100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 832d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   832d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   832d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   832d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   832d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   832d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   832d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   832d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   832d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Top Ten Best Fourth Entries

10m ago - SPC writes, "It's August the 4th, so today SuperPhillip Central is getting into the numbered spir... | PSP
20°

Tower 57 Will Change Your View of Post-Apocalyptic Cyberpunk Shooters

10m ago - Serena Nelson writes: "I'll have to admit that I've never been much of a fan of shooters, but I d... | PC
Ad

'Warhammer: Arcane Magic' - a Digital Boardgame for iOS

Now - Arcane Magic is a turn based strategy game set in the Warhammer universe. Play it now on Ipad and Iphone. | Promoted post
20°

PS Nation Podcast-Ep434-Purple Flappy Spaceman

10m ago - New Releases Interview with Benjamin Rivers for 'Alone With You' August 2015 PlayStation Plus u... | PS3
30°

Did Xbox Make Its Gamescom 2015 Presser Pay?

10m ago - Push Square: "Sony's got the biggest presence on the Gamescom 2015 showfloor, but unlike in previ... | Xbox One
20°

Kings Quest Review – A Game to Remember | Modvive

12m ago - In this review, Samantha discusses how Kings Quest: A knight to remember meets all the series exp... | Xbox One