New Fight Night Round 3 Images
This goes to show you what developers with 8 months extra time. EA said the PS3 version would be better. But my 360 version is still good. This is one for the PS3 fan boys to get happy about.
While you are correct that the graphics will be better because of the extra development time, why try to start something with other people. I own a 360 but I can still see that the PS3 will have cool games too. If somebody wants to buy a PS3 for $500 or $600 let them, they will have fun with games just like I am on my 360. Games are meant to be fun, not to start stupid arguments about which system is better.
Tham, your being such a fanboy and it's so apparent in every single comment you make. If you don't like the ps3, then why are you constantly commenting negatively on every single ps3 related article? It makes no sense. If you don't like it, stay away from it. Period. And I hope in reality, you're much smarter than your comments because you must realise that you don't by a console because of one game.
I'm not bashing you or anything but the 360 is $400 for Premium. I personally really enjoyed Project Gotham 3, Kameo, and Call of Duty 2. I know COD2 is on PC but mine can't run it. If you like Playstation games better, that is completely cool, a lot of people do. Some people prefer different games. Let's try not to start a stupid argument please.
STFU!!! Your mad because PS3 is WAY better and WILL beat the 3sh1tty!
Since when did PS3 games cost 600$?
But ive played the 360 version so no need of getting this 1 unless they put alot more into example more features etc - but i doudt ill get the ps3 version.
looks very cool. the ppl who are crying "but they had more development time" dont have an idea of anything. you can be sure that they developed the xbox360 version as long as the ps3 version.
They had an extra 6 to 7 months to tweek a finished game ! What don't you understand ?
this is the same situation as with Oblivion. think about a normal game. you've got X amount of time to finish the story, character models, environments, etc. now you have a finished game and you decide to make it on another system. all of the old resources are pulled out and the game is ported but you also can concentrate much more time on making the game engine look better. this is the same kind of stuff that was happening when PS2 games were ported to the Xbox. the games were not just looking better because the xbox was more powerful, it was because there was time to make a completed game look better.
I never said the games cost $600.00. The PS3 cost $600.00.
You guys are trying too hard to pick an argument with me. I really do not give a [email protected] And EA is on record saying that they had extra time for the PS3 version. If you know so much a bout the ps3 why do you not know this?
I'm making it up like I'm looking for a reason to bash the PS3. The development of FN round 3 started at the same time for both consoles. It was supposed to launch with the PS3 March 2006. Since that was delayed the developers had 8 - 9 extra months.
Have you seen the Madden 07 screens for the PS3. They are horrible <<<<< that was true and to piss you oof as well.
Can somebody tell me why the Boxers all Look like an Overglazed Donut? The sweat in most sports games are gettign there but still looks overly done.
I'd rather over-done than half-baked. ;)
...but isn't there a $500 PS3? Why do all the MS fanboys always say PS3 costs $600? Can't they accept the truth that we get a great, future proof console for just $500 or is there something terribly wrong with the cheaper version? Do the $500 PS3 lack HDMI? Do the $500 PS3 lack HDD? Do the $500 PS3 lack wireless controllers? I dunno, maybe it does. Please enlighten me why people should only buy the $600 PS3 and not the cheaper one.
why does everybody say it's future proof, it's not. Pretty much nothing is future proof. people said the first plasma screens and mobile phones were future proof, but are they?
IGN: Are the visual improvements specifically thanks to "The power of PS3" or is it simply because the developers had more time to work on next-gen hardware?
Blank:The answer is both. More time allows us to think about how to do things in different ways. At the same time, the PS3 is a powerful system and there are things we can do on this system that are unique. Each system has its advantages but both systems are really powerful tools that help us to make the great games we want to make.
IGN: The game is set for the launch window but not launch day itself, why is it taking longer to bring it to the system when it has already been finished for months on the other platforms?
Blank: Fight Night was released after the Xbox 360 launched. We did this because the extra time allowed us to polish the game further which helped make it one of the best games released on the 360. We are using the same strategy for the PS3.
IGN: Well then, be as frank as possible: How difficult or easy was it to port the game from Xbox 360 to PlayStation 3?
Blank: Making the game work on the PS3 was not an easy feat but this is the experience all game makers have at every hardware transition. The PS3 works differently than the 360 in many respects. That being said, once the initial learning curve was overcome, we've become very adept at figuring out how to get the most out of the platform.
IGN: Since it's coming out so much later than the 360 version and it's obviously so different, are you going to give it a title change to reflect that or are you just going to stick with "Round 3?
Blank: The game will be called Round 3. Ideally we would have been able to release the PS3 version simultaneously with the 360 but the platforms were off cycle. The extra time between the releases has allowed us to add some of the awesome new features that I've described
You didn't answer my question. I can only repeat myself: Why do you say PS3 costs $600 while there is a $500 version? Is it
a) cause of your blind fanboyism or
b) do the $500 version lack something significant?
Please choose Thammie and explain your choice. People deserve to know the truth and all I want is to enforce it.
O.K. When and if I buy a PS3 the only version they offer the is best suited for me is the $600.00 version. (PRO PACK) The $500.00 is the RETARD PACK. The $600.00 version has a chrome finish and a 60 gig HDD. Although 20 gigs is good enough
See the problem is you think I'm out to stop the PS3. But I'm not I just want us to be more honest. It really bothers me that people can not tell the truth all because of brand loyalty.
I work in the credit division on a bank. People make bad financial decisions for the same reason.
The PS3 is a good console but it is extremely over priced and the Blue ray drive is a Trojan horse. It dose not bother me that the 360 has no BR or HD DVD drive because it has been proven time and time again that 9 gigs will be fine for the next 5 plus years and more. PC gamers have been enjoying better graphics and more immersive games that we console gamers for years on DVD. So for Sony to say BR make the next gen better is nothing more than BULL S#!T. They are playing with the game community’s intelligence. Claimes that CG footage being true game play, claime that Blue Ray will make games better. (WTF) And the rest you know.
Sony fan boys look past all of the PR infractions because you guys are in love with play station so much that you see no faults. That reminds me of myself back in 2000. I was running around talking about how powerful the PS2 was and how it could be used to arm nukes and on and on.
This is my last bubble and I hope you get my point. But I have a question, is the Cell smarter than you?
The truth has no bias. Look up the dictionary definition of the word Bias.
I do not hate the PS3 but I am turned off but Sony and people who make group think decisions.
"I just want us to be more honest."
Yet you say the ps3 eats babies??
You call the $500 PS3 a RETARD PACK cause it doesn't have a chrome finish? That's one of the dumbest things I ever heard, are you serious? So what is the Core 360 without HDD and wireless controllers for you? You are just pure comedy. Also funny that you say 20GB is enough. Doesn't it have anything to do with 360 only having 20GB? ROFLMFAO
Calling PS3 overpriced is another classic. Truth is it has a way better value than 360 and your beloved console costs a lot more if it only offers HD-DVD.
How could it be proven time and time again that 9 gigs will be fine for the next 5 plus years? Sheesh fanboy, we are in the 360's 1st year LOL What you are saying about PC games is simply ridiculous and only shows that you ain't playing on PC. PC games can surely survive the next few years on DVD, but not console games. Console games ain't installed on HDD and have to be decompressed on the fly.
Thammie don't forget that it was Sony themselves who admitted it wasn't realtime. Everybody makes mistakes. It's more important how you deal with them then that you make them.
Yeah the truth has no bias and I'm stating the simple, naked truth. I know that biased fanboys hate the truth, but no matter what, it has to be enforced.
I have an aswer for you: Cell can't be smarter than any human. In case you didn't know it, Cell or any other CPU can't think, it can only execute. I got a better question for you:
Is an ape smarter than you? You should know there are apes with higher IQ than dumb humans...
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.