30°
Submitted by h0stile 392d ago | opinion piece

Sony, PlayStation 4 and the low-cost value proposition

You’ve heard the news. You know the details. Maybe you’ve even made up your mind and you already know which console you’re going to get this holiday. Behind all this hype and excitement, there is a piece of hidden truth that you should be aware of, so let’s see what’s this all about Sony, PlayStation 4 and their low-cost value proposition. (PS4, Sony, Tag Invalid)

medman  +   392d ago
This author, in my opinion, has got it all wrong. Just because Microsoft chooses to charge a premium, doesn't mean the Xbox One is a premium device. It simply means they are robbing you blind, as they have for years in charging for their live gold all while collecting money hand over fist from gamers and advertisers alike. The PS4 has technically superior specifications. Your argument for premium could only be true if the One were offering a better experience with superior hardware. It is quite the opposite. They offer inferior hardware and demand everyone implement kinect whether you're interested in the camera or not. Making that camera mandatory is self serving for microsoft, it doesn't benefit the average consumer. And your analogy stating "That’s what high income men aged 18-34 are paying for. Do you think they don’t have an internet connection? Do you think they need to sell their games? Do you think they care about their privacy with all those gadgets around them? They need people to tell them how cool and succesful they are, to confirm their status quo and that’s what Xbox One helps them achieve." is false. High income individuals already control their A/V setups with proprietary apps on their tablets or smart TV's. These apps allow a far greater level of control than the Xbox One could ever offer. So out of the box, the device is obsolete for these people. As the owner of a fairly substantial A/V system, I already have the functionality Microsoft is trying to peddle with the One. I can do it better. Right now. From my tablet, smartphone, and smart TV. So what exactly are they selling? An overpriced, underperforming box that may have some interesting exclusive games Microsoft has paid through the teeth for, but little else of value to me. That does not constitute premium, sir. Sony, meanwhile, has the better horsepower, a better design of the system from an engineering perspective, better first party exclusives, and no restrictions on the content I buy. Game over.
#1 (Edited 392d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Enemy Mind Review | RETRO

1h ago - RETRO Magazine reviews a 2D side scrolling shooter that allows you to take control of any enemy s... | PC
40°

Who Will Be Crowned Greatest Smash Player Alive at EVO 2014? "5 Gods" vs "3 Underdogs"

2h ago - NE: "Before EVO 2013, Super Smash Brothers had been for the most part a grassroots community,... | Wii U
40°

Wolfenstein: The New Order Review | Game Podunk

2h ago - GP: "Wolfenstein: The New Order is a brilliant shooter that makes all the right moves. Fun, explo... | PC
40°

The Wolf Among Us: Episode 5 - Cry Wolf Review & Gameplay | GamersNexus

2h ago - GamersNexus: "Nine months after releasing its first episode, Telltale Games’ The Wolf Among Us ha... | PC
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
40°

The Co-op Podcast #81: Should Companies Try Harder To Secure 3rd Party Exclusive Titles?

2h ago - Gary Swaby at The Koalition writes: Welcome back to The Co-op podcast. This week Jakejames Lugo,... | PS4