Try our new beta!Click here
Submitted by syrinx 945d ago | news

Titanfall pre-orders will be $60 USD, even on PC

EA, never shy of pinching a few pennies, are wanting a lot of money up front for Respawn's Titanfall. (PC, PS4, TitanFall, Xbox 360)

majiebeast  +   945d ago
Get pucked EA 60$ for a multiplayer only game is a ripoff especially on PC.
#1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(52) | Disagree(9) | Report | Reply
Muerte2494  +   945d ago
I'm sorry this game isn't worth $60 just for multiplayer. Sorry, not when people can get a similar experience with COD: Ghost and get a single player experience. This is coming from someone who was genuinely interested in this game, and doens't like COD.
dedicatedtogamers  +   945d ago
$60 on PC? When they're gonna drown the game in DLC? They've already confirmed that the game will have cosmetic DLC and weapon/map DLC.

No thanks. The game does look cool but I'll just pick it up on Steam sale. Oh wait! It's on Origin, meaning it'll be years before it goes on sale...
pixelsword  +   945d ago
Behold; the beginning of the collapse of the games industry.
thorstein  +   945d ago
@ Pixelsword Try the beginning of the end for X1. Hear me out first: Titanfall (and I am a SONY "fanboy") looked to be an interesting game. I was very intrigued and thought, X1, one day... because I wanted games like Titanfall. Granted, I will get it on my PC, but the one thing I liked about MS's E3 were the games.

So... this really sticks in my craw.
spaceg0st  +   945d ago
Battlefield would be worth $60 alone for just multiplayer. The amount of hours and play time would be well worth it... So it IS conceivable. Gamers are so fking whiny these days... If you don't like it, stfu and don't buy it
JokesOnYou  +   945d ago
Well MAG was a full $60, for a multiplayer only game, right? Should we blame sony for contributing to this standard?...or do I sense a double standard?

I think it depends on the title, if there is enough compelling content there then it could be worth every penny. Why is it not a problem to pay $60 for SP game that lasts 10-12hrs but not a game like Titanfall which looks like it will deliver countless hrs of playtime such as games like COD or Battlefield? I never even thought it wasnt going yo be $60 on X1. As for $60 on pc thats unfortunate but I was always getting it on the X1 anyway.
#1.1.5 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(4) | Report
Muerte2494  +   945d ago
MAG was 40 vs 40 (5x8 man squads) players at the same time on one huge map. This is only 7 v 7.
spicelicka  +   945d ago

lolwat, that doesn't mean anything. MAG was a pretty bad game, having 256 didn't make it much better or worth the price. I'm not justifying Titanfall's price here but what you said was just dumb.
JokesOnYou  +   945d ago
Muerte2494 are you seriously suggesting that player count makes a better or more compelling game thus justifying why one multiplayer only game is worth $60 and the other is not? So what if I make a terrible, broken game with stick figure graphics and throw in 300 players multiplayer only does that make it worth $60(not saying MAG is terrible but you see why your logic is flawed)....I mean whats next should we distinguish between one has mechs and the other doesn't= NO, they both fit the multiplayer only category, so the question is, is the content offering overall worth it, frankly Titanfall looks like a superb multiplayer gamer, poised to even outdo the ccurrent industry giants, its won more game critics awards at E3 than any other game in history, yet you're actually saying MAG is worth it but Titanfall is not? Wow, you really exposed yourself with your comments on this post. Nothing against MAG but its not really considered among the best shooters...if you love it thats fine though, I just think your reasoning is laughable at best or were you just kidding? lol please tell me you were just messing with me.
#1.1.8 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(4) | Report
bsquwhere  +   945d ago
Actually when MAG came out people on here raged and MS fans came out the wood work. So its only fair the same thing happens now. MAG sounded promising and was decent. Problem: not COD(amongst other things.). I Titanfall is as good as it looks then buy it. In general though I do believe MP only doesn't justify $60.
badz149  +   945d ago
why are gamers freaking out about this now?
It's already been awhile since pc games started to cost $60. Not that I am here to justify the price but it's already too late to bitch now as big publishers already price their pc games $60. Just look at Steam
GrownUpGamer  +   944d ago
@ Muerte2494
I'm sorry this game isn't worth $60 just for multiplayer. Sorry, not when people can get a similar experience with COD: Ghost and get a single player experience. This is coming from someone who was genuinely interested in this game, and doens't like COD. "

"MAG was 40 vs 40 (5x8 man squads) players at the same time on one huge map. This is only 7 v 7."

Hey Muerte... Judge


#1.1.11 (Edited 944d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
6DEAD6END6  +   945d ago
They're charging too much for a multiplayer only game. It should be $40 tops just like the Socom: Confrontation was.
jukins  +   945d ago
Online games require more post release maintenance, balancing, and overall work especially nowadays. Im not sure why ppl think if its online only it should cost any less because even if it is online only it still require not only the initial investment but as a said before more post release investment.
Muerte2494  +   945d ago
This game is....
actually a perfect match for Xbox One. An overpriced game for an overpriced console. As if the console needed anymore help not selling. This is the "One" game people wanted but it severely overpriced. I guess the "power of the cloud" comes at a premium.
6DEAD6END6  +   945d ago
It's all about the cloud my friend that's where their heads are at in the clouds.
ExPresident  +   945d ago
Spot on.
jeffgoldwin  +   945d ago
Troll alert. Really cant just comment on the game itself without foaming at the mouth and drooling out fanboy comments?
MRMagoo123  +   945d ago

Ill do that for you in a none fanboy kinda way

IMHO from the direct feed pics of titanfall it looks like a 360 game not next gen at all, if i do get it it will be on pc and i hope to god it doesnt look like those screens they showed yesterday cos otherwise COD beats it on this gen consoles in graphics.
fermcr  +   945d ago
60€ for the PC version (witch you can't resell, unlike the console version). No thank you very much. I'll wait until the price goes way down. No rush. EA really like to f*ck people in the b*tt.
#1.4 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Muffins1223  +   945d ago
Technically you paid 60 dollars before for just multiplayer...battlefield of duty...we all know the only time their played is during multiplayer titanfall is just smart and its dropping that bullshit single player experience that no one sure great games like halo need a single player and bioshock....but guess what...THEY DONT SUCK...cod and battlefield single player is shitty.
Imalwaysright  +   945d ago
Even if the single player component of those games were crap they still cost money to produce which made that €60 price tag justifiable. This is nothing but greed from EA. They killed online passes most likely thinking that MS and Sony would force DRM down our throats and now that they can't bring online passes back they'll do anything to nickle and dime us in every possible way. I can tell you right now that most PC gamers won't support EA greed.
#1.5.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report
adorie  +   945d ago
Your argument is strawman. The fact that you even mentioned those games having single player, already removes the rug from underneath it.

If "no one wants" single player? Why charge 60 bucks? What makes this game worth *more* than other games?

You played a recent build?
Kanzes  +   945d ago
They should've look Valve's Team Fortress 2 as example.. It's multiplayer only, it's an awesome game, and most of all, it's free! you pay only if you want customizations
MidnytRain  +   945d ago
Team Fortress 2 was released with a price in 2007, then went free-to-play in 2011. It had almost four years to rake in money from it's initial buying cost. Combined with the fact it was very popular over that time, and still continues to be, it's in a much more comfortable position that Titanfall is; a new IP which has the very possibility of failing.
joe90  +   945d ago
haha, nice try EA, ill just change my IP address to russian and pre-order it from your russian Origin store for 1,000 Ruples (£20) the same way i buy all my EA games.
#1.7 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
JsonHenry  +   945d ago
I will get it on a Steam sale for around $20. :)
M-M  +   945d ago
They know very well that multiplayer only games are supposed to be cheaper. Only one explanation, EA.
aceitman  +   945d ago
60$ for for online only is bull no matter what platform or pc.
the worst  +   945d ago
lololoollolololol ea think this is the new call of duty
kewlkat007  +   945d ago
Quick to forget Platystation's M.A.G..

Remember when that came out..was it $20 game?
#1.12 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Belking  +   945d ago
And it wasn't even worth that.
adorie  +   945d ago
This is an EA game, which probably won't make it to Steam. For 60 bucks, they can shove it. As for ORIGIN? 'Ain't nobody got time for dat.
guitarded77  +   945d ago
Wow, yeah. Totally agree. This is just a lame attempt to cash in on the hype behind the first game from the guys since leaving IW. Pathetic. First they sell out to make it console exclusive (for whatever time period), now they're jacking up the price by $10 for the average PC game. I'm taking a pass. I wasn't as impressed as most when they showed the E3 demo. I think there are many better looking MP games coming out, like Destiny and The Division.
Xulfxulf  +   945d ago
EA likes pennies.
Smoovekid  +   945d ago
Multiplayer only for $60... no.
CrimsonStar  +   945d ago
M.A.G says hello .

Gamer > Fanboy
ginsunuva  +   945d ago
How is he being a fanboy?
MidnytRain  +   945d ago
That's the one thing. There have been games, like MAG, that do just fine at justifying a $60 price tag as a multiplayer only game. In addition, from a business perspective, it makes much more sense to charge full price for the mode the company knows people will spend the most time playing anyway. For instance, CoD is primarily played for its multiplayer component by it's millions of players. And those millions of players seem perfectly happy with paying $60 without ever touching the single-player!
#3.2 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
6DEAD6END6  +   945d ago
I'll get it when it's on sell for $40 for PS+ members for the PS4, cause we all know its coming :p
Belking  +   945d ago
You mean on "sale" guy...geeez

That will be about 3 or 4 years Titan Fall2 will be almost out by then,
#4.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(20) | Report | Reply
6DEAD6END6  +   945d ago
No just no young padawan, it's coming out late 2014 to Feb 2015. Mark my words.


That's what I've been trying to tell people since the game was announced, it's Mass Effect and Bioshock all over again.
#4.1.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(4) | Report
MRMagoo123  +   945d ago
From the looks of titanfall i doubt there will be enough interest to warrant making a sequel the games graphics are this gen not next.
Muerte2494  +   945d ago
This game was suppose to be...
multiplatform. This game is using Source engine and one of the reason's for that is because it ran so great on PS3. So Belking, this is more than likely a timed exclusive. Good thing Microsoft bought all the ps4 copies of this game in advance, because that's the only way this game was going to sell. Even then EA is going to find a way to get out of this deal with Microsoft. I wonder how much of that went to securing TitanFall?
#4.2 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
HugoDrax  +   945d ago
It could end up multi-platform, well that's what PS4 only adopters are hoping for. After Titanfall won 10+ E3 awards, and Microsoft having deep pockets, I'm sure they may try everything in their power to secure this title as an exclusive (XB1/X360/PC). Only time will tell, but $60 for PC is a bit steep...
Belking  +   945d ago
I know the game is a timed exclusive but ps4 won't get it till 2015 or later. The game doesn't even release until this time next year so how is it gonna be on PS4 on 2014 too. They don't even have enough people to even do the 360 version.
Muffins1223  +   945d ago is only on pc and 360 to begin with lol
Funantic1  +   945d ago
I doubt it'll come to PS4. Maybe PS4 will get a Titanfall 2. MS will just extend their exclusivity for Titanfall and money talks. Plus this games relies on the Azure cloud heavily according to Respawn themselves. Respawn actually went to Sony and Microsoft and told them about the desire for dedicated servers. Microsoft was the only one that responded with an answer. This company relies on dedicated servers that they can't afford themselves. MS is charging them a price to rent servers at a unbeatable rate that Sony can't match. Plus Respawn is a team of only 60 people. They don't have the manpower to make a PS4 version not relying on the Azure's computation and still work on other projects at the same time. Their team is too small to even make a story mode for Titanfall which is ok for me because multiplayer has the replay value. The version that the 360 will have will be watered down and a port by a whole other company. PS4 users wouldn't want to play a lesser version than X1's version. I read many facts about Respawn and the cloud straight from their website. People said Dead Rising and Saints Row would come to PS3 and they were right but only part 2 and after of both of those only.
#4.4 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
Muerte2494  +   945d ago
Doesn't even matter...
now at this price. There are similar experiences elsewhere with a compelling single player to boot. I was going to buy this game on PC, but I'm losing interest as time passes. I'm a Killzone2/Battlefield fan myself. Socom is primed for a new release too. I think I'll have enough shooters to where I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything.
PSN_ZeroOnyx  +   945d ago
Respawn already said PS4 is in consideration, so yeah, timed exclusive if that.
Pinkdolphin  +   945d ago
2 years later....
ginsunuva  +   945d ago
or for $48 on Newegg like every game on earth before release.
syrinx  +   945d ago
Yeh it's damn expensive. Can't believe the PC version is expensive too.
6DEAD6END6  +   945d ago
Well the cloud is not going to pay for its self.
CrimsonStar  +   945d ago
lol u need to watch the new fanboy video at gamespot. While you just troll every Xbox Article now till the future I'll be sitting back enjoying my PS4 and Xbox1.
Gamers> Fanboys.
DaCajun  +   945d ago
That's because EA only cares about EA not gamers.
Sanhlami  +   945d ago
Narutone66  +   945d ago
More like Meeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhh!
CrimsonStar  +   945d ago
Unicron  +   945d ago
MP only? Should be $40 or less IMHO. $60 for just MP is a bit steep.
djoboy  +   945d ago
I ♡ EA and their overpriced games and dlc.
ExPresident  +   945d ago
Lmao I hope someone from EA or the producers of this read these comments cause this is going to get ugly. You are absolutely out of your minds if you think I'd buy an MP only game for $60. Arrogance at its best here from EA.
syrinx  +   945d ago
I bet its mainly because media was really bigging up the game after E3 and everyone was like "wow" look at that. So they think kerching!
SpideySpeakz  +   945d ago
Back when I was a noob, I made the mistake of pricing MAG at $60, thinking it had a single-player or offline mode. Boy I was wrong. I couldn't even play the game for several months because my internet was out due to moving.

EA isn't going to clarify to the general public that it's MP only, but MP enabled. Just like EA's Simcity5. It doesn't say "always online" until you read the small print on the back of the box, which is enclosed in a glass locker. So people who don't research would have to buy the game unknowingly that it's MP only or DRM.
#9.1.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report
MRMagoo123  +   945d ago
all the good things they said about titanfall at E3 then the screen shots come out and it looks average at best in the graphics department, i know about 6 ppl that where going to get it but i dont think they all are now after seeing it. Fingers crossed the PC version looks good or otherwise its a flop imo.
Narutone66  +   945d ago
That's why MS and EA liked each other.
Kenshin_BATT0USAI  +   945d ago
In that case it better have plenty of content and be available on Steam too. Else that would be a rip off.
Funantic1  +   945d ago
This game will have story campaign elements in the multiplayer. So it's a little bit of both but mostly multiplayer. But I'm going to support Respawn because they're a small company just starting off. They're a small but experienced team. Respawn has artists that made God of War Ascension, a few of the Call of Duty games, Medal of Honor,God of War2, and God Of War 3. They have sound designers from Resistance 3 and Rage. Also Game designers from StarCraft:Ghost, Borderlands, Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter, Doom 4, Kill Switch, and God Of War. I could name about 20-30 more games they have worked on that I know most people used to enjoy. I'll pay $60 because I'll play this all year long anyway.
deadfrag  +   945d ago
Rip off!Has always Activision and EA are the first to try and screw things up for gamers by imposing high prices on some games that i dont see reason to do it.When they told that this game was only MP,i start thinking for myself wow another one thats going to Bomb like Shadowrun,APB,Brink,LostPlanet they come and say its $60 the price tag,well if they dont stick a SP campain on this game,for this price this one will BomB really hard!PC gamers will be the first to tell Respawn and Activision to shove that up yours,especially in EU were the diference between PC games and console games in price is very diferente been PC way more cheaper than the console version of the same game.
#12 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
PSN_ZeroOnyx  +   945d ago
Activision? They have nothing to do with this story. Respawn is an EA studio.
deadfrag  +   945d ago
I know that but activition also have rise the prices of COD wordwide.COD titles are higher price at release too.Not to mention that they rarely come down in price in the first year.
#12.1.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
PSN_ZeroOnyx  +   945d ago

Activision is no saint and out for the money. However, COD has cost me $60 day one since MW1, though back then DLC was only $10 each. But I'm only spending $12.50 now for DLC so not too bad.
Supermax  +   945d ago
It will still sell like hot cakes people Gonna eat it up.
S2Killinit  +   945d ago
I see why some would be interested in this, but honestly, a game with no single player storyline just doesn't sit well with me. At least they could reduce the price a little since they aren't even offering a single player experience? is that so much to ask? Doesn't that make sense? anyone?
crazyeightz  +   945d ago
Yeah such a ripoff only mp, I guess Skyrim is a ripoff too since it have no MP.
#14.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
Smoovekid  +   945d ago
The Single Player can last you for months.

Nice Grammar.
#14.1.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
S2Killinit  +   945d ago
wait a minute, Skyrim is a RPG. Historically, you would have a single player campaign that tells you a story about what it is you are playing, and then they would offer you a Multiplayer in addition to it. This game is the first time I've heard of a major game not having a story. But I guess if people like you feel that it isn't necessary then they know what they are doing. I'm just worried that one day, your decisions to buy games like these, will mean that I will have to pay extra to play full games.
Nafon  +   945d ago
Haven't all EA games from the last couple years been $60 when they came to retail?
deadfrag  +   945d ago
Pc no.And this is a MP game only!$40 maximum,more no way and even so i really dont have fate on this game yet.
#15.1 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
mydyingparadiselost  +   945d ago
That's alot to drop to pre order, I don't see an all or nothing strategy being very smart at this stage. Seems a certain company is worried about profit since its last numerous failings.
SynestheticRoar  +   945d ago
WTH. 60 dollars om PC. Damn EA i'm starting to hate you as much as I hate Activision.
SpideySpeakz  +   945d ago
Then they can keep it. I'm not about to become a sucker.
crazyeightz  +   945d ago
ok I understand some people don't like to part with their money too soon but what is the damn difference dropping $60 now on a game and dropping $5 now and paying $55 later? The game is still worth the damn same where is the ripoff? $60 for a game with no campaign? How about $60 for a game like god of war finishing it one single weekend and never playing it again??? As long as the content gives you 50+ hours of enjoyment then it's worth the money. MP or SP who cares. Idiot fanboys just can't think like normal human beings. And before the disagreements come in from the damn sony fanboys, I have preordered a PS4 and will be enjoying the hell out of it.

I've never played PC so I am only speaking for consoles
#19 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
jimmywolf  +   945d ago
i disagree with your statement overall, to me it not worth 60+ $10-$15 for dlc or more depending how they want market it.

i did that with black ops, was fun but the nickel an dime for maps got old. when i found steam an found AAA game 50-75% off i knew were the real value was
younglj01  +   945d ago
I think if TitanFall was released on both Xbox One and PS4 the price would be about $40-$45.I wonder how much MicroSoft payed ReSpawn Ent. for this title.Also if this game become Multi-platform in the future how would MS respond?Because If $300-$400 million of that billion dollars went towards TitanFall,only for the title too come on the PS4 anyway I would be extremely pissed.
xReDeMpTiOnx  +   945d ago
Welcome to EA where we drop online passes but charge 60$ for a multiplayer only game and to even pre order lol
buynit  +   945d ago
Its just mp...

Here comes cod to do the same..

And to think ppl feel sorry over used games..
kewlkat007  +   945d ago
Is this the first multiplayer only game to cost full price?

Wasn't PlayStation's M.A.G. an online *only multiplayer focused when it came out?
#23 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
the worst  +   945d ago
lolol ea is going to try to kill the game b4 it comes out
#24 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
BabyTownFrolics  +   945d ago
Mag was 60.00 at launch, it was multiplayer only, and I had a lot of fun with it. Is there a double standard here?
Pinkdolphin  +   945d ago
Yes and so is Destiny but i guess they are also an exception
Supermax  +   945d ago
Majority dont buy or even play the single player in battlefield or cod.people that like multiplayer want the best game for hem and want all the resources going into multiplayer.
Pinkdolphin  +   945d ago
If it has the depth and content to justify a 60$ release then im all for it. I pay 60$ for a 10 hour only single player experience and dont complain *cough* Tlou *cough* bioshock and dont act like neither do you guys. Too many people jumping the gun here remember guys they have been developing this game for YEARS i remember hearing about respawn in mid 2010 and is coming out in mid 2014. No way they they are going to develop just 10 maps and a couple of weapons in 4 years. I expect alot of depth and content. I put 504 hours (21 days) into cod 4 multiplayer in my profile give me that level of addiction of multiplayer that has yet to be replicated and i will gladly dish out 60$
desertpunk86  +   945d ago
what a bunch of morons how many people buy cod and bf and don't touch the sp,im happy they are concentrating on mp the game will be worth the 60 like mag a generic shooter and starhawk an unbalanced mess with plenty of base raping and a sp so generic you'll fall a sleep in the first 30 min,both sony exclusive both a waste of time.

i bought both games this gen and they are my biggest regrets this gen specially starhawk,i guess there's only one thing sony fanboys are good at and that is hype exclusives that turn out to be diarrhea to the mouth.
LAWSON72  +   945d ago
If this game comes out six months after xbone version for $60 that bs. I wont really care because I think this game looks too much like cod anyway and haver zero plans of buying it even at $20

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Obliteracers: Racing Fun for the Whole Family | Hardcore Gamer

3h ago - Quick, name five family-friendly racing games other than Mario Kart. Name two? For sure, there si... | PC

French Instutution Bunches Video Games Together with Cocaine, Ecstasy, Alcohol and More

3h ago - Video games are often portrayed in a very negative way by general media, politicians and even gov... | Industry

Gran Turismo SPORT Beta Testing Begins early 2016

Now - Start tracking GTS with's release date alert service and be notified when the GTS beta launches. | Promoted post

The Best XCOM 2 Mods

4h ago - From GameWatcher: "Look alive commanders! ADVENT is here, hiding in plain sight among friends, fa... | PC

Review: Calendula | Hardcore Gamer

5h ago - What is it with [community-dubbed] “meta-games” appearing almost like buses? You wait for one and... | PC

Quantum Suicide’s Second Kickstarter Proves Successful

6h ago - Hardcore Gamer: Developer Cotton Candy Cyanide first tried their luck at Kickstarter late last ye... | PC