Christophe Balestra is very happy co president today
They deserve it. While most game developers are milking stuff over and over, naughty dog is one of the developers that still innovate. Congratulations.
hope the studio grows bigger and bigger, can't wait to see what they have for E3.
Naughty Dog are beasts!! 2 years to make one of the most memorable games ever concieved!! Gamers can only bow
Be careful what you wish for.
Replying to abzdine: It took them 4 years to make The Last of Us. Remember, the studio was split after Uncharted 2 came out. One half worked on The Last of Us while the other half worked on Uncharted 3.
they started out making a game on the genesis and even the 3do before their talent was put to use on the playstation family. They are well deserving of the credit for their games and I look forward to even greater ideas on the PS4.
Can't wait for them to show somthing at E3 for the PS4!
I think it may be the 1866 game we have heard rumours of. It seems to fit in with the ND logo that looked like an old naval map. Could be a swashbuckling version of Uncharted which I would love.
Innovate...haha... Again with ND and innovation. You don't know what innovate even means do you? ND don't innovate, never have, never tried, likely never will. Edit- Who's ****ing on anything hulk bash? I'm talking about Innovation. You don't have to be innovative to make an Amazing game. The best games are usually the ones that don't innovate and just perfect whats already there. It's what Naughty Dog does best. Deal with it.
Lets [email protected] on something that is getting great reviews because it makes us feel better, said every fanboy ever....including irishguy95.
The level of the cinematic gameplay and attention to detail in Uncharted 2 was not seen in any videogame before. Which to me was in and of itself pretty innovative. So for you to claim that Naughty Dog has never innovated is a false claim and seems a bit bitter in light of The Last of Us getting pretty much universal acclaim.
Yeah they deserve it, especially with all the hard work that's went into this game Looking at that site though, can any one believe GTA4 is at the top of the high score list. It wasn't that bloody good. That my friends is what hype does to you
and this will only drive their ego even higher, i just hope they won't get deluded and think they are close or on same level of legendary gaming devs like KojimaPro, Nintendo, Capcom..etc cuz they're not also, this is the first time i've seen a dev counting reviews and talk about Metacritic lol
hahahaha capcom... really? get a load of this guy
Not beating gta4
If the demo is anything to go by, it beats GTA IV with a 2X4. GTA IV one of the most overrated games of this generation.
Ca t talk about review scores, and say reviews scores are not relevant. Review score wise, GTA4 is game of this generation.
I agree, I had fun on GTA IV, and still play it occasionally but it's nowhere near the perfect scores it was getting when it came out. Technically speaking, it was a marvel to look at and play. Gameplay-wise though, it wasn't near the level of entertainment that previous entries offered. EDIT: @Corpser - Yeah it got amazing reviews, but I don't think a lot of them were justified. They were in essence blinded by the spectacle of the game, and weren't really looking at the entertainment value it offered. (In my opinion of course.)
HAHA GTA IV? You kidding me? Every R* game is overrated, GTAIV being the game at the top. Don't get me wrong R* games are good, but they're NOT 96% good like every goddamn game they release.
It is TOO early to judge. GTA4 got 86 reviews on Metacrtics (TLOU has half of it for now) with one of the sites (Destructoid) gving 8/10 for it while 10/10 for TLOU! Expect more perfect scores from non-drunk and noob kiddy (who can't play REAL survival horror games) reviewers. BTW Don't expect GTA5 to even reach 90 n metacrtics and have the same effect like GTA4. Trust me Watchdogs will get better score than GTA5. Games with innovatiion like TLOU and Watchdogs are better received even if they explore the same (abused) genre.
gta 4 is a mediocre game. Period
Worst game in the series. Easily
and that's why we don't trust metascore
Which has nothing to do with anything.
review scores are irrelevant until their favorite company makes a high rated game. skyward sword got a 10 and everyone on here was saying that ign are just nintendo fanboys, GTA4 gets a 10 and it was paid off by rockstar, the last of us gets a 10 and the game wholly deserved it. thats the logic on here.
Nobody said it was, you're off topic my friend. What about the fact that it's a new IP reviewing this highly? Any thoughts on that front? Thought not...lol Review average is very impressive. End of. :)
Look at the disagrees lol. But it's true, 51 reviews already in at score 95. It's just not going to beat GTA4's 98. Do the math
People are more than likely disagreeing because, although absolutely factual, nobody has said it was beating/was going to beat GTA4, so it was totally out of context. It's also kind of irrelevant; everyone should play something that averages over 90, as it's a major achievement, regardless of accuracy, as so few make that milestone. This guy was trying to provoke a response and he got one, so I'm sure he's happy lol ;)
Congrats to you Naughty Dog. My favourite developer along with Valve and Rockstar Games.
I'm happy for ND, but I'm disappointed in some of the attitudes on this site. stuff like this: "I think anything less than a 9 is just trolling. Ha polygon gave it a 75. Shows how much weight should be given to their opinion." Like, when did review scores become so important on vindicating someone's justification of purchase instead of an actually evaluation? I thought the site was turning a corner on this kind of number-gazing but I may have been wrong. Glad TLoU turned out well tho.
Yeah, review scores are meant to be looked at as a whole. Go around to multiple sites and get an average score. Of course there are going to be people who like something less than others do. That's why you don't base it off of one review. Get facts from multiple sources, then judge base your purchase on what you've heard.
People do it all the time.They build hype.Feed off each others hype.Build more hype. Then get disappointed when their hype isn't matched by reviews. That's why i try to keep my expectations low and reasonable.I expected 8&9's across the board and look, i got nothing to complain about now.You'll see the same thing leading up to the E3 conferences. Everyone commenting about the last guardian or Versus or something.Then if it doesn't show they'll flip the hell out lol.People are people.Can't change that.
Prcko post below shows why Polygon's review seems so out of place (i also read somewhere that Polygon was founded by Microsoft, is that true?).
Why would they bother reviewing sony games then? That would be an obvious conflict of interest. This is the same sight that gave Journey a 10 and guacamelee a 9.
Didnt they also give Ni No Kuni a 6.5 and Dead Space 3 a 9.5? Doesnt matter, reviews rarely change my mind on games anyway.
NiNoKuni is my personal GOTY so far (Last of Us & BioShock Infinite are on my June/July hitlist) and Polygon completely lowballed it as well, so I'm not surprised to be at early odds with them yet again. Unfortunate, but predictable. 95 avg puts TLoU in LBP territory. Great gen for new, exclusive IP. Bring on Beyond and Puppeteer!!
That's just my opinion of them. If they're entitled to one, then so am I too. If someone told me they think the sky is green, then my own commonsense would tell me, well theyre someone I can safely ignore without fear of missing anything relevant. And its not important to me, it will have absolutely no bearing on whether I buy the game or not. I decided that a long time ago. I just think its sad there's always someone who has to try to be the stand out is if to demonstrate theyre impervious to hype. Sometimes things get hyped because theyre that good. I bet there was even one film reviewer who insisted Schindlers list was just a boring black and white war movie without any battles. But please, ignore me like im going to ignore him, that's your right. im not trying to change anyone opinions, just disagree with them.
You know what... instead of dismissing gamers opinions about polygon, lets look at the facts: http://www.neogaf.com/forum... Polygon was funded by Microsoft for $750 million. Please explain to me how we can expect anything honest from them.
I can only say: Well done Naughty Dog!!! Keep up good work!
Good job ND deserved all good ratings and feedback. ^~^ Keep it coming for PS4 also.
Game deserves 10/10 IMO Haters gonna hate Looking at you: polygon, gamespot
I love Balestra's accent :D
IGN 10/10 Eurogamer 10/10 Eurogamer IT/Sp 10/10 Edge 10/10 CVG 10/10 Destructoid 10/10 Gamereactor 10/10 VideoGamer 10/10 thesixaxis 10/10 ibtimes 10/10 PS-Lifestyle 10/10 Digital Spy 10/10 Machinima 10/10 Digital Fix 10/10 Post Arcade 10/10 speciogames 10/10 Gamingbolt 10/10 Godisageek 10/10 OPM 10/10 Pushsquare 10/10 PS-Nation 10/10 Giantbomb 5/5 Techdigest 5/5 Gamesradar 5/5 TheMirror 5/5 Guardian 5/5 Telegraph 5/5 Gameblog 5/5 CheatCodeCentral 5/5 Adam Sessler 5/5 This is HUGEE!!!!
what's an Adam Sessler? Is that a game site or something :)
Adam Sessler is industry person and pretty high in gaming industry if you ask me :)
Naughty Dog are one of if not the best game developers out there at the moment, the amount of effort and time they put into their games compared to others is amazing.
Well, I think he has reason to be incredibly proud. ND are one of the top developers in gaming. They stand with Valve, R* and a few others.
That's the face of a happy man. http://www.google.com.au/se...
Doesnt deserve the 10's, trust me this will go to the over rated bin, dont rage fanboys dont rage. I have a lot to say but I will contain myself
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.