60°
Submitted by MsMcClever 679d ago | opinion piece

Super Smash Bros. Brawl vs. PlayStation All-Stars: It's Not That One-Sided

In 1999, Nintendo released a game that would define a genre: Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 64. The game pit classic Nintendo characters against each other in timed or stock death matches, but didn't follow the complicated combo structure of fighting games such as Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat. Since then, Super Smash Bros. has owned the genre of console fighting games and has become a staple for each generation of Nintendo consoles. Then in 2012, Sony attempted to copy Nintendo's model with PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale. Which is worth your time? The answer is obvious, though the winner isn't perfect either. (PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale, PS3, Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Wii)

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Quiplash Review (Video Chums)

4m ago - Review for Quiplash on PlayStation 4, PlayStation 3, and Xbox One. You can now officially prove t... | PC
40°

Kill Strain Reimagines Competitive Play | VGChartz Preview

4m ago - VGChartz's Nick Pantazis: "One of the most promising things I saw early on in this generation was... | PS4
Ad

Bulbapedia

Now - The community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. | Promoted post
40°

Xbox One Streaming to Windows 10 is Awesome | VGN

4m ago - A demonstration of a new feature coming to Xbox One and Windows 10. See how well streaming games... | PC
30°

Prototype PSX Controller DTL-H500C

4m ago - This prototype PSX controller is from after Nintendo and Sony's breakup, but a similar model was... | Industry
20°

Legends of Eisenwald Gets Approval From Heroes Of Might & Magic Fans

4m ago - One Angry Gamer "Aterdux Entertainment’s Legends of Eisenwald has finally launched on Steam after... | PC