Submitted by creHEARTive 902d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   902d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   902d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   902d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   902d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   902d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   902d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

#2.2 (Edited 902d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   902d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   902d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Taking killer ghost selfies in the new Fatal Frame

7m ago - Polygon: "Fatal Frame: Maiden of Black Water is a horror game where you explore haunted locations... | Wii U

Beyond Sol Review – A Vacuum of Content | PUG

8m ago - Adam Lloyd writes: "For the first time in what feels like an infinite expanse, space is finally c... | PC

Top 5 Movies To See This Month

Now - The month of September has Johnny Depp portraying an enraged criminal, a group of climbers trying to make it home safely, and the return of the sur... | Promoted post

SuperPhillip Central: Q.U.B.E.: Director's Cut (PS4, XONE, PS3, Wii U eShop) Review

8m ago - Phil writes, "The concept of the puzzle is nothing new to gaming. However, the puzzle game itself... | PS3

Wasteland 2: Director’s Cut Is Now Available For Xbox One

12m ago - From the Producer of the original Fallout comes Wasteland 2, the sequel to the first-ever post-ap... | Xbox One

Lover's in a Dangerous Spacetime is all about hectic co-op madness

12m ago - Toronto-based Asteroid Base’s Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime is the type of game that’s difficul... | PC