Submitted by Lavalamp 798d ago | article

Xbox One's digital strategy overlooks popular games like DayZ

Gamasutra: "'I'm quite happy for DayZ to come out on any console that is indie-friendly,' says Dean Hall, project lead on the game, which, springing from the runaway success of his original mod, is currently in full-on development as a standalone title.

The problem: He doesn't see any indication that Microsoft has changed its policies in a way that makes it possible for him to bring his game to the Xbox One. 'As a developer, the biggest concern for me is, why doesn't Microsoft have a digital distribution model? They don't. It doesn't exist.'" (DayZ, Dean Hall, Xbox One)

Foxgod  +   798d ago
Find a publisher, if demand is high enough, that should be easy.
Just look at state of decay.
Lubu  +   798d ago
The point is, they shouldn't need a publisher. If they have the resources to self publish, why should they have to share their profits with a 3rd party?
Blankolf  +   798d ago
Don't insult your own inteligence good sir, this problem isn't about DayZ entering the PS4 and not the Xbox1, this is Xbox1 no longer being the indie friendly device, forcing little but small games to seek out a distributer.

Do you honestly think Minecraft, before its success would be taken by anyone? A retro mining open world with graphism that dates to my windows 98? But look at it now...
fermcr  +   798d ago
If X1's digital strategy overlooks popular games like DayZ, then something is definitely wrong with X1's digital strategy.

Microsoft needs to alter X1's digital strategy because a lot of indie developers aren't happy with it and are going to ignore the X1.
#1.3 (Edited 798d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Ace Killa 08  +   798d ago
Then again it's not like Dayz developers are the first to start off on a budget. Other Indie games were like that in XLA and kicked off. It is a supply and demand at the same time a gamble. It is 46 million(it may be active users or not) people that will not have access to this game, that's a big loss.

http://www.gameinformer.com... - source for 46 million. I know it's outdated and also not of active subscriptions.
KwietStorm  +   798d ago
Indies are Indies for a reason. Several reasons really, but not having a publisher breathing down your neck, stifling creative direction, forcing release windows, regurgitating DLC and the like, and then taking a cut after all the work, is a big deal for these guys. They obviously can handle themselves, so why bring in this big company with other priorities to watch over the project? If it ends up not releasing on the Xbox, then so be it. You shouldn't have to compromise your own model because someone doesn't look at you as an equal partner.
rydamgw  +   798d ago
Day Z has been confirmed coming to PS4 sorry the loyal Xbox fans will miss out just because MS has terrible support for anything indie.
ThatCanadianGuy514  +   798d ago
That's right.I go where greatness awaits.
Ace Killa 08  +   798d ago
But state of decay developers are working on something bigger for xbox one...
#2.2 (Edited 798d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
KwietStorm  +   798d ago
What's that?
KwietStorm  +   798d ago
Confirmed where exactly?
marchinggamer  +   798d ago
It will be on x1 too and anyway x1 has minecraft
Fireseed  +   798d ago
I seriously can't wait for the X1 as a gamer, but as a game artist I seriously cannot imagine why they still have this whole pay per update thing.
Ace Killa 08  +   798d ago
In my opinion, it would make any developer think twice before submitting a game or update. No bad updates will be submitted. Then again in theory this practice could work or there might be other reasons why.
Fireseed  +   798d ago
Sure you can make them think before they us a broken update but my example to counter this is TF2 has long been considered the greatest example of post launch support. It to this day has had over 360 updates since the game has come out. And we see what has happened as a result of the 360 editions update locking.

The main reason why I'm baffled by this is that it really has no clear advantage for Xbox to keep these policies. Like seriously NONE whatsoever! Microsoft may have to push the update to live but COME ON! But hey I'm looking at this from a software developer standpoint, not a hardware dev stand point. Maybe theres some things I'm not aware of, but Steam puts updates out for 3rd parties games at no charge.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

ARK SPHERE service ends in February 2016

9m ago - After one year of the service, WeMade Online is going to close the ARK SPHERE in February 2016. | iPhone

NBA 2K16 Gameplay Improvements Detailed in 'The Living World' Trailer

12m ago - 2K Sports has released a new gameplay trailer for NBA 2K16, titled The Living World. It documents... | PC

Top 5 Movies To See This Month

Now - The month of September has Johnny Depp portraying an enraged criminal, a group of climbers trying to make it home safely, and the return of the sur... | Promoted post

Face-Off: Dishonored: The Definitive Edition

14m ago - Digital Foundry: While the introduction of some new effects work adds to the core look of the ga... | PC

Long live last gen: 10 Xbox 360 games we want now

17m ago - At nearly 10 years old, Xbox 360 is still going strong. Here are 10 games to look out for this year. | Xbox 360

Pop Fizz and Splat Join Skylanders Cast Ahead of Superchargers Release

18m ago - Two more of the 20 characters slated for release with Skylanders Superchargers have been revealed... | Wii