30°
Submitted by h0stile 407d ago | opinion piece

Sony, PlayStation 4 and the low-cost value proposition

You’ve heard the news. You know the details. Maybe you’ve even made up your mind and you already know which console you’re going to get this holiday. Behind all this hype and excitement, there is a piece of hidden truth that you should be aware of, so let’s see what’s this all about Sony, PlayStation 4 and their low-cost value proposition. (PS4, Sony, Tag Invalid)

medman  +   407d ago
This author, in my opinion, has got it all wrong. Just because Microsoft chooses to charge a premium, doesn't mean the Xbox One is a premium device. It simply means they are robbing you blind, as they have for years in charging for their live gold all while collecting money hand over fist from gamers and advertisers alike. The PS4 has technically superior specifications. Your argument for premium could only be true if the One were offering a better experience with superior hardware. It is quite the opposite. They offer inferior hardware and demand everyone implement kinect whether you're interested in the camera or not. Making that camera mandatory is self serving for microsoft, it doesn't benefit the average consumer. And your analogy stating "That’s what high income men aged 18-34 are paying for. Do you think they don’t have an internet connection? Do you think they need to sell their games? Do you think they care about their privacy with all those gadgets around them? They need people to tell them how cool and succesful they are, to confirm their status quo and that’s what Xbox One helps them achieve." is false. High income individuals already control their A/V setups with proprietary apps on their tablets or smart TV's. These apps allow a far greater level of control than the Xbox One could ever offer. So out of the box, the device is obsolete for these people. As the owner of a fairly substantial A/V system, I already have the functionality Microsoft is trying to peddle with the One. I can do it better. Right now. From my tablet, smartphone, and smart TV. So what exactly are they selling? An overpriced, underperforming box that may have some interesting exclusive games Microsoft has paid through the teeth for, but little else of value to me. That does not constitute premium, sir. Sony, meanwhile, has the better horsepower, a better design of the system from an engineering perspective, better first party exclusives, and no restrictions on the content I buy. Game over.
#1 (Edited 407d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Five Incredible Opening Acts in Video Games

13m ago - Hardcore Gamer: It’s not easy making a good first impression. Gamers don’t like to wait. We like... | GameCube
10°

Lotus 98T Formula One car arrives in Assetto Corsa

17m ago - VVV: "Headlining Assetto Corsa Version 0.21 is the inclusion of an all-new car for the title: Lot... | PC
30°

Gaming Live to take on Twitch with new service for streamers

22m ago - With Twitch reportedly having been sold to Youtube (Google) for $1bn, Gaming Live is about to lau... | PC
30°

LittleBigPlanet 3 Interview: Sackboy Is Back But This Time He Is Not Alone

25m ago - Senior Producer Daimion Pinnock on how LittleBigPlanet 3 will innovate the series but at the same... | PS3
Ad

Study Game Design at DeVry

Now - DeVry University, is an accredited* university offering you the flexibility of over 90 locations, online courses and a wide variety of bachelor's a... | Promoted post
10°

GamerBolt: Blue Estate Game Review

29m ago - GamerBolt: "Blue Estate is a game that doesn’t deliver the full package that it could have. This... | PS4