Submitted by alexmac 377d ago | rumor

Battlefield 4 player count could increase to 70+ players

Credible sources have rumored that DICE is testing Battlefield 4 multiplayer with 70+ players... (Battlefield 4, PC, PS4, Xbox One)

Hard to tell
Is this rumor true? Rumor votes 12
Hellsvacancy  +   377d ago
Awesome, more the merrier
littlemac  +   377d ago
And the fact that everyone can be in a squad is good too.
MysticStrummer  +   377d ago
Agreed. I say keep adding players until there is a performance hit, then back off the total a little.

There should be as many players as possible while also having no hiccups even with lots of action onscreen.

EDIT - Map design is also a factor though, so there can be too many players.
#1.2 (Edited 377d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
avengers1978  +   377d ago
Yea, smaller maps should be player capped, it can be a cluster f*ck, and take away a players ability to enjoy the game. Large maps more is better
DeadlyFire  +   376d ago
Battlefield 2 had borders that expanded depending on the player size set for the map. Why can't Battlefield 3, and 4 be like that.
iamnsuperman  +   377d ago
I agree. One of the biggest criticism I had with BF3 (if I completely ignore the single player part of that game) was there just wasn't enough people for the map sizes on the consoles. I know people disagree with me on this but I hated how unpopulated the map can be. Okay I do feel map design has a big impact on this as BF:BC2 has some of the best maps with open space but yet it still felt hectic but more people would have made BF3 a bit more enjoyable on the console versions
Izzy408  +   377d ago
Yeah, i've been playing BF3 on xbox and some of the larger maps can feel empty even with a full game and less capture points. This time around, im getting BF4 for next-gen. No way i'm missing out on bigger action.
#1.3.1 (Edited 377d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report
DeadlyFire  +   376d ago
Its because they designed the maps for 32 players and PS3/X360 only let 24 players in a game. That is the core of that issue. I think they really wanted 32 players on PS3/X360, but were limited due to the hardware.

BFBC2 was designed alot better with a narrower maps so in those PS3/X360 games it was more people running around in front of you.
Rearden  +   377d ago
Real source is http://bf4central.com/2013/...

You keep stealing BF4Central's stories and submitting them to N4G
alexmac  +   377d ago
Put it as an alt source, anyone can do it. The most important is the there is a link to the source in the post, and there is isn't there.
Vip3r  +   377d ago
I reckon they could easily do 128+ players on the new consoles and PCs.

The only limit would be the maps.

The technology is there for it though.
#3 (Edited 377d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Ray186  +   377d ago
MAG had 256.
Hufandpuf  +   377d ago
But it looked and played like shit.
shibster88  +   377d ago
Hell yea the more the better if they do change it to 70/80 then I will never buy ano5her game again please santa help dice make this true.
Izzy408  +   377d ago
70 players makes a lot more sense with 5-player squads. And if game quality isn't affected, i'm all for it. With the new consoles, they can probably go even higher on the player count. But one of the concerns is that too many players won't actually make multiplayer more enjoyable. But who knows?
#5 (Edited 377d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Trunkz Jr  +   377d ago
Ummmm. Have you played Planetside 2 during a large scale assault/defend?
Izzy408  +   376d ago
we're talking about BF4 here, not planet side.
Trunkz Jr  +   375d ago

Well duh, but when you can see a game that plays out well with a large scale assault it shouldn't be impossible for them to push the limits on the PC platform, PS2 has shown that large scale battles can work (larger then BF).
KrisButtar  +   377d ago
Won't do them no good if they have that $20 more higher price tag
littlemac  +   376d ago
That's not DICE's choice.
dcj0524  +   377d ago
You can't divide 64 by 5.
Trunkz Jr  +   377d ago
Shouldn't have to. In BF2 you could make squads (and name them) be in 2 people or 6. 32 vs 32 or 35 vs 35 it's not that much of a difference.
mkotechno  +   377d ago
Urusernamesucks  +   377d ago
Dont you just love games that live up to their name.
alexmac  +   375d ago
Battlefield didn't live up to their name last time.
SITH  +   377d ago
I absolutely do not know one single person who is not buying BF4 day one.
alexmac  +   376d ago
Wow, you have a lot of CoD friends.
greenlantern2814  +   377d ago
BF needs a lot of players, I have played mp where it seems like I spend they entire time looking for people to shoot.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Halo: Nightfall Trailer Analysis

8m ago - We deconstruct the Halo: Nightfall trailer, and speculate on how it all connects to Halo 5. | Xbox One

Next Gen driving starts with The Crew - incredible open world driving demo

14m ago - A video which takes a look at the varied terrain details in Ubisoft's forthcoming next gen consol... | PC

The PlayStation 4 Offerings: Making Great Strides

34m ago - Every week, Short Pause digs deeper into the games offered through PlayStation Plus' Instant Game... | PS4

New Photos from Halo: Nightfall

1h ago - Microsoft has released a huge selection of new photos from the upcoming web series Halo: Nightfal... | Culture

Looking for a great Pokemon Community?

Now - Look no further. Join us at the BulbaGarden Forums, the best community for everything Pokemon | Promoted post

SNES A Day 61: Garry Kitchen's Super Battletank: War in the Gulf

1h ago - The quote on the cover of Garry Kitchen’s Super Battletank: War in the Gulf is adorable: “…looks... | Retro
Related content from friends