Submitted by creHEARTive 945d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   945d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   945d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   945d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   945d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   945d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   945d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

#2.2 (Edited 945d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   945d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   945d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

‘Star Wars Battlefront’ Review | Analog Addiction

11m ago - Analog Addiction writes, "DICE, the development team best known for the Battlefield shooter serie... | PC

World of Warships Developers Really Went All-Out on Audio Design

55m ago - The Games Cabin: The studio has just released a new developer diary to give fans some insight int... | PC

Rock Band 4 Van Halen Hits Pack 01 Now Available On The Xbox Store

2h ago - GS: Rock Band 4 has been receiving plenty of extra content since its release, with new song packs... | Xbox One

Massive Infocom Info-Dump Released Free Online

2h ago - Text adventures have had a long gaming history, from the best sellers of the ’80s to the interact... | Retro

New To VR: Back To Dinosaur Island Heads to Oculus VR Share

2h ago - VRFocus heads Back To Dinosaur Island as Crytek's Oculus Rift DK2 experience is released to the O... | PC