Approvals 6/3 ▼
The_Game21x (2) - 3889d ago Cancel
Anon1974 (2) - 3889d ago Cancel
darklordzor (2) - 3889d ago Cancel
160°

Microsoft points to all-in-one nature of Xbox One in price debate

"Price is important. There's no doubt about that."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Wrong story type
Should be Article
cl19833889d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3889d ago
ABeastNamedTariq3889d ago

But the PS4 is just as "All-in-one". It's just not the forefront/selling point of the system. Games are.

Stuntz3889d ago

sadly PS4 is apparently for games but X1 is demolishing them in the game department lol.

Quicktopick3889d ago

demolishing? keep dreaming bro

porkChop3889d ago

Oh, really? And how do you figure that? The launch exclusives are completely different for the most part and really can't be compared due to different styles and genres. Neither launch is better than the other, they're too different with the exception of the multiplats which are obviously on both.

VforVideogames3889d ago

Now that's a lie, the XBOX-1 has the best launch games line up ever, so yes XBOX-1 its crushing the ps4 on the games department.

SCW19823889d ago

Wow some people. You are literally taking it up the backside for a company who abandoned you in the games department 3 years ago. Meanwhile we are playing last of Us we will be playing beyond two souls, puppeteer, gran turismo, and ratchet and clank all on our PS3. Than lets not even mention the fact that Sony doesn't have to blow there load all in one sitting. We have games right now, we will have more games in the future and our exclusives will continue to win GOTY while you bend over to a company that has abandoned you with two consoles and will abandon you in the future. You should try standing up for yourself instead of being Microsofts personal doormat labeled bitch.

TheSsus3888d ago

How so? Honestly, can you provide a serious answer? Try to not look like a moron though...

AzureskyZ3888d ago

I hope you arent talking about titanfall cause thats the only worth while title i saw on xbox one and its not even launching with the system.

* I hated Dead rising 2 so 3 isnt even on my radar
* Ryse looks dumb as hell
* Forza is cool though-- i enjoy car games so 1
* Killer instinct is being developed by double helix plus its f2p model... ugh why.
so yeah 1 game i would buy at launch...
ps4 exclusives has
* Drive Club -- look at Forza .. enjoy car games
* Killzone besides titan fall it was the next best looking fps and its a launch title.
* Knack ... ill pass
*War Thunder looks pretty good but not sure about f2p model on it.
*Blacklight looks good but once again F2P
--- I would say the launch is about even maybe a little tilt to the ps4 side... besides i dont have to purchase a spycam if i dont want it.. 100 bucks less to boot.

HammadTheBeast3888d ago

Titanfall is the only appealing game I've seen so far, it's not even launch though.

Meanwhile, we have Knack, Driveclub, KZ:Shadowfall, (Planetside 2, Blacklight, F2P etc.), indies (tons of major ones, including Resogun, RIME etc), AND what people are forgetting, INFAMOUS IS LAUNCH WINDOW, SO EARLY NEXT YEAR.

BOOOM.

RyuCloudStrife3888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Please do tell more oh wise one! And please do pass the joint, please!!

NateCole3888d ago

Yeah like the x360 demolishing the PS3 right?. lol!

MysticStrummer3888d ago

"Now that's a lie, the XBOX-1 has the best launch games line up ever, so yes XBOX-1 its crushing the ps4 on the games department."

Who has the best games is subjective.

The lie is this "All in One" marketing BS. It can't possibly be all in one if you have to attach another device, such as a cable box.

WrAiTh Sp3cTr33888d ago

Hammad, you say the only interesting game for XB1 is Titanfall and then you sound off with Knack? Please GTFO...

kenshiro1003888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Please tell me that's sarcasm. The last thing I heard, Sony made Microsoft look like amateurs since E3 and their press conference.

And WrAiTh Sp3cTr3, you didn't exactly give an argument to refute what Hammad just said. Why tell him to gtfo when you can't even come up with an intelligent debate?

Guess what? I think Titanfall and Killer Instinct are interesting but Microsoft still hasn't convinced me to get their next gen console. If anything, Sony's making all the right moves so I'm going with the PS4 first.

WrAiTh Sp3cTr33888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Why would I have to? The only thing I feed a troll is a good 'ol dose of GTFO. When I come into a Xbox article I don't want to hear or see anything about another console. Anyone bringing up another console is just showing their insecurities.

solidjun53888d ago

I'm noticing an increasing in these "new accounts" for the purpose of trolling.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3888d ago
Stuntz3889d ago

pleas enlighten me you literally only have infamous.. X1 DR3, TitanFall, Quantum Break, Halo, Ryse, Project Spark, KI, please tell me what they have compared in games? Ill wait for a few to laugh at your responses.. o yea i forgot you got indies that nobody cares about lol

Whitey2k3889d ago

U fool same crap with god of war clone driveclub that looks better then forza and a few games that runs 1080 60fps that hasnt got bake lighting and for that natter whats going to happen after the launch same crappy timed dlc

ABeastNamedTariq3889d ago (Edited 3889d ago )

You be trollin, lol. But I'll bite.

"pleas enlighten me you literally only have infamous.. X1 DR3, TitanFall, Quantum Break, Halo, Ryse, Project Spark, KI, please tell me what they have compared in games?"

You're friggin silly, just because MS announced their entire game lineup for the first year, while Sony has barely begun to, does not mean they have no games.

I'm glad you can pretend that Naughty Dog, Sony Santa Monica, Quantic Dream, MM, Team Ico, Ready at Dawn (who is making The Order, one of the best looking next gen games, like damn it looks like CGI), and more don't exist. Live in your bubble and cover your ears, because when Sony drops bombs, they're megatons.

porkChop3889d ago (Edited 3889d ago )

Titanfall, Quantum Break, Halo, and Project Spark are not launch titles. They won't be out until later next year. Project Spark and Titanfall aren't even Xbox One exclusives considering both will also be available on 360, and PC as well for Titanfall. It's pretty sad when you have to pad your "exclusives" list with multiplat games.

Nice try though.

AzureskyZ3888d ago

Well if you gonna bring out titles thats not releasing at launch yet--- lets look at the possibilities-- Naughty dog next gen title,Infamous, Quantic dream next title, level 5 jrpg, killzone, santa monica title, order 1886, Gran turismo, everquest, Maybe Team ICO title, media molecule title, driveclub---- plus francises that could be continuing next gen...uncharted, god of war, tlou, mlb the show... i could play this game too. Out of the xbox games titanfall is the best but then again it will eventually release on ps, besides i can play on my pc.

Clarence3888d ago

Half the games you named aren't even release titles. Please enlighten me when the release date is for these games. Please enlighten me when the Xbox 1 will be released.

Deadpoolio3888d ago

LOL why the hell are you naming games that aren't even launch titles...Halo is probably 2015...There was literally nothing but a cgi made, quantum break is summer or fall 2014 and Titanfall again is summer 2014.....You literally have 4 games....DR3 at 15fps, Ki with Pay model, Ryse lol a upscaled Kinect game and Forza an incomplete have to download half your game...LOL keep dreaming that it has a better launch line up

kenshiro1003888d ago

Did you just say that Sony only has Infamous? Wow, you're on a roll with that sarcasm./s

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3888d ago
Stuntz3889d ago

o and i also forgot to mention Forza, ALSO XBL compared to PSN/PS+ is comparing a buick to a lambo. I had a PS3 and 360 PSN blows, Downloads take way longer, online play sucks, Also XBL is gonna be running 300,00 servers while PSN is what 15,000? what a joke

porkChop3889d ago

300,000 virtual servers means jack shit. I can run 10,000 virtual servers off of my PC and guess what? They'd all be horrible. When/if Microsoft announces how many PHYSICAL servers they have, you come let me know.

HammadTheBeast3888d ago

MS owns 300 k servers. You must be a retard to believe they'll let the Xbox division alone use all of them.

I'm guessing 50 k Max for Xbox division, Windows probably needs 100 k on it's own, BING probably needs some, and then the rest of the shit MS has.

AzureskyZ3888d ago

Yeah lets pretend you actually have a ps3 and know what your are talking about <not>--- the joke is you dude-- apparently you and other morons here think 300k servers is only for gaming-- news flash its for all ms products that uses cloud-- as one already said virtualization is a huge chunk and mesh topology for enterprise level redundancy is also gonna take a chunk-- you know that sony purchased a specialized clouding service company to support gaming and other apps as well-- ms is late to cloud game not the other way around dumbass.

Deadpoolio3888d ago

LMAO you know those servers are shared with EVERY windows device right...Not just XBL so minus a chunk for Windows 8 a chunk for Games for Windows, a chunk for the marketplace...

And they have already stated several times NOT every game will have dedicated servers the publishers have to pay for them

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3888d ago
JokesOnYou3888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Yep X1 has the best games, best online with dedicated servers/cloud, best online community with live improved matching making and player feedback ratings, now the best in game points system which micro introduced with 360 achievements are even better with new rewards system, best controller with wifi direct/rumble triggers, best headset with improved sound quality included in the box, PLUS most advanced motion camera that retails for $400 standalone included in the box AND it has the best media integration with HDMI IN and the 3 OS design so that you can snap back and forth quickly between gaming and tv/media, ability for any X1 to become a dev kit/self publish= All In One and so its easily the best value.

So with all this gaming greatness plus micros ability to continue to adapt and improve a already superb console and deep pockets to bring hot devs over to Xbox its a bright future for X1.

Xbox One Day One...I feel like a kid waiting for Christmas again.

stuna13888d ago

Only to find out when you wake up, and go downstairs to open your presents, that the grinch has already been there!

The games, the features, and the hardware are all subjective dependant on each gamers taste.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3888d ago
matrixman923889d ago

i miss microsoft points...they occasionally went on sale, real currency does not

porkChop3889d ago

But it isn't all-in-one. If you want to use the TV features you have to have a cable box plugged in through HDMI. The console needs other devices plugged into it in order to use all of its features. Hell, Kinect isn't even built in, it needs a separate cable plugged in.

AceBlazer133889d ago

lol my tv is all in one. it can play ps3,pc,360,...etc so long as i plug them in

HammadTheBeast3888d ago

Also, 90% of HD TV's have more than 2 HDMI ports. So TV's are all-in-one aleady.

Deadpoolio3888d ago

And knowing they had a 55% failure rate with the 360 and the rumors that the One80 is having the same sort of problem with the eSRAM frying the console, what moron would actually leave their One80 on while they watched Tv LOL...Thats basically leaving your heatbox on 24/7

Enemy3889d ago

It is all in one. All in one terrible console.

CrimsonStar3888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

Dude wtf happened to you ? You used to be some what of an unbiased commenter , and now you're just going full on fanboy. Its pathetic . Maybe your next post will have some structured criticism or valid points , rather than just childish anti MS accusations .

sincitysir13888d ago

Don't be upset that's he's your enemy now! See what i did there? ;)

Hicken3888d ago

You know, after a while, people get tired of having well-structured criticisms, only to be called fanboys who are just looking for something to complain about and never had any interest in buying anyway.

There's only so much of that you can deal with before you just say "Screw it, Microsoft sucks."

And painfully few of the MS supporters come back with valid points. At best, they give Microsoft an advantage subjectively(which is a wash, since the same can be said on both sides), and disregard all the OBJECTIVE advantages Sony has. Or they bring up financials and net worth, as if every penny Microsoft makes will be available to the Xbox division.

Show all comments (53)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community6h ago
70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community6h ago
190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7h ago
-Foxtrot12h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke196h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke192h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot16m ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf4h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor5h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave4h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor2h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot12m ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke192h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai4h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris4h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (21)