100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 611d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   611d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   611d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   611d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   611d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   611d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   611d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   611d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   611d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

PSN Down: Is there anything Sony can actually do?

8m ago - PSU discusses Sony's options in relation to its continued outage. | PS3
40°

3DSBlessed : Top 5 3DS Games of 2014

1h ago - HelenBaby writes : "With the year’s end once again drawing upon us the time has come to put our f... | 3DS
30°

Pokémon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire’s Hoenn-Themed Battle Competition Confirmed

1h ago - The first battle competition for Pokémon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire will be running from Janua... | 3DS
20°

Mega Man Zero 2 Hits Wii U in Japan on January 7

1h ago - Japanese Wii U players have a date with the sequel to Mega Man Zero. Rockman Zero 2 is officially... | Wii U
Ad

Are you bored?

Now - Watch 10 seconds videos about games and game culture at COUB Gaming... | Promoted post
40°

Final Fantasy XIV optional items store updated with new years items

1h ago - Square Enix has updated the optional items store for Final Fantasy XIV to include items from past... | PC