100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 765d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   766d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   765d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   765d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   765d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   765d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   765d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 765d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   765d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   765d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

5 Surprising Celebrities Who Play Clash of Clans

18m ago - See which celebrities spend their downtown raiding villages in Clash of Clans in this article fro... | iPhone
20°

Everything you need to know about Tour Pro Mode in Rory McIlroy PGA Tour

24m ago - EA Sports' Rory McIlroy PGA Tour will be providing players with plenty of new options for how to... | PS4
Ad

Splatoon (Wii U) Review

Now - Ken sprays paint (I mean ink) everywhere in the name of reviews. | Promoted post
40°

Splatoon review: Nintendo’s ink-spraying shooter is refreshing and different | Post Arcade

43m ago - So will Nintendo’s ink-filled shooter satisfy the unquenchable thirst of angry former Nintendo fa... | Wii U
40°

Never Forget Them: Tifa and Barret

47m ago - Eyes on FF: Welcome everyone to Never Forget Them! Do you ever get bored of hearing about Squall... | PSP
20°

Let's take a look at the Mortal Kombat kartoons

2h ago - IT'S KOMBAT TIME!! ProJared takes a look at the not-so-great Mortal Kombat cartoons from the 90s. | Culture