100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 727d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   727d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   727d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   727d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   727d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   727d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   727d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 727d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   727d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   727d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Should We Stop With Pre-Release Awards?

31m ago - OnlySP: The other day it was announced that The Witcher 3 will finally be released in just over a... | PC
20°

CGM Reviews: The Charnel House Trilogy

31m ago - The Charnel House Trilogy reminded me of one of those classic sideshow gaffes. A banner proclaime... | PC
Ad

Xenoblade Chronicles 3D (3DS) Review

Now - Justin takes the latest 3DS remaster for a spin. | Promoted post
40°

5 Reasons To Be Excited For Star Wars: Battlefront

32m ago - "Though I have causes for concern given EA’s atrocious track record at reviving old franchises, I... | PC
30°

LEGO Dimensions vs Disney Infinity: Which is the Better Value?

38m ago - Traveller’s Tales burst onto the Lego video games scene ten years ago with Lego Star Wars and hav... | PC
40°

Xbox avatars come to the Windows 10 preview

38m ago - Xbox users participating in the Windows 10 beta can modify their avatars with a dedicated app for... | PC