100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 803d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   803d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   803d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   803d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   803d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   803d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   803d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 803d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   803d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   803d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Get Your Munchies On in Space Food Truck

5m ago - Serena Nelson writes: "In Space Food Truck, you'll be playing with up to three friends in a digit... | PC
40°

Nintendo 64 Controller Works On Xbox One, Perfect For ‘Rare Replay’ Release

8m ago - Xbox One and other console gamers never tire of the classics, and classic games will always have... | Xbox One
Ad

Bulbapedia

Now - The community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. | Promoted post
20°

MMOs - Grand Chase M Review

8m ago - Grand Chase M mobile game review with screenshots and videos. | Android
20°

Top 5 coolest vehicles in games

10m ago - Cars, boats, planes; no matter what form your ride takes, they're meant to make you look attracti... | PC
30°

Top Thumb Grip Covers for PS4

14m ago - TechU4ria has put together a list of the top Thumb Grip Covers for PS4. To prevent wear and t... | PS4