100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 833d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   833d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   833d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   833d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   832d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   832d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   832d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   832d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   832d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

The International V Main Event Day Two – Too Easy for Arteezy?

4m ago - MWEB GameZone writes: "Day two of the Main Event delivered one of the biggest upsets in recent Do... | PC
40°

PS Now Reviewed - A Great Idea in Principle, Just Not a Great User Experience

4m ago - In conclusion: Yeah, it’s alright, but it’s also a bit crap. There’s room for improvement (read:... | PS3
Ad

Win a Pro-Painted Ghorgon!

Now - Turbo Tape Games is pleased to announce a contest for an exclusive Ghorgon miniature hand-painted by Dave Taylor! | Promoted post
20°

One mission, countless explosions, Just Cause 3

4m ago - Check out the latest Just Cause 3 screenshots. | PC
20°

You should be playing Dirty Bomb

5m ago - PCgamer: "At its peak, when some popular streamers and YouTubers were being paid to play it, D... | PC
40°

Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege Spectator Mode Walkthrough Released

19m ago - Ubisoft has just released a new Rainbow Six Siege video that walks viewers through Spectator Mode. | PC