Try our new beta! Click here
Submitted by john2 853d ago | screenshot

This is what Uncharted 3 - and racing games - could look like in CryEngine 3

DSOGaming writes: "Ah, the power of CryEngine 3. You know though, it’s really funny. This bloody engine can push some of the most spectacular visuals we’ve seen, yet developers are not taking advantage of it. Guess Crytek is overcharging CE3′s license, otherwise we can’t find any reason at all for not using it. But anyway, modder ‘PianoPolish’ was utterly impressed by Naughty Dogs’ Uncharted and decided to create a map that was inspired by the game’s ‘Desert’ level." (Cryengine 3, PC, PS3, Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 »
iamnsuperman  +   853d ago
Crytek has a habit on making things look pretty but not delivering on any other aspect on the game. I really do not rate them as a developer. This engine looks good but what about the other stuff. They are important too
dark-hollow  +   853d ago
That's why it's a good thing that other developers besides crytek can pay to use this already outstanding engine.
john2  +   853d ago
I seriously don't know why they are not taking advantage of it. Is Crytek overcharging for it?
GameNameFame  +   853d ago
Overcharging and maybe its difficult to use?
Ive seen very few games demo that were using Crytech engine.

It looks nothing like Crysis 3. IDK why... maybe its difficult to use...

Speaking of Uncharted... When is Uncharted 4 coming out????

They are now 2 team and been making a sequel since 2011.... Should be about time...

Why is there no news on theses devs? ND is 2 team. GG is 2-3 teams. Santa Monica is 2 teams... and there is MM.

dedicatedtogamers  +   853d ago
@ john2

It may not be an issue of overcharging for the engine (though that might be it, too).

The reason why - for instance - Unreal Engine is so widely used is because EPIC does such a fantastic job with creation tools and middleware. Plus, plenty of devs are already familiar with it.

In this day and age of "churn the game out, get it to stores, and sell it with marketing hype" what value is there in making a game with CryEngine when you can make a game with UE for less cost, less time, and you can simply bullshot the visuals prior to actual releaase?
abzdine  +   853d ago
sorry but sand in U3 looks more realistic than this

man these pictures make me wanna give this amazing game another go!
#1.1.4 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(65) | Disagree(13) | Report
Godmars290  +   853d ago
Missing iamnsuperman's point.

If Crytek can't do more than make pretty looking games with their own engine, how is anyone else do better with it?
andrewsqual  +   853d ago
@abzdine And that's not all. To keep the relevance to the article I have to say that snow in the CryEngine looks NOTHING like the snow physics in Uncharted 2 and The Last of Us. Even Resistance 2's water effects are more incredible than the Cryengine with water that actually reacts and turns into small waves when you move in it.
The Cryengine is one of the most overrated and underused engines of all time. The first Far Cry is the only good game Crytek ever made.
(I didn't looks at the video the article is talking bout because I got sick of these videos 5 years ago)
Autodidactdystopia  +   853d ago

this is literally the only place on the internet that cant see that crytek is definitely talented..

I mean seriously guys why cant the godlike developers trump them.

they must suck because they are doing physics simulation on a level uncanny to the average dev?

I honestly don't get it guys, what in the hell is the deal with bashing crytek on this site?

They make things that are fantastically impossible to other devs... they make graphics that toast ea.

yet story, something that every fkn body can do and compete about you see as lacking..

What is my problem that I don't agree with you?

1 leader in gfx industry
2 no title released has failed to be a blockbuster
3 n4g takes things and skews the heck out of them saying things like "THEY MAKE GUUD GRAPX BUT GAMEPLY DURR DURR"

4 are you guys kidding?

seriously I have never seen such a sacramental ode to twisting what is actually in front of you to suit your sony aspirations EVER.

and I dislike consoles and love exclusives, I bought a ps3 for killzone 2-3 and gt 5 and and xbox for gow 2-3 and forza.

what the hell is wrong with you children. crytek is doing things that people simply CANNOT do as well as include supplementary story to rival shit like cod and ghost recon whats the problem?

does crytek have to rename themselves naughtydog to get some recognition.. or are all of you too young to see the advances in realtime graphics provided by them?

ND might have an edge in story but great stories have existed since times begone, great graphics on a "magic box" we call monitors have only been around for about 5 years and believe it or not crytek have taken the forefront of that battle, creating the most insane effects ever seen on a piece of silicon that you can own in your own damn house.

what is your deal? I ask again...

I mean .. every body loves a good story but I don't go to universal studios , or Disneyland or , knots berryfarm, to read a fckn novel I go there for the mind blowing effects and sound.
If I want a great story I funkin read one of the best books ever written or (lol play halflife) haha jk
or are you just not paying attention?
#1.1.7 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(35) | Report
inveni0  +   853d ago
We always get lots of screenshots from CryEngine, but rarely any decent video. I'd like to see a character running through this environment, leaving sand cascading away from his footprints. I'd like to see a character climbing around on the rocks, jumping from this one to that one. I want to see some great animations.

Scenery just doesn't do it for me. There's more to a game than scenery. The place needs to come alive.
Sarick  +   852d ago
Graphics aren't everything that make a great game. Games are like books. You can put pretty pictures in them or have awesome covers for them but in reality it's the story and how entertaining they are that wins in the end. Everything else is just EYE CANDY.

I've seen some AWESOME looking game animations movies and soundtracks in games. These games look or awesome visually but play like horrible Battlefield Earth movies.

Just remember games that look or sound great don't always play great.
#1.1.9 (Edited 852d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report
Muffins1223  +   852d ago

Its not that hard to use compared to unreal engine and it is more expensive,i heard they charge you a million dollars to publish with the engine while unreal charges you $500,000.
bangshi  +   852d ago
This is a pointless article.

Who cares how it looks made in CryEngine 3, it wouldn't run on the PS3 like that so it is a moot point.

It isn't like ND would be incapable of making a game that looks as good as, if not better than these screenshots.
Spurg  +   853d ago
''I really do not rate them as a developer. This engine looks good but what about the other stuff. They are important too.''

I thought Crysis games had pretty interesting gameplay. Choose the way you want to play in an FPS isn't very common I think they delivered but it wasn't appealing to you. And their setting are interesting too...a whole island for you to explore...again not a lot of fps games let you do that. So when it come to delivering...I think they do but not to your taste.

Crytek is going places games rarely go. Ryse is a nice example of that. Ryse may have gotten a lot a criticism from viewers but people who played it actually liked it saying how the combat is similar to the arkham series.
iamnsuperman  +   853d ago
Everyone is different as I know some people like Crytek. I find their gameplay very boring and the locations (all be it look pretty) are equally as dull (I am talking about pre Ryse because information about that game is all over the place so I am waiting for it to be released to make a judgement on it). There hasn't been a game I can say i really liked by them
#1.2.1 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(12) | Report
Truehellfire  +   853d ago
I liked the first Crysis and Warhead quite a bit. Gameplay was fun, graphics were good, and story wasn't half bad. Crysis 2 wasn't very fun, and 3 was just slightly better.
tubers  +   853d ago
Really loved Crysis 1.

You have no idea how many hours I enjoyed just dicking with the North Koreans on the 1st level.

I just loved grabbing them and staring at their constipated facial reactions. I also found it hilarious when they try to sniff me out and then I de-cloak, go maximum strength, punch their faces and watch them fly a few meters!

Pretty fucking novel when I played it several years ago.

I didn't feel as good when I played C2 and C3 :(
turgore  +   853d ago
Except that these are made by modders, and not Crytek. However, we have to give Crytek credit for creating an incredible engine.
levian  +   852d ago
I really like the looks of the shots of the desert. Its so bright and crisp! It looks similar to the setting of the new Metal Gear actually
Hellsvacancy  +   853d ago
Sorry for sounding stupid (it's only because I don't know) but could Crytek not loan or license out the CryEngine 3 so other (more creative) developers can make use it to make a game?
GuyThatPlaysGames  +   853d ago
Could would should. Nobody is ever happy
showtimefolks  +   853d ago
i recently bought crysis 3 and while the game looked great everything elser is a huge fail for me personally

guns felt weak
mediocre story and only 5 hours long

so crytek can deliver on graphics and nothing else
NBT91  +   852d ago
They made Far Cry and that was great, I enjoy the series (aware that Ubisoft developed 2 & 3).
But yeah Crysis, for all its visual flair is a boring game I think, it has some interesting ideas though.

I think it would be good to see what other things they can do. They are making Homefront 2 and (although the rest of the game was pretty average)I loved the online play modes in the first one, it was good how it focused on objectives, as you unlocked rewards / perks in game via points which you could get by either killing and / OR focusing on the objectives so that was neat. Looking forward to Homefront 2.

EDIT - I should mention I played Crysis on PS3, not PC. While the graphics are probably not as good, I still found it pretty average as games go.
#1.6.1 (Edited 852d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
starchild  +   853d ago
Oh please. I hate this trendy Crytek-hating bandwagon that sprouted up.

The Crysis games are all good games. I enjoy them a lot more than most military shooters and the like. They have great dynamic gameplay that I find to be a lot of fun.

The fact that Crytek creates industry-leading visuals and pushes graphics technology further than just about anybody should also earn them a little respect.

Just sad the way some of you act.
CBaoth  +   853d ago
+1 well said amigo. Even their worst game, C2, looked fantastic with Maldo's and Blackfire's mods running.

People have unrealistic expectations. They complained the gameplay was no longer open world. To that end I say no shit Sherlock, it's New York City, not an island in the South Pacific. What did ya want to do - enter ANY skyscraper with 10 thousand plus rendered office rooms and stare at old PCs on every floor? It's a videogame, not a Holodeck from Star Trek. The only valid criticism I ever entertained was the anemic AI and even found that, on the highest difficulty settings, was much improved in C3.

Crytek is a good developer. If their games were simply a function of a great engine, then I ask why does City Interactive's IP Sniper 2 look and play like shit?
jollygoodchap8  +   852d ago
People like to hate on them that's for sure.

Unless Crytek is making an exclusive for their precious console then all of a sudden its "I can't wait! This game looks sick!!"

Flip flop
starchild  +   853d ago

I'd like to know what games you think are good...
hattie11gottlieb   853d ago | Spam
Funantic1  +   853d ago
State of decay is a great game using the cryengine 3.
PockyKing  +   852d ago
Very buggy though. Just like Sniper Ghost Warrior 2. I think the Cryengine will really shine in the next-gen though.
Funantic1  +   852d ago
They justed updated it. It's fine now.
KazHiraiFTW  +   853d ago

Obviously you haven't played Crysis or Crysis Warhead, two of the best FPS's of all time designed for the PC exclusive Cryengine 2.
#1.11 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
kevnb  +   853d ago
they made great games until they went multiplatform. Farcry and Crysis 1 were awesome.
Rhinoceros  +   852d ago
A voice of reason at a moment when everyone is screaming about spec superiority. Gameplay matters the most.
TobyBuxton   852d ago | Spam
fontell15  +   852d ago
as Jacob implied I didnt even know that a student can make $6748 in four weeks on the computer. have you seen this web site
princejb134  +   852d ago
i think gameplay is more important than graphics
i have played many ugly looking games but because they were fun to play it never stopped me from playing for hours
Dagobert  +   852d ago
Crytek games are just tech demo's really.
keyz1579  +   852d ago
I do like what Crytek brings to the table graphically but hopefully in the next gen cycle they will concentrate on gameplay as well and other aspects that make a game successful
iCaruth  +   853d ago
It looks good but leave the car engines to the racing devs.
Pancit_Canton  +   853d ago
Looks horrible. It looks blocky,bland and dull looking. Naughty Dog 3.0 would blow Crytek's CryEngine 3 out of Uncharted territory.
isa_scout  +   852d ago
I agree, most people that talk smack about Uncharted's graphics fail to understand that Naughty Dog intentionally makes games that don't look photorealitsic. They make stylized graphics, and it adds to their charm. Nathan Drake would look weird if they were to try to make him look real. Naughty Dog makes the best graphics on consoles, and Crytek makes the best graphics on PC...
As far as gameplay,story,length, and support goes Crytek hasn't made anything amazing since Crysis 1. There is a hell of a lot more to games than just pretty graphics. My fav game this generation was Dragon Age Origins and the graphics for that game was horrible. Since when did graphics beat gameplay??? These young kids would have never made it on my Atari...Sad.
KazHiraiFTW  +   852d ago
uh I dunno dude I just finished playing The Last of Us, great game, but the graphics were atrocious. Ugly low res textures, blocky shadows, abysmal aliasing, flickering textures, and very rarely did the FPS get as high as 30, most of the time it was a 20-25 fps slideshow. I completely disagree with Naughty Dog making the best console graphics, Crytek does a much better job with Cryengine3 on weaker hardware (360)
jimbobwahey  +   853d ago
Uncharted 3 looks nicer than those CryEngine 3 screenshots, so I'm glad that Naughty Dog stick to their own engine :)
starchild  +   853d ago
No, it really doesn't.

I would love to see the world through the rose-tinted lenses of the Sony fanboy glasses.
_QQ_  +   853d ago
Just like The Last of Us is the "best looking game ever made".....
KUV1977  +   853d ago
Cry-Engine is really nice but thse screens really look very weak and not at all like they could be in the engine. As far as those special screens go, the actual game looks way better. In most-cases it is artwork over pure tech.
ChickenOfTheCaveMan  +   853d ago
I agree, I really really liked the visual on PS3 for Crysis 3 and Dead Space 3, but Uncharted still looks better than those and the simulation of Uncharted 3 in CryEngine3, sorry...
#4.2 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
Beastradamus  +   853d ago
Naughty Dog use the HAVOK engine which is the same engine used in GTA 4 and many other games. Learn what you're talking about man.
Wintersun616  +   853d ago
HAVOK is just the physics engine, and yes while it is used in Uncharted 3, it's not the actual engine used to build the game because it's just a physics engine. Naughty Dog has their own engine for their games.

The irony.
dogdirt2000  +   853d ago
"Learn what you're talking about man".

It really doesn't take more than a minute on the net for any layperson to learn that Havok is a physics middleware, as Wintersun616 said, and that Naughty Dog use their own in-house proprietary engine.

Don't slam others when you, yourself, clearly have no understanding of software development and game development.
#4.3.2 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(0) | Report
isa_scout  +   852d ago
Naughty Dog owns their own engine, not sure where you get your info from but the Havok engine is a physics engine not a graphics engine dude.
EdoubleD  +   853d ago
It's all about the art direction
Mr Tretton  +   853d ago
Art direction with Pong engine.
_QQ_  +   853d ago
AznGaara  +   853d ago
Yup. Believe it or not, the Uncharted series isn't as uber realistic as people make it out to be. There's a hint of stylization to their games. Same with TLOU, which is why I love the way their games look. Not so hyper realistic that it loses a sense of character.
MidnytRain  +   853d ago
There's nothing BAD about Crytek games. If their games weren't so pretty they wouldn't get so much hate.
OrangePowerz  +   853d ago
Don't you mean if their games wouldn't look that good nobody would notice them?

I love the first Far Cry and Crysis 1, but Crysis 2 and 3 where not that great. Moving to linear levels in order to show better graphics and bad story writting.
WeAreLegion  +   853d ago
We have the same opinion on Crytek. I'm glad I'm not alone. ^_^ FarCry and Crysis were so awesome! I wish 2 and 3 had been more like 1. :/
isa_scout  +   852d ago
Completely agree bro, no one would ever talk about Crysis if it had the graphics of COD. IT's not unique or innovative at all. One of the best FPS this gen was Bioshock 1, and it didn't have awesome graphics(art style was amazing though) it successed by being innovative and unique. Crysis 2 and 3 are something akin to a supermodel, beautiful on the outside, but ugly and shallow underneath.
Baka-akaB  +   853d ago
if they werent pretty they wouldnt get enough attention to be hated or loved to begin with
starchild  +   853d ago
Oh look it's the hate brigade.

If the Crysis games weren't good they wouldn't have generally high review scores.

It's just trendy to hate on the Crysis games. Mostly fueled by console fanboys who feel jealous of the visuals in those games and whose only recourse is to lash out at subjective things like "fun factor".
_QQ_  +   853d ago
Crysis online is fun.
#6.3.1 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report
Pintheshadows  +   853d ago
Do you know what bothers me about Crysis?

It draws attention from PC games that are not just flamboyant visuals. 2 and 3 were hollow tech demos with limited gameplay when compared to the first game and Warhead.

I'd much rather be saying 'PC Gaming is great, look at Total War Rome 2'. Not 'teh PC CRYSIS powerz!!!!' because as games 2 and 3 are not very good. They are almost the very definition of dumbing your series down.
#6.3.2 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report
isa_scout  +   852d ago
Did you even play the entire series??? Cryis 1 was AMAZING.period. Crysis 2 and 3 were huge departures from what made Crysis 1 so awesome. Blame it on Crytek moving the series to consoles or whatever you like, but in the end it was still Cryteks fault. Most PC gamers agree. Go ahead and play your pretty, but shallow games. I guess me and everyone else will do as you said, and enjoy subjective things like "fun factor".
jollygoodchap8  +   852d ago
Well said.

Nothing but Crytek hate in here but go to a Ryse article...Nothing but love for Crytek.

Being Exclusive can change minds quick for some reason.
Baka-akaB  +   853d ago
Really you wanna go there ? Most of the complaints about Crysis 2-3 are from actual players from the first game on PC .

It got worse beyon the first game and warhead and is selling less and less . But whatever , "it's just disliked coz it's trendy to" ... ok , if that's the best kind of argument you guys can come up with , good for you
#6.4 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
starchild  +   853d ago
You're right, some of the hate-bandwagon was built up by PC gamers that are just pissed at Crytek for making later games multiplatform.

I'm a PC gamer, but aside from the crap job they did on the PC version of Crysis 2 before they did the directX 11 update I have no beef with Crytek and have no problem with them making console ports of the games. They are still easily some of the best looking games on PC in any case.

And despite what some people say, I have a great time in all of them. I think some people try to play it like any other shooter, but you can't do that. The fun lies in using the tools and playing it like it was meant to be played.

Going by the way some of you talk you would think all of the Crysis games scored in the fifties (like 56 out 100) and are just completely mediocre games. But, in fact, they have all scored well enough to be considered good games.
CandyFace  +   853d ago
I seriously don't get the hate and i don't think the stories were bad at all. Yes Crysis 2 had a bad launch with directx 11 post patch stuff etc. but the story was good and had some excellent soundtracks as always. Crysis 3 was better in terms of everything. I'm a PC gamer too but i really do not get the hate just because they make beautiful games and people think that's the only thing they're good at.
Wni0  +   853d ago
These look terrible to be honest. They are impressive graphically but they are so unrealistic.
BlackPrince 42  +   853d ago
You know, I don't actually like it, at least not for Uncharted.

It looks amazing yeah, but Uncharted games are slightly stylized so as not to create any uncanny valley. The photorealism of these screenshots would create a lot of dissonance with Drake's character model. (We're still a ways off from character models and movements that lie on the far side of uncanny valley.)

Might work for a shooter though.
corvusmd  +   853d ago
this truly is the best engine out there, it should almost be gamer law that all games use this engine. Crysis 3 still has not been surpassed as "best looking game"...Far Cry 3 looks amazing too...and both of those games are rather open games (far cry being completely open world...yet smaller games still can't look better
OrangePowerz  +   853d ago
Far Cry 3 isn't using the CryEngine in case you meant that it's using the engine.

CryEngine 3 looks good, but that's at the cost of being less scalable than other engines and less optimized. Given you want to sell your game to as many people as possible it makes more sense to use other engines that have less great graphics, especially given how bad the engine is on current consoles.
corvusmd  +   853d ago
No I know that the Far Cry series doesnt use cry engines anymore, it uses the Dunia, but still very similar...I'm not a developer or anything, so I'm sure they have their reasons...but seeing how detailed and smooth they can make Crysis 3 look, shows me that it's capable of a lot...and I'm PRETTY sure Crysis 3 was the first cry engine 3 game it can only get better from with the extra power on PS4 and XB1 I'm sure it'll be MUCH more impressive...I played Crysis 3 on Xbox 360 and that has what...512 mb of ram (not including OS) PS4 and XB1 will be using 4.5-5.5Gb of would be nuts
OrangePowerz  +   853d ago
I could think of one reason, the engine is horribly optimized and doesnt scale as well as other engines like UE3.
#10 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
ABeastNamedTariq  +   853d ago
I like the sand better in Uncharted. It was like smooth creamy luscious wavy sparkly beautiful sandy sand. Yes it's worth that many adjectives to me. It was pretty. This sand is just bland. Bleh. For some reason the foliage (or cacti? Or whatever) reminds me of Metal Gear Solid V.
Ben Dover  +   853d ago
I'm really not impressed. Makes Uncharted 3 look more cartoony which is not the point of the game.
Beastradamus  +   853d ago
From a screen shot of sand and trees you can tell that?
Ben Dover  +   852d ago
I don't see how this is much different from the people claiming it looks amazing, if not better, from those exact same screenshots "of sand and trees". But I guess it's perfectly fine then right? Hypocrites -.-
Nivalis  +   853d ago
the CE3 images look so devoid of soul, its just high res textures, bad ones at that, slapped on an environment without any real thought or artistic direction.
the cars all lined up is even worse, lots of attention to detail and then a backdrop that looks like something youd see in a ps1 game with higher res textures.

Really wish people would stop touting CE3 like its the holy grail, it isnt.
BlackPrince 42  +   853d ago
Yes that's it exactly, these screenshots have no soul. In fact, that same criticism pretty much sums up Crytek doesn't it. They are a competent developer, but their games lack anything approaching an artistic soul.

That's why I rate Crysis 2 as their best game. It too has no soul, but they brought in an established author to write the dialogue, and he gave that game a brain to compensate.
nnodley  +   853d ago
That's what I was thinking. While they do look somewhat impressive it also looks somewhat odd for some reason. Plus the sand looks way better in UC3 than in these screenshots, imo. These just don't do it for me. Gonna be fun times when Naughty Dog shows off their game and it's loads better than these screenshots.
iBlackyi  +   853d ago
Honestly, i would prefer the normal uncharted 3 graphics over this. It just doesnt look real, its only in high res. It looks cartoony...

the sand in this photos looks awful and unrealistic. why are there so many notches in the sand? Sand is smooth, lightly and "creamy". The sand distributs itself equally. This looks like 500 camels are walking over it every day.
#14 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
_QQ_  +   853d ago
Art style and graphics are 2 different things.
iBlackyi  +   852d ago
Yes, but then this art style is awful at least for uncharted.
Me-Time  +   853d ago
Those cars make me feel icky. The Lamborghini needs to be shown somewhere else, too. Some of its exterior parts look really edgy where it shouldn't be. And the environment like I said before just turns me off from the detail of the car. It feels lifeless and eghh. The paint is what probably turned me off the most. It appears to convey "natural", but fails to convey it like others (particularly pCARS - to add, I'm annoyed by the physics system that pCARS is hyped up to be).
#15 (Edited 853d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Mikefizzled  +   853d ago
I still maintain that Far Cry is Crytek's best game as the Crysis series feels a little bit like pimping out Master Chiefs armour. Maybe Ryse will change that, who knows.
CathyRolphe22   853d ago | Spam
SynestheticRoar  +   853d ago
That looked pretty good, but I think I'll be more impress with Naughty Dog's new engine.
plaZeHD  +   853d ago
Naughty Dog will be using the same engine that powered Uncharted 3 and The Last Of Us for next gen.
PablitoPaperito  +   853d ago
You can find dozens of tech demos and concepts of what games may look like using each iteration of Cry Engine.
But then... they never do.

Only Crysis.

And btw Crysis 3 looks phenomenal on PC, they should make a PS4 version.
Agent_hitman  +   853d ago
Crytek only cares about the photo-realistic Graphics but not on storyline..
Beastradamus  +   853d ago
Crysis 2 had a pretty damn good story-line in my opinion. Then again I haven't played Crysis 3...yet.
kingmushroom  +   853d ago
I don't need T_Tek when i have Naughty Dog.
Beastradamus  +   853d ago
Gamer's were spoiled by graphics this gen....Uncharted 3 and 2 still look amazing yet we see articles like this.
Booyah  +   853d ago
What's funny is I can't seem to see that much of a difference.

chobit_A5HL3Y  +   853d ago
i wanna see what borderlands looks like with this engine~
NeoTribe  +   853d ago
Naughty dog doesn't need help from crytek. Uncharted 4 is gonna blow heads off with there next gen engine. If anything people are gonna wish they could buy naughty dogs engine. Off topic but when is crytek gonna make a game that's actually fun to play? Ryse sure as hell isn't looking the part.
Funantic1  +   853d ago
State of Decay is one good survival horror zombie that uses cryengine 3. I love this game. It's like a open world dead rising with drivable vehicles. And it's only $20 but exclusively on the 360 arcade.
mjaucat  +   853d ago
that SUCKS! looks like high end PC games TODAY and them consoles are not out for months
imt558  +   853d ago
It sucks! Really. Rocks looks ugly.
Mkai28  +   853d ago
I think it would look better if different devs learned the engine and programmed for their own game. Example: Turn 10 using it for racing, Naughty Dog using it for a third person game. Because turn 10s car models look better then this, Naughty Dog's Uncharted looks better then this.. I'm sure if they had use of the cry engine, it would perhaps look better then anything out there..
modesign  +   852d ago
when amateur developers are given a choice of using cryengine or unreal, they should choose cryengine.
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Examining the Explosive Success of the $120k+ Hatoful Boyfriend Plush Kickstarter

14m ago - Marcus Estrada writes: "Scarecrow’s last campaign was for a Hotline Miami figure. In the end, tha... | PC

Lara Croft GO: The Shard of Life, Cave of Fire Walkthrough

7h ago - AppUnwrapper writes: "This is a complete walkthrough guide with videos and relic locations for th... | iPhone

Blu-ray And DVD Highlights for November 2015

Now - With the spooky month of October all but ritualistically murdered and buried in a haunted house sitting a top an ancient Indian burial ground under... | Promoted post

Chronicle: RuneScape Legends Enters Closed Beta

9h ago - Jagex, the creators of the award-winning free-to-play MMO RuneScape, today announced the beginnin... | PC

17 Best Star Wars Games of All Time

10h ago - Chillopedia: Gaming has exceptionally evolved since the past decade, which is quite evident from... | Culture

Minecraft: Story Mode - Episode 3 “The Last Place You Look” Complete Walkthrough

12h ago - Episode 3 “The Last Place You Look” Complete Walkthrough of Minecraft: Story Mode on the PC in 60... | PC