PS4 Exclusive Deep Down blew everyone's socks off with its Debut Gameplay, but with the recent reveal of more Gameplay we feel the new gameplay doesn't quite match. Heres the comparison.
Didn't we know the original, as you put it gameplay, video was a CGI video. I didn't think it was gameplay as it was never announced as such. It was just a typical CGI trailer (I dislike how it is such a common practice. AC series does it all the time)
Nah man it was Gameplay, they have the in game HUD and all. + i believe it was mentioned somewhere.
So i dont know where this article is coming from. Literally non hardcore gaming media blew up. It even made top list on reddit which never really cares about graphics. Forbes going nuts. and news making gifs.
it's more like comparing real-time cute scene to a gameply (not cgi) take a look at ND games all cute scene are in game-engine not CGI the deep down debut was a cute scene running in game engine and the fire effect is almost the same BTW bottom line whom ever write this has no clue maybe next time u can compare between agni's philosophy demo and Final fantasy XV
^^ Agree 100 percent. Running in game cut scene real time. Is not same as CGI. If you want real deceit, look at X1 BF4 at E3. Or Ryse at E3. Every real game play seen was never good as the E3 gameplay.
So in regular gameplay are we going to have shields that melt from fire?
Well, being as though the recent gameplay has the smoothest physics and best graphics of any console game (ever) I don't think anyone will be complaining.
Latest Gameplay had amazing graphics. Lol, if you want to laugh, just look at the article, because it IS the same game play footage, it's just the screen shot's resolution is not quite on par, but that's it. Here, look: http://n4g.com/news/1372084... http://n4g.com/news/1371800... Nah, if you REALLY want this kind of Article, compare the original Ryse E3 demo VS latest gameplay footage. The E3 one looked very much next-gen high end graphics, but the new one just looks current gen, like a glorified Wii U game in comparison. E3: http://www.youtube.com/watc... Latest Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watc... Note at the bottom of the screen: "Not actual gameplay" on the first intro.
It was target gameplay, not actual gameplay. Just because it has the HUD doesn't mean it's actual gameplay.
Game has 4 player splitscreen and is doing 1080P+60FPS all while looking simply amazing. What more could you possibly want?
Reddit doesn't care about graphics? what? I'm on Reddit...i care about graphics.
So you 'believe it was mentioned somewhere' that it was gameplay after doing a 'gameplay comparison' with no sources about that in your article? That's some serious journalism there, great in-depth research (NOT). It's a target render with a serious amount of time left in production, this game will look astonishing on release.
grfx look great, gameplay not so much. i wanna see alot more.
Black0o and GameNameFsme have it right The original debut trailer was all "IN-ENGINE", running on "Real PS4 hardware" http://www.youtube.com/watc... The models used were definitely higher in polygons but none of it was CGI. It was a situation similar to the cut-scenes in Uncharted. The actual in-game footage still look amazing, the link they posted still doesn't do it justice. Watch the 720p 60fps gamersyde videos to see how good it really looks. http://n4g.com/news/1357589... They aren't very exciting like the dragon gameplay demo but they do a great job showing off how amazing the lighting and dungeon really look, how smooth the character animations are and how accurate the hit detection is.
http://www.youtube.com/watc... Skip to 1:46 'Nuff said
Edit: I can't even joke about that. The game still looks incredible.
Why compare with a cinematic announcement trailer and then ask Sony "what's up" when it's Capcom who is developing the game? And the author completely cherry picked those last pics. We've all seen better screens and from the latest gameplay footage.
wait,so the gameplay doesn't look as good as the trailer because the camera isn't cinematic or because the graphics got a downgrade? If its the former,I don't see the issue with that..If its the latter I will have to disagree..
the GFX from the latest build looked very very Next gen to me http://i.minus.com/idbWfn65... http://i.minus.com/iAAzBwxb... http://i.minus.com/iiukY190... also this article didn't show side by side any downgrade at all....no real proof at all i really couldn't tell what different between the debut trailer and this gameplay video EDIT: @codelyoko ok where is the proof that it doesn't as good?! there is no side by side here to back him up i'm not saying there isn't downgrade nor i'm saying there is just need solid facts not just an opinion
No one is saying it doesnt look Next Gen :P what it says is that it doesnt look as good as the debut game play,
Wow!!!!!!! Those GIFS look amazing. If Deep Down wasn't on my radar already, it sure is now.
it looks amazing, i dont know how anyone can argue it... its easily one of the best looking new games coming out
The game's graphics have quickly devaluated and I now serioisly belive battlefield4/killzone SF/Driveclub/Watch_dogs/Ass4 smash it into bits.
@iamnsuperman actually it was stated by the developer, and on the trailer if I'm not mistaken, that it was all in-engine. The later gameplay vids that were revealed have the exact same graphics anyway, the only difference being that the original "cg" trailer as you called it, had more cinematic animations and camera work
This website has more sponsor shipped ads than actual article depth, story, quality. It's come to this blogisphered world we live in; were people can write, publish, toss some screen grabs of high res production shots vs half arsed pixelated, crappy off screen grabs from some gaming convention. This is to conjure some story stating teh graphics are worse than that were promised. Lets wait and see until the dam games start rolling out. Until then, they are not finalized unless stated otherwise. Well that's how I feel about it.
And the actual gameplay is 60fps too.
that's why it's downgraded, if ps4 and X1 were 100$ more expensive, it would make gfx like PC, like the first two watch dogs gameplay vids and BF4 PC Gameplay damn straight
Apparently you haven't seen this? http://www.gamersyde.com/st... Yes, it's game play and the first next gen console game to look like true next gen. The first next gen game you can say that 360 and PS3 could not do it.
This site captures videos well at 1080p at 60fps. Thumbs up, game looks amazing at 60fps.. A little off topic http://www.gamersyde.com/st... http://www.gamersyde.com/st... http://www.gamersyde.com/st...
Plenty of PS4 games that can't be done on the PS3 unless you water down the graphics and particle effects. Killzone, Watch_Dogs, and Resogun for example.
lol, so now everyone just "knew" the debut trailer was a target render? People have been saying this about Deep Down for weeks yet it was rebutted rebutted and rebutted some more. http://n4g.com/news/1350574... People were fools to really believe this - free to play - game would look like this: http://i.minus.com/ibjxCz37... But...hey. Nothing better than sitting back and watching with a smile at the end.
Blaze, yes is a F2P game. But when was announced that it will be a F2P game? A month ago, right. Off course many believed that graphics in first demo will be in final game until F2P announcement. Tell me, what is the release date of the game? Some rumour said that the release date is somewhere in late 2014. This game look pretty good for a F2P game and for a really early stage of development.
before you sit back and smile point what in the latest Gameplay don't look the same as Debut trailer because this article fail to do soo it was nothing but opinions with no solid facts nor side by side so tell those "fool" people why it's not as good ?! in full detail with facts plz also while at it tell all those "fool" people what's wrong with the latest gameplay gfx as well ?! since everyone saw the latest build said it was jaw dropping and said it's one of the very best looking next gen titles and it's 1080p /60fps as well i will wait...
for your kind in formation ac never youse to do that this deep dow looks like shit and ac is a big hit ,you fucking compaering this lame gameplay with ac franchise fuck you.
LMAO. I think you hit your head if you say AC looks better than DD. P.S: AC turned shit after 2. 3 was a HUGE let down for not only me but alot of people.
i always thought the first video was in game engine but not a cgi video. the demo looked amazing from other day . he must be a xbot and wants to defend Ryse,which was faked
Blind fanboys were still insisting it was real gameplay and even made comparisons to Ryse. How sad. -.-... this is exactly what happened with kz2 and blind fanboys get fooled once more, always forgiving.
looking at the latest bulid it still look far better than ryse as well and in 1080p with 60fps http://i.minus.com/idbWfn65... http://i.minus.com/iAAzBwxb... http://i.minus.com/iiukY190... and i dare you to point me to what different between that Debut trailer and THIS latest build gameplay with SIDE BY SIDE too because this article didn't he simply saying his opinion and didn't back it up every one who saw the gameplay is saying how the gfx are beyond incredible as for KZ2 comment E3 build (left) vs final build (right) http://i13.photobucket.com/... http://s2d1.turboimagehost.... any one who have eyes can see how much better the final build look than E3 trailer what else ?
The fact remains is that it IS in-engine, tech-demo gameplay, not CG. The original trailer contains gameplay artifacts and this was before anyone could have guessed it was an online game. So NO- no one's blind for being reasonable, and no-one's blinder than those thinking the latest Deep Down footage we've seen looks worse than Ryse. Ryse only looks impressive when things are slowed down, control is taken away and you see the animations close-up. In fact, if Ryse looks so much better than Deep Down, how does that make the original trailer shown a graphical impossibility, when it's running on more powerful hardware? And nope, this is nothing like Killzone 2 situation at all.
Nobody claimed it was gameplay. In-engine? Yes. But NOT gameplay. Not that original trailer. Keep trying, blind fanboy.
@DigitalRaptor Or maybe it is not more powerful machine? Recently there were articles about ps4 having R290 gpu inside...which is quite funny when console is only using 100wats while XO use more double of that when really stressed. MS still didnt come out with their GPU specs so I'll hold my judgement.
Well BallsEye. Of course you will hold your judgement, cause you have nothing else working in your favour and this entire coming generation will be spelling it out to you a day at a time. It's delusion here on out for you guys. The "bu-bu-bu but wait until...." argument has already disintegrated since it's been used by you guys so much, with nothing to show for it.
The trailer looks closer to a combination of CGI and real actors. Then to completely deceive the viewer, they throw in a few seconds with the weapon selection HUD. Those few seconds were clearly showing gameplay which looks far better than the latest gameplay videos out there. please, take off the blinders and just accept the fact that you got duped.
"please, take off the blinders and just accept the fact that you got duped." I clearly wasn't duped as I thought it was CGI. Some of the comment here are telling me it is in game engine (which I might have gotten wrong) but when I first say this I thought CGI because no-one said gameplay. So I could have I been duped (unless you are talking about me being duped into thinking it was CGI)
Fanboys will reject the truth...just like with killzone 2 demo back in the day.
i still see the amazing graphics that ware promised. these pro-MS press is just ridiculous cuz they know the xbox1 cant compare to the PS4 ¡¡¡¡
The hypocrites on this site just don't like to admit Sony mislead people too. It took GG 3 years, that's right, 3...to finally say the Killzone 2 reveal was a target render. This reminds me of the FFXV reveal trailer. No one seems to know that was a target render and not actual gameplay trailer.
I guess its a good thing they still have LOTS of time to work on the game then, geeze it's like it's coming out next week not next year, I'm sure when it releases it will look amazing
I can't believe what I'm reading from some of you folk in here. THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE CLAIMING THIS WAS REAL-TIME GAMEPLAY RUNNING ON THE PS4. http://n4g.com/news/1179433... http://n4g.com/news/1182688... Those articles are full of them. People did breakdowns and all kinds of mental gymnastics to confirm it was running on PS4 hardware. And then, to make matters even worst, the used the February footage in that Ryse Vs Deep Down comparison. So no. "We" didn't know the original was a "CGI" trailer. It was touted as the real deal.
Lmao. All of a sudden the original was CGI when before all the fanboys were hyping it up as if it was actual gameplay.
The gameplay looks next gen. I randomly came across the multiplayer gameplay and was honestly amazed how it looked. It's honestly on my radar from now on.
Only thing is its freemium and that can either be good or horrible.
Thank you for the comparision gaming website that's here one weekend and gone the next. I like how you compare a CGI video to actual gameplay. Real quality work there.
Why would you think it's cgi when Capcom themselves said it was running on PC?
It wasn't CGI :) it was confirmed in-engine footage. Notice the HUD in the debut trailer.
Disagrees aren't going to change the fact that it was a CGI trailer.
You're really in denial aren't you. No matter how many times you say it was CGI won't change the fact that it was realtime on PC.
No, I'm not in denial, just know the difference.
Apparently you don't since you still think it was CGI when it wasn't.
So now we're comparing what was basically a tech demo, calling it "gameplay" because it had a hud for show purposes, with actual gameplay. Yeah, I see how this comment section is gonna become fun.
I still can't believe people thought that was actually gameplay. No where did it say it was running in-engine or was gameplay. Like you said it was a tech demo.
It had a HUD bozo! When there is a HUD, they're supposed to show actual gameplay. Having a HUD over CGI is about as deceiving as you can get.
When you show an HUD and pretend its actual gameplay, then you cant get away with calling it a Tech Demo. If it was a Target Render they should have said so. -...-
these screen grabs dont do the game justice. they are really low res. download this video and you will see how great it looks http://www.gamersyde.com/le...
it was all realtime on ps4 if ps4 cant output that then lets just stay with ps3... dont see much of a difference same story with killzone 2 1st trailer.. we have games that look beter than the trailer now..
Real time and gameplay are two very different pairs of sleeves. Tech demos normally are rendered in real time. That doesn't make them gameplay. If you don't know that, you should really do some homework.
You have to admit that Killzone 2 (even if not to its reveal level) was stunning.
i think the killzone game shut alot of people up. people said it wouldnt be anything near the trailer shown. yet it was and the reveal was not gameplay. haterz gonna hate
Initially we got a trailer setting the theme of the game. Then we got an early build setting the character of the gameplay. The latest build of the gameplay (though not on par with the trailer) is a big improvement on early gameplay & I'm expecting this to be improved & developed even more. ; D
I would think it makes more sense to wait until the game is complete before making any judgement.