100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 443d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   443d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   443d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   443d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   443d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   443d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   442d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 442d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   442d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   442d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Dota 2 International Recap: Day 3 - an eSports roller coaster

8m ago - Your daily Dota 2 International recap is here. MWEB GameZone takes a look at Day 3 (Day 2 of the... | PC
20°

Phoenix Down 27.1 – Catherine

28m ago - Phoenix Down is hosted by Drew Leachman and Matt Quinn. Each segment focuses on an older game the... | Xbox 360
10°

Whispering Willows Goes to $9.99 Until July 16 on OUYA

1h ago - Hardcore Gamer: Whispering Willows just hit Steam, but the OUYA version hit a month ago. | Android
20°

Reddit User "Harry101UK" Gets Some Great Pictures of Valve HQ

1h ago - For creating a Team Fortress 2 short, called “Lil’ Guardian Pyro”, Reddit user Harry and his team... | Culture
Ad

Murdered: Soul Suspect Review

Now - Drew takes on some paranormal investigation. | Promoted post
20°

Humble Weekly Gamepedia Bundle Released

1h ago - Hardcore Gamer: The pay what you want tier features Windforge, Stacking, ReignMaker, Paranautical... | PC
Related content from friends