100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 510d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   510d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   509d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   509d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   509d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   509d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   509d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 509d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   509d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   509d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Hardcore Gaming 101's Castlevania Compendium Now Available

6m ago - Carl Williams writes, "The team over at Hardcore Gaming 101 have just released the 158 page compe... | PS2
10°

Illusion of L'Phalcia - Guide, Cheats and Strategy Tips

18m ago - RPG Illusion of L'Phalcia Kemco Guide Cheats - Strategy Tips for Android iPhone Game Using Magic... | iPhone
20°

Transport Giant: Steam Edition Review - A Pixelated View

41m ago - This Steam re-released transportation simulator has a few issues, but a lot of depth. Read the fu... | PC
20°

Zeldamotion Releases A Link To The Past: Episode 1

53m ago - GuG Writer, Casey Covel tells about the Zeldamotion. | Culture
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
30°

Dead Rising 3: Apocalypse Edition Review At Skewed and Reviewed

1h ago - Skewed and Reviewed have posted a mixed review for the new Dead Rising Apocalypse Edition game. T... | PC
Related content from friends