100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 642d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   642d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   642d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   642d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   642d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   642d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   642d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 642d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   642d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   642d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Grey Goo Review | OnlySP

14m ago - OnlySP: Petroglyph Games, a Las Vegas based publisher and developer, was founded by remnants of f... | PC
10°

Hyrule Warriors - Wii U Review | Chalgyr's Game Room

15m ago - Chalgyr's Game Room writes: It is pretty safe to say that a few of us around here quite like t... | Wii U
20°

Each Act of Kingdom Come: Deliverance is a Self-Contained Story, Act 2 and 3 Depend on Act 1 Success

15m ago - OnlySP: Each act of Czech developer Warhorse Studios' upcoming Kingdom Come: Deliverance will hav... | PC
10°

Resident Evil HD Review | Gamers Heroes

15m ago - The shambling undead are back once again in Resident Evil HD, a re-release of the survival horror... | PS3
Ad

Check out the new Bloodborne Trailer

Now - Sony just released a new trailer of the upcoming PS4 exclusive by From Software and SCE Japan Studio. | Promoted post
30°

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is the Most Ambitious RPG Yet | Hardcore Gamer

18m ago - Hardcore Gamer: "There’s a good chance you know about The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, the latest title... | PC