Top
40°

Does The Last Of Us Really Need To Be That Violent? Well...Yes

Much has been made about the brutality on vivid display in Naughty Dog's latest masterpiece, so we ask a very important question...and then answer it.

Read Full Story >>
psxextreme.com
The story is too old to be commented.
andron6661654d ago

I want more kittens in my post-apocalyptic games... jk...

Kyosuke_Sanada1654d ago

Or AK-74's that shoot bubbles.....

smashcrashbash1654d ago

So people let Gears of War who chainsaw and curbstop living things for absolutely no real reason slide to ask if the desperation of violence in Last of Us is necessary? Tell me where the uproar was for that? Where were the articles asking why is it necessary to chainsaw someone's face off when you had bullets that worked just fine? But the moment Last of Us hits someone too hard suddenly it is to violent? People grinned and defended every horrible thing you could do to someone in Bullet Storm and now you want to ask if Last of Us violence is necessary because it hits to close to home?

andron6661654d ago

It's like the whole PG-13 vs. more real violence in movies.

No one questions the violence when people are pounding the hell out of each other in a highly unrealistic manner for minutes without getting a scratch. But when a film comes along which shows some more real violence and it's consequences some people start complaining...

first1NFANTRY1654d ago

double standards at it's finest. there no such thing as reliable journalism. their a bunch of fanboy nerds who pick and chose sides.

GenericNameHere1654d ago

It's an M rated.

WHY IN THE BLOODY FLIPPING HECK DO YOU QUESTION VIOLENCE IN A FREAKING MATURE RATED GAME??!! AAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHH!

Sorry for the caps lock. It's just... This is stupid. I'm not gonna even listen to stupid people who question how much violence is in an M rated game. Might as well call the FBI to ban the Aduld industry considering there's sex and porn involved and is not meant for kids!