280°

EA scraps Bad Company weapon DLC

EA today confirmed for GameSpot that it has scrapped plans to charge extra for the weapons included in the Gold Edition of the game. Instead, those who purchase the Gold Edition will receive the weapons out of the box, while all others will gain access to the weapons by ranking up their online personas to the maximum level.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
The Wood5859d ago

Im leaving EA alone until EA big do another SSX. That game was too good. Other than that EA can SMB

Yi-Long5859d ago

... EA CAN make great games, and they have in the past. So I'm not an anti-EA boy or whatever. I just pick up the good games and leave the bad/mediocre ones alone, and I boycot the DLC rip-off games (not just EA, but ALL games that use the DLC scam to make extra money)

But yeah, SSX3 was awesome, and Burnout 3 was great, and DefJam FFNY was brilliant (best fighting game on the xbox), so it's a shame they screwed that up with DJ Icon... en EA has a bunch of ther great games, and I'm sure they'll keep making good games, alongside the bad, the easy, and the rip-offs.

I hate the company that is EA, but I dont hate every product they make.

5859d ago
Ghoul5859d ago

seriously

where can i request a ban for you mesh your comments are nothing but flaming spamming and insulting

The Wood5859d ago (Edited 5859d ago )

It pisses me off too especially when you hear that devs want to give them out for free ala criterion for burnout ironically whilst some are told they have to charge ala gears of war. I don't hate all EA games but we have to stand up to them. They have slipped into the comfort zone and apart from the effort shown on burnout p and Fight Night their games have been rehashed and mediocre to say the least. They are meant to serve us not the other way around. Business is business and all that but give em an inch and they'll take a mile. If we say FU to em they wont sell as many or/and people will revolt. Charging for weapons, I bet your blood boiled when you read that, mine did. W*nkers. Some DLC is good though especially if it was made after the game was made because its out choice whether we want to purchase it or not. I think the cod4 map packs might fall into the 'good dlc' category only because they put a lot of effort into the game in the first place. They sure made enough money to release it for free but that's how it goes sometimes. Swords, horse armour, guns, BAD BAD BAD. They are part of 'Our' industry that we fuelled. They are not bigger than us. We can live without EA but they cannot live without us.

@mesh1, please, do us a favour, no offence but →

Lacarious5859d ago

EA fcking sucks! The gaming world needs to fully recognize that EA is a btch company that pushes out garbage and their main concern in gaming is how to screw over gamers so they can continue to rake in the $$$$

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5859d ago
Salvadore5859d ago

Did they seriously think they could get away with this?

shysun5859d ago

YES THEY DID! But @least they know they f'ed up now.

Tempist5859d ago

Gamers and the Internet saved the games and corrected DLC... Awesome!

Hurray for Sarcastic gamer!

JasonPC360PS3Wii5859d ago

I said they would do this when the news first came out. Even had like 10 disagrees.

JasonPC360PS3Wii5859d ago

probably be around 5 in an hour. So... just incase "see 5 of em are here now" :)

Captain Tuttle5859d ago

Complaining about disagrees always gets you at least 5 more.

The Closing5859d ago (Edited 5859d ago )

5 in 29 minutes you're breaking your own records! Congratzz. Glad I could help.

CRIMS0N_W0LF5859d ago

MAYBE people disagree without reading your comment because you are well known for being biased

H-V-H5859d ago

Hey CRIMS0N_W0LF - The Pot Calling The Kettle Black

JasonPC360PS3Wii5859d ago

What next, you going to tell people to stop smoking crack, with a crack pipe hanging from your mouth?

Baised, me? noooo... who would have thunk it? BTW, fire is hot, so don't touch it.

wallace10005859d ago (Edited 5859d ago )

Everyone carries some form of bias. There are people that are really biased and some that are only slightly biased, but everyone is at least a little biased. It is impossible not to have some form of bias.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5859d ago
Supa5859d ago

I'm glad they didn't seriously go through with milking the game like that.

GameDev5859d ago

weapon dlc made this a no buy for me, now that they realize what greedy bassstids they are Im not sure I even care anymore.

Show all comments (47)
70°

The Argument for Battlefield: Bad Company Remakes

With the franchise’s mainline entries failing to find their footing in recent years, now is the perfect time for a Battlefield: Bad Company remake.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
thorstein113d ago

Of course there is no counter argument. This is what fans of the franchise have wanted for years. This and/or BF Bad Company 2.

When asked why there hasn't been another Bad Company:

“There's one thing that lingers with Bad Company that we've been asking ourselves: What is it that the people really liked about Bad Company?" DICE general manager Karl Magnus Troedsson told Eurogamer.

Troedsson says that he and his team can’t put their fingers on what it is that people loved about that branch of the brand. “It's hard for people to articulate what that is, which is actually hard for us,” he says. “It would be hard to remake something like that. Can we do it? Of course. We have our theories when it comes to the multiplayer."

(Source: Game Informer, June 24, 2014)

SonyStyled113d ago (Edited 113d ago )

I always activate the Black Weapon on BFV Solomon Islands for all the BC2 fans who hear/recognize it, thus starting the events of BC2 on BF5 :)

Derrrunnn. Derrrunnn.

Tody_ZA113d ago (Edited 113d ago )

What is so hard to understand for them?

Bad Company 2 is one of the best and most memorable games in the series because:
- It was class-based (duh)
- Heavy focus on squads
- Substance over map size or gimmicks
- Fantastic and realistic gun play
- Well designed maps
- Destructible environments (why has this been minimised so hard in the series? You could demolish buildings in bad company 2 with some well placed C4
- Great progression system and variety in play
- No stupid CoD imitations or focus on the store over the game
- It was *drumroll* incredibly good fun?
- It was unmistakably BATTLEFIELD

INMATEofARKHAM112d ago

Probably should add a fun campaign to the list.

390°

Battlefield Legacy - Sunsetting Announcement

EA: "As we close in on 15 years since the release of Battlefield 1943, and Bad Company™ 1 & 2, we are announcing that their journey is coming to an end."

darthv72400d ago

This reminds me... I have ME on my PS3 hdd. Never really played it, but it was free.

XiNatsuDragnel400d ago

Digital future ppl is good they say nope imo

Eidolon400d ago

And it still says nothing about being able to downloaded even when it's off the storefront, that's a huge ouchie for some who somehow still have it in their backlog...

Shane Kim400d ago

Dont make it an issue when it's not. If you haven't played it in 15 years, chances are you'll never play it.

isarai400d ago

That all digital future sure looks great!

/s

zidane1341400d ago (Edited 400d ago )

Online game servers shut off eventually all the time. Doesn’t matter if you have the disc or not. Even if you have the disc, it’ll be just paperweight unless the game lets you connect directly to a friend or LAN play.

isarai400d ago (Edited 400d ago )

Read the article bro. They are delisting the games, including mirrors edge which is an offline game. Online servers i can understand, not being able to buy/download the games anymore? Completely separate issue, especially seeing as how some these games had lengthy sp campaigns and not just mp.

zidane1341400d ago

@israrai, you can still buy the disc for less then 10$. Hardly a loss.

TheEnigma313400d ago

You shouldn't have to buy the disc, that's the issue.

OhReginald400d ago (Edited 400d ago )

Some brilliant minds created servers to keep these old online games alive. A lot of ps2 and ps3 games that had there servers shut down a long time ago have been restored by fans to keep it going. Warhawk, killzone 2, socom 2/ confrontation, resident evil outbreak series, etc.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 400d ago
DankSinatra400d ago

The disc still exist. I don’t understand the issue. You guys are upset about that “all digital future” yet these games are not “digital only”. Hell digital only is a minority in the gaming world and so far we haven’t moved into it, the only digital only games are games as a service or online only games, which end up failing in the end.

This is no different than a store that stops selling old games, just go and buy a copy somewhere else. So which is it, you hate all digital or you like it? Make up your mind.

isarai399d ago

Talk about missing the point entirely. I'm not going to sit here and explain it to you, figure it out.

DankSinatra399d ago

Talk about whining about something and not wanting to explain from an off handed sarcastic original comment.

I got the point just fine. You’re literally complaining about something that has an easy alternative to it.

ManMarmalade399d ago

I don't think you got the point

DankSinatra399d ago (Edited 399d ago )

@ManMarmalade

No I got it, it has to do with the push towards a future of all digital and reprocussions of losing games. Something I already stayed that hasn’t happened nor is it large enough right now to cause any issues as the games that are all digital are online only to begin with or make up the minority of games

So I’ll say it again, the disc still exists for these games that are over a decade old and can still be played easily. You guys are contradicting the whole “we don’t want a digital only future” crying when the dude I originally responded to stated:

“Read the article bro. They are delisting the games, including mirrors edge which is an offline game. Online servers i can understand, not being able to buy/download the games anymore? Completely separate issue, especially seeing as how some these games had lengthy sp campaigns and not just mp.“

So again, which is it? Do you hate all digital or do you want it?

Inverno400d ago

On PC I don't think it's much of a problem but I'm sad to see BF43 being shut down. I haven't played it in a while since it's stuck on PS3, but i preferred it way more over BF3. It was the lack of invisible barriers which made it better for me.

badz149400d ago

BFBC2 was still the best overall package offered by the franchise so far IMO

porkChop400d ago

Absolutely. BC2 was such a great game. It's a shame we never got BC3.

P_Bomb399d ago

I had a great run on Bad Company 2. Pound for pound, as solid a BF package as there’s been.

InUrFoxHole400d ago

Does anyone play the last BF anymore? I searched crossplay servers and it was 20 people the most on all the servers? Can never find a game

SonyStyled400d ago

The last BC you mean? I was still able to find 10v10 on ps3 2 years ago on NA servers during the evenings. I have all the free and paid dlc installed, but there want any matches in the Vietnam dlc.

Show all comments (35)
230°

Battlefield 2042 Is More Than Enough To Prove We Need Bad Company 3

With this multiplayer experiment going every way but right, it's time for Battlefield to return to what made it so great - a fun single player mode coupled with classic multiplayer.

Read Full Story >>
thegamebutler.com
DaCajun880d ago

Yes, because there is no way they could screw up a BFBC 3 like they just did the last 2 Battlefield games, right?. /s

They're not the same DICE devs they used to be they're just EA puppets. You will just keep getting COD/APEX/SEIGE BF games now, because idiots keep throwing money at EA for this garbage.

seanpitt23881d ago (Edited 881d ago )

BF is dead especially after this abysmal release.. what have EA done to this beloved franchise.. it’s really upsetting they are so far disconnected from what the actual fans want from this series.. such a same

If they would of made BC3 and stuck to the same formula as BC2 but gave it the next gen treatment it would of been a massive hit

LucasRuinedChildhood881d ago (Edited 881d ago )

Tbh, I think BF 2042 was a battle royale, and then they changed direction mid-development and didn't have enough time to finish it properly before EA's deadline. Specialists make more sense in a br, for example.

Like Halo Infinite before its delay, it needed at least an extra year of development. When you think about it, Infinite had 6 years and BF 2042 had just 3 years. It seems that's just not enough time to make a high quality AAA game anymore.

LucasRuinedChildhood881d ago (Edited 881d ago )

Here's evidence for BF 2042 originally being a battle royale game, heavily influenced by Apex Legends:
https://gamerant.com/battle...

ChubbyBlade880d ago

It did start as a battle royale. It’s pretty obvious. All the pieces are there.

isarai881d ago

Thing is i dont think they're capable of capturing what made those fun/different anymore.

Fluke_Skywalker881d ago

They actually admitted that in an interview a while back. They quite openly said they had no idea what made those games so popular and how to recapture it.
Maybe if they actually went and played BC2 they would find out.

RetroCaptainSteve880d ago

I mean, if they can bring back fun Star Wars single player games, anything's possible, yeah?

Gardenia880d ago (Edited 880d ago )

I think that says more about the people working on games nowadays. They have no idea what they are doing and aren't true gamers themselves. Because gaming is a billion money industry they follow the orders of the business men and investors who only look at making maximum profit of games.

Look at the beta and the launch of Battlefield 2042 alone; how can you not see the negative reactions of the community coming? That alone tells us enough of the people involved in making the game.

Yppupdam880d ago (Edited 880d ago )

Really? They don't understand what made the Bad Company games popular, or they just don't want to admit what made them popular...That is most likely what the creatively bankrupt writers of the Disney made Star Wars films say about The original trilogy. They don't want to admit that the people before them were just better and that ALL the things that make the Bad company games great are the same things that they probably deem "problematic". Just think how they would destroy Haggard if they made a new game? Everything about his character makes modern game developers sob and run for the first safe space filled with teddys and the soothing voice if Anita Sarkeesian piped in from a speaker in the ceiling.

Sheppard7t3880d ago

Like Ubisoft and the recent Splinter Cell rumors, I don’t trust EA/DICE in its current form anymore. They’d find a way to ruin Bad Company 3.

Azurite881d ago

Bad Company 2 was amazing but I'm afraid they'd mess it up with a new game.

Ninver880d ago

Better yet remake with new engine and new coat of paint. Plus all the bells and whistles of next gen

badz149880d ago

BFBC + BFBC2 remasters for next gen. skip last gen altogether. lower chance for them to screw it up rather than trusting them to make a new BFBC3

annoyedgamer881d ago

EA knows players want BC3 the same way Activision knows players want MW2 back. They will not make it because the goal is to make games built around MTX and Battle Royale.

Ninver880d ago

Very strong point. I see the light

Show all comments (34)