60°
Submitted by Filthcardia 679d ago | opinion piece

Can “Alternative” Games Journalism Exist?

Why can’t a secondary form of gaming journalism, if you would call it that, ever take hold with audiences? (Culture)

ifritAlkhemyst  +   679d ago
I don't think this is entirely necessary. What needs to be established is an agreed upon reviewer criteria for each journalist or website. A publisher press release will only take a review so far. Most reviews and previews I see today give only the most cursory mention of the actual gameplay mechanics. They tend to mention it in a paragraph, then ending that paragraph with "it was fun or it wasn't". The rest is usually some discourse on the games narrative or storyline.

I understand that sort of detail is going to turn off your average reader, who doesn't care about that stuff and more or less represents the bottom line of those websites, but you could always segregate the reviews into a more objective score and a more subjective score for those interested.

Then again, most games journalists are just journalists that occasionally play video games. The difference between them and say, film journalists, is that film journalists normally understand the history of their hobby. Game journalists tend to be ignorant of anything earlier than your popular SNES games and show almost zero knowledge of PC gaming that isn't a well-established franchise.
Filthcardia  +   679d ago
I don't think the question to consider about alternative gaming journalism is if it's a necessity. It can coexist with the established gaming media as a separate form of expressing feeling and emotion in a game.
iceman06  +   679d ago
I think that you hit on a point when you said "hen again, most games journalists are just journalists that occasionally play video games." that could relate to what the article is saying. It would be interesting to see what a true games journalist could do with expanding the dialog of not just a number scale or a cursory comparison. It will open them up to a lot more criticism. But, how is that a bad thing? This could require games journalists to actually do their due diligence, as opposed to some of the lazy efforts that we get at this point. I wouldn't argue against an established reviewer process, but I think that this "alternative" could co-exist alongside traditional reviews, previews, and press release information.
Blank  +   679d ago
Im going off topic to say dorito man! On the article pic! What a tool.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Tour De France 2015 Review - GamerKnights

21m ago - GK have done a full in depth review of the new sports cycling game "Tour De France 2015" for next... | PS3
30°

PS4 and Xbox One aren't big in China, yet TV-based games grow in popularity

21m ago - Gamasutra: The Chinese gaming market is dominated by PC and mobile games -- consoles are not a fa... | PS4
Ad

Go Mechanical

Now - WASD mechanical keyboards provide a superior typing experience over common rubber dome keyboards. | Promoted post
30°

E3 Interviews: Assassin's Creed Syndicate, Dishonored 2, Mirrors Edge Catalyst and CoD: Black Ops 3

1h ago - Good Game's Hex gets a look at Assassin's Creed Syndicate, Dishonored 2, Mirrors Edge Catalyst an... | PC
30°

PSU review: Batman: Arkham Knight (PS4)

2h ago - "Arkham Knight has some flaws, but they generally pale in comparison to the wondrous spectacle Ro... | PS4
30°

Deal: Borderlands: The Handsome Collection for PS4/Xbox One Now $39.99

2h ago - Oh we do love a good bargain round there parts so we’re chuffed to be able to inform you that Gea... | PS4