100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 583d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   583d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   583d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   583d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   583d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   583d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   583d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 583d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   583d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   583d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories

Advanced Warfare – Top 5 Multiplayer Maps

4m ago - With Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare now available and thoroughly enjoyable, LzyGmrs takes a look... | PC
10°

Hollow Knight shows a strong opening week on Kickstarter

4m ago - Developed by Team Cherry, Hollow Knight is a 2D adventure platformer inspired by games like Metro... | PC
30°

Buddha-cast: Ep. 30 – “Geeksgiving Special”

13m ago - EB's Matt Heywood writes, "In the latest episode of the OG Buddhacast Myself, Ana, and the host o... | Xbox 360
30°

Retro Weekend - Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars

16m ago - Grand Theft Auto Chinatown Wars released for the DS in 2009 and later released for PSP and iOS. C... | Retro
Ad

Blood & Blade Giveaway

Now - Join us in celebrating the release of Blood & Blade with a key giveaway for in game gems. | Promoted post
30°

Tales from the Borderlands - Episode 1: Zer0 Sum Review | HAL

24m ago - Isaac Wagner: "Tales from the Borderlands' first episode is a far superior storytelling and world... | PC