Rebel Gaming takes a look at the controversial topic of legends being included regularly in WWE games.
legends are the only ones i give a crap about.
If it weren't for legends I would pass!
Whats a WWE game? Seriously... What is it?
It's an awesome game that never gets the credit it deserves. (See what I did there? I spoke Americanise, seriously the first time I used that word) The same way Pokemon is prob the best Nintendo ga,e of all time, it no one plays CUZ 'it's embarrassing "
What separates wwe from fifa and nba? It's prestige. Wwe is still run by legends. They help shape tommorow. Look at the orton vs bryan match at hell in a cell. They picked 3 hall of famers. Why not 3 modern day wrestlers. Because it would be more biased and less meaningful. Wwe games is about old vs new. Rock vs dwayne Johnson, Andre vs big show so forth. The wwe universe is very critical. The last era is always better than the era now. Even your casual fan, who just watches every 2 weeks, gets excited over the word Hall of famer. That's what I love about wwe. Take away all the high tech, you can still see the difference of superstars now and superstars then. Easy to compare Morrison to hbk. Easy to compare hart vs del rio, even if you don't know what most of the moves are called.
I marked hard for my all-time favorite, Brian Pillman being included as DLC last year and this year, I'm excited for the Ultimate Warrior, Randy Savage and Big John Studd. So, yes. Yes, they do.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.