Crysis 3's Development Was 15 Months Shorter Than Crysis 2's, Up To 2X More Lights Used On The PC

DSOGaming writes: "During GDC Europe 2013, Pierre Donzallaz talked about the lighting techniques that have been used in Crysis 3, and shared some screenshots, showcasing what Crytek’s artists have achieved. During his presentation, though, Donzallaz revealed some interesting information about the development of the game and the lighting difference between the PC and the console versions."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
Pain_Killer1736d ago

CRYSIS 3 without a doubt looked amazing given the time i took for its development, it was short for sure but its story was an improvement over CRYSIS 2.

die_fiend1736d ago

What story? This game had a story?

starchild1735d ago

Yes, it had a story, quit being facetious. The story was just as good as in most shooters, unless you think Killzone, Gears of War and COD are amazing examples of well-developed narratives.

Only story-driven FPS like Half Life 2 and Bioshock Infinite have clearly better narratives.

Anyway, Crysis 3 was an improvement over Crysis 2 in my book. And the visuals are truly astounding. It still looks better than any next gen console shooter I have seen.

SlavisH21736d ago

i would love a next gen release of the series!

Moncole1736d ago

Just play the PC version.

1736d ago
Kurylo3d1735d ago

I think his point was that the pc version is already next gen. lol No need to wait. Dont take offense .. he didnt bash the consoles lol

Baka-akaB1736d ago

Then they should have spent 15 more months onto it , over releasing some hybrid between C1 and C that is only superior to the mediocre C2 .

1736d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (19)