30°
Submitted by Lavalamp 654d ago | opinion piece

Defining Success: Why Metacritic Should Be Irrelevant

Warren Spector tackles the thorny issue of Metacritic's impact on the industry in his second exclusive column for GamesIndustry International (Industry, Metacritic)

P_Bomb  +   654d ago
Interesting read. One passage which echoes my sentiments:

[QUOTE]
Beyond questions of the utility of its data, there are two aspects of Metacritic's methods that undercut its credibility in my eyes and, should, I think call its accuracy and even the validity of its data into question.

First, the aggregation of data is skewed by the selection of review sites included in the aggregation. For example, with Disney Epic Mickey, I know of several perfect scores (higher even than I would have given the game!) that were simply not listed or included in the game's average. And we're talking about high profile, well-respected sites here. By way of contrast, our worst review scores, typically from Some Guy With a Website, were integrated in the aggregation instantly. I know this sounds like sour grapes and if you want to interpret this in that way, you're welcome to do so. But with future projects, team bonuses, and so on hanging in the balance, I don't think it's inappropriate to ask for a public discussion of the reasoning behind reviews that are included in Metacritic's calculations and those that are not.

Second, the data are skewed by the weighting and summary-conversion systems employed by the people behind Metacritic's ratings. Though I have no idea what criteria are applied or the decisions made, my understanding is that certain reviews are given greater weight in determining a game's overall score. I applaud the concept here, but without knowing exactly how the weighting is applied, the validity of the score is called into question.

Similarly, the widely discussed conversion of certain reviewers' letter grades into a numerical rating is arbitrary. And the conversion of 1-10 scales and 1-5 star ratings to Metacritic's 1-100 point scale introduces a host of problems. Is a B and 80? Who decides? Is a 3 star review a 60? Again, who says? And what are the ramifications of making that decision?
[/QUOTE]

This. Those aspects remain shrouded in wtf, yet make arguably the biggest difference. Metacritic's letter grade to number conversion is at odds with the way we're taught in school, and scores out of 5 getting converted to 100 definitely lose something in translation. The list goes on. Seems like a pretty haphazard thing to hang company bonuses on.
#1 (Edited 654d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

MAME Version 0.159 Released

1h ago - The latest version of the Multi Arcade Machine Emulator has been released. That’s right, you can... | Arcade
30°

Morningstar: Descent to Deadrock Review | Metal Arcade

1h ago - Metal Arcade: Phil McGrew writes: The generation of gamers to which I belong seems to have mis... | PC
30°

Who Should Gamers Trust?

1h ago - NoobFeed Editor Adam writes- How do we know who is telling the truth, who can we trust and why? D... | Culture
20°

Nintendo Knows That Mario Is Golden

1h ago - It is safe to say that Mario is one of the most famous characters (if not the most famous charact... | Wii U
Ad

See what games are coming out in 2015

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2015. | Promoted post
20°

Let's Play - Hot Seat: Prop Hunt Featuring Max Kruemcke

1h ago - Geoff, Ryan, Ray, Michael, and Gavin put Max Kruemcke in the Hot Seat to interrogate him as they... | PC