100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 443d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   443d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   443d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   443d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   443d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   443d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   443d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 443d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   443d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   443d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Nintendo Rants: Project CARS Screws Wii U Owners

7m ago - In the latest edition of Nintendo Rants, Shawn Long takes issue with the Wii U version of Project... | Wii U
20°

10 of the world’s wealthiest game developers

26m ago - For those of you wanting to make it in the video games industry, here's an inspiring list of some... | Industry
20°

Smooth McGroove turns his voice into the best instrument

27m ago - The Internet is full of individuals trying to make a living doing something unique that appeals... | Culture
20°

Take a look at H1Z1's dynamic weather

28m ago - SOE recently unveiled a batch of images on Twitter, featuring the dynamic weath for the upcoming... | PC
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
10°

StarCraft II in Battle.net price drop

29m ago - Pixel Dynamo report Blizzard's price slash on Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty and Heart of the Swa... | PC
Related content from friends