Top
250°

Proof: Original Crysis Realistic Jungle Looks Much Better Than CoD: Ghosts Realistic Jungle

A stunning and gorgeous looking comparison screenshot has arrived showcasing realistic jungles in original Crysis (2007) and Call of Duty: Ghosts.

Update:

Another set of comparison screenshot added. This time around the comparison is between jungles in Battlefield 4 and Call of Duty: Ghosts. And It seems like CoD: Ghosts is again falling short....

The story is too old to be commented.
Hellsvacancy1339d ago

The COD Ghosts jungle looks realistic, if your wasted and walking through a jungle that is

Axonometri1338d ago (Edited 1338d ago )

The light in the Ghosts shot is indirect scattered light reflected and coming through the trees. Why does everyone think this does not happen?

This proves to me, more than anything, that consoles have been way behind PC for a long time.

Walker1339d ago

COD Ghosts looks current gen graphics .

hesido1339d ago

See it motion on your TV, instead of from a 30fps video feed. I think it's a valid trade-off for 60fps on consoles.

coolmast3r1339d ago (Edited 1339d ago )

I don't even want to reply to this r****d (hesido).
Oh wait!.. =P

JKelloggs1339d ago

From 30fps to 60fps, doesn't make the graphics ten times better, you know?

Crysis came out in 2007, this is coming out this year, and it has the same graphics as a 6 year old game, that's pretty laughable seeing as this is 'next gen'

hesido1339d ago

I'm a r****d because some random good for nothing person calls me a r****d on the internet.

Take it easy, and be civil. I applaud their commitment to 60fps gaming, and I prefer temporal resolution over eye candy. It's a matter of preference.

Baka-akaB1338d ago

This argument only works when assuming you can't have better graphics than what was shown if pursuing 60 fps , wich is a lie .

ginsunuva1338d ago (Edited 1338d ago )

Crysis 3 and Bf3 on my current pc (gtx670) at 60fps say otherwise.

hesido1338d ago

I'll agree with you if they can make those games run at 60fps on consoles (which I do hope, I'm a sucker for 60fps). If the competing games go with 30fps, we cannot know if they would look better at 60fps than Call of Duty, on consoles. After all, it is easier to do more stuff at 33ms compared to 16ms. John Carmack was mentioning how they could add 3x the detail at 30fps for the next installment of Doom compared to Rage at 60fps, not just 2x the detail.
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

inveni01335d ago

CoD should not be compared to any game graphics-wise unless you're just wanting to show how horrible CoD is. CoD does NOT speak for the current graphics threshold. It is always behind since CoD4.

They should be comparing Crysis 3 with KZ:SF.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1335d ago
first1NFANTRY1339d ago

What a joke of a "substantial Upgrade".

Serious M$ and Acti belong together. What a bunch of incompetent American goofs.

papashango1338d ago (Edited 1338d ago )

don't worry the next gen sony games will start to be compared with Crysis jungle landscapes as well and will also fall short.

sashimi1339d ago

CoD and realistic grfx...i lol'd pretty hard

Sandmano1339d ago

TBH it looked like a low budget PC game too me, sure some parts looked OK but the fire effects for example looked really current gen, I hope they prove me wrong with actual gameplay but I don't think they will.

Show all comments (42)
The story is too old to be commented.