Submitted by creHEARTive 947d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   947d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   947d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   947d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   947d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   947d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   947d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

#2.2 (Edited 947d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   947d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   947d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Best CPUs for Gaming 2015 – Black Friday Guide to Sales

16m ago - GamersNexus: "This guide rounds-up the best gaming CPUs on sale for Black Friday, ranging from $7... | PC

Rocksmith 2014 & Cable for PS4, PS3, Xbox One, Xbox 360, PC $34.99

31m ago - Amazon offers Prime members Rocksmith 2014 Edition with Real Tone Cable for PlayStation 4, Xbox O... | PC

HotLiked - What the Internet is talking about right now

Now - Kill some time at HotLiked.com. You will regret it... | Promoted post

Naruto Storm 4 Scan Details The Upcoming Demo

35m ago - Weekly Shonen Jump is finally here and although at first glance it seems like an old scan; the sc... | PS4

Jake & Tess' Finding Monsters Adventure Now Available For Gear VR

58m ago - VRFocus reports on Brazilian developer Black River Studios launching Jake & Tess’ Finding Monster... | Android

Q&A With Thomas Van Den Berg, Co-Developer Of Kingdom

1h ago - Baden of WGB: "I got the opportunity to toss a few questions toward Thomas van den Berg, better k... | PC