120°
Submitted by Rebellion12 455d ago | news

GeForce GTX Titan LE Poses For The Camera, Packs Quite A Punch

Rumored to be a cut-down version of the behemoth GeForce GTX Titan, the GeForce GTX Titan LE has now made an appearance online, some details regarding the GPU were also shed. (PC, Tech)

TheKayle1  +   455d ago
and the real next gen starts
kikoano  +   455d ago
yes sony and microsoft failed they dont have next get
imchuckbass  +   455d ago
This will be a nice upgrade from my gtx 680, provided its £600 max.
SlapHappyJesus  +   455d ago
Exactly my thoughts. Wait a few years, the card will decrease in price by around half and will show a good performance increase in comparison to the original card.
ABizzel1  +   455d ago
Why not just buy another 680 and SIL?

Save you money, and give you better performance in most cases than a single Titan.
SlapHappyJesus  +   455d ago
Performance will improve with the Titan over time. Look at the higher-end 680s of today when compared to when they first released.
Also, you dodge the potential issues of running in SLI.
I always recommend going with single cards if price and performance are comparable, personally.
#3.2.1 (Edited 455d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
ABizzel1  +   455d ago
@SlapHappy

If a Single Card can do what your potential SLI can at a similar price then yes I agree.

But 680's in SLI blow away the Titan in most cases and cost less.

You're better off buying 2 680's, SLI them, and wait for the UHD graphic cards (probably 2015), in which case you could sell your 680's for around $200 a piece and buy a UHD 890 or UHD 1970 when there's another leap in graphics cards.

Best of all you can do this now with 680's for under $1,000 whereas most titans are selling for $1,000+, and by the time you want SLI your Titan's the UHD series will be out.

I'm all for single card use as well, but when that card starts to peak (which the 680 still hasn't) then it's time to SIL until single card GPU's get another performance boost.
DarkZane  +   455d ago
Titan is so not worth that price point. Might as well get 2* GTX680 (4gb) or 2* GTX690.
ExCest  +   455d ago
Or 2 7970!
ATi_Elite  +   455d ago
HD 7970ghz CFX set-up destroys a Titan and cost less.

The Titan LE is still over priced and I'm not so sure it will blow a GTX680 or HD7970ghz away enough to justify the huge price.
#4.2 (Edited 455d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
jeffgoldwin  +   453d ago
GTX 690 is already a dual card. So if you went sli with it, that would really be doing a quad sli. That is definitely gunna suck some power from the outlet.
#4.3 (Edited 453d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
CapsLocke  +   455d ago
This thing is overpriced as f**k!
Tr10wn  +   455d ago
This thing is twice faster than the PS4 GPU and paying $650 for it is acceptable especially when "next gen" console will cost $400+

pay $150 more and get 1080p@60fps rather than 1080p@30fps.
clintos59  +   455d ago
Thats $650 for just the gpu which is a ripoff.

"The GeForce GTX Titan LE uses the same cooler design as the GeForce GTX Titan as seen in the pictures. The GPU uses the same GK110 graphics core with 12 SMX units enabled, bringining the Cuda core count to 2304-2496 and memory to 5GB GDDR5 over a 320-bit wide memory interface. The GPU will be much cheaper than it’s older brother, rumors point to a price-tag of approx  $659-$759.&q uot;

Atleast u get everything packed with the ps4 for $400 to $500 while u waste $650 to $750 just for a gpu. Hey if u have money to buy it great for u but your average gamer wont spend $650 just for a graphics card.
#5.1.1 (Edited 455d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report
iamgoatman  +   455d ago
"pay $150 more and get 1080p@60fps rather than 1080p@30fps."

These cards are meant for 5940x1080 at an acceptable frame rate though, they're overkill for just 1080p unless you need a constant 120FPS v-synced. So it's hardly $150 more for an extra 30FPS.
DarkZane  +   455d ago
PS4 games are gonna be 1080p@60fps, not 1080p@30fps.

The only game so far at 1080p@30fps is thief and that's because the devs said that only 30fps was necessary. So 60fps could be done if they wanted.
Tr10wn  +   455d ago
@DarkZane and Killzone 1080p@30fps and bf4 will run 720p@60fps because it can do 1080p@60p on the ps4, get your facts straight, GG said that the ps4 is a beast if that is true why their FPS game is running at 30fps? everyone knows you need 60fps to play an FPS efficiently, is pretty much standard for PC gaming.
#5.1.4 (Edited 455d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report
SlapHappyJesus  +   455d ago
@Darkzane

Wonder how many more are going to consider it "not necessary".
#5.2 (Edited 455d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Digital High – Most Anticipated Games in 2014, Is No Man’s Sky Getting Overhyped, and More

15m ago - The Digital High guys are back to deliver your weekly dose of gaming news and discussion. This we... | Xbox 360
20°

The Vita Cast Episode 32: More Anime More Games

16m ago - Their back again, The Vita Cast crew is here to discuss some news, new releases, and some talking... | PS Vita
40°

GTA V Social Club TV leak leads to ban

17m ago - Additional details on Social Club TV w/ a Video - "As far as we’re aware though, this is the firs... | PC
20°

The Wolf Among Us - Where Next?

19m ago - With the release of Cry Wolf, the final of the first season of The Wolf Among Us, one of the n3rd... | Xbox 360
Ad

Filmwatch June Contests

Now - Join us as we give away a ton of cash this month! | Promoted post
10°

Turtle Beach Ear Force XO SEVEN Headset Review | GB

20m ago - "While the Xbox One’s bundled wired headset provides ample audio for one of your ears, gamers who... | Tech