100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 859d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   859d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   859d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   859d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   859d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   859d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   859d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 859d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   859d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   859d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

One Final Breath Developers Return with Secluded Kickstarter

15m ago - Marcus Estrada writes: "It's not a good idea to hold grudges. Most often, they're far more troubl... | PC
30°

Review: Steins;Gate (Sony PlayStation 3) | Digitally Downloaded

34m ago - DD: Much like walking simulators do not appeal to everyone, visual novels have their detractors... | PS3
Ad

Win a Pro-Painted Ghorgon!

Now - Turbo Tape Games is pleased to announce a contest for an exclusive Ghorgon miniature hand-painted by Dave Taylor! | Promoted post
40°

Review: Trine 3: The Artifacts of Power (PC) | Digitally Downloaded

42m ago - DD: The third entry in the Trine series shows an evolution of sorts by taking chances seldom fou... | PC
40°

The Killing Floor 2 Review - The Gamers Lounge

46m ago - A fast pace bloody 6-player co-op Zed-slaughtering survival game. Wanna kill fast and often, wann... | PC
40°

Yacht Club Games details Plague Knight's moveset

50m ago - Yacht Club Games released a post detailing the ways in which Plague Knight will control different... | PC