100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 485d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   485d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   485d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   485d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   485d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   485d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   485d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 485d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   485d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   485d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

The Problems with Mists of Pandaria – So Much to Do, But Not Really

10m ago - GeekParty writes: "Hitting Level 90 in Mists of Pandaria gave World of Warcraft veterans an unfam... | PC
10°

Sixty Second Shooter Prime Reviewed - Cliqist

11m ago - Marcus Estrada writes: "Sixty Second Shooter Prime is, well, a top-down shooter. You play as a ti... | Xbox One
30°

Amazon Germany listing Sniper Elite: Zombie Army Trilogy for PS4 and Xbox One

11m ago - The Sniper Elite: Zombie Army games appear to be heading to the current generation of consoles. | PS4
20°

Should We Get A Hyrule Warriors Wii U Bundle?

17m ago - The Tyuno Project: "The release of Nintendo’s upcoming Wii U game, Hyrule Warriors, is just aroun... | Wii U
Ad

Win a Titan One from N4G and ConsoleTuner!

Now - We're giving away three Titan Ones from ConsoleTuner (original inventors of the Cronus and CronusMAX)! The Titan One device makes modded controller... | Promoted post
40°

Steam shame: The games we're all most embarrassed to have in our libraries

21m ago - GamesBeat writers and the community share which games they'd hide from the rest of the world. | PC
Related content from friends