Here are some new direct-feed screenshots of Titanfall from the E3 demo. The game is currently rumored to not be running at full 1080p at the moment which might explain the lower resolution and muddy textures.
Really hope these are from the 360 version...
Nope, direct-feed screenshots of the highest quality video of the E3 demo. Pretty sure this isn't the fault of the One at this point, it's certainly proven it can render games in 1080p with great graphics a la Forza 5.
I think it being cross gen is probably letting it down in the graphics department, if it was One/PC exclusive I imagine it would look a bit better, the game still looks fun though.
sure it'll look great on PC
Thing is are you talking about in-game or "car-porn" footage Forza 5 has become known for? Though both use the exact same game engine, the exact purpose its used for is different.
This looks like pure garbage. No surprise, considering the engine it's running on. Killzone 2 and 3 both look better.
FORZA's lighting is still baked-in. And these are PC shots. Xbox fans are easier to fool since you can plug in an Xbox controller to a PC and the button prompts on screen will change to that of the controller's.
I would argue that Dust 514 looks better, and that's a f2p game. http://www.playereffort.com... http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/HxSo...
Some of you are blind. Killzone 2 and Dust 514 look better? Give me a break. Titan Fall isn't the best looking next gen game, but it is still better looking than current generation games. Go read Digital Foundry's tech analysis. Yes, it's weak in certain areas, but it's still using graphical techniques that only the very most advanced games on consoles used this generation and a few techniques that have only really been used on high end PC games. Also remember this game is running at twice the framerate as something like Killzone Shadow Fall. It looks about 80% as good as KZSF, but it is also rendering 100% more frames. That's still a respectable accomplishment.
Everyone here is so ignorant. This is a MULTIPLAYER ONLY title. Of course the graphics aren't going to look as good as other single player next-gen games. For those saying it looks like current generation, try comparing the graphics to CoD or Halo's multiplayer and you'll see how amazing Titanfall's graphics is. It even looks way better than Crysis 3's multiplayer (one of the best looking games of this gen). Don't you get it?
@ShinMaster Dont complain about forzas lighting killzones is fake as well its not real time at all.
How would you know? The gaming public hasn't seen this game running on Xbox One hardware yet. The smoke and mirrors show Microsoft put on at E3 is still fooling some folks, I see.
@Enemy "This looks like pure garbage. No surprise, considering the engine it's running on. Killzone 2 and 3 both look better." Which do you think will be more fun though? Between Killzone: Shadowfall and Titanfall.
Starchild and Georgeenoob, you guys need to remember that this game is (currently) not going to come to a Playstation system. Therefore everyone on N4G is automatically going to hate it. The game looks great, but all the fanboys have their PS goggles on and can't see it honestly as a result. Will it be the best looking Next Gen game? No of course not. Does it look better than ANY current gen game. Absolutely. Anyone that says otherwise is blinded by fanboyism or just plain trolling.
from the creators of cod . did they use the same engine. not impressed at all with the graphics it better be from the 360 version or it can spell some trouble on the graphics side.
Nah they used Valve's Source Engine. I just remembered that the game originally started as a current-gen game.
Yeah this game is not graphical impressive at all.
Yeah graphically, it does leave a lot to be desired but it more than makes up for it in the gameplay department.
I don't get why people are harping over this game. It's a first person Starhawk with Call of Duty's engine. This game will fail due to it having to compete with both Battlfield and Call of Duty. Battlfield has got a respectable fanbase now even the number of COD players is still up there. But Titanfall is simply COD with jetpacks and robots. Quite unoriginal. But it's making me more irksome seeing all these people harping over it like its Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Oh and now there's Destiny which is doing something incredibly revolutionary and broadening upon the gameplay of Borderlands. So I can't see why ANYONE would pick up this COD clone next to actual COD/ Battlfield/ and Destiny.
and your an idiot.. do some research before writing
@loulou Why don't you state what part of what I said is wrong if anything?
it doesn't have KS like cod. It doesn't have rts like starhawk. Also the game is coming out next year... sometime after cod and bf!!. Now killzone is crazy for going up against cod and bf.Destiny is like defiance but better im guessing. This game is geared towards cod players for sure. It also has the wall running mixed with jet packs
@jetlian The mechs and jet packs from starhawk. The ugliest engine in the world from COD. Which is now almost 6 years old. Killzone is a different type of fps. That's why I didn't mention it in this comparison. No other fps plays like Killzone. Kind off like how no other game plays like Halo besides maybe Destiny because I see a lot of similarities. But Killzone is doing something different this time around and their goal is to create a technically beautiful game as an fps. Hopefully the story and multiplayer get better too, but I have faith in Guerrilla games. But tell me Titanfall doesn't look/play exactly like COD but with Mechs and Jetpacks. I hate ignorant gamers like that. Talk shit about COD being the same every year, then defending Nintendo because "new characters doesn't make a new ip, new experiences does" which is bullshit they're just afraid none of their games will sell if Mario isnt attached to it. We as gamers should be pushing devs to make games like Destiny, The Last of Us, and the Division. Not this Titanfall dribble which looks like COD with one of their $15 map packs. Disagree all you want. But there is truth to what I'm saying.
killzone hasn't shown anything new, same with destiny. the division looks good but im worried about all these online shooters.Even the last of us isn't new. people who like cod would pick this up. By the time this hits cod players will be falling off.
@jetlian Destiny nothing new? A broader vision of Borderlands a seamless co op experience that evolves with other players around you. Tell me one game like it. Killzone it trying something new to what it was doing before. The Last of Us use familiar elements from different games to create a fresh experience, tell me a game like The Last of Us. If Titanfall hits in the holidays it'll be condemned to compete with the next COD/ Star Wars Battlefront/ The Division and other unannounced titles that would appeal to the average COD player. For Titanfall to succeed it must release in Q1-Q3 and avoid Q4 all together. This way COD: Ghosts or Battlefield 4 players will be tempted to migrate to Titanfall before the holiday 2014 titles hit.
destiny is like defiance it an mmo shooter thats it. killzone isn't breaking bread. The last of us is like old school survival horror. I am alive even though a arcade game was more survival with limited resources nothing in recent years is new except maybe tablet style games.Which isnt major gaming. I cant think of any games like angry bird or cut the rope from when I was younger. I'm sure somebody could find soomething similar though
is this what the cloud is doing . not inpressed at all.
I just saw pictures of Titanfall on other sites and they look much better than these for some reason. Like the author explained these are low resolution...very low resolution. I just hope it wasn't done intentionally since it is the favored game of the next gen.
Why does everyone want the game to be graphics first, everything else later? I'd rather have the graphics held back and have a really smooth shooter with 60 frames per second, or higher if that's what they aim for. Graphics are overrated, I'll take a good game over a pretty one any day.
gameplay looks fun but the graphics... wtf
Lol dont worry if u seen the direct footage from e3 you know it looks better then these direct feed pics
Shut your mouth.Gaming is more than graphics.
so why bother buying the xbone version? why even get it for next gen?
Just watched a video with Destiny and it got me thinking. Which of the two, Destiny and Titanfall, are you most looking forward to playing? PS4 owners can't purchase Titanfall, but we all still have opinions. Also one owners get the best of both worlds in this case.
I'd definitely want to see more of TitanFall, but I'm gonna have to say Destiny.
I have the same opinion.
I'll check out titanfall on PC. But if it feels anything like cod, NO thanks. Destiny could be good, looked nice and looks interesting. Shadowfall looks like a big game as well, as does BF4. Many to choose from.
What the fuck has Destiny to do with Titan fall. Destiny is a more like an rpg.This is a multiplayer shooter.
I'm getting Titanfall on PC, but Destiny all the way.
I'm not excited for Titanfall, I keep trying to be but I think my gaming preferences have changed over the last couple years. No single player actually bothers me now. I use to just jump online and never play campaigns but I think I have online multiplayer fatigue from all the shooters every year.
i'm getting both for xbox one
Yep same here. And the amazing looking Forza 5! Man that game looks sweet as hell!
Destiny will be the first next Gen game I get!
Destiny looks and plays just like Halo. The guns even sound like Halo. The environments are copied and pasted from Halo. Don't get me wrong Halo is great but this game is a duplicate with slightly better graphics. This is Halo with a new name just to have an excuse to be brought to all the consoles and make more money.
Honestly neither, but Destiny will be a multiplatform so it'll be more widespread than Titanfall for at least a year. That's a lot of headstart.
I will be getting Destiny for PS4. I will either wait for Titanfall to make it's way to PS4 in a year or check it out on PC.
I can't say I am blown away, especially at the textures up close.
It looks nice, but honestly, Killzone SF looks much much better.
One thing that I'm most curious about is that most games that use the Source engine, end up having a similar feel to Half-Life (Not a bad thing). But since the Source engine is HIGHLY modular I wonder how far of a departure they're going to be able to get out of it.
Oh dear. Did MS just pull a Killzone 2 2005 E3 with Titanfall?
right...and how do you figure that? the killzone 2 e3 2005 trailer was cgi. the titanfall demo shown at e3 was gameplay and this is gameplay.. how in the world are the two situations in any way similar??
actually killzone 2 final version is better than the 2005 CGI. and about graphic wise titanfall looks oki compare to other games shown in E3, but now it is all about gameplay.
If these is true xbox one pics i guess those high end PC's really boosted its visuals
You do realize only one game demo was running on a Geforce Titan model graphics card. That demo was Lococycle, and that was because the developers admitted they didn't have a working demo. Titanfall is still in the alpha stages, this is why companies like CDPR didn't show their gameplay to the public because the public is retarded and doesn't understand what Alpha means.
@thelastofgen I did not state the E3 TF demo was CGI dude. These screenshots shown look nothing like the E3 demo MS showed us, I just went back and watched it. The demo looks sharp, with no shadow jaggies (as seen in the cockpit view). The demo defitnity didnt have any poor textures as shown in these screenshots. Either these are 360 visuals or MS conned us with showing it running on a high end PC. Hence my reference to the infamous Killzone 2 debacale of E3 2005. I am just shocked by thess screenshots.
They need to have the gameplay nailed down which from the e3 demo seems to be done. Now they have around a year before release to make some strides in graphics department and polish the game.
this pics look like they are from the 360 ver which i hope they are cuz im not going next gen until the end of next year.
I'd say those pics look bad even for current gen standards. The textures are horrible. Everything is so blurry. http://s21.postimg.org/ktcq...
i don't care about the graphics is the mech vs mech combat im exited for,i haven't play a online mech game since mechassault 2 lone wolf and for a game running on a modified old engine is looking great.
To be honest game looks ok nothing special...
I know people will claim that the game looks like this because its rendering at 1080P at 60FPS but Battlefield 4 does the same thing and it looks much better than this. Edit: Anyways isn't this game using the cloud to improve the visuals 3 times over an offline Xbox One? If so then the cloud features of the Xbox One disappoint me because it should be much better than this. Motorola RAZR i
Retard alert? They're using the Source engine because making a new engine takes time and money. Dice had time and a team working on the Frostbite engine for years and updating it so comparing it to BF4 makes you look retarded. And the Cloud was designed to offload certain things not improve visuals 3 times over an offline X1. They just said it gives 3 times the power but having Dedicated Servers allows them to offload A.I onto the servers which gives them bit more freedom in the shipped product. Cloud could be a complete gimmick for all I care because "Dedicated Servers for all Multiplayer games" is more than enough for me to pick up an X1 for games like Titanfall. P.S don't compare a game like BF4 that's more like a Battlefield 3.5 to something that's new and innovative based on graphical appeal.
When will people just understand Mariokart8,X,Bayonetta2,COD Ghosts,Watchdogs,were best graphics at E3 technically. http://nsider2.com/wp-conte... and this is real time co-op in game running on wiiu its coming to the UK can't wait,oh this is 818x460 resolution,wiiu will run at much higher resolution wow.
The E3 PS4 demo of The Division was the best graphically impressive game I saw.
Totally agree: http://cdn0.sbnation.com/en... @Snipercontrol: And that's a screenshot from the PS4 version. Now before anyone complains, I'm not saying it can't look like that on the X1, I'm just comparing it to Titanfall, which I believe is deliberately being over hyped For those who disagreed with Snipercontrol: http://www.specsavers.co.uk...
@GribbleGrunger I am not a massive MP fan, but I will be definitely be getting this game. That screen shot you posted is like DAMN!
Yeah running on pc ???? just like all ubisofts games ?
@Triforce079 I see from your random comment, you didn't see the on-stage LIVE demo? Stop trolling!
That is one Ugly game. Games like this and Call of Duty shame me for calling themselves Next-Gen when clearly it looks like something that should be on PS3/360/ and Wii U.