100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 704d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   704d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   704d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   704d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   704d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   704d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   704d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 704d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   704d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   704d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Review: Bloodborne is the successor that the Soul series deserved (The Outerhaven)

1h ago - The Outerhaven writes: Being a what I consider to being a pretty die-hard fan of the FROMSOFTW... | PS4
40°

Computer and video games are purchased more frequently for download

2h ago - An increasing amount of PC and console games is acquired via download. Around one third title for... | Industry
Ad

Want to Join the Releases.com Team? We are Looking for News Editors

Now - We are looking for news editors for the following categories. Games, TV Series, Movies and Tech. If you are an aspiring journalist in one of these... | Promoted post
40°

Surprising Facts about the Relation of Video Games and Learning

2h ago - MyGameMag: Our brain is one of the most important parts of the body. It can be called the ‘Power... | Culture
40°

Why League of Legends is Smart for Staying Away from Consoles

2h ago - There are times when it seems that certain mmo games want to conquer the world. They are released... | PC
40°

Video Game Or Interactive Movie: Breaking Down The Order:1886

2h ago - No game in recent memory has caused as much debate as The Order: 1886. As such Skewed and Reviewe... | PS4