100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 832d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   832d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   832d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   832d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   832d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   832d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   832d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   832d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   832d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

The Witcher 3 Broken Achievements Won’t Be Awarded Retroactively With Upcoming Patch

13m ago - The Witcher 3 broken achievements, such as the Card Collector achievement, won't be awarded retro... | PC
30°

Xbox One Chat Pad Announced, Adds Clip Sharing and Screenshot Functionality to Game Pad

13m ago - Xbox One players will soon be able to purchase a nifty little add-on for their Xbox One consoles,... | Xbox One
Ad

Check What PS4 Games are Coming Out in August

Now - At Releases.com you can check release dates for all PS4 games. Visit now and start tracking the games you plan to buy. | Promoted post
30°

Arkane Studios on Dishonored 2's Emily: A finesse character, differs from Corvo

13m ago - Back in 2012, Bethesda Softworks and Arkane Studios released a brand-new IP called Dishonored. Th... | PC
30°

J-STARS Victory VS+ "Sugar Rush" | Start Replay Review |

13m ago - Josh from Start Replay writes, "I’ve never been a fan of Japanese manga, but when I was tasked wi... | PS3
30°

Rare Replay Review | Analog Addiction

24m ago - "Rare Replay is a must-buy for anyone looking to experience great games of the past or searching... | Xbox One