100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 858d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   858d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   858d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   858d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   858d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   858d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   858d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 858d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   858d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   858d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Until Dawn Review | Gamers Elite

17m ago - GE writes: "Overall, I loved Until Dawn. Sure it has it’s faults, but it’s a homage to ‘old schoo... | PS4
30°

Gears of War: Ultimate Edition Review I Hey Poor Player

17m ago - Hey Poor Players Gary Swallow writes - "Nine years ago, Microsoft and Epic Games teamed up to giv... | Xbox One
Ad

Check What Xbox One Games are Coming Out in August

Now - At Releases.com you can check release dates for all Xbox One games. Visit now and start tracking the games you plan to buy. | Promoted post
30°

Voice Actor Tuesday – Catherine Taber

47m ago - Sagamer: Some voice actors only play a few roles, but often those roles are ones that stand out i... | Culture
40°

Devil's Third (Review) - Horror Cult Films

47m ago - Come for the fun but flawed single player, stay for the surprisingly good multiplayer (if more pe... | Wii U
40°

Until Dawn review: if you love horror, just buy it - Staffordshire Newsletter

48m ago - SN - There aren't many games I would give top marks, but this is one of them. I can tell the team... | PS4