60°
Submitted by Filthcardia 584d ago | opinion piece

Can “Alternative” Games Journalism Exist?

Why can’t a secondary form of gaming journalism, if you would call it that, ever take hold with audiences? (Culture)

ifritAlkhemyst  +   584d ago
I don't think this is entirely necessary. What needs to be established is an agreed upon reviewer criteria for each journalist or website. A publisher press release will only take a review so far. Most reviews and previews I see today give only the most cursory mention of the actual gameplay mechanics. They tend to mention it in a paragraph, then ending that paragraph with "it was fun or it wasn't". The rest is usually some discourse on the games narrative or storyline.

I understand that sort of detail is going to turn off your average reader, who doesn't care about that stuff and more or less represents the bottom line of those websites, but you could always segregate the reviews into a more objective score and a more subjective score for those interested.

Then again, most games journalists are just journalists that occasionally play video games. The difference between them and say, film journalists, is that film journalists normally understand the history of their hobby. Game journalists tend to be ignorant of anything earlier than your popular SNES games and show almost zero knowledge of PC gaming that isn't a well-established franchise.
Filthcardia  +   584d ago
I don't think the question to consider about alternative gaming journalism is if it's a necessity. It can coexist with the established gaming media as a separate form of expressing feeling and emotion in a game.
iceman06  +   584d ago
I think that you hit on a point when you said "hen again, most games journalists are just journalists that occasionally play video games." that could relate to what the article is saying. It would be interesting to see what a true games journalist could do with expanding the dialog of not just a number scale or a cursory comparison. It will open them up to a lot more criticism. But, how is that a bad thing? This could require games journalists to actually do their due diligence, as opposed to some of the lazy efforts that we get at this point. I wouldn't argue against an established reviewer process, but I think that this "alternative" could co-exist alongside traditional reviews, previews, and press release information.
Blank  +   584d ago
Im going off topic to say dorito man! On the article pic! What a tool.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

First Hour Weekly: EP. 1 (3-28-15)

1h ago - The Best PS4 Exclusive Meets The Worst PS4 Exclusive On This Premiere Episode Of First Hour Weekly! | PS4
20°

Flop Rocket Review | Games Reviewer

1h ago - Games Reviewer reviews Flop Rocket from Butterscotch Shenanigans. It is an original endless runne... | iPhone
Ad

See what games are coming out in 2015

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2015. | Promoted post
30°

Bloodborne Diaries Part 1 - Cobblestone Lives

1h ago - The firs part in Clipping Error's written let's play series for Bloodborne, following the movemen... | PS4
30°

Is Motion Capture the Future of MMOs?

1h ago - The use of motion capture has been increasingly dramatically over the last few years in both movi... | Industry
20°

Princess Evangile Launches On Steam, Tackles Gender Integration Issues

1h ago - One Angry Gamer "So what happens when a lone boy is forced to attend an all-girl school where 99.... | PC