Top
80°

A Visual History of Call of Duty

IGN:The Call of Duty franchise is about to turn 10 years old! Take a trip through memory lane and see the series' roots.

The story is too old to be commented.
Jovanian 986d ago (Edited 986d ago )

The quality of COD was very high for the first game, second game, and the ones in between (big red one and finest hour, finest hour having one of the most epic russian campaigns I've ever played), and peaked at COD4. Unfortunately, as it started to become more and more annualized that's when the quality dropped drastically. I'm not saying CODs after COD4 are completely bad, but at the current rate they're never going to attain the quality they had from COD1-COD4

I would also like to make an amendment, and say that COD3 was erm...not as good, so that not every game from COD1-4 was good, but most were

GamerzElite986d ago (Edited 986d ago )

I can see visual improvement between MW2 and Black Ops but Not between Black Ops 2 and Ghosts. IW and Activision both claimed Ghosts is running on new next gen engine but I can't notice any kind of visual improvement.. WTF?

ambientFLIER985d ago

I've seen some screenshots that said otherwise. Just wait until you actually play it on a next gen console before getting frustrated.

WeAreLegion986d ago

1, 2, 4, and MW2 are all incredible games. Can't wait for Titanfall. ;)

Pillsbury1986d ago

Only good was was MW 1, rest are copy/Paste from it.

MRMagoo123986d ago

COD4 and world at war where by far my favs, i got bored with them from then on tho i did try them all.

Show all comments...