100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 484d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   484d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   484d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   484d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   484d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   484d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   484d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 484d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   484d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   484d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Nintendo Download (8/21/14, North America) - free Disney Infinity download and more

9m ago - Nintendo has announced the games/demos/sales out on the North American Nintendo digital platforms... | Wii U
40°

The Witcher 3 Gamescom Interview - Worlds Factory

17m ago - "At Gamescom 2014, we caught up with CD Projekt RED's Jose Teixeira to talk about The Witcher 3.... | PC
20°

Which Bonus Will The Players Get For The Civilization: Beyond Earth Pre-Order?

17m ago - 2K Games company has announced the bonus for the Civilization: Beyond Earth pre-order and a speci... | PC
20°

F1 2014 - Austrian Red Bull Ring Hot Lap

17m ago - Codemasters has released a new gameplay trailer for its upcoming F1 game, F1 2014. | PC
Ad

Win a Titan One from N4G and ConsoleTuner!

Now - We're giving away three Titan Ones from ConsoleTuner (original inventors of the Cronus and CronusMAX)! The Titan One device makes modded controller... | Promoted post
30°

Sword Art Online Hollow Fragment Review I Rice Digital

19m ago - Rice Digital takes a look at the PSVita JRPG set in the popular anime. | PS Vita
Related content from friends