Via TheGameReviews.com "Contrary to a new story in EDGE magazine, Prey 2 is not being developed for the PS3" More info after the jump.
I will try but will not Buy "Shooters" on the PS3 anyhow. Damn controller. Seems like the 360 gets all the treats and BETAS..these days.
what are Sony up to ? they have been really silent these couple of months.
Isn`t PC best platform for FPS and RTS, while PS3 for other genres? What`s the big deal here? I think, people shouldn`t waste their time on such news in future.
i predict a port sooner or later. Not like i care for the game. Played the demo was kinda lame if you ask me
Seeing as PS3 has 3 great exclusive FPS games coming this year and 360 so far has none until now this is not a huge deal. Assuming Prey 2 comes out next year 360 has no exclusive great FPS games for 2008.
I'm tired of generic FPS they are boring, I bought my PS3 for good exclusives and good games.
Comon guys. The 360 deserve good games too. I wasn't a fan of the first Prey but I'm sure they have stepped it up. It might be a smart more to only do it on the 360. That way they have a change of delivering it in 08 where as far as I know there isn't a single exclusive FPS on the way to the 360. On the PS3 this game would not do well at all right now. Going up against Resistance, Killzone, Haze and all the other non FPS would absolutely kill a smaller title like this.
"exclusively for Xbox 360 and PC" Way to word it the wrong way.
I think you missed the meaning of "exclusivity".
no i think you do, it will be a games for windows and 360 game, both MS so exclusive to them
No, he is right. While it may be MS exclusive it is not platform exclusive. This is where MS kind of screws themselves. If they had kept Bioshock, GeOW, Mass Effect and the others on the 360, or released them much, much later on PC like they do with Halo, it would force people who want to play those games to buy a 360. Now, somone with a decent computer (which you can use for other things, thereby making it a more reasonable investment) can play those games. This is in sharp contrast to PS3 and Wii exclusives where if you want to play those games, you have to buy those systems. @ below: What the hell does that mean? That's right it isn't "console exclusive". That means there is more than one place to get it. It's sort of like being married, You are exclusively with that person (ideally), MS's idea of exclusivity on the 360 and the PC is like being married toa girl, but still having the option of banging her older sister. So any game, regarless of platform or publisher, if there is more than one way to play it, regardless if it's only on one companies platforms, it is not exclusive. And why would you call me a lemming? i don't see myself following the crowd going to my death. But nice try though.
Exactly, they're not "console exclusives." Company exclusive maybe...but not console exclusive. If you can buy a game for more than one "console", it doesnt matter what company makes them...it's not "console exclusive".
if thats the case then people have to stop calling The Agency exclusive too because its being developed for PS3 and PC.
You dont see the big picture its PC+360VS PS3 not 360Vs PS3, many good titles of 360 comes on PC so do many of PC easily make their place on 360, while PS3 not supporting PC much doesnt gets any of the PC titles + many titles of PS which where exclusive earlier lost to 360 and PC.
This is in reference to this story... http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
Who's TheGameReviews.com anyway? Edit: The Open Zoners are going on a disagree spree!
Like I care. The first one sucked.
The first one was awesome, just the multiplayer was screwd but there is so much potential there to make the multiplayer great, lets hope they sort it out. Back to it not coming on ps3, this is where having both consoles comes in handy.
I wasn't a fan of the first one. I will probably rent the second.
Only played the demo, and it was enough to push me away from buying the actual game.
all the Sony kids come running and screaming "I didn't want this game on PS3 anyway" and "Who needs a crap game like this with MGS4 on the way" or "I'll just play it on my PC" I just want to say I agree totally with the above comment, it is best to own both consoles these days, there is just too much going on with both platforms, and PC is just not viable with its Vista only and super computer requirments.
PC's viable if you can afford the proper hardware for it. Otherwise, not so much.
Owning all the systems is the way to go. If you can afford it.
Why do people always think that PCs upgrade at the speed of light? I understand and know quite well that technologically speaking, a two-year-old computer is technologically obsolete. However, PC developers have to define minimum specs to run the game, and those specs are usually two to three years behind bleeding edge, sometimes even 5 years depending on the game. And while it is true that you might not get the "ultimate" expereience by playing it on very high settings, but you can still enjoy the game. I don't mean to single you out, you're just the first one I've seen in this thread bring up constantly upgrading your computer. EDIT: Like I said, I wasn't trying to attack you, yours was just the first comment I noticed talking about affording PC gaming. I get annoyed when people seem to think that PCs are only used for gaming and therefore not cost effective as such. Or they seem to think that the only way to play on a PC is to buy a bleeding edge high-end PC every year. EDIT2: case in point, Elementx's comment at 8.1
I never said you had to get the top-of-the-line hardware. Even a "decent" video card can cost upwards of 300$ However, I chose to go all out and use 2 8800GTXs in SLI.
What about the people who own both consoles and still say they didn't want this game anyway, but don't point out the fact that they own both consoles? Does that make them immature?
Hm. Didn't really like Prey 1. It was okay, but it just didn't have the spark that CoD 4 had. Though, the vaginal doors was quite hilarious. However, I'm sure PS3 owners won't be too affected by this announcement. The PS3 market for FPSs is incredibly saturated this year.
I enjoyed the concept behind Prey. It's a shame that some devs will miss the PS3 boat especially now that it's really taking off. Perhaps it's a money issue with them.
With the price of 360 coming down soon, there's no reason you can't afford a 360 to get the best of both worlds. To the PS3 "only" fans: Don't give me the "I can play them on PC" because to play games coming out later this year at a constant framerate, you'll probably pay more for a video card than a 360, albeit with a lower resolution, however I'd rather have 360 with a larger screen anyway
I've been considering it for months now, it's just other stuff gets in the way...school, sax, people, ya know? However, my 8800GT which can play Crisis on High at 1440x980 cost me $200.
So this game wont sell any xbug 180s. now MGS4 is real exclusive to the PS3, no PC! that my friends will sell millions of PS3s. this is a big problem for xbug 180 all of their games are always best on PC, so it makes the xbug 180 a useless gaming system.
Prey 2????? Who cares???????