110°
Submitted by Jamiex66 669d ago | opinion piece

Is Ubisoft’s Franchise-Centric Mindset Good For The Gaming Industry?

Analog Addiction: "Franchises have always been a part of the gaming industry, from Pac-Man, Mario and even Metal Gear Solid. These franchises have become synonymous with gaming culture, and even the masses who don’t consider themselves gamers know of their significance.

So it wasn’t surprising when Ubisoft VP of sales and marketing Tony Key, clearly stated Ubisoft’s intentions when developing new titles. “We won’t even start if we don’t think we can build a franchise out of it.”" (Industry, PC, PS4, Ubisoft, Watch Dogs, Wii U, Xbox One)

colonel179  +   669d ago
Yes and No! It's great when a game is good and it gets a sequel. Everybody likes to enjoy more of the games they like. On the other hand, they need to know when to stop. Assassin's Creed was too much. I love the franchise but I really couldn't finish AC3. It was boring most of the game. They should have never release the a new game yearly.

So in short. Franchises are good. Yearly milking is not.
Craigatorian  +   669d ago
At least do every 1 year and 6 months, instead of every 12 months
mydyingparadiselost  +   669d ago
For games with very little story it works well but story heavy games shouldn't be built into a franchise, the constant sequels draw out plotlines longer than they should and the storytelling is always the first aspect to get worse.
ps3vita4life  +   669d ago
It really just depends on how Ubisoft plans to handle these franchises. If they plan to spread apart the releases and make sure that each game in the series evolves and brings new innovations then I believe that franchises are good for the industry. But if they handle their franchises like they handle Assassin's Creed (yearly releases with little to no innovation) then franchises are not good for the industry.
fsfsxii  +   669d ago
As long as idiots keep buying, they'll never stop. Yes, its that simple
Jdoki  +   669d ago
Seems we've got a multitude of these articles over the last few weeks.

Ubisoft is smart to do this. It means they are doing their homework.

Sure we're getting a load of Raving Rabbids - but to make a franchise work it has to be profitable, and that profit is obviously being reinvested in new franchises. People may hate on Rabbids, but if sales of that franchise are allowing Ubisoft to invest in Watch Dogs and The Division - I will not complain!

Ubisoft have got the balance right. As much as there are Rabbids games, we also get Assassins Creed. I may not have liked #3, but it was certainly not a lazy 'more of the same' release. And #4 looks just as interesting.

I would have no problem if Ubisoft continued it's new tradition of one mind blowing new IP per year which rolls in to a franchise.

You can bet that if a title is not selling, the franchise will get dropped.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

The Co-op Podcast #119: Which Company Will Have The Better E3 Strategy?

4m ago - Gary Swaby at The Koalition writes: "Welcome to episode 119 of The Co-op Podcast. With E3 now... | Industry
20°

The 5 Best PS4 Exclusives (So Far)

4m ago - MenStuff takes a look back at the PS4's life-cycle (so far) to see which exclusive games stand ou... | PS4
Ad

Filmwatch Contest Details

Now - Come celebrate the upcoming Avengers: Age of Ultron with us on Filmwatch and win cool prizes. | Promoted post
20°

The 10 Best Konami Games Ever Made

4m ago - Daniel Kurland, GIZORAMA - "Konami is certainly one of the heaviest hitters out there when it com... | PS2
10°

PressureCast Seventy-Nine: E3 is Doomed

5m ago - Doom comes to E3, YouTube announces 60fps streaming and Crossy Road teams up with Pac-Man. | Culture
20°

Destiny House of Wolves Review - Duuro

12m ago - House of Wolves is not a just DLC, it is an old school expansion pack as the amount of content it... | Xbox 360