Top
140°

SuperPhillip Central's Top 100 Games of All Time (80-71)

SuperPhillip Central writes, "On June 5, SuperPhillip Central turned five years old. We're celebrating big the only way we know how, with a list of our favorite 100 games of all time. SuperPhillip Central's staff has come together to come up with this list. These don't necessarily have to be the best, but they are indeed our favorites. Coming up with an order for these games has been an immense challenge. We're sure you won't agree with our order-- heck, we don't even agree with our order. That said, we hope you'll at least agree with our picks, and if you don't, at least you can read our rationale for our choices. Regardless, for ten weeks, we will be counting down our favorite games of all time. Please join us for this great undertaking. Let's get to the countdown!"

Read Full Story >>
superphillipcentral.com
WeAreLegion1044d ago

You know what happens when you release your "Top 100 Games of All-Time" list in ten-title increments?

I don't freaking care!

Phil321044d ago (Edited 1044d ago )

Speaking of not caring, we're sure we'll suffer since the most popular user in N4G history, WeAreLegion, does not "freaking care" about our list because he's too short-sighted and ignorant to see how much work putting more than 10 games each week would be.

We'll try to pick up the pieces and move on with our lives.

WeAreLegion1044d ago

Only two people commented on this post. Do you know why? Because you put "80-71" on there.

Retort all you want. The fact remains that people don't care about lists when you only do ten at a time. They may care about that last ten, but that's it. Make the full 100; then post it. I realize it's a lot of work. I've done it. It took me weeks to put together.

Phil321044d ago (Edited 1044d ago )

double post

Phil321044d ago

The views toward the article tell a different story.

And the amount of comments here =/= interest in a story.

We appreciate your insight, though.