30°
Submitted by Lavalamp 685d ago | opinion piece

Defining Success: Why Metacritic Should Be Irrelevant

Warren Spector tackles the thorny issue of Metacritic's impact on the industry in his second exclusive column for GamesIndustry International (Industry, Metacritic)

P_Bomb  +   685d ago
Interesting read. One passage which echoes my sentiments:

[QUOTE]
Beyond questions of the utility of its data, there are two aspects of Metacritic's methods that undercut its credibility in my eyes and, should, I think call its accuracy and even the validity of its data into question.

First, the aggregation of data is skewed by the selection of review sites included in the aggregation. For example, with Disney Epic Mickey, I know of several perfect scores (higher even than I would have given the game!) that were simply not listed or included in the game's average. And we're talking about high profile, well-respected sites here. By way of contrast, our worst review scores, typically from Some Guy With a Website, were integrated in the aggregation instantly. I know this sounds like sour grapes and if you want to interpret this in that way, you're welcome to do so. But with future projects, team bonuses, and so on hanging in the balance, I don't think it's inappropriate to ask for a public discussion of the reasoning behind reviews that are included in Metacritic's calculations and those that are not.

Second, the data are skewed by the weighting and summary-conversion systems employed by the people behind Metacritic's ratings. Though I have no idea what criteria are applied or the decisions made, my understanding is that certain reviews are given greater weight in determining a game's overall score. I applaud the concept here, but without knowing exactly how the weighting is applied, the validity of the score is called into question.

Similarly, the widely discussed conversion of certain reviewers' letter grades into a numerical rating is arbitrary. And the conversion of 1-10 scales and 1-5 star ratings to Metacritic's 1-100 point scale introduces a host of problems. Is a B and 80? Who decides? Is a 3 star review a 60? Again, who says? And what are the ramifications of making that decision?
[/QUOTE]

This. Those aspects remain shrouded in wtf, yet make arguably the biggest difference. Metacritic's letter grade to number conversion is at odds with the way we're taught in school, and scores out of 5 getting converted to 100 definitely lose something in translation. The list goes on. Seems like a pretty haphazard thing to hang company bonuses on.
#1 (Edited 685d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Computer and video games are purchased more frequently for download

2m ago - An increasing amount of PC and console games is acquired via download. Around one third title for... | Industry
20°

Surprising Facts about the Relation of Video Games and Learning

3m ago - MyGameMag: Our brain is one of the most important parts of the body. It can be called the ‘Power... | Culture
Ad

Find out when Uncharted 4 releases on PS4

Now - Start tracking Uncharted 4 at Releases.com to get important updates about this game release. | Promoted post
10°

Why League of Legends is Smart for Staying Away from Consoles

3m ago - There are times when it seems that certain mmo games want to conquer the world. They are released... | PC
20°

Telling a Tale about TellTale

3m ago - Everyone's favourite Point and Click adventure game specialist has been around for 3 years now...... | PC
10°

Now is the time for EA to revisit Fight Night

3m ago - Ouros magazine explores the reason EA should revive the Fight Night franchise | PS4