120°
Submitted by Rebellion12 561d ago | news

GeForce GTX Titan LE Poses For The Camera, Packs Quite A Punch

Rumored to be a cut-down version of the behemoth GeForce GTX Titan, the GeForce GTX Titan LE has now made an appearance online, some details regarding the GPU were also shed. (PC, Tech)

TheKayle1  +   561d ago
and the real next gen starts
kikoano  +   561d ago
yes sony and microsoft failed they dont have next get
imchuckbass  +   561d ago
This will be a nice upgrade from my gtx 680, provided its £600 max.
SlapHappyJesus  +   561d ago
Exactly my thoughts. Wait a few years, the card will decrease in price by around half and will show a good performance increase in comparison to the original card.
ABizzel1  +   561d ago
Why not just buy another 680 and SIL?

Save you money, and give you better performance in most cases than a single Titan.
SlapHappyJesus  +   561d ago
Performance will improve with the Titan over time. Look at the higher-end 680s of today when compared to when they first released.
Also, you dodge the potential issues of running in SLI.
I always recommend going with single cards if price and performance are comparable, personally.
#3.2.1 (Edited 561d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
ABizzel1  +   561d ago
@SlapHappy

If a Single Card can do what your potential SLI can at a similar price then yes I agree.

But 680's in SLI blow away the Titan in most cases and cost less.

You're better off buying 2 680's, SLI them, and wait for the UHD graphic cards (probably 2015), in which case you could sell your 680's for around $200 a piece and buy a UHD 890 or UHD 1970 when there's another leap in graphics cards.

Best of all you can do this now with 680's for under $1,000 whereas most titans are selling for $1,000+, and by the time you want SLI your Titan's the UHD series will be out.

I'm all for single card use as well, but when that card starts to peak (which the 680 still hasn't) then it's time to SIL until single card GPU's get another performance boost.
DarkZane  +   561d ago
Titan is so not worth that price point. Might as well get 2* GTX680 (4gb) or 2* GTX690.
ExCest  +   561d ago
Or 2 7970!
ATi_Elite  +   561d ago
HD 7970ghz CFX set-up destroys a Titan and cost less.

The Titan LE is still over priced and I'm not so sure it will blow a GTX680 or HD7970ghz away enough to justify the huge price.
#4.2 (Edited 561d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
jeffgoldwin  +   559d ago
GTX 690 is already a dual card. So if you went sli with it, that would really be doing a quad sli. That is definitely gunna suck some power from the outlet.
#4.3 (Edited 559d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
CapsLocke  +   561d ago
This thing is overpriced as f**k!
Tr10wn  +   561d ago
This thing is twice faster than the PS4 GPU and paying $650 for it is acceptable especially when "next gen" console will cost $400+

pay $150 more and get 1080p@60fps rather than 1080p@30fps.
clintos59  +   561d ago
Thats $650 for just the gpu which is a ripoff.

"The GeForce GTX Titan LE uses the same cooler design as the GeForce GTX Titan as seen in the pictures. The GPU uses the same GK110 graphics core with 12 SMX units enabled, bringining the Cuda core count to 2304-2496 and memory to 5GB GDDR5 over a 320-bit wide memory interface. The GPU will be much cheaper than it’s older brother, rumors point to a price-tag of approx  $659-$759.&q uot;

Atleast u get everything packed with the ps4 for $400 to $500 while u waste $650 to $750 just for a gpu. Hey if u have money to buy it great for u but your average gamer wont spend $650 just for a graphics card.
#5.1.1 (Edited 561d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report
iamgoatman  +   561d ago
"pay $150 more and get 1080p@60fps rather than 1080p@30fps."

These cards are meant for 5940x1080 at an acceptable frame rate though, they're overkill for just 1080p unless you need a constant 120FPS v-synced. So it's hardly $150 more for an extra 30FPS.
DarkZane  +   561d ago
PS4 games are gonna be 1080p@60fps, not 1080p@30fps.

The only game so far at 1080p@30fps is thief and that's because the devs said that only 30fps was necessary. So 60fps could be done if they wanted.
Tr10wn  +   561d ago
@DarkZane and Killzone 1080p@30fps and bf4 will run 720p@60fps because it can do 1080p@60p on the ps4, get your facts straight, GG said that the ps4 is a beast if that is true why their FPS game is running at 30fps? everyone knows you need 60fps to play an FPS efficiently, is pretty much standard for PC gaming.
#5.1.4 (Edited 561d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report
SlapHappyJesus  +   561d ago
@Darkzane

Wonder how many more are going to consider it "not necessary".
#5.2 (Edited 561d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

The Top 5: Gruesome Deaths in Horror Games

1h ago - 7 more days till Halloween, Halloween, Halloween 7 more days till Halloween, at We the Nerdy! Ano... | GameCube
40°

Will 'Destiny' Survive 'Call Of Duty,' 'Halo,' And 'Far Cry?'

1h ago - Two months in, Destiny is still a big deal. Engagement numbers are impressive, plenty of people a... | Casual games
30°

Review: Shantae and the Pirate's Curse | Game Podunk

1h ago - Game Podunk's Jason Clement writes: "Shantae and the Pirate's Curse has been a long time comin... | 3DS
20°

Wasteland 2 Review | Front Towards Gamer

1h ago - Twenty-six years is a long time to wait for between entries in a series. Frankly, if you’ve been... | PC
Ad

Get a Free Kindle Fire HD!

Now - Check out details here! | Promoted post
30°

Shadowrun: Dragonfall – Director’s Cut Review | Front Towards Gamer

1h ago - I’ve always had a misguided idea of what Shadowrun was. It wasn’t up until a year ago that I beca... | PC