EuroGamer: "After Battlefield 4 unveils 'Levolution', Infinity Ward reveals its take on destruction."
IW's definition of dynamic is knocking a couple of logs over. (I KID) All jokes and playful jabs aside (that's all the above was, lol), their dynamic stuff is..interesting. That Freefall map sounds interesting. I don't see how it won't be the standard COD with some extra commotion, and some extra (baked) destruction. Not saying that's a bad thing. It's embracing its arcade-style nature. It's good that they're making changes.
http://funnygasm.com/wp-con... Speaks for itself.
as dynamic as my 2001 desktop background theme
Its alright I'd be more worried about the gun balance and lag If the pistols are more powerful than the assault rifles like in BLOPS2 then this game will be a joke as well
What?? Which pistol?? Unless we talkn about Semi auto assault riffles maybe
depending on the situation some of the pistols were more powerful... actually powerful it not the right word. They are more effective then AR's. to be honest I don't know how they perform now after the last few updates cos I don't play it anymore. but the auto pistols in confined space was instadeath nearly every single time.
nah, most pistols in the game are way overpowered. The Kap40 the Tac, pretty much all of them are ridiculous. If they balance the guns and fix lag it'll be one of the best cods, if not, just another ho hum entry.
I still prefer the BF dynamic maps. They bring more tension to the gameplay than say rolling logs for me.
Its not even a competition.
Im not saying its a competition. I play both series. I just feel when it comes to map eviroments BF series has a better flow to them.
Once ina a while a rock will fall down or your dogg will start barking:p
the question SHOULD be why do the "next-gen" graphics still look like MW3 AND IT WAS PLAYED ON A PC, and what's being done about ded servers/lag compensation??? that should be question... not some gimmicky take on one of BF strongpoints..
Thank you. my feelings exactly.
The only thing that was good was probably the sound fx.
I get so tired of hearing COD haters, if you don't like the game vote with your wallet. COD and BF provide completely different experiences so they should never be compared literally. I am purchasing both and Ghost looks exactly what COD should look like, just like Madden, NBA 2K, FIFA and every other yearly release some things change but overall its the same type of core experience.
The formula shouldn't change too much for COD. It is just like every other yearly release. The formula for bf4 is the same. They just switch around classes and gadgets. They are both two different styles of games. I'm a big fan of both and it's crazy how people will spend the time to bash a game
Yes I agree that they are different games, but the only reason why COD gets bashed is because they themselves get put in that situation by trying to 1up the BF series, in regards to the "NEW Dynamic" maps BF BC2, BF3 & BF4 already had and have that going for them so NOW COD is trying to implement "Dynamic"?!?! come on?!?! they should have done that with MW3 and with the BLOPS series. Look at BF BC2: Vietnam. That was one of the best expansions I had ever seen at the time and that's what BLOPS 1 should have been. The only thing that BF3 took away from COD is the "Closed Quarters" map which in my opinion is so much better than playing COD maps because it's much more exciting and fill with chaos and destruction and that is what makes the BF series so much better, it's the realism aspect that gets me going. I'm sorry but that's my opinion, the only thing that I hope is that Ghosts is a very good game because their track record stopped at MW2 the rest of the series sucked really bad, yes they sold millions but that doesn't mean that it was a great game. The name is what sold not the game.
@zero see you're still comparing it to BF though, and like he said they play 100% different. That's like comparing NBA 2k to Fifa, ya they're both sports games but completely different! Only thing in common is that they're military shooters. One is fast paced quick matches and the other is slower pace that can take hours for matches to be completed. Plus if we brought up things that one game copied from the other, there wouldn't be a BF series if it weren't for COD. Perks, classes and many other main features of multiplayer were created by the COD series. Get BF out of the COD conversation!
Seriously, every single COD topic gets flooded by BF trolls. The mods need to do something.
Yeah and COD trolls are come to BF topics as well.
From the reveal it looked like they spent more time on adding new modes and features than working on the actual game like textures, models. It sounded like they put a lot of work in more diversity of gameplay but it was REALLY hard to look at still looked like a ps3/360 game. I am not spending 400-500 dollars at launch to be underwhelmed like that.
funny how cod is copying bf 1-stabs r the same as bf 2-destruction 3- running and jumping over objects they can try but they will never be like bf
last gen game on next gen systems is still a last gen game. Thats COD4. So dont expect any significant improvements. Expect to play the same game you've been playing for nearly a decade now. totally not worth it... ill stick to bf4.
What if Fifa was "revolutionized"? How could it be? It is what it is and changing the formula could ruin the game. What if they added a medicine ball mode? What if they added a big head mode? You can't really go outside the scope of the game because it wouldn't be FIFA anymore. Developers can only go so far as to what elements that they actually change.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.