100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 495d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   495d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   495d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   495d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   495d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   495d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   495d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 495d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   495d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   495d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Five Games: ‘The Sims 4′ And Everything Else You Need To Play This Week

1h ago - Get back into The Sims or climb aboard a garbage truck in this week's Five Games. | PC
30°

Metro Redux: A Collection of Patches

1h ago - Nicolae Andrei at in2gpu.com writes: "...for me Metro Redux is one giant patch and I never pai... | PC
20°

Danse Macabre: Moulin Rouge - New Screens

1h ago - You are an experienced detective in the late nineteenth century Paris, a time when Belle Epoque... | PC
30°

Assassins Creed 4 Black Flag review I Gameluster

1h ago - Assassins Creed 4 left a lot to be expected after playing through Assassins Creed 3. The previous... | PC
Ad

The Walking Dead Meets Spider-Man

Now - Come join us on Filmwatch this month as we give you a chance to win the Electro Collector's Edition of Amazing Spider-Man 2 or the Limited Edition... | Promoted post
30°

Nosgoth Preview - VGU

1h ago - Nosgoth is bringing the "Kain" series back to the masses in a very glorious way indeed. Will this... | PC
Related content from friends