100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 677d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   677d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   677d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   677d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   677d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   677d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   677d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 677d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   677d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   677d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Bloodborne Strategic Preview - Darkbeast, Saw Cleaver (Prima Games)

18m ago - Christopher Buffa (Prima Games): Although March is two days old, we’re already looking ahead to t... | PS4
10°

[ABG] Sublevel Zero - Awesome Descent-Style Roguelike Shooter

19m ago - Sublevel Zero is a first person six-degree-of-freedom rogue-like shooter, that’s inspired by clas... | PC
10°

The impossible architecture of Castlevania: Symphony of the Night

21m ago - KSD: Even in his early 20s, Giovanni Battista Piranesi could sense his dream of being an architec... | Retro
40°

7 Game Franchises That Would Make Great MMOs

1h ago - Gamerant For some time now, hybrid MMOs have been quickly rising in popularity. The genre is... | Culture
Ad

Valve Partners With HTC To Create The Vive Virtual Reality Headset

Now - Valve has formed a relationship with Taiwanese smartphone and tablet maker HTC to help create a virtual reality headset called The Vive, which is p... | Promoted post
20°

N00b or Veteran: Why You Should Get Into Monster Hunter 4 Ultimate

1h ago - Toni R.: As a fan of the Monster Hunter series since Freedom Unite on the PlayStation Portable, M... | 3DS