100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 460d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   460d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   460d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   460d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   460d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   460d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   460d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 460d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   460d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   460d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Gamers Become Disappointed in Destiny Overnight

3m ago - Destiny has been riding high on a wave of hype since its announcement in February, 2013. Pitched... | Xbox 360
20°

Transformers: Rise of the Dark Spark Review - The Digital Fix

21m ago - If you’re interested in buying Transformers: Rise of the Dark Spark, there’s a good chance that y... | PC
40°

Amazon India is now a marketplace for pirated games. Watch Dogs going for $8.

21m ago - Games in Asia says: "A cursory search for Watch Dogs on the PC brings in a range of deals from a... | PC
20°

Ten Things You Need To Know From San Diego Comic Con

21m ago - Joe from Awesome Games writes: 'While most of the year’s big gaming-related announcements came du... | PC
Ad

Looking for a great Pokemon Community?

Now - Look no further. Join us at the BulbaGarden Forums, the best community for everything Pokemon | Promoted post
30°

How has The Division changed since its 2013 reveal?

22m ago - Are the key features still intact? What functions have been simplified or changed? And what new g... | PC
Related content from friends