Submitted by alexmac 817d ago | rumor

Battlefield 4 player count could increase to 70+ players

Credible sources have rumored that DICE is testing Battlefield 4 multiplayer with 70+ players... (Battlefield 4, PC, PS4, Xbox One)

Hard to tell
Is this rumor true? Rumor votes 12
Hellsvacancy  +   817d ago
Awesome, more the merrier
littlemac  +   817d ago
And the fact that everyone can be in a squad is good too.
MysticStrummer  +   817d ago
Agreed. I say keep adding players until there is a performance hit, then back off the total a little.

There should be as many players as possible while also having no hiccups even with lots of action onscreen.

EDIT - Map design is also a factor though, so there can be too many players.
#1.2 (Edited 817d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
avengers1978  +   817d ago
Yea, smaller maps should be player capped, it can be a cluster f*ck, and take away a players ability to enjoy the game. Large maps more is better
DeadlyFire  +   815d ago
Battlefield 2 had borders that expanded depending on the player size set for the map. Why can't Battlefield 3, and 4 be like that.
iamnsuperman  +   817d ago
I agree. One of the biggest criticism I had with BF3 (if I completely ignore the single player part of that game) was there just wasn't enough people for the map sizes on the consoles. I know people disagree with me on this but I hated how unpopulated the map can be. Okay I do feel map design has a big impact on this as BF:BC2 has some of the best maps with open space but yet it still felt hectic but more people would have made BF3 a bit more enjoyable on the console versions
Izzy408  +   817d ago
Yeah, i've been playing BF3 on xbox and some of the larger maps can feel empty even with a full game and less capture points. This time around, im getting BF4 for next-gen. No way i'm missing out on bigger action.
#1.3.1 (Edited 817d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report
DeadlyFire  +   815d ago
Its because they designed the maps for 32 players and PS3/X360 only let 24 players in a game. That is the core of that issue. I think they really wanted 32 players on PS3/X360, but were limited due to the hardware.

BFBC2 was designed alot better with a narrower maps so in those PS3/X360 games it was more people running around in front of you.
Rearden  +   817d ago
Real source is http://bf4central.com/2013/...

You keep stealing BF4Central's stories and submitting them to N4G
alexmac  +   816d ago
Put it as an alt source, anyone can do it. The most important is the there is a link to the source in the post, and there is isn't there.
Vip3r  +   817d ago
I reckon they could easily do 128+ players on the new consoles and PCs.

The only limit would be the maps.

The technology is there for it though.
#3 (Edited 817d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Ray186  +   816d ago
MAG had 256.
Hufandpuf  +   816d ago
But it looked and played like shit.
shibster88  +   817d ago
Hell yea the more the better if they do change it to 70/80 then I will never buy ano5her game again please santa help dice make this true.
Izzy408  +   817d ago
70 players makes a lot more sense with 5-player squads. And if game quality isn't affected, i'm all for it. With the new consoles, they can probably go even higher on the player count. But one of the concerns is that too many players won't actually make multiplayer more enjoyable. But who knows?
#5 (Edited 817d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Trunkz Jr  +   817d ago
Ummmm. Have you played Planetside 2 during a large scale assault/defend?
Izzy408  +   816d ago
we're talking about BF4 here, not planet side.
Trunkz Jr  +   815d ago

Well duh, but when you can see a game that plays out well with a large scale assault it shouldn't be impossible for them to push the limits on the PC platform, PS2 has shown that large scale battles can work (larger then BF).
KrisButtar  +   817d ago
Won't do them no good if they have that $20 more higher price tag
littlemac  +   816d ago
That's not DICE's choice.
dcj0524  +   817d ago
You can't divide 64 by 5.
Trunkz Jr  +   817d ago
Shouldn't have to. In BF2 you could make squads (and name them) be in 2 people or 6. 32 vs 32 or 35 vs 35 it's not that much of a difference.
mkotechno  +   816d ago
Urusernamesucks  +   816d ago
Dont you just love games that live up to their name.
alexmac  +   814d ago
Battlefield didn't live up to their name last time.
SITH  +   816d ago
I absolutely do not know one single person who is not buying BF4 day one.
alexmac  +   816d ago
Wow, you have a lot of CoD friends.
greenlantern2814  +   816d ago
BF needs a lot of players, I have played mp where it seems like I spend they entire time looking for people to shoot.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Introducing Black Ops Fridays — Weekly Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Live Streams Throughout October

11m ago - By Scott Lowe on October 08, 2015 // Communications Manager, Activision: The November 6 launch... | PC

We Got This Covered | Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection Review

12m ago - We Got This Covered Honestly, there’s no reason to skip on Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collect... | PS4

Filmwatch Contest Details

Now - Age of Ultron is coming to Blu-ray. And we have something special in store for it's arrival. Come find out details on Filmwatch. | Promoted post

Super Meat Boy Review | PS Vita Reviews

12m ago - PS Vita Reviews just finished playing the newest version of Super Meat Boy. Here are their thoug... | PS Vita

Quick Tips – Star Wars Battlefront Beta Final Star Card Unlock, the Sharpshooter Trait

14m ago - In PlayStation LifeStyle's latest Quick Tips video they’ve gone ahead and unlocked the most expen... | PC

The Gamer Scene Preview: Albert & Otto

50m ago - Albert & Otto is a story about a mysterious boy and a magical bunny, with fun puzzles, action, an... | PC