100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 705d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   705d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   705d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   705d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   705d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   705d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   705d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 705d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   705d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   705d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Remakes, New IP, DmC and more: A Chat with Ninja Theory’s Dominic Matthews

25m ago - Adam Cook: "I’ve never made it a secret that I’m a fan of Ninja Theory’s games. In fact, I feel t... | PC
20°

Life is Strange Episode 2 - Out of Time Review [Deaslpwn]

25m ago - Deaslpwn: Seven weeks is far too long to wait between episodes. Episode 1 was a fantastic opener,... | PC
Ad

See what games are coming out in 2015

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2015. | Promoted post
40°

This Week's New Releases in the US - 3/30/15

26m ago - Here is Middle of Nowhere Gaming's weekly edition of new releases in North America | PC
30°

Rainbow Six Siege - one of the most tense tactical shooters you'll ever play | GamesRadar

26m ago - GR: "We love a good team deathmatch here at GamesRadar+. But let’s face facts; unless you’re par... | PC
40°

Life is Strange Episode 2 Spoilercast

32m ago - On this episode of Quick Time Event, the team talked about anything and everything Life is Strang... | PC