100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 494d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   494d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   494d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   494d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   494d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   493d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   493d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 493d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   493d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   493d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

What The 3DS LL Should Have Been

8m ago - MegaJon28 writes "The 3DS LL has been announced and looks to be an improvement over the 3DS XL. T... | Wii
40°

The Last of Us: Proof PS4 Ports Are Easy? - Podcast Beyond

9m ago - IGN - Devs were saying porting a PS3 game to the PS4 would be hard, so is The Last of Us proof th... | PS3
20°

Gryphon Knight Epic Preview - of Bows and Birds | Gamecrastinate

9m ago - Gamecrstinate takes a look at Gryphon Knight Epic, a “2D Medieval Shmup that mixes elements from... | PC

Video-101 Ways to Kill an Orc - Shadow of Mordor at PAX

11m ago - "We detail our hands-on with the Nemesis system of Shadow of Mordor and why it is so exciting in... | PC
Ad

The Walking Dead Meets Spider-Man

Now - Come join us on Filmwatch this month as we give you a chance to win the Electro Collector's Edition of Amazing Spider-Man 2 or the Limited Edition... | Promoted post
30°

The New Nintendo 3DS is everything fun, exhausting, about Nintendo's strategy

28m ago - Retailers are going to have a hard time explaining that there is a system called the 3DS that pla... | 3DS
Related content from friends