1000°
Submitted by cyguration 302d ago | rumor

Rockstar Updates Agent Trademark... For PS4?

Gaming Blend "The trademark has been updated as recent as September 10th for a publication review. That means that while Rockstar had everyone busy clamoring over Grand Theft V and all the leaked code and XML config files that came with it, they were also busy securing trademark updates and prepping to finalize logos and whatnot." (Agent, PS4)

Alternative Sources
Most likely
Is this rumor true? Rumor votes 193
« 1 2 »
Majin-vegeta  +   302d ago
E3 2014??:o
come_bom  +   302d ago
Agent and Half Life 3 will release soon. /s

Rockstar better update Agent trademark for PS5 and PS6.
#1.1 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(29) | Disagree(74) | Report | Reply
TesMgsFan  +   302d ago
What are you saying are you dumb or something ??
loulou  +   302d ago
multi-plat??
zeee  +   302d ago
It's probably gone multiplate and will release on next-gen consoles.
Edito  +   302d ago
His not dumb his just not ignoring history FF Versus took more that 6 yrs, agent is taking even more and i don't believe it will be out this gen if so it will be a multiplat game...
ZodTheRipper  +   302d ago
PS4 exclusive announcement would be the biggest thing that could happen with Agent.
Gaming101  +   302d ago
There's no reason for it to go multiplatform if Sony bought the rights you idiots. It's just in development turmoil as is the case with a ton of games these days. It would be pointless to release on PS3 unless they could finish it sometime next year, because by that point PS4 will have completely taken over people's attention span.
strifeblade  +   302d ago
@gaming101

dont call these people idiots. Look at la noire- originally ps3 exclusive and then what happened. Seems that this game may no longer be published by sony. Ask yourself when was the last time sony paid a third party to make a big exclusive? Yeah mgs4 and even that game was not secured by sony but rather technical limitations of xbox would not allow it plus kojima loved playstation but all that is changed now :) Have you not seen that sony does not pay third parties for exclusives\? they have plenty of in house studios so why should they- (thats all fanboys here brag about). Msoft is more likely than sony to secure third party exclusivesas we have seen.

I mean its rockstar who updated the trademark not sony. Now who is an idiot?
Blaze929  +   302d ago
@Gaming101

"Sony bought the rights you idiots."

You end with idiots, for a statement that isn't even slightly true...lol. Why would Take-Two interactive, yet alone Rockstar, give up an IP? Silly man, Sony doesn't own Agent and it'll likely be multiplatform.
#1.1.8 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(5) | Report
JP1369  +   302d ago
Will probably just be an updated logo.

Seriously though, I just want to see the game to know if the hype is justified. Until then, I'll keep assuming it is, as Rockstar rarely disappoints.
PlayStation_4  +   302d ago
assuming it comes out it'll likely be multiplat
-Foxtrot  +   302d ago
Not really...Rockstar still owe Sony something.
ALLWRONG  +   302d ago
Why does Rockstar owe Sony? Because you think they do?
stevehyphen  +   302d ago
Because L.A. Noire was supposed to be exclusive.

It's been said before.

It's probably in writing somewhere that Rockstar owes Sony an exclusive that they've already paid for.
ALLWRONG  +   302d ago
So... like I said because you "think" they do. Feel entitled much?
FamilyGuy  +   302d ago
@ Foxtrot

Why does Rockstar owe Sony anything, where does this idea come from?
What makes you think they couldn't just buy their way out of any exclusive deal anyway, if they haven't done so already?
Maybe that deal fell apart and that's why Agent has been in limbo for so long.

Hopefully the game just comes out at all. Would make a nice next gen intro for R*
#1.3.5 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(35) | Report
mike32UK  +   302d ago
@ALLWRONG it's pretty common knowledge that Sony helped R* to fund LA Noire, which ended up multiplat meaning that as part of the deal they had Agent would be PlayStation exclusive
porkChop  +   302d ago
@ALLWRONG

Sony poured over $20M into LA Noire before Rockstar took over the game and made it multiplat. That's why Rockstar owes Sony. Rockstar announced an untitled exclusive for PS3 which was apparently a zombie game, but that was canceled. Then they moved on to Agent as a PS3 exclusive. You can ignore the facts all you want, but that won't change anything. Deal with it.
ALLWRONG  +   302d ago
MS helped fund the dlc for GTA IV (50m) and that went multiplat. Yet no one cried about how Rockstar owed MS. Sony also had exclusive rights to Rockstar games for the PS2 while MS had to wait. So by using your logic, Rockstar owes MS. Feeling entitled to everything must be a Sony fanboy thing, because no one else does it. Sony paying money into LA Noire doesn't mean much now does it?

Now what?
#1.3.8 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(69) | Report
FamilyGuy  +   302d ago
MS (stupidly) paid for timed exclusivity, that was their choice. Rock* doesn't owe MS anything.

As far as this 20Mil thing for L.A. Noire, I'm pretty sure Rock* could pay that back and probably did pay it back long ago. Maybe they paid it back by having all these PS3 focused GTA 5 commercials? Unless Sony comes out saying that Rock* owes them there's no reason to believe any deal still exist.

Rock* makes too much money being multiplaform to make an exclusive game. As an example: GTA V cost 265 million to make, if it was only released on PS3 it would've made 600-700$ million instead of the 1.2$ billion or so it's currently at. The 265 million doesn't out way the 500 million extra gained by being multiplatform.

*Special Logical thinking Note* I say 600-700$ mill because (even though it sold more on 360 than PS3) many people own both PS3 and 360 and chose to buy it on 360. Had they not had a choice more copies would have sold on PS3 than what have currently sold.
#1.3.9 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(30) | Disagree(5) | Report
Mr_cheese  +   302d ago | Funny
@allwrong

You really did choose a perfect name.
JasonKCK  +   302d ago
He did choose a good name because he just proved you all wrong. You guys totally forgot about the money Microsoft paid Rockstar in your arguments.
#1.3.11 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(37) | Report
Killjoy3000  +   302d ago | Well said
@ALLWRONG

You sound like a sour little prick. Report me, but you do.
ricochetmg  +   302d ago
You guys are such trolls with the multi platform comments...
Pintheshadows  +   302d ago
I thought this was common knowledge.

Sony invested very heavily in LA Noire (it was a PS3 exclusive to be published by them orignally) and they handed it to R* in good faith that they would pay them back, not with cash, but with an exclusive game.

That deal is seemingly still in place and I remember Jack Tretton talking about a folder containing potential games and Sony picked Agent as they liked the concept about 6 years ago.

This isn't like Microsoft paying stupidly ott money to keep DLC exclusive. That poor choice is on MS and R* must of been laughing all the way to the bank. I'm still amazed that some on here are so misinformed.
MrBeatdown  +   302d ago
@ALLWRONG

You live up to your name.

"So by using your logic, Rockstar owes MS."

Rockstar owing MS? What a crazy, idea...

Oh wait... Rockstar DID owe MS...

http://www.edge-online.com/...
BlackTar187  +   302d ago
Allworng,

You do realize whether its changed or not at this point is another thing entirely since you're assuming that's the case without anything in the form of a sniff for your argument. At least even if not true anymore or not the opposite of what your saying is backed upped on paper right? You do also understand the difference between the Sony funding of LA Noire and the MS paying for timed exclusive GTA 4 comment right? I mean is this really that hard to understand?
Deadpoolio  +   302d ago
Uh doubt it unless Rockstar is going to make them a completely different exclusive game since they still owe Sony a game for them investing in L.A. Noire....Although maybe it will be that exclusive PS4 version of GTA5 that people keep going on about....
XabiDaChosenOne  +   302d ago
@Allwrong and JasonKCK
Microsoft did not fund the DLC genius, they paid 50 million for timed exclusivity. The dlc was a timed exclusive therefore rockstars "debt" to Microsoft is payed....time for you guys to pay attention.
JasonKCK  +   302d ago
Your arguments are so contradictory they would fit right at home in the bible. Amazing.
#1.3.19 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(8) | Report
Lykon  +   302d ago
does it matter if it's multiplat? I'm sure it will be a good game either way. Maybe slightly better FR or textures or something on PS4. I'm not going to cry if it's multiplat. I'm a sony fan boy and used to get really emotional over things like this, but not anymore. However it would be really cool if it was ps4 exclusive. I still enjoy pain for M$
Pekka  +   301d ago
I think Rockstar owes absolutely nothing to Sony anymore. Anyway, that $20M is tiny amount compared to possible losses if they only release it on PS4. Unless, of course, Agent is a huge flop. For example, GTA5 would have probably made at least $500M less money if were released exclusively on PS3 or 360. So, $20M doesn't motivate anything, it is currently so tiny amount in game business.

I believe that Agent will be released on other consoles too, just maybe few months after PS4. $20M is barely enough to secure timed exclusive, even for Agent. For GTA, even $100M wouldn't be enough to get exclusivity (you might get some smaller exclusive DLC but nothing major). Actually, just having PS3 exclusive ads would cost more than $20M for Sony in case of GTA.

You also have to remember that game business is just business. Companies only do business arrangements to get more money or to lose less money. Companies are never "friends" or "enemies" with each other (Sony makes Windows laptops and have a lot of other deals with MS too) and don't owe anything to each other unless they have made a deal. If they haven't made deal on paper, deal doesn't exist. In this, it seems that deal doesn't exist because in that case LA Noire would have already been exclusive. There is no reason to believe that deal would apply to some other game.
SouthClaw  +   302d ago
Rockstar don't go to E3. They always do their own announcements separate from everyone else. Most likely early next year announcement.
porkChop  +   302d ago
Agent was announced at E3.
Abdou023  +   302d ago
I like how people get excited about games they know nothing about, and even their companies don't give a shit for..
showtimefolks  +   302d ago
its in development we will hear about it when RS are ready plain and simple, whether its exclusive or not i loved the idea of what agent could be
Blaze929  +   302d ago
Didn't GTAV sell more copies on Xbox 360? And people think Take-Two Interactive will happily ignore that userbase as a source of income? okay.

Not even sony knows what is going on with Agent. They only talked about it once and never again lol. I'm sure if it was still exclusive, they would still be talking about it. Until that happens, there's no reason to think Agent is still a Playstation exclusive lol.

But hey, people thought that about Final Fantasy 13 vs...and Kingdom Heats 3. All because it "started" out exclusive.

And just like LA Noire, what makes you all think Take-Two won't make this game multiplatform as well and just "give" Sony yet ANOTHER exclusive? Rockstar are just the developers, Take-Two are the money talkers.

And seriously, can someone link just ONE link to where Sony or Take-Two has said something about this "we owe them a game" or "Rockstar owes us"?

..because i can't find any. ill wait
DigitalRaptor  +   301d ago
For just a moment, pretend that Microsoft isn't the only player in the ballpark that is willing to secure exclusive content for its consumers.

For instance, the 21 publishers that have signed deals for exclusive content for Sony. Rockstar is one of these publishers. http://www.vg247.com/2013/0... And these deals, like most of Sony's acquired third-party content, seems to actually be exclusive, not timed. So from this, it's not actually that difficult to imagine the same outcome here.

GTA V sold roughly 200k more on the 360 than PS3. Though, GTA V is a secured juggernaut. The security of a new IP even from Rockstar is not guaranteed to sell more on one console over the other, or even be a HUGE hit.

You have to question many things. Why was Agent exclusive to the PS3 in the first place? Where did this all come from? Why was Agent not proposed for 360 or PC? Why is that, if not a deal between Sony and Rockstar?
#1.7.1 (Edited 301d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
FunkMacNasty  +   302d ago
I Hope so! While everyone here wants to argue about whether AGent is (or should be) exclusive, I'll simply state that I JUST WANT TO PLAY IT!!!! I don't care about which console its on or if it's multiplat, or whatever, I just wnat to get my hands on it!

Just the thought of an open world 60's Spy thriller dreamed up and created by arguably the best videogame developer in business this generation makes my panties a bit wet..Can you imagine? I bet it would be like a more suave GTA with gadgets and gizmo's and multiple ways to complete missions.

Bring it Rockstar!!
#1.8 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Big_B0SS  +   301d ago
Rumor were that this game was suppose to be James Bond meets GTA.

Glad that they have atleast updated the TM.
iamnsuperman  +   302d ago
Agent is to Rockstar as Half Life 3 is to Valve. Like one big troll fest.
GiggMan  +   302d ago
Agent, Half Life 3, and Last Guardian 2014 confirmed...
Xsilver  +   302d ago
http://images.wikia.com/fri... me everytime i hear some news about those games.
#2.1.1 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(1) | Report
BabyTownFrolics  +   302d ago
i prefer calling it vaporware:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Reverent  +   302d ago
I don't fully disagree with you, but with that said, I can't agree with you either. Rockstar ALWAYS take forever to show anything of a game they are working on. I remember they announced Red Dead Redemption then took something like six years just to show it off.

I think with the PS4 just around the corner, it would be a perfectly well timed move to announce Agent for it anytime next year.
BabyTownFrolics  +   302d ago
ok...folks disagree with I prefer calling it, please tell me what do I prefer calling it since I am mistaken.

Also, Reverent I see what your saying, and thus I have just diagnosed myself synesthesia
#2.2.2 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(8) | Report
MysticStrummer  +   302d ago
Some people on here will disagree with anything, no matter how undeniable the facts are.
BG11579  +   302d ago
And yet, everyone knows they are coming. We don't know when, or much we'll wait, but their are definitely coming. And they arrive...
NextGenHorny  +   302d ago
Does it means that Rockstar will launch an Operating System for games, some gaming HW platform and a gaming controller?
pwnsause_returns  +   302d ago
AGENT:REVENGENCE
RiPPn  +   302d ago
To bad we can't still lump Duke Nukem 4 into the mix.
reko  +   302d ago
interesting.
#3 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
XboxFun  +   302d ago
Here we go again folks!

Edit:
Here we go again with these up in the air, vaporware type of games that never materialize or come 10 years too late.

"And like I told you before what if Sony still owns R* because.."

I don't think R* owes Sony anything, honestly. Money could have been traded back, deals could have been broken. Hands could have been shook and they could have went their separate ways.

If Agent is still a PS4 exclusive then right on for that. But at this point in development limbo I seriously doubt it will be.
#4 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(51) | Report | Reply
reko  +   302d ago
@xbox

here we go again folks.. trolling...

LOL!
ZHZ90  +   302d ago
Do you mean "We are going to get trolled again by R*?" or do you mean "You would like to have this game on X1."?

If you mean the 1st choice well I hope not and they announce a realse date as soon as possible and show us a gameplay.
If it's the 2nd choice well have you even seen a gameplay in action? What if it is bad?
And like I told you before what if Sony still owns R* because Sony also funded LA Nore. I remember you told me that maybe R* gave Sony's money back but what if not?

Don't give me FF Versus XIII(aka FFXV) excuse because Sony didn't funded FFXV at all that's why SE didn't had any problem at all to make FFXV multiplat but you see Deep Down being exclusive to PS4 because Sony funded it or just like DR3 is X1 exclusive because MS funded it.
#4.2 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
-Foxtrot  +   302d ago
The only way Rockstar don't owe Sony something (WHICH THEY DO) is if Rockstar gave Sony the money back they spent on L.A Noires development.

It's a deal...you stick to it.
FamilyGuy  +   302d ago
R* has a lot of money and with GTAVs recent release just got a ton more. They probably gave that money back long ago and if they didn't they surely would by now.

Stop being delusional, R* doesn't need money from Sony to make a game and their profits would be much higher from going multi. Unless Sony pays for 100% of the development cost I don't see R* making any exclusive.
-Foxtrot  +   302d ago
If they did then Jack Trentton would of said so when asked about AGENT. Its a simple yes or no question.

How am I being delusional, your the one being delusional because they did IN FACT do this deal with Sony

You funded L.A Noire (which wasn't directly made by Rockstar) but we would like you to allow the game to go multiplatform and in return we will make AGENT an exclusive PS3 game

...thats how it most likely went, thats not being delsuional, it's fact.
FamilyGuy  +   302d ago
The part that's "delusional" is thinking that Rockstar couldn't just give the money back to Sony and make even more money from being multiplaform.

I do understand what you're saying though. Agent may well be exclusive and maybe that's why R* is dragging their feet on making it. If it does come out as an exclusive it'd be a great system seller based off of R*s fame alone.
As far as Jack Trenton saying anything about it: did he use the word "exclusive" the last time he spoke about it? How long ago was this?

I'm buying a PS4 day 1, it's not like it want it to be multi, I don't care just as long as it comes out on PS3 or PS4. All I'm saying is that a broken deal makes sense more than them honoring that deal. They didn't honor the deal for L.A. Noire so why trust them now?
#4.3.3 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(10) | Report
BlackTar187  +   302d ago
Family guy,

The delusional part is assuming your story completely. At least these people saying the opposite have some sort of factual evidence to back it up. With you and allwrong you are basically just assuming everything in it's entirety. The delusional ones are the ones that's entire argument is based on assumption.
MysticStrummer  +   302d ago
"Stop being delusional, R* doesn't need money from Sony to make a game"

They made LA Noire and Sony helped them. Case closed. Yes, they could theoretically pay Sony back with cash instead of an exclusive, but you're assuming more than the people you're calling delusional.
FamilyGuy  +   302d ago
It's just a logical opinion. I'm not saying/assuming that the deal no longer exist, just giving out thoughts on the possible outcome.

I guess I just tend to think of negative outcomes because I don't like to be disappointed.
maniacmayhem  +   302d ago
"They made LA Noire and Sony helped them."

And LA Noire went multiplatform so how does this help your argument.

I find it extremely funny that no one is willing to believe that Rocksta doesn't owe Sony a thing but instead choose to believe that they still do.

Jack Tretton even stated years ago that he had no idea about the state of Agent so why would anyone still believe that it's exclusive or even still a project in development?

I think it's even more delusional to believe that Rockstar is in some kind of mafia like debt to Sony.

@Foxtrot
"...thats how it most likely went, thats not being delsuional, it's fact."

What!? You state that's how it most likely went, meaning you don't even know yourself. But in the same sentence you write it's a fact?

That makes absolutely no sense at all. It's not a fact because no one knows what deal is in place or if there is even a deal still.

That is extreme delusion by the way.
#4.3.7 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(10) | Report
snp  +   302d ago
I don't know what the deal is beyond what i'm reading here, but assuming it's true, it stands to reason there would be more to it than simply 'paying the money back'. 20 million years ago would have almost entirely funded a huge game. Nowadays it's relatively paltry versus budgets.

It would be disingenuous to just give back that money in place of a game - if a game were promised back then - with budgets to create a reasonable alternative where they are now. If they were to simply 'give back' the money common sense says they'd be in larger debt than simply 20 million. It would have to be some sort of 'market equivalency' number; and quite possibly factoring in roi from what LA Noire's revenue, via Sonys funding, opened up (if Rockstar were to welsh.)
#4.3.8 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report
nunley33  +   302d ago
wishful thinking,don't get your hopes up though. i'm sure sony would rather have the game.rockstar needs another franchise they can sell in-between gta titles.
#4.4 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Deadpoolio  +   302d ago
Oh jesus here we go again with the morons......RockSTAR not asterisk owes Sony because Sony dumped 20 million into the development of L.A. Noire, not timed exclusivity like Micro$haft with the GTA 4 DLC....

Which is WHY the Agent has been a Sony exclusive....Which typically means either Sony will want that 20 million back, GTA5 exclusive for PS4 or the Agent....
WitWolfy  +   302d ago
Maybe Sony considered it to be even when they released the GTA IV DLC on PS3.. Remember the game MS financed R* to make?
kenshiro100  +   302d ago
Give it a rest. Seriously.
ziggurcat  +   302d ago
yes!
harrisk954  +   302d ago
I was just thinking about this game... it has never been "officially" cancelled... Perhaps, R* needed next gen tech to do what they wanted with the game. Of course, this could also mean that it is no longer an exclusive to Sony's platform and if it is made, may be on XB1 as well. But, who the heck knows. We may never see this game at retail. What I am really looking forward to is a next gen sequel to Red Dead!!
PLASTICA-MAN  +   302d ago
The deal is still going with Sony, Rockstar signed a deal with Sony to have an exclusive game, it started with L.A Noire then went to Agent. Whether Agent stays an exclusive or becomes multiplatform, the deal was cancelled and is still going.
#6.1 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
harrisk954  +   302d ago
@PLASTICA-MAN

Yeah... I am not disagreeing with you at all. I remember reading about the deal between Sony and R*... but, depending on the contract, it could have been related to the PS3. If Agent becomes a "next gen" game, then it is very possible that the terms of the contract end up void. Plus, the original contract may have been negotiated before the PS4 was even in development, which creates even more of a question about exclusivity going forward. If I remember correctly, Assassins' Creed was originally announced as a PS3 exclusive and we know what happened there.

I really hope that Agent is made and that it is a Sony exclusive. In my opinion, an exclusive title always utilizes the strength of whatever system it is developed for and multi-plats need to cater to the least common denominator, or at least use more generic engines that can be adapted to any platform. We know that (at least on paper), the PS4 appears to be more powerful than the XB1, so it would be awesome to see what a quality developer like R* can do with the PS4 to push it's limits.
#6.1.1 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report
BlackTar187  +   302d ago
Harrisk,

but, depending on the contract, it could have been related to the PS3. If Agent becomes a "next gen" game, then it is very possible that the terms of the contract end up void.

Pretty sure R* wouldn't be able to snowball the contract like that at the very minimum. I do think other things are possible and do believe it will be Multi.
CaptainPunch  +   302d ago
I wish developers never announced games so early, I realize it builds hype - but waiting an entire gen is ridiculous. *cough* Final Fantasy Versus 13 *cough*.
TheRealHeisenberg  +   302d ago
Come on R*. Can we get some real information concerning this game? Is it still happening? Platforms? The wait is killing me.
qzp  +   302d ago
rockstar never says shit
Deadpoolio  +   302d ago
Who is Rock*? I've heard of RockSTAR but I've never heard of Rock Asterisk. Not sure why people keep using Rock* cause an asterisk and a star are completely different
Deep-throat  +   302d ago
Hopefully it's only for XBOX ONE.

*troll face*
IHassounah  +   302d ago
If that will become a true statement then Sony just lost Rockstar Games
KwietStorm  +   302d ago
Snake face.
torchic  +   302d ago
the day I have Agent, The Last Guardian and Final Fantasy XV in my hands at the same time, it will be a historical day
chrissx  +   302d ago
Lil bird says this agent is still in the works and will be officially announced eventually. And no I don't mean u @torchic lol. The future for Ps4 so bright I gotta kip my shades on
#11 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
xKugo  +   302d ago
Cool if it's actually coming to PS4.
Games people purchasing a PS4 can look forward to in 2014:
FFXIV
Possibly Agent
Possibly Last Guardian
Infamous: Second Son
The Order: 1886

Looking good so far for PlayStation, but that's to be expected I guess.
Campy da Camper  +   302d ago
Sony should make this a release day game for ps4 through PLUS. Can you imagine what the internet would do? All they have to do is give the 50 bucks from people signing up to rockstar and then they know after a year most would renew.

Just imagine: Agent as Decembers free game on PLUS.
#13 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
I'm sure it will be for PS4. Companies like Square-Enix & Rockstar love to bait & switch their consumers as does Sony. When Microsoft announces at a conference that there will be a game on the 360 you can damn well count on it to be on the 360 and not be delayed 5-10 years just for it to be canceled and released on their next console. Microsoft actually sticks to their announcements unlike Sony.
ZHZ90  +   302d ago
"When Microsoft announces at a conference that there will be a game on the 360 you can damn well count on it to be on the 360 and not be delayed 5-10 years just for it to be canceled and released on their next console. Microsoft actually sticks to their announcements unlike Sony."

What about Ryse and DR3, these 2 titles were suppossed to be on X360 not X1, and if Sony did the same we would've seen games like TLOU on PS4 instead of PS3.
#14.1 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(21) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
noctis_lumia  +   302d ago
why do you even waste a bubble to comment this idiot dante troller lol
WeAreLegion  +   302d ago
Too Human?
Minato-Namikaze  +   302d ago
When was the last time MS announce a non Kinect title that wasn't halo, forza, gears, or fable? Its easy to stick to announcements when you don't announce anything.
MrBeatdown  +   302d ago
Like Ryse and Crimson Dragon?
#14.4 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
ziggurcat  +   302d ago
"Microsoft actually sticks to their announcements unlike Sony."

all of MS's policies from the xbone reveal say, "hi."
TheOneEyedHound  +   302d ago
Aaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Rare?
brew  +   302d ago
Funniest thing I've read so far today , lol.
GraveLord  +   302d ago
I say this being PS4 exclusive is extremely unlikely at this point. Even Final Fantasy Versus XIII went multiplatform and Japanese devs are supposed to be loyal!
ZHZ90  +   302d ago
I gave you a disagree even though I am getting FFXV(And also KH3 and MGSV) on PS4, if Sony payed/funded a game like FFXV yeah ok but Sony didn't paid them so why would SE be loyal? SE is a 3rd Party not a 2nd/1st Party to Sony.

And since you are getting these games on your console of choice why bother this game is exclusive or multiplat?(I am really curious about this)
(This goes to PS fans that are bothered about FFXV, MGSV and KH3 being multiplat and goes to Xbox fans being bothered whenever a PS fan asks for Titanfall to be on PS4/PS3 because seriouly tbh exclusives are bad for consumers)
#15.1 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
noctis_lumia  +   302d ago
make kinda sense for mgsv and FF to be mutlipalt but KH3 plz lol that game should be sony exclu

new comers who will buy a xbox one and get kh3 wont have a single clue about the story
Minato-Namikaze  +   302d ago
Because we fear that the games quality will be lowered or some unwanted changes to the franchise will happen to appease western gamers. Just look at some of the changes already announced for MGSV.
Myze  +   302d ago
With the way the SE engine for FFXV and KH3 works, it's not really much more effort to release the game multi-platform than it is to make it exclusive. The games are made on the PC and transferred to the respective console.

I don't expect FFXV (or KH3) to be as good on the xbone simply because I don't see SE spending the effort to optimize (what little they can) specifically for a system they know is not gonna sell a ton of copies. Think FFXIII. Again, though, doesn't mean it won't be easy to still make a profit on the game for the xbone (since it's basically just all bonus sales), even though they know about 80% of the sales (especially KH3) will come from the ps4.

As for MGSV, I could see it doing a lot better in comparison. The ps4 will still receive most of the sales (probably like 95% of Japanese sales), but I could see the xbone doing a couple million, at least (and about 4-5 mil on ps4).
#15.1.3 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report
jony_dols  +   302d ago
GraveLord: Sony part-funded L.A Noire & as part of the deal (when Rockstar bought out Team Bondi) was to make an exclusive Sony title to compensate for L.A noire going multiplatform.

That game was Agent; so unless Rockstar paid Sony a lump-sum, then the game (or whatever new IP they are developing instead) is exclusive to a Sony platform.
#15.2 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
EXVirtual  +   302d ago
Sony didn't fund FFXV. I'm just saying. You don't really need to worry anyway, as it'll sell way more on the PS4. So much so that FFXV-2 will probably BE an exclusive.
I'm not really bothered about it. At least we're getting the game. Third part exclusives are good and all, but I'd rather see Square go multiplatform with that game and KH3 than lose any money. Like I said, they're bound to going back to being PS4 exclusives anyway.

OT: Agent for the PS4 would be great! I'm not 100% whether or not they'll make it an exclusives though.
#15.3 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
pyramidshead  +   302d ago
Interesting.
MurerDk  +   302d ago
Just a little note: In the iFruit Phone app for Gta5 under your profile > games There is also a icon of (AGENT - coming soon) between other Rockstar games.
MurerDk  +   302d ago
Disagree?! Log in on IFruit app > social club > games > button left > AGENT ~ coming soon.
BlindMango  +   301d ago
As far as I remember, Agent (coming soon) has been in the games section of the social club for probably about a year now, so I guess it's basically the same thing that you're talking about since iFruit is basically a social club service
OmegaShen  +   302d ago
This isn't a shock, I think any games we didn't hear about for along time that were set for PS3. Will come to PS4, or they can do it on both.

Anyways, hope it is true.
DOMination-  +   302d ago
Like.. WarDevil?
Myze  +   302d ago
Well, WarDevil was officially cancelled about three years ago, so I don't think it would fall into the same category.

Honestly though, the only impressive thing about the game back then was that it was supposedly gonna run at 1080p and 60fps on the ps3. The art direction and gameplay described were never all that impressive, and that resolution and framerate wouldn't be anything special on the ps4.
#18.1.1 (Edited 302d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report
JuniorCE  +   302d ago
Another exclusive PS4 game ;-)
solidt12  +   302d ago
Now that GTA V is out they can focus on Agent. I am sure we will hear something about it by the end of the year. Maybe at the Spike video game awards.
Xtremist  +   302d ago
Another big game for ps4?
It seems that about 40% of the high profile games of this generation are going to be ps4 exclusives...
ricochetmg  +   302d ago
what an odd number....to pull outta no where
waltyftm  +   302d ago
Non gimped GTA, yes please.
MultiConsoleGamer  +   302d ago
No.

Click bait.
T2  +   302d ago
they should just release agent 2 at this point and blow everyones' mind, and be like "what? you missed the first one??" LOL
Sarobi  +   302d ago
I WANT TO BELIEVE.
xxxGEOxxx  +   302d ago
If it's true, and it turns out that Agent will be on next gen, and the exclusive that Rockstar has promised Sony, then I think it would have been worth the wait.

They have a good track record, so I don't mind giving them the benefit of the doubt.
SevenSwords485  +   302d ago
We can hope...
josephayal  +   302d ago
PS4 and XBOX One, cannut W8
stonecold3  +   302d ago
I heard some people say all that microsoft got the dlc of gta 4 first and in exchange for the agent to be exclusive for the ps3 and Microsoft help funded it for the ps3 any way I hope it stays on ps4 .
Pinkdolphinyfg  +   302d ago
Who is this "i heard from these people" everybody on this forum talking about? Any concrete evidence?
Pinkdolphinyfg  +   302d ago
Gta v cost 200 million+ to make. I highly highly highly doubt R* would make the game exlusive to either platforms. Being owed 20 million dollars to (supposedly, no real concrete evidence to begin with) is not a valid argument to keep the game exclusive at all and is quite frankly a fanboys wishful thinking. Hmmmm which do i choose keep the 20 million and keep the game exclusive and make 500 million or pay back the 20 million and make 1 billion through 2 consoles. Its pretty obvious cant believe people still believe in crap like this. You cant either expect Agent to retain the scope or quality of a Game like gta with 1/10th of the budget lets be serious guys.
Sarobi  +   302d ago
Well I mean.. you never know. While I do believe it'll be multiplatform (if it ever releases, that is), I wouldn't be too surprised if it remained exclusive after all this time.
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

The Sims 4: Making your sims "3D on the inside"

13m ago - GRTV caught up with associate producer Azure Bowie-Hankins to learn more about the work that goes... | PC
40°

Early Access is No Different Than Games Released on Time

51m ago - As we waltz into 2015, it seems that 2014 is shaping up to be known as the year of Early Access w... | Industry
30°

Sharknado: The Video Game Review | GIZORAMA

51m ago - Daniel Kurland, GIZORAMA - "It’s a feeling unlike anything else. Those moments where you play a p... | iPhone
40°

Watch And Learn How To Complete Oddworld: Abe's Odyssey In Record Time

1h ago - Just Add Water has recently released its superb reimagining of the PlayStation hit Oddworld: Abe'... | Retro
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
30°

All You Need Are Guns And Panties To Take Out Tanks In Bullet Girls

1h ago - In Bullet Girls, D3 Publisher and Shade’s upcoming action shooting game, you’ll play as high scho... | PS Vita