100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 515d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   515d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   515d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   515d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   515d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   515d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   515d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 515d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   515d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   515d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Project Scissors - Hifumi Kouno's Amazing Revelation of Upcoming Horror Game

36m ago - Graham Arthur represented AUTOMATON at the Tokyo Game Show press conference announcing "Project S... | iPhone
30°

Space Channel 5: Part 2 Gets Major Steam Update

1h ago - If you’re still playing Space Channel 5 in 2014 then, well, you’re pretty awesome. And an awesome... | PC
30°

Dark Horse Editor Dave Marshall On Adapting Video Games into Comics

1h ago - Hardcore Gamer: Dark Horse has made waves among gamers – collectors especially – over the last fe... | Culture
40°

Warframe Review – A Free-to-Play Game Without a Catch | COG

1h ago - COG writes - We spend some extended time with Digital Extreme’s free-to-play shooter Warframe and... | PS4
Ad

Access to Geekmemore.com the Best Geek Dating experience!

Now - N4G is now partner with Geekmemore.com. Enjoy for free and with illimited access all the feature of this new site! Promo Code NFRUHD59 | Promoted post
30°

Professor Layton vs. Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney Review – The Great Franchise Merger | COG

1h ago - COG writes - In the world of videogames anything can happen, and we play a cross-over game with P... | 3DS
Related content from friends