Get a look at the graphics upgrade.
i'm not seeing a huge difference... but they did have an extra year to improve it
The got final dev kits not too long ago. Thats the bottom line. Also, if the 360 is supposed to be so easy to develop for, why couldnt these graphics be on the 360. 360 is supposed to be a developers dream right. They havent had an extra year to develop it, its about the same time as it took for the 360, its not like they had the final dev kits since 2005. Come on people, PS3 will slowly start pulling away from the 360, its only a matter of time. I say one year max.
Do you understand?
Jin have you played it on the 360 ? because I have and to be totally and utterly honest I cant see any difference between them ....
Is a dragqueen, I personally didn't see a difference. There will be no difference in graphics a year down the line.
PS3 has greater particle effects performance
XBox 360 has better texture performance
So all in all they have their weaknesses and strengths, I much rather see alot more textures than particle effects.
though the 360 will have better texture, it won't be anything far and beyond. particles, lighting effects, physics, and hundreds of different things working in real-time simultaneous is what creates the "magic" of a scene. that's just my opinion though.
Keep flipping burgers.
Stop trying to explain something that you don't understand. Only if you were able to understand that what these "graphics" are. Game assets are first made using programs like Maya, 3D studio max and other graphics tools. This translate to the more time developers have to work on these assets the better they will be. Do you actually think they they created every single game asset all over? hah! Consider the PS3 version a FN3.1 since they are using most of the game assets from the Xbox 360 version. Why do you think they call it port? "Also, if the 360 is supposed to be so easy to develop for, why couldnt these graphics be on the 360." for the same reason that no PS3 game look better than Gears Of War and for the same reason why PS2 games today look a lot better than all PS2 launch title. Do you understand? Or I have to explain to you that the console does not magically generates graphics, but that someone has to sit down and do it.
This is the game that alot of people are saying "look at the PS3 difference" I'm looking but it sure ain't obvious. Yes the game looks a little more polished, in other screens I noticed they perfected the sweat. I don't know what else to say. It's a year old game , enjoy it.
The PS3 version has extra features, and it looks better. All you 360 fans are just making excuses as to why.
the "excuses" are logical... and they may not have gotten the final dev kits until a little while ago, but they certainly have been playing with the engine for a long time. True comparisons can only come from simulatneous releases (such as CoD3 and Rainbow six... both of which are supposed to be running smoother and with better textures on the 360 compared to the ps3)
the ps3's fnr3 will be better than the 360 version, as it should be.. but when ea releases round 4 the two will be the same (except for added tilt functions for the ps3.. and rumble and better online features for the 360)
Yes it is a port which means that they didn’t have to start from scratch but that doesn’t mean that they had a whole extra year either.
When you port you don’t have to re-code as much but all of the code doesn’t work so you have to patch up the game. Also because the systems have different architecture you also don’t get the benefit of taking advantage of the total system hardware. (i.e. X360 better at textures, Ps3 better at partials)
Therefore the game will only be a little bit better. (As we can all see it’s only slightly better graphically)
As for saying that we can start judging games like R6:Las Vegas and COD3 I thihnk your wrong on that one. Developers have had more time with the X360 than they have had with the PS3. Therefore they wont even be a good EVEN match to compare. The game to compare, will be in my opinion, FN:R4 because right now the EA team is not working on that game. So when they start they will be working on them at the same time. Secondly it will more than likely be done in the same location, so in terms of game play they will be exactly the same outside of tilt control, and rumble. Online? The jury is till out on that one.
Yes Xbox has a great unified online service but what I have seen so far (as of late) from Sony their online is shaping up to be very very nice compared to XBL. I mean its FREE and its showing that it can do just about everything the XBL is doing for a $40-$50 dollar a month price tag.
Xbox fans don’t get mad this can only help you out too. If Sony delivers on their online solution then maybe just maybe XBL will drop their subscription fee and make it FREE too. That would be GREAT!!
“Jump In” and “Welcom3 Chang3”
XBL is 40 - 50 dollars a year, if you break it down - 3.33 - 4.17 a month
see? thats the problem. You never tried xbox live to be able to give an intelligent comment about it. "I mean its FREE and its showing that it can do just about everything the XBL is doing for a $40-$50 dollar a month price tag."
Sony has not shown anything about how people will play games online(sessions, centralized accounts, etc). They only showed/mentioned the marketplay side (i.e. buying content, download demo, etc). This is also free on xbox live. You don't have to pay to do any of this. This shows you're bias. If Sony has any advantage over xbox live right now, it will be that it allows you to play online for free. This is the only benefit over xbox live and it's the only part sony is not saying much about it. All we know is that xfire is involved, developers may have to implement their own back-end and that it does not even have a name, less than 1 month before the console launches.
.. but didn't I see this a little under a year ago.
I am glad it is coming to the PS3, but I have already player AND ENJOYED it a good bit on my 360.
For the LITTLE differences, I see no reason for me to buy it again. (much like Oblivion)
The Xbox Live experience with this game is what really made me enjoy it sooooooo much more. You gotta love knocking the snot out of friends that live all over the world. I find it REALLY REALLY FUNNY how folks knock the fact that XBOX LIVE runs you under $5 a month and they go on like you are breaking the bank.
"TRY IT" ... for what LIVE gives me ... I'd pay twice that much. I was never a big XBOX (MS) fan, but it is LIVE that ended up selling me on the console and I am VERY GLAD IT DID.
A good online service giving me Co-Op,Multiplayer, Demo's, extra content, etc, etc ........ IS NOW A MUST HAVE for me !!
ENJOY EM BOTH !!!!
360 & PS3 = BEST OF BOTH WORLDS
You don’t know me and you don’t know what I have or haven’t done.
Second, to clear so things up I have and Xbox and I have used XBL.
Third I never said anything about specifics as to what was free and what wasn’t free I only said that it was shaping up to look very good in comparison. NOT BETTER!
Four you talk about intelligent and YOU FAILED to see the point that I was trying to make all together.
I NEVER said that Sony has and an advantage of XBOX
This is where you show your bias!
If you could just take my comments as is, maybe you wouldn’t be a fanboy! I also never said that it could do everything.
I said ALMOST EVERYTHING!
Get it right!
Be a gamer get your facts straight and read my words not what you think I said!
“Jump In” and “Welcom3 Chang3”
P.s. as for Sony online your right they haven’t given it a name ….. And what’s in a name. Like a name makes it more real or not.
Also if you read the other articles on this forum Ted Price showed how the online would work of their game so It’s REAL! Lastly when Xbox first came out (the original one) did it tell the world the name of its online network and explain in detail how it was going to work? Ummmmm NO!
Damn it is hard to talk to people who are so short sighted!
The game looks significantly better that the XB360... in stills, in motion it looks the same if not just incrementally better.
Screen shot wise, you can definitely see that the sweat, lighting and textures on the boxers have been revamped pretty drastically. You can see the pores in their skin!! Will I spend $50 for it though? No, not unless Sony online is comparable to XBL nd right now no one knows either if it is or isn't.
if the 360 version ended up being released later and looked better, it is more powerful than ps3.
but now youre just saying that they didnt have enough time
I play and own FNR3 for 360 and it's obvious the game was not rushed. It is an excellent game and by means 100% next gen. But what's wrong with it looking better for PS3? and It was completeley their choice to release it for 360 in feb, no one was forcing them, it wasn't 1st party.
It is dead obvious that the ps3 version looks better, and because of that, my respect for EA just went wayyyyy up.
EA has never taken advantage of hardware, all games are multiplatform, and will look the same no matter what, but they finally changed this with FNR3 for the ps3.
If youre so happy playing your 360, play it, us ps3 fanboys seriously dont care about your comments, it means nothing to us because we can actually see for ourselves that there is a visible upgrade in the games we see from the 360 games we see. Now stop advertising your console and enjoy it for what you bought it for.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.