Enormous new shots featuring intense action and "dual-weilding" of weapons.
Today they announced that Resistance won't, run at 1080p, so I don't know how you came up with the 1080p screenshots. Especially since you got the screenshots from IGN, it says nowhere on the IGN-site that they are in 1080p.
...but Insomniac already confirmed they had to sacrifice 1080p for the final game. Think of this as "what could have been". ;)
Besides, it's all irrelevant...the game still looks like BLACK with slightly better textures and lighting...SLIGHTLY. Gears of War owns this graphically, in a MAJOR way.
for the people that dont think that GOW looks better than this, its time to get a eye check up. this is a launch game, so for 1 it shouldnt look better. and 2, are you F@#!ing kidding me, the gun doesnt even show any light reflections or anything. this game looks better than black but not by much. in all honesty this game looks like xbox 1.5
Those are some nice screens. The enemy aliens in this game are all extremly creepy.
Thankin you Bhai you are probably the only person who does their articles on N4G perfectly and doesn't require any editing from us mods :D...
lol..thx for makin our lifes easier :D...
lol...if only people would use a little common sense before they post....but the good "news" is I can always count on this site for a few laughs. Thanks.
Emm needed 22gb of space eh? I have to say this game looks like the Doom 3 engine with no textures, it looks rubbish.
Gears Of War beats its hands down with a needle!
Hey but amazingly after touting it was 22+gigs and growing which could only be done on BD (hype pushed by Sony) now 3 weeks from launch(which is when you have to show your hand) now its down to 16gigs.....they said they used "further compression" and "other things that make sense"....whatever that means???? uhmm....Can I say I told you so?, I can't wait to see just what we get with the 16gigs.....I'm just wondering since DJ always says that this game proves dev's need BD right now.....especially since its looks so awesome, you can only make a game this good on BD with 22, uh I mean 16gigs right DJ?
They improved their compression techniques, but most of the data reduction came from taking out the PAL-formatted FMVs. They found out that the PS3 was powerful enough to do video format conversion in realtime, so they simply programmed the game to convert the NTSC video into PAL format when in use on PAL-region PS3s.
Saves time and gives them more space for game content. Resistance is already finished, but since Ratchet & Clank has been in development for some time now they can use these techniques on that title. Considering how people have been throwing out accusations like "sloppy coding", "sloppy graphics", and "wasting space on junk", it's nice to see that PS3 developers are being very efficient with the large amount of space they've been given.
Good thing Gears of War looks at least twice as good as this one and keeps it on a DL-DVD!
Oh yeah, they cut 6 GB of CGI PAL movies. They still didn't optimalize the compression and cut some more unusefull CGI stuff. I think you'll be playing 5 seconds and then get 3 minutes of CGI again. The new Metal Gear?
lol, buy glasses. this games powns gow in any way. it looks far better you moron.
ARE YOU STUPID? TWICE LOL YOUR NOT A GAME YOUR FANBOY.
RESISTANCE HAS MORE STUFF GOIN ON THE SCREEN,40 PLAYERS,DESTRUCTUBLE ENVIROMENT,ECT..
YOU COMPARING GOW LOL STUPID THEMART
4V4 LOL THATS NEXT GEN EH?
FRAME RATE SUKCS NOT MUCH STUFF GOIN ON THE SCREEN THE GAME IS JUST SO DARK .
this game is the sh!t so much stuff going on at one time you can shoot people up part by part the world is big as hell lots of people running around shooting 40 people online so you will be done with GEOW in about a week people will be playing Resistance for years
and whats even funnier is that your post sound's like a person talking to himself, trying to convince himself that he's right, since no one else believes him....its OK, Resistance is a good game and I'm sure it will be enjoyable....but try not to compare it to GOW, because uhm, well lets just say its NOT GOW.
and I didn't compare it to GOW theMART did and I'm telling the truth and you Know it GOW will not outlast Resistance most people wont even play the story mode of Resistance they are going right to the internet and thats where they will stay for months shooting it out with 40 people at the same time.
The saying goes "don't judge a book by its cover" it takes more than pretty graphics to make a game enjoyable! GOW gets little respect from me because I don't go around claiming titles are AAA on just great graphics! Besides I have seen UT2007 and it looks to be an awesome game thus far!
Will I but GOW? Yes! But I'm withholding my judgment until I can play the game because MS and epic haven't given is a playable demo yet!
Will I but RFOM? Yes, but I'm also withholding judgement until I get to play it!
From what I've seen from both games my personal judgement this far leans towards RFOM because I have seen more that I like and I can't wait to really play online with 40 players, the enviornments look huge and there is just so much going on at one time, the weapons are innovative and I really enjoy the games this developer has made in the past!
Its clear the only thing some of you gamers enjoy is graphics. Which hardly makes some of you real gamers at all! Get over it both games can be great depending on your preference
that UT2007 will be on x360 also.they just want to push GOW first.once Gears is out an the hype has died down a bit then they'll announce UT2007 for the xbox360!!dont forget that second to halo was Unreal Championship for online game play on xbox1.
What are you talking about? I don't even see a point in your post of course we know that UT2007 will come to both consoles! And then we will have this time wasting pitiful debate about whick one looks better, ect ect ect but my point was from the videos I have seen of both GOW I prefer what UT2007 has to offer. Its all a matter of preference people! Both games CAN be great and successful on each respected console, everytime we see or hear anything about RFOM we have to hear about how GOW looks so much better and adhere to ignorant comments like RFOM looks like a PS2 title or something else childish! It get old and really diminishes what both these potential AAA have to offer gamers! Enjoy GOW and RFOM but don't act like a 12 year old in the process!
all I was doing is stating that it WILL be mulit platform. because of your statement there will be fanboys in here talking about the Ps3 has UT2007 an the x360 wont.an acting like a 12 year old I think not!! I'm not bashing the Ps3 or its games, I dont compare GOW to RFOM, I dont care about that, when I see fit then I'm gonna get a PS3, do I like SONYS tactics NO!! but am I getting a PS3 sure!!! in due time.
are like me and really don't care if a game supports 40 playes at the same time? to me this takes away any strategy or thinking. You don't need to find the enemy, flank, outhink them. All you need to do is run into an area and shoot for about 10 seconds and kill as many moving thigs as you can until you are killed. 4 on 4 is great 8 on 8 is probably optimal in my opinion. Any more and it loses something, it just becomes a fragfest. If that is your cup of tea the resistance looks like it will be great. Just not my style. I think that the 4 on 4 tactical gameplay would hold my attention much longer. But I don't have ADD so go figure.
Contrary to what some people may think, I beleive they would let you choose how many players can duke it out in a map. Yes,40 is the maximum number of players allowed in a map. That doesn't mean that every multiplayer session will have 40 players.
if you have seem the videos of the online play for rfom with ted and his 70 inch tv it shows in the demo just how huge these enviroments are. i thought it would be crouded too but it realy didnt seem so. and this game will obviously have its own strategy, but it will be on a higher scale due to amount of players and such. but i respect your opinion on the 8 on 8. ill be playin rainbow 6 vagas for that.
this game looks fantastic, i like the 4th pic. best.
and gow dosnt realy have much better graphics people stop lie'n to yourself. and its only because of what can be done per frame. correct me if im wrong but i havnt seen more than like 9 people on screen at once, and no distructable enviroment. all the detail goes to these 9-10 players the enviroment isnt that detailed. so people shoulnt be hating RFOM for graphics. it has a lot more action there for weaker graphics and it still looks great anyways. game play i cant argue yet though.
i wonder what difficult all the rfom demos were on because they seemed hella easy. cus the AI seemed sort of stupid but also very agressive and that could be where they are going with the game. over powering the player with tons of agressive retarded aliens.
they're not retarded...they're special. (politically correct) wouldn't want to hurt the aliens feelings.
i have read all of the coments on the blog i just have to say somthing about the ps3 people are saying that the graphics aint all that ,what people are not takeing in to acount is that the developers havent had the dev kits all that long so they need to catch up a bit but give them a year with the hardwair and you will see a diffrence as you will with the 360 ,i have a 360 and its great ,i just get sick of peaple saying that one is better than the other in fact there aboute the same in spec .....so just play the games and have fun ...aint that what its all about any way.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.