100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 706d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   706d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   706d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   706d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   706d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   706d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   706d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 706d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   706d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   706d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

CGM Previews: Nevermind

1h ago - You are lost in the woods. The more you panic, the more your vision tunnels inward. You can see l... | PC
20°

TouchArcade - 'Forgotten Memories: Alternate Realities' Preview: As Creepy As You Want It To Be

1h ago - TouchArcade: If anticipation for a game can be measured by the conversation it generates, then ov... | iPhone
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
30°

Final Fantasy XV Preview | Continue Play

1h ago - Nic Bunce for Continue Play takes a look at what we can expect from Final Fantasy XV, based on Sq... | PS4
10°

Battlefield Hardline: How to Earn Tier 4 Reputation Track Solo or With a Hacker

2h ago - Here is a fast and easy way to earn Tier 4 Reputation in Battlefield Hardline solo or with the he... | PC
40°

The Zen of Bloodborne: What gaming can teach us about repetition

2h ago - Ben Kuchera of Polygon writes: "In gaming, as in life, we crave novelty. New experiences excit... | PS4