report
Hicken  +   329d ago
"8gb GDDR3 + 32MB ESRAM giving X1 more bandwidth?"

Yes, a higher peak theoretical bandwidth for 32MB at a time is DEFINITELY higher. 32MB at 196/s or 212/s or something obviously surpasses a full 8GB running at 176/s.

"but you can’t just write to the memory, you need to read sometimes."

I guess someone hasn't heard the PS4 can read AND write at the same time.
dmitrijs88  +   329d ago
Shinji Mikami needs his eyes to be checked.
nypifisel  +   329d ago
Kinda makes no sense. What has changed lol? the 9% upclock isn't relevant in any way, I honestly don't get why they did it seeing how diminished the return is. Anyway it doesn't explain how a 9% cpu upclock can fill the 50% GPU gap lol
AngelicIceDiamond  +   329d ago
@Beast

“We only need one console. Why do I have to make two versions of a game? And when Xbox One was first announced it had lower specs than PS4, but now they’re almost identical."

You missed this part.

"when Xbox One was first announced it had lower specs than PS4,"

Now that MS made the changes the X1. PS4 and X1 are nearly identical. According to him of course.

I'm not sure why the writer thinks its architecture when the guy clearly said X1 had lower specs at first.
#1.9 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
Blaze929  +   329d ago
"almost identical" does not equate to "50% more powerful/faster"

...if such were the case, we would obviously see that with launch PS4 games vs Xbox One - but we don't.

Truth hurts, PS4 not as strong as you all believe it to be over the Xbox One. Only, the Xbox One has extra resources - the cloud.
nypifisel  +   329d ago
We do actually see it in launch games.. All PS4 titles with confirmed resolution is at 1080p. Xbox One only got 1 game as far as I know (Forza), and for that to even be possible they have no AA solution, pre-baked lighting, no day/night cycles and so on, not very impressive.
showtimefolks  +   329d ago
Fanboys are happy when they say this or that is more powerful, bottom lime is games count, and if Sony delivers like it did on ps3 than MS just won't be able to compete

It's amazing that most of Sony's big studios haven't even announced a game for ps4 yet and it's about to launch, than you take into affect that many of independent studios like ready at dawn are also working with Sony

Ps4 for ultimate gaming console
Xbox one more for entertainment and causal games on kinect

Both will succeed but both will target different audience
JsonHenry  +   329d ago
I'm more disturbed by the fact the guy keeps saying we only need one system. If you believe that then just develop for the PC. I'm a firm believer in competition though. I'm glad we have more than one.
NiteX  +   329d ago
In the future there will only be 1.
MEGANE  +   329d ago
If they where able to bump specs in two weeks they wouldn't need 5 or 6 years to develop a console. A significant increase in performance will have all the engineers back to the drawing board.
Now to the resident evil creator... this is why your franchise is been death since RE4, cause you can even se the difference in features and exploit them(like kinect or the touch pad on the PS4 controller... he wants to convince him self he only needs one game for two consoles.... they don't want to make different experience for gamers that own 2 consoles. This is y why Capcom is behind many western developers.
#1.13 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Dagobert  +   329d ago
He's a developer who's not exclusive to Sony so naturally he has to praise both systems.
FunkMacNasty  +   329d ago
GAME DEVELOPER: "both systems are pretty much the same...no biggie".

NERDS ON THE INTERNET: "This guy that does this for a living has no idea what he's talking about... The Ps4 is 190,000 times more powerful!!!!!!!!"
Mr Blings  +   329d ago
aka 3rd party studios will make their games on par regardless if one system is ultimately more powerful. It is good business sense. All comes down to first party studios. Unless...COD is truly running 1080p ps4 vs 720p Xbox One...LOL I kid I kid.
Amphion  +   329d ago
"almost" doesn't count.
pixelsword  +   329d ago
Resident Evil Creator Says PS4 And Xbox One Are "Almost Identical"

Roseanne Barr and Scarlett Johansson are also "almost identical", but the little things mean a lot.
#1.18 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
_QQ_  +   329d ago
There you have it an actual source that isn't some anonymous indie dev, Well then can we stop with the" Hur xbax holding back meh PS4" Nonsense.

look at what carmack said as well.
#2 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(23) | Disagree(42) | Report | Reply
hadouken007  +   329d ago
Alot of ps3 games are almost identical to 360 game and slightly better on 360 but is called a 360 win...?
BBBirdistheWord  +   329d ago | Funny
oh no. no no no.

This is n4g.com
No matter what the usable and realistic specs
No matter what the developer comments
No matter the reality

The ps4 is +50% because the comments say so

/s
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
""No matter what the usable and realistic specs""

other than the offical specs that we all know
what realistic specs are you talking about ?!

also ps4 is not 50% more powerful
it more like 30-35% more powerful thanks to the 50% more powerful GPU and much faster/better RAM
#2.2.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(15) | Report
JasonKCK  +   329d ago
lol BBBirdistheWord

Here, have a bubble.
Gozer  +   329d ago
When you take into account the Esram, the X1 has the bandwidth advantage over the GDDR5 of the ps4. But this is N4G, so we are supposed to forget all about that and just say the GDDR5 is more powerful because sony said so.
snp  +   329d ago
When you take into account the Esram, the X1 has the bandwidth advantage over the GDDR5 of the ps4. But this is N4G, so we are supposed to forget all about that and just say the GDDR5 is more powerful because sony said so.
------

Actually in real world the PS4's GDDR5 supposidly taps out very close to it's theoretical max - 176GBps. In the real world the Esram taps out at 140-150GBps bandwith. This is without hypothetical where the GDDR5 provides dynamic solutions and the esram could theoretically prove of insufficient quantity and become a bottleneck.

Look, thing is, i don't even care about the power difference that much. I'm coming from a PC background where neither is going to floor me specs wise.. but this wishing and hoping and tapping ones ruby slippers together and desperately begging the PS4's hardware advantage relative to the Xbox1 is somehow, magically, not going to be an actual advantage or never ever show... it's unhealthy, and odd.
#2.2.4 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(6) | Report
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
@snp
no matter what FACTS you post
no matter what the offical specs show
they will ignore all that
and believe any PR from 3rd party studios that all they want to sell their games on all systems
so don't bother

even NEOGAF is laughing at this
#2.2.5 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(7) | Report
Imalwaysright  +   329d ago
True. Legendary devs have come out and stated the same thing. 1st Kojima followed by Carmack and now Mikami. I'll take their word over anonymous devs any day of the week.
HiddenMission  +   329d ago
Maybe you should do your research because all 3 of those sources have been tainted.

Carmack has always preferred XBOX over PlayStation...equals biased.

Kojima has been trying to gain more western appeal for years which is why he has been focusing the majority of his efforts with MS and XBOX...agenda here to consider.

Mikami is trying to promote his new title and MS is looking for 3rd parties willing to take some cash and are willing to do damage control for them...another agenda here.

Now I'm not saying that other devs saying that the PS4 is more powerful don't have their own agendas or are biased but instead I'm saying take all of them with a grain of salt until we are a year or so into next gen.

This way we can then do a healthy review of who was full of shit and who was paid to do damage control.
#2.3.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(8) | Report
Imalwaysright  +   329d ago
We're not talking about some dumbass fanboys that make their life mission defending or talking crap about pieces of plastic on the internet. We're talking about some of the most respected and influential devs in the industry so I'll definetely take their word over some anonymous devs or fanboys with agendas and conspiracy theories on the internet.
Volkama  +   329d ago
Ha ha "tainted".

Go find a reputable quote favouring either console that we can't consider "tainted" using your established logic.
HiddenMission  +   329d ago
Looks like neither of you actually took the time to read my response comment.

The only untainted perspective is the consumer who doesn't care about forums or comment threads. Devs and publishers and the big 3 have vested interested so they can't really be trusted except for the hard spec numbers...vague comments without cold hard facts that can be tested mean nothing.

That's all I'm saying that's all because you could easily flip the coin to the other side and get the same response. Hell if you want to take 3 devs who say they are equal I can find between 20 and 40 who are in favor of the PS4 or 10 to 15 who say the opposite.

So none of them are to be trusted with vague comments like this.
Imalwaysright  +   329d ago
Oh I read your comment: full of opinionated conspiracy theories that you can't back up with hard cold facts.

As for those 20 devs, please tell me their names because I've never heard of them.

Also those untainted consumers you speak off (me included)will only be able to judge on which is more powerful 2 or 3 years from now wich is when the devs, that actually work on these consoles, will start maxing them out. Until then I'll take the word of people that have the knowledge and are actually working with these consoles over anonymous sources and biased fanboys.
ziggurcat  +   329d ago
RE creator is an anonymous indie dev, now?
_QQ_  +   329d ago
thats what i am saying. reread my comment
ziggurcat  +   329d ago
@ lopez:

good god, i must be pretty tired... totally misread :(
chrissx  +   329d ago
There's a fine line between almost identical and identical. We all know Ps4 is more powerful u can sugar coat it all u like
_QQ_  +   329d ago
Probably to the point where it doesn't make much a difference...
Jovanian  +   329d ago
Compared to a PC the difference between power of the PS4 and XB1 is trivial at best

So there.

And watch how peoples brains suddenly switch, and 'graphics matter' suddenly becomes 'graphics don't matter!'
scott182  +   329d ago
"A pc" what PC? My PC? sure my PC has better specs but not all do. It's hard to compare a machine built from the ground up with the sole purpose to be a efficient as possible for gaming to a PC that's used for tons of things at any given time, so you can't really compare specs side by side with a PC... That's why we compare console to console.
#3.2.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(4) | Report
Jovanian  +   329d ago
By your logic, my PC has been built from the ground up (by myself) in order to make it as efficient at gaming as possible. Therefore, I am able to compare it to consoles
scott182  +   329d ago
Actually that's not my logic.. You're not understanding the point I guess I worded it wrong. PC games are not made for one specific system and designed with just those specs in mind to run as efficiently as possible for THAT machine. Games are built from the ground up to run as smoothly as possibly knowing the exact specs the machine has and knowing exactly what they need to do to program for those specific specs as efficiently as possible.
lifeisgamesok  +   329d ago
Sorry dude but if the Ps4 was just a little more powerful to the point where there's an advantage he wouldn't have said identical he would've said minimal or very little
#3.3 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(12) | Report | Reply
snp  +   329d ago
Who knows? It's all relative. They're also making a PC version. If the Xbox1 is putting out 200 (assigning numbers for simplicities sake), the PS4 280-300 and the PC version maxes out at 700.. relatively speaking the Xbox1/PS4 seem like a wash.

And there's also politics involved in all this. When dev's have spoken to reputable publications on condition of anonymity they've put the difference at 40-50% (and gone into much greater spec by spec and 'software environmental/tools' detail than the very ambiguous 25 or so words grab of this bit). Logically looking at the hardware that seems like it would be right.
#3.3.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(2) | Report
Saithraphim  +   329d ago
The numbers suggest that the spec bump the Xbox got only marginally increased the performance. I agree both platforms are great, but considering what other Devs are saying i don't see them being "almost identical"
GmIsOnPt360  +   329d ago
LOL shot to the heart of the PS4 is king talk hahah
josephayal  +   329d ago
The PS4 has 50% more raw power in graphics
thrust  +   329d ago
Dev disagrees with you, who knows more?
josephayal  +   329d ago
With ME? When the developers are the one working on the two consoles, if its from the devs mouths it mast be true
hollabox  +   329d ago
Its more like 30 to 40 percent depending on what perspective you look at it from. Which is not an huge amount like everybody make it out to be. Now if the PS4 was something like 3-5 times more powerful than yes expect to see an huge difference.
gnothe1  +   329d ago
Oh nooo...it can't be....
lifeisgamesok  +   329d ago
Well that settles it "identical" specs definitely don't mean 50% more power

But we already knew this from seeing Ryse, Quantum Break, and Forza in all their glory
#8 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(20) | Report | Reply
MRMagoo123  +   329d ago
I guess you are another one that doesnt read before vomiting forth BS, but believe the stuff you make it up to be it will make it all the worse when the consoles are out and the games on the xbone are always lower rez and lower performance compared to the ps4.
lifeisgamesok  +   328d ago
I guess you're the idiot that thinks higher resolution is automatically better graphics when better shading/lighting will win every time

And Ryse is the best looking game

It performs great fanboy
#8.1.1 (Edited 328d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report
TheEnigma313  +   329d ago
For 100 dollars more, The xbox should be more powerful, but it isn't.
#9 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(21) | Disagree(12) | Report | Reply
thrust  +   329d ago
Kinect is boxed with it
MasterCornholio  +   329d ago
Thank you for explaining why its weaker.

In this case better specs was the tradeoff to get Kinect bundled with the system at 499$.

Nexus 7 2013
#9.1.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(5) | Report
xXxSeTTriPxXx  +   329d ago
You make that sound like a good thing.
BlunderbusDriver  +   329d ago
Like Thrust said, this is because of Kinect.

Also, this gen Sony doesn't have a credible answer to Kinect. They would have boxed their camera with the PS4 otherwise.

They are saying they din't box it due to price. I think its more due to the fact that it can't compete well with Kinect 2.0

If looking at hardware we only look at processing, Sony has an advantage. If looking at hardware involves all of the hardware, then this becomes a completely different question.
TheEnigma313  +   329d ago
I don't think many people want kinect anyways. Most people who are buying an xbone doesn't even want it.
Ko_Uraki  +   329d ago
If the difference will be only between some games with a res of 720p/900p upscaled to 1080p on xboxone and 1080p native on ps4...yes they will be almost identical despite what fanboys are saying.
Xsilver  +   329d ago
"Almost identical" does not mean that something is the same as the other so one console is higher that's a fact.
Niv  +   329d ago
Talking about architecture, not POWER!
BadlyPackedKeebab  +   329d ago
Its all about context though. Compared to the ps3 and 360 they are almost identical. Compared to a wii u and ps4 they are almost identical.

It all depends how wide his view is when he makes the comparison I guess.

I am talking architecture btw.

i.e. 360 and ps3 are very different. ps4 and one are not. architecturally.
#13 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
PFFT  +   329d ago
John Carmack, Hideo Kojima and now Shinji Mikami have all pretty much said the same thing. Those three's words have more credibility than all those so called UNNAMED Developers put together. So there you have it.
XabiDaChosenOne  +   329d ago
You are using the appeal to authority fallicy. His words mean nothing in the face of the confirmed specs.
PFFT  +   329d ago
Your so called confirmed specs are 5 or 6 months old. Both systems have changed one way or the other but your blinded fanboyism doesnt let you see that.
buynit  +   329d ago
Well damn if well known devs dont mean anything then none of you are saying anything... credibility> n4g
XabiDaChosenOne  +   329d ago
Unless you have any proof of Microsoft and Sony switching their current hardware configuration with better chips than your response is wishful thinking. The only thing that has changed is minor upclocks to the GPU and CPU.
forcefullpower  +   329d ago
This comes from a dev that hasn't made a decent game in years.
badkolo  +   329d ago
neither have you, at least hes a dev
DigitalAnalog  +   329d ago
And all of them uses the term "identical". An ambiguous term. I can say Brad Pitt and Jim Carrey are "identical" because they have penises, they're actors and they are men does that make them the "same"?

Heck, both the PS3 and 360 are "identical" in power (much more than next-gen) but why is it that developers don't use this term, huh?
#15.2 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(9) | Report | Reply
buynit  +   329d ago
Wtf?!

Talk about a fly ball to the right field and your running to the left!
Imalwaysright  +   329d ago
Oh look it here, the "I dont like what he said so I'll dismiss what he achieved in this industry to make me feel better" tactic.

You guys used the same tactic when Carmack basically said the same the thing and all you achieved was giving the impression that you're 12 years old that started gaming this gen.
windblowsagain  +   329d ago
Almost identical my ass.
KontryBoy706  +   329d ago
Almost doesn't count
stuna1  +   329d ago
Exactly! What people fail to grasp is the term "ALMOST", that word can be used to describe a minute' similarity or it could be used as a all encompassing term! Almost identical in no way means identical! No matter how someone may spin it to fit their argument. Sure there developers stating these consoles are "almost identical", but how is this any different from what we've heard this as well as past generations!? We've heard claims throughout this generation how things were touted to be almost identical on the hardware as well as the software side of things, and the majority of the times this has turned out to be completely and utterly false! An Example would be FFXIII.

Mind you some of these almost identical claims came from.......Yes, well known and respected developers. On top of this, it is statistically impossible for these consoles to be even almost identical, because even if they had the exact CPU and GPU, it still wouldn't account for the other vital components that make up the inner workings of each respective console. This generation was made up a diverse group of gamers from different platforms, it's only logical to believe that developers in general will try to appeal to as many gamers on as many platforms this coming gen, even if it means pitting platform against platform.

EDIT; And for those that still find it hard to differentiate the difference in Hardware, please refer to the section titled "EXCLUSIVE"!
#17.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
BattleTorn  +   329d ago
almost
/ˈɔːlməʊst/
adverb
1. not quite; very nearly.
----------------------------- -----
So, how exactly does 'almost identical' mean "no way" idenitcal to you?

Or could it be that you hate the concept of console parity?
#17.1.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report
stuna1  +   329d ago
You answered your own question! Not quite; Very nearly! Meaning not exactly. Next time think before typing. And the question still remains in what area or areas are they "Almost Identical"?

Better yet re-read my comment, because it was explained in detail.
The Meerkat  +   329d ago
So its down to the games then.

I'm going for the one that lets me play War Thunder.
GiantEnemyCrab  +   329d ago
A PC?
TripC50  +   329d ago
Noice
XabiDaChosenOne  +   329d ago
Confirmed specs allow me to dismiss the words of this man. Anyone using this guys words to back there arguments is commting the appeal to authority fallicy. That is all.
ambientFLIER  +   329d ago
The words of a developer mean much more to people than some n4g warrior (you) that bases his knowledge on only raw numbers.
#19.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
XabiDaChosenOne  +   329d ago
I don't care what my words mean to the deluded like yourself, your opnion means nothing in the face of facts. #dealwithit
stuff  +   329d ago
Sounds to me like he's just complaining about having to do his job. Somehow I get the feeling that he made this comment after having a few drinks.
Dante81  +   329d ago
Other than resolution, they are practically identical.
sigfredod  +   329d ago
The key word is "almost" for a few difference a game can be output in 1080p and other in "almost" full hd in one console or other
pinocchio2600  +   329d ago
I agree with meerkat. It gonna come down to the games. X1 games were the clear winners at e3.
LiQuiZoN  +   329d ago
Disagree and a very shortsighted view. Long term investment of a gaming console is more than 1 year or sic months. Sony is strong for the entire lifecycle. This is undeniable. Microsoft is I'm it for the fast cash,not the innovation of evolution of gaming.
theEx1Le  +   329d ago
You can only base that on how the 360 life cycle went towards the last couple of years in terms of games. You can't say for certain that is the way MS is gonna play out this gen.
IRetrouk  +   329d ago
While i agree that you cant say that micro will follow the same pattern that they went with the 360, they did kinda the same thing with the original xbox, two consoles in a row of no real support after the first 3 or so years isnt really a good sign, i wouldnt be 100% confident that they wouldnt do the same again, you never know this could be the gen that micro really challanges the playstation name.
grassyknoll  +   329d ago
If anyone thinks that anyone who works for the big publishers will speak out against Microsoft or Sony, you're living in a dream world. The proof will most definitely be in the games!
tigertom53  +   329d ago
PS4 is like a big muscle car, while the X1 is an average every day car, Microsoft decided to tweak the car by making it lighter which would be dedicated high-end audio processor, adding a turbo charger which the ESRAM, and other move engines to make it more competitive to the PlayStation's Muscle car "PS4". It seems that most people are just comparing 400 HP Muscle car to 200 Hp everyday sedan say it has 50% percent more power, but forgetting about all the tweaks under the hood to make it more competitive. At the end of the day it which one wins at the finish line that matters. let the games speak for themselves when they are released and am sure they will be pretty much neck and neck at the finish line..
BlunderbusDriver  +   329d ago
cool analogy.

Also the Xbox car has more high tech features (kinect). It can respond to the driver in more ways than the muscle car.

FWIW - I am muscle car fan, though. That's a different forum :-)
tigertom53  +   329d ago
well maybe a luxury sedan. yes you got a lot of nice tech with the X1 like, TV input, multi OS to run multiple apps while playing a game, High End Gigabit Ethernet, WiFi Direct super high bandwidth and super clear chat audio, improved on one of the best controller also adding "vibrating, impulse Triggers". and one of the best internet services....
#25.1.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report
KNWS  +   329d ago
I haven't enough bubbles to reply, to the discussion above. The PS4 isn't 50 per cent more powerful. Sony fans ignoring the ESRAM its just fanboy logic i guess.

We know the CPU of the Sony console because its a off the shelf part with a known clock speed of 1.6 GHZ confirmed by Sony, look it up.

The Microsoft CPU runs at 1.75GHZ
#26 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
Dante81  +   329d ago
A down-clocked 7870 eats a 7790 for lunch.
theEx1Le  +   329d ago
Well yes, on paper, but it all depends on how its used. Pretty sure the Ps3 had the weaker GPU this gen and look what happened there.
IRetrouk  +   329d ago
Again with the off the shelf bulls..t i keep hearing, mark has already stated, countless times that every chip in the ps4 is customised, use google, its your friend, the thing that i dont understand is why your so up in arms about the ps4 being more powerfull, which by the way is fact not one of your made up off the shelf retorts. just enjoy your one for what its going to give you and stop worrying about the other console.
srd4484  +   329d ago
This can't be true!!! It's not from an anonymous source or indie dev...I refuse to believe this.

- Sony fanboy
#27 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
Lboogieskells  +   329d ago
I'm looking forward to the The Evil Within, but I can't take this dev's opinion seriously. The Evil Within isn't winning any awards in the visual department. Looks like it could run on a low end PC or current gen console.

“We only need one console. Why do I have to make two versions of a game?"

I gather from his demeanor and the way he answered the questions, the last thing he is worried about are unlocking either of the consoles potential.
Scatpants  +   329d ago
This just in, person who's livelyhood depends on both consoles says both consoles are good.
R0n0rve  +   329d ago
My thoughts on this... The PS4 being more powerful wont sway my decision. The system I chose is based off of the games it has and what it offers to me. I'm getting an Xbox One and I'm not afraid to admit that the PS4 has the superior specs. It's more powerful. It's a FACT. Even as a person who is getting an Xbox it still kind of annoys me when they try to sugarcoat it.
#30 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
ZHZ90  +   329d ago
Q: You mean it annoys you that "PS4 is more powerful" or "people trying to hide that PS4 is more powerful"?

But anyways, I am getting PS4 because of its games from Sony's owned studios(like ND, SSM, Sucker Punch etc) and 3rd Parties(like R*, Konami, SE, EA etc) (PS4's Exclusives and Multiplats).

The power of PS4 and PS4 being cheaper and improvement of Dualshack 4 with addition of touchpad are all bonus to me.
#30.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
R0n0rve  +   329d ago
It annoys me when people try to hide the fact that the PS4 is more powerful. I mean yeah the Xbox has its advantages but no sweet talking can deny the fact that the PS4 boasts a better GPU and faster RAM. It's just a simple fact. And those are all great reasons no doubt, I'm sure the PS4 will have games that will absolutely rock. For instance, The Order looks very interesting. But anyways, have fun with your PS4! I'm quite excited to see how both consoles turn out :)
#30.1.1 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(2) | Report
DoubleM70  +   329d ago
Me being a first generation gamer. I'm excited for both consoles. I love seeing a Hobby that I took up back in 1979 flourish. I just hate the fanboys on both sides it's very freaking annoying. I guess social media have just made it worst over the years. Can't wait to buy both system.
Ezz2013  +   329d ago
at least you are honest
much respect to you
i wonder why xbox fans still can't accept that
#30.3 (Edited 329d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

FanFiction Friday: Knuckles

50m ago - In light of the change from Sega superstar Sonic, Zack from the IP team has a suggestion: "It can... | Culture
30°

We Shall Wake’s Combat Is So Fast Most Physics Engines Can’t Keep Up With It

1h ago - Siliconera: We Shall Wake is a high-speed third-person sci-fi action game coming to PC “when it’... | PC
30°

Max Hall on Outpost 13, Killer Dogs, and Sci-Fi

1h ago - Greg Micek writes: "You can think of Outpost 13 as an adventure game based on the classic horror... | PC
30°

MMO Economies - How to Manage Inflation in Virtual Economies

1h ago - Every quest reward or sellable item in an MMO generates more gold that goes into the economy, cau... | Culture
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
30°

New Tales of Zestiria Famitsu Scans Give More Info On Rose And Edna and Dezel's Mystic Artes

1h ago - AbyssalChronicles: "The latest issue of Famitsu Magazine details the newly revealed character, Ro... | PS3