One of the most anticipated gameplay reveals at E3 2013 was that of Destiny from Bungie. They did a good job hyping the game before the event, but went crazy during the Sony Press Conference, showing the game off in all its glory.
Interesting, can't wait to play this next year. Maybe they'll put a demo in Ghosts?
Yes to the no.
A yes to the yes to the no
A yes to everything except the demo in Ghosts.
Haha wow, wasn't expecting so many disagrees for that comment. I just meant I wonder if they'll put a demo in Ghosts so they can help it get in the minds of as many people as possible.
Stop mentioning Call of Duty on the internet. Disagrees will follow.
This is a BUNGIE game. It will be direct competition for the Call of Duty franchise.
You'll get double the disagree if you added "XboxOne" to your comment. Lol
its not a bad idea... the thing is that ppl like me who has no interest in a cod game may buy one just for the destiny demo.. and that would totally suck.. so pls noo.. any other game would be fine
lolol poor trendygamers. just trying to make a point, you poor soul.
@onyoursistersback imagine saying "im playing cod ghosts on my xbox one" next gen
I see what you're saying. Unfortunately members of this site respond to triggers and can't possibly view and judge your objectively.
Why? Ghosts ain't anything groundbreaking....like the past couple CODs...
Perhaps they'll give us free leprosy with every copy as well? That would be just as awesome!
@Parapraxis Are you on drugs?
there probably like me got so tierd of fps only one i play now is borderlands 2 and battlefield 3(because of psplus) so we wont be getting ghosts
All CoD hate aside, game demos aren't normally in games anymore, it seems. at least not as often as they used to be. I think this fall would be a bit early for a destiny demo, too.
The only way to get a "Demo" is to go to Bungie.net and sign up for Beta.
God no because then I would have to buy COD.
At first I thought you were crazy, then I remembered that Activision is publishing Destiny. This could well happen. Sorry I can't take back my disagree.
And all the money out of my checking account.
Title to article is mis-leading. The Bungie.net manager doesnt say anything about a super secret dev kit engine. Digital foundry analysis of Destiny ps4 that it has a low poly-count compared to COD Ghosts. http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
Bungie: "What we took to E3 were our super-secret dev kits. Those are the hardware tools we’re using to make the game. If you thought that looked pretty, you can totally expect that level of polish on your PS4." The title has a comma before engine...
"Lever of polish" hmmmm what does that even mean...I hope he meant "detail"
@larkman So, you're following me now? I should be flattered, but you're a bit of a simpleton....I am, therefore, disappointed....
Low poly Characters. Because they aint faces. Halo has low poly everything. I wish COD would die a horrible death.
Halo 4 won best graphics of the year awards....
That's exactly his point, when you are not rendering faces poly count will usually go significantly down without meaning the game looks bad, simply your models demand less polygons to achieve good quality.
Who cares about CoD. This and The Division are my high roles on my shopping list. And I go with KZ:SF over CoD and BF for my quick shooter fix. The same I did on the PS3. The better visuals and a half open world aspect (bigger world which lets you choose missions instead of yet the same linear run through). And then followed by so many other games - AC:BF, Watch Dogs or inFamous or Drive Club. Can't play all those in the time I have. I am not sure if I like all this massive games. I have no time for all that. I loved the Co-Op mode in R2 - and really a shame there hasn't been much like it since. Both those two seem to be just like what I want.
Lol Eurogamer has bin shitting on PlayStation as far back as I can remember...I used to have an account on there and I seen it happen on a Dailey basis!.
The sooner they show games on ACTUAL PS4 hardware, the happier I'll be.
"If you thought that looked pretty, you can totally expect that level of polish on your PS4."
Well I expect that to happen at Gamescom.
Infamous and Killzone are happy to help. And Knack too.
So it's safe to say the PS4 is the lead platform for Destiny?
I'm a xbox fan, and even bigger Bungie fan...
Atm, I'd say it's safe to assume so.
There is no such thing as "lead platform" anymore, both use the same PC architecture.
Yeah, they even phased out lead platforms this gen. Or, if they do have a lead plat, they don't tell anyone, as it turns into a massive deal.
"No lead platform" yes, "same PC architecture" no
Xbox One will be the lead; you want to start with the inferior hardware. Then you can scale and apply the better technology on top of the Xbox one version to produce the better looking PS4. The GPU in the PS4 is at least twice as powerful as the Xbox One; the RAM also puts the Xbox One to shame. The only place it can compete is the CPU: with that said; unlike the fictional power of the cloud; PS4 has already shown the benefits of being able to utilize their GPU for processes normally performed by the CPU. As they have ample power to spare on the GPU; the CPU will produce well ahead of the similar chip in the Xbox One.
@Foliage, uh, that's actually the opposite of how it works. Developers start with the higher end technology because it is much easier to scale things down than it is to scale them up.
@Foliage "The GPU in the PS4 is at least twice as powerful as the Xbox One; the RAM also puts the Xbox One to shame" Are you drunk? the GPU is supposedly 50% more powerful but they compared it to an off-the shelf GPU. The X1 GPU is custom-made, we don't know what it is really capable of. so it might be closer to 20%. Also its been recently confirmed that the RAM is pretty much comparable if not faster then the PS4's RAM. The X1 is capable of 192GB per second while the PS4 does 176GB. http://vr-zone.com/articles...
@Mystogan the fact that MS hasn't released any specs other than 5 billion transistors and the execs saying hardware isnt everything is very telling that they have the weaker hardware.
Myst, only the embedded 32meg ESRam can reach that figure. The DDR3 setup still tops out at 102g BW. Don't spread misinformation.
Foliage you lost all credibility and proved how clueless and misinformed most fanboys are. Your whole troll post should be pounded with a giant red "fail stamp"
There will always be a lead platform until all systems are exactly the same, which hasn't happened yet. Also, 32MB of One's RAM have turned out to be faster than previously thought. The rest is just as slow as previously thought. You don't add the two together.
I would hope so since it's the more powerful machine. I don't want a repeat of last gen with Sony getting the crap end of the deal when it came to multiplats
Only Naughty Dog can Maxout the PS4.
Very disrespectful to the other talented developers in the world.
I don't see how that is disrespectful. It is an opinion.. as we are all entitled to.. There are a lot of talented developers out there.. and that being said, I have been playing Naughty Dog games since the PS1 and as far as immersion goes, there are no developers that are still in business, that beats them.. (okay, 2K comes close).... I have never rage quit a game as many times as I have while playing my second playthrough of The Last of Us.. but I cannot walk away from it...
They have some pretty stiff competition. Quantic Dream definitely seem to know their way around the system.
I don't count interactive cut-scenes as gameplay though. I'm still not a fan of QTEs as it is but I've grown accustomed to them through god of war and I think it was properly implemented in The Last of US. I guess I am biased though, I'm not a fan of Quantic Dream, never have been. They have great concepts and awesome ideas, they're just poorly executed in my opinion. And they think way to highly of themselves. I can't stand even listening to David Cage talk, he annoys the hell out of me for some reason.. Hopefully they can prove me wrong, I really do hope they make more than an interactive cut-scene, I'm intrigued by the concept of their next venture. I just personally don't have my hopes up on Beyond. It still seems like they skimped on the gameplay elements to tell their interactive story. I want immersion, and I just haven't gotten that from them, so we'll see...
Interactive cut-scene? You sound like you think their games are QTE after QTE, which isn't the case at all, you do a lot of exploring and puzzle solving, it's just for the few and far apart action moments they go with QTEs... Have you even played an adventure before? The idea is not to have you running around kicking bad guys in the nuts or shooting terrorists, but instead to be using your brain to solve problems... Action moments play very minimal holes in adventure games and even when they appear the most usuall form involves making a fast decision on how to proceed with the fight, escape a trap, etc, not on having you doing the action yourself. Of course, if you need to make a fast decision on how to fight, the obvious interface will be a 2 or more timed button prompts on the screen... I'll agree Quantic don't handle the specific fight scenarios the best (other action moments are ok), as you barelly make decisions in fighting, most of the time you simply get to "press X to dodge" or "O counter", while you could have, let's say, "press X to dodge, O to counter or  to reach for gun" all in the same time to make it more decision based instead of just following the QTE, but even so it would still be multiple QTE, for a pure adventure game there's no way around it and I don't think they care about mixed Action Adventure (which is fine by me, there's tons of those kind of games out there).
I would say they mastered the ps3 so why not the #ps4?
I still think KZ3 does so much more - and KZ:SF _is_ already impressive on the PS4. So, yeah, I'd add Guerilla to that list (not only PS4 - if you look at what Cambridge squeezes out of the Vita).
"What we took to E3 were our super-secret dev kits." -read; - pc's that probably play the game at higher settings than ps4 or xbox1 ever will dream of holding out for official pc announcement, much rather play on that!
Are you one of the many mid range pc owners that see console/high end pc comparisons and claim a pc win. My best mate spent nearly £1500 upgrading his pc to play crysis 2 (which took him a further day to run the game). I asked him if he was looking forward to witcher 3 and he said yeah but will have to spend more for it to look how it should! Thats not even 1 generation, not even 1/4 of a generation.
your friend is a moron a single gtx 680 trashes everything the ps4/xbox1 will ever hope to display its about $400 the ps4 and xbox1 will NEVER be capable of the visual fidelity a single gtx 680 is able to produce, heck a $200 660 ti craps on ps4/xbox1
@cunn, yet no developer is EVER going to develop ANYTHING specifically for the GTX 680.
I gotta agree your friend is an idiot. My 5 year old backup PC will cost a whole $200-$250 to upgrade for this gen. Throw in price of games and not having to buy any accessories and it amounts to me saving hundreds if not thousand of dollars over an average console gamer this gen..... @sweendog
lol you butthurt son? Don't need to post your sh1t on a PS4 article. There's no need to start a war. I don't talk shit about my rig. Yes, we have one too, fool.
I am sorry but I have been working with computers for years and if you think one GTX 680 does anything really you are the moron my friend or seriously know next to nothing about computers in general. Let me guess? You just buy expensive shit and call yourself an expert right? Put that GTX 680 in a single core or dual core PC with shit RAM and see how far it gets you. It is always the most inexperienced PC users that think the GPU is the most important thing in a PC.
Are they talking about the awesome freezing? Bungee current gen already have that feature.
Awesome freezing? THat sounds like an oxymoron.
watch Bungie have to limit themselves on PS4 just because MS has agreements with everyone that there version cant be noticeably inferior to the competitions version, happened on PS3 will happen again on PS4. LAME.
Source? And btw PS4 games will not look Better then X1 games. you won't notice any difference.
Mystogan he is telling the truth there is an agreement with developers for Microsoft that the games have to look equal for third party games this has been known for the past 3-4years
@TIER1xWOLFPACKx Please provide link with actual evidence please.
I think there will be a difference, but it'll likely be so small that most people won't bother to compare