100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 796d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   796d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   796d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   796d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   796d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   796d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   796d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 796d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   796d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   796d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Why everyone should be happy for Final Fantasy VII Remake and Shenmue III

16m ago - Metro: "I cannot get my head around the negativity displayed by some gamers regarding the most re... | PC
40°

Close Up: Metal Gear Solid Premium Package

16m ago - A detailed look at the Japanese Metal Gear Solid Premium Package for Metal Gear Solid on the orig... | Culture
Ad

See what games are coming out in 2015

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2015. | Promoted post
10°

The Soul Reaver Sword From Legacy of Kain Gets Forged in Real Life

17m ago - EB: The AWE me YouTube channel has posted the latest episode of Man at Arms: Reforged, and this t... | Culture
20°

FFXIV: Heavensward Review Log Part 1 – The First 5 Hours

17m ago - First impressions are everything in this world. In part one of this Final Fantasy XIV: Heavenswar... | PC
30°

R-Type Deluxe In Development for Atari ST, Trumps Original

18m ago - Carl Williams writes, "The Atari ST, and Commodore Amiga, was quite the arcade to home gaming com... | Retro