100°
Submitted by creHEARTive 861d ago | review

Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Review | GamerHub TV

Almost a year ago, Capcom released a surprising original IP. The legendry company expanded its reach in the world of video games to release an open world hack and slash game that they hoped would turn into another successful franchise. That game was Dragon’s Dogma. Dragon’s Dogma was met with moderate commercial and critical success yet it still found a following. Now, Capcom is releasing a full disc expansion called Dragon’s Dogma: Dark Arisen. Will the new features allow the game to rise to success or descend into darkness? Find out in our review! (Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, PS3, Xbox 360) 6/10

YoureINMYWay85  +   861d ago
Looks Sick!
SolidDuck  +   861d ago
The games at least a solid 8 for wrpg fans. I don't even feel like that's an opinion.
-MD-  +   861d ago
I just want a PC version so I don't have to deal with the framerate everyone complains about.
BldyShdw  +   861d ago
Is that a normal concern? I had no problem with the original(360).
Bimkoblerutso  +   861d ago
...I had a lot of problems with the framerate in the original, and I still have problems with the framerate in Dark Arisen.

Plus there's STILL terrible dithering, pop-in and screen tearing, all things that could have been overcome with even a modest PC setup by today's standards.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVED this generation of consoles (this is not some console war BS), but at this point, they present a giant bottleneck for a lot of games these days.
GamerToons  +   861d ago | Well said
I read the review hoping for a reasoning behind the 6/10.

1st off the reviewer put around 50 words per page and made the article 4 pages. Why? Probably Ads. It was annoying.

2nd They did little to describe anything. They said the environment was 'same 'ol same 'ol' and I don't see it. Everything I have seen shows the environment looks beautiful and interesting.

3rd They didn't describe anything in detail whatsoever. Talk about the new dungeons? Nope. The only thing they said was it was hard. They did as little writing as they could and without much thought. Where was the descriptions of the game to people who have never played it like myself?

Where was the REAL review on this thing? It is like the reviewer didn't even play the game.

Review Score:

2/10
#2.2 (Edited 861d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TriangleOffense  +   861d ago
added an agree and well said bubble. I went into this review hoping for some basic info and was met with nothing.
gamerlive  +   861d ago
I thought the review was good.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

On Launch Day, Gamers Are Increasingly Asking 'Is It Playable' Instead Of 'Is It Worth Playing?'

8m ago - Forbes: Warner Bros. Interactive released a new video game on PC today called Mad Max. You’ve pro... | PC
20°

FIFA 16 Top 50 Player Ratings - 21 to 30 Revealed

8m ago - Spottis: EA revealed the first part of FIFA 16 Player Ratings (Top 50) list today, 21 to 30. | PC
Ad

PC Games Still To Come This Month

Now - We're halfway through the hottest month of the year, but there's plenty more PC games still to come, so don't go outside just yet! Let's take a loo... | Promoted post
20°

Neverwinter: Elemental Evil - PAX Prime 2015: Hands-On Preview | RPGFan

13m ago - RPGFan: With the latest expansion to Neverwinter, Cryptic Studios seeks to bring the Xbox One ve... | PC
40°

The Launch Of 'Metal Gear Solid 5' Is A Unique Moment In Gaming History

31m ago - Forbes: Tomorrow marks the launch of Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain, Hideo Kojima’s latest... | PC
30°

The cultural origins of the Mushroom Kingdom

31m ago - KSD writes: Mario is a game that always struck me as highly strange—especially the early games. W... | Culture