60°
Submitted by MsMcClever 422d ago | opinion piece

Super Smash Bros. Brawl vs. PlayStation All-Stars: It's Not That One-Sided

In 1999, Nintendo released a game that would define a genre: Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 64. The game pit classic Nintendo characters against each other in timed or stock death matches, but didn't follow the complicated combo structure of fighting games such as Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat. Since then, Super Smash Bros. has owned the genre of console fighting games and has become a staple for each generation of Nintendo consoles. Then in 2012, Sony attempted to copy Nintendo's model with PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale. Which is worth your time? The answer is obvious, though the winner isn't perfect either. (PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale, PS3, Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Wii)

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Three game developers reminisce on the man that gave indies a spot with Nintendo

4m ago - NE: "As sort of a tribute to these developers, this nice man, and the games that they, together,... | Wii
10°

NBA Live's executive producer on the future of the series: 'Guaranteed'

4m ago - The case for NBA Live, the series, is also the case against NBA Live 15, the game hitting stores... | Xbox 360
10°

Video Games and Philosophy

4m ago - Matthew Beard explores the philosophy evident in modern games and writes "Not many people cite... | Culture

Euro Gaming Expo - The Interviews - Nerdgenious

4m ago - Michael Burhan Celebrates the Independents by interviewing some of the core talent in independent... | Dev
Ad

iCreditCardNow.com

Now - Quickly locate just the right card for you. | Promoted post
30°

Pro Vs Anti GamerGate – Two Interviews

5m ago - Mangotron believes in peace and love between all. It does not promote aggression or hatred. It al... | Culture