Speaking through the latest issue of Game Informer, Sefton Hill as director of both the previous title Batman: Arkham, expressed confidence in the studio Rocksteady Studios heir to the work of gold.
No shit, as if they can say anything else. Learn to post actual news from obvious PR crap.
Developers always do this, more sales for this game mean more money for the company they are under and if they have more money then they are happy....and if they are happy they won't get p***** off at Rocksteady in any way making there jobs safe and secure. Capcom said the same with Slant Six Remedy said the same with Max Payne 3 (good game but not Max Payne like what Remedy did and they said it was JUST LIKE theirs) Irrational Games said the same for Bioshock 2 and so on...
Its not like anyone expected Rocksteady to say other wise since WB signs their checks
I know. Can you imagine if they had said, "No way, these guys aren't capable of handling this franchise. Don't expect anything good. And everybody should probably skip it and wait for Our next-gen Batman game."
Still high hopes for this game as I am stubborn enough to continue the love. Im still playing Arkham City......cant help it. that game is a true work of art
I guess I am the only one who thought this game was overrated. Not a terrible game by any means but the hype the Arkham City got it didn't live up to it for me.
I find alot of my Arkham City gaming is just flying around the city beating people up. I love the combat system in this game like no other. I'll put on the Dark Knight Rises soundtrack and fly around for hours beating the everlovin shit out of criminals. Tweaking camera angles, doing crazy moves that look awesome, etc etc..... I go through the story every now and then but mainly this game is a time killer anymore for me. It's like dressing up like Batman and going in the back yard and....well, playing Batman! Lol. I'm a nerd, get over it. Isn't this nerds4gamers.com? :) It's the closest thing I'll ever get to being Batman unless I was this guy...then again, no thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
I wonder what rocksteady is working on right now.
I wonder why Rocksteady decided not to make this. My guess is that they knew that there wasn't anywhere to go after their last game because they pulled out all the stops on that one. Heck, they introduced practically every villain in the DC universe.
I doubt Rocksteady cares. It wasn't up to them to make this and I think they are too busy with their next game for next-gen. More than likely going to be Batman.
Offcourse they care its their franchise its what put them on the map! Im sure they want it to do really well. Its obvious they are making a prequel because Rocksteady want to make the third installment that continues the story, Im taking this game for what it is and I hope its great!
I'm sure Rocksteady cares to the degree that this next installment is not a flop, creating disinterest onbthe Batman series. Sure they're working on a next gen Arkham World.
Doesnt mean I am...look at Sly Cooper..Sly 4 was a totally sub par game and they had a team that did the entire HD collection create that one and the whole time said they were happy. Then t came out and it was just totally not the same. I fear this might happen again but tha's just regular consumer skepticism...I still think they totally could deliver
I enjoyed Sly 4 more than Sly 3. I understand your point, though.
For all we know they could be being completely honest here, but we'll never know since they are owned by WB. Or maybe they are saying these things without any influence from WB at all, but how would we know? Jumping to the conclusion that this is nothing but a forced PR move, is probably something we've learnt to do thanks to companies like EA.
Whoops wrong page.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.