Top
230°

Mainstream Gamers Doesn't Care About Always Online

Gamers everywhere gathered to their forum or gaming website of choice to voice their displeasure and insist this was a rumored feature that—if true—they would not accept and that they were likely switching allegiances to the PS4, speculating that this en masse defection to a rival console would teach Microsoft a lesson.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagazine.ca
The story is too old to be commented.
The_Infected1174d ago

So how do you know mainstream gamers don't care about "always online?" How do you know mainstream gamers all have Internet connections that are reliable?

greenpowerz1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

How do you know they do? Only people complaining about it are PS3 fanboys and media taking advantage of their traffic/trolling. Most gamers are just waiting for an announcement.

The rumor is probably confusion over new 720 *always connected*, auto update and remote functionality, smartglass features needing an *always on* Xbox(standby mode for above features and Kinect control in standby) Some sort of Pre Launch dev kit security with the 720 needing to be signed in to the web/MSFT at all times, not allowing the xbox to play the new games if not monitored is where the confusion is coming from.

To use these new features the xbox needs to be in standby mode(ALWAYS ON) and (ALWAYS CONNECTED) This doesn't mean you have to use these features and have internet for the console to work. It also doesn't mean there isn't a DEV KIT security protocol making sure devs use the console at a contracted location or controlling where and when the DEV KIT and GAMES are being used, also.

BlueTemplar1173d ago

Thats some quality reaching right there - dont like the rumours going round? Simple - make up your own!

BlueTemplar1173d ago

"Some sort of Pre Launch dev kit security with the 720 needing to be signed in to the web/MSFT at all times, not allowing the xbox to play the new games if not monitored is where the confusion is coming from."

You do realise how that stupid what you just said is right? Prelaunch devkit security to stop other new games being played on it? What games would those be exactly? The ones that wouldnt be available due to, you know, it being pre-launch?

And why would they even care that much anyway - are these devkits really the cause of so much rampant piracy that MS needs to take this kind of measure? Do they really show developers this level of contempt and distrust?

iGAM3R-VIII1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

Do you have an off switch greenpowerz.... just wondering....

Anyway this article doesn't make sense, the gamers could have no internet or what if the internet decides to go down in the worst moment possible. Even I wouldn't risk it.

Skips1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

"Only people complaining about it are PS3 fanboys and media taking advantage of their traffic/trolling."

False.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Read the comments buddy. Seems like A LOT of people, not just PS3 fanboys, are PISSED!

In all honesty. I can definitely see the core gaming community shift even further away from Microsoft, given just how awful it is to work for them. lol

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Corpser1173d ago

Yep how do the same Sony fanboys feel about gaikai? It obviously needs "always online"

Why o why1173d ago

Corpser. . .Did you really compare the two. Can't you distinguish between alleged always online just to play a game versus having to be online to have access to a cloud game. Another jack reacher.

I have no real need to care for what mainstream gamers want over what I want. If I was led by the mainstream I'd be super fit and a great dancer. I'm core. I want Sony to listen to me first. . I've been with them since day zero. The casuals or mainstream gamers are important but they're preferences aren't more important than my own. I'm in this for me.

nukeitall1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

@Corpser:

"Yep how do the same Sony fanboys feel about gaikai? It obviously needs "always online"

That is a dang good comment. Bubbles up!

I don't expect people to agree with you though, because this is rabbid playstation fanboy nest right now.

@Why o why:
"Can't you distinguish between alleged always online just to play a game versus having to be online to have access to a cloud game."

Can't you *SEE* that this indeed that *allegedly* i.e. a rumor versus fact! That is of course on top of the fact that MS has Xbox LIVE and they are damn good at tracking all the data about their gamers. Heck, they probably collect more data and know more about your internet connection than even your ISP.

"I'm core. I want Sony to listen to me first."

Yes, and if they listen to you first then you get a dying platform like PS Vita as opposed to the successful and casual 3DS.

If you love games, then you want the industry to survive even if it means you aren't at their center of universe and that they make financially viable choices too.

Aceman181173d ago OffTopicShow
Lone_Man1173d ago TrollingShow
Why o why1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

Nukeitall. Sorry mate but nowhere did I say casuals or mainstream aren't important or that any company should rely on just my type because thats just shortsighted. I actaully said they are important. . .its right there. What you didnt see was my point and filled that gap with assumptions led by your misinterpretations of what I said.

Sony dont pay my bills. I want from them what I want from them which may differ from what the mainstream or casuals want. If they're catered for then fine but who's desires should I want catered for first? Theres or mine? Do you think the casulas are making coments on sites for ms Sony or Nintendo to make more core games? Ok den

g2gshow1172d ago (Edited 1172d ago )

@greenpowerz

lol did microsoft make you whats your model number lolol

Christopher1172d ago

***Yep how do the same Sony fanboys feel about gaikai? It obviously needs "always online"***

An optional service versus a platform requirement.

Sure does sound like the same thing... /s

===

I agree that we don't know exactly what "always on" or "always connected" means when it comes to our games. To say either way at this time is an uninformed response to unspecified terminology.

Having said that, to say that the media or people are trolling is kind of harsh considering the many forms of 'always connected' DRM we've been experience over the last two years and how the community has responded to them. It's fine to be afraid of this being a normal thing on the console and the communication of such fear may even be heard by Microsoft and others and affect their plans going forward. It especially should be at least heard by the publishers and seen as a thing that, obviously, most gamers dislike and don't want to deal with.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 1172d ago
RememberThe3571173d ago

I have crappy internet and even my connection is reliable. The issue I have is that the requirement is unnecessary. Always online is not about my end, it's about their end. We've seen it time and time again, always online is a pain in the ass. Now, MS has probably made is super easy, most of us sign automatically anyway. But when their network is down I can't play games? No thanks. Imagine if the PS3 had an always online requirement; the Anonymous hack would have been devastating. If people don't care, that's fine, I don't have a mob mentality, but I'm not buying into it.

So far, I know I'll be buying a PS4, lets hope this is all a big misunderstanding and the new Xbox blows us all away. I'm crossing my metaphorical fingers.

JokesOnYou1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

Damm, I follow gaming news, I care about always online, I played Bioshock, I played The Witcher and tons of other "hardcore" games, ooops I also played all the 'gasp Call of Duty games, and yet I'm not freaking out about always online, no just waiting for announcements, hmmm so I guess I'm not casual or hardcore. I feel lonely now....well at least I have the internet.

a_bro1173d ago

"Mainstream Gamers Doesn't Care About Always Online"

Until their Internet drops.....

fr0sty1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

Some of my best experiences this gen came when playing a single player game offline. I love online, but offline is a must for me. It represents my roots as a classic gamer, before online gaming was ever even thought of at any wide scale.

It also ties into being where I'm from, in a hurricane prone area. We lose power a lot from storms, and with it goes the internet. You can run a generator to keep a TV and a console going for a few days to help pass the time (and help you ignore the humidity and heat from having no A/C) until the electricity comes back. Not so much if you can't connect to the network, and that network connection is required.

So, as much as I love online-only games like Warhawk (still my fav... though likely more to do with the fact that I used to own in that game with a friend who has since deceased), there's something nice about a simple game that doesn't require any connections, waiting in lobbies or for matchmaking, etc.

shivvy241173d ago

same here , im more into campaign mode but dont play mp alot , my internet in australia went out for 1 full day so what im trying to say is ill get pissed off if online requirement is the reason i cant play an offline game such as sly cooper

slapedurmomsace1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

In all reality at least in America if you have a broad band connection, it's probably fairly reliable, though that's not gonna make anyone feel better the 5 days or so a year their 720 turns into a nice paper weight. Though this is damning, for me the deal breaker is..so you want me to have an always on connection, with a console that forces you to have a camera pointed directly at you and your family 100% time? Yeah, no..I'm 100% confident someone will hack this, watch and record what you are doing and upload to the internet, and odds are you may never know. As a 30yr old man, I don't need microsoft or a hacker watch me nail my wife.

edit: and I am a mainstream gamer. Gaming is my #1 hobby and has been since my dad gave me his intellivision when I was 5. I spend probably close to a grand a year on just games alone, and have owned an xbox and freaking 4 360's, 2 RROD, and 1 disc read error. I have sheeped out $50-$60 a year on live for the last far to many years. I am a multiplate gamer, I have no blind loyalty, however this gave me plenty of reason to become loyal to 1 company. It's all about customer service for me, and Microsofts xbox division will not see one more dollar from me if this comes to light as a fact. I'll get the PS4, and build a linux based gaming PC, and call it a generation

delboy1173d ago

Diablo 3, 12 millions gamers and that's on PC.
A platform known for low sales, just look at CoD, BF, Crysis3 or even Mine craft sale numbers compared to console sales.
And no disrespect to console gamers but I think PC gamers are more educated/advanced tech users then console users.
If they accepted Diablo 3 in such high number, what makes you think console gamers will be any different.

Simon_Brezhnev1173d ago

"And no disrespect to console gamers but I think PC gamers are more educated/advanced tech users then console users. If they accepted Diablo 3 in such high number, what makes you think console gamers will be any different."

That made my morning. LMAO

I guess you didnt see the outrage and i bet half of diablo 3 number are chinese farmers. Hell my account got hacked into.

slapedurmomsace1173d ago

Wait, since someone is a PC gamer they are more educated, and use more advanced tech?? I can only assume by that comment you are board gamer. Than you go on to explain that since PC gamers have accepted Diablo 3 (one game, not a whole damn platform), consoles gamers won't be any different, and will accept this. This is not true.."wes rnt as smert as the people who use dem new dag nabit super boxes", or PC's. Again, Diablo 3= 1 game, Xbox 720 = all of them. If your internet goes down, you can just pop in another game and play on the PC, if your internet goes down on the 720, you have a really big piece of worthless crap.

Zer0bros1173d ago

"And no disrespect to console gamers but I think PC gamers are more educated/advanced tech users then console users."

LOL Are you kidding me? PC gaming these days is super easy. All it is is a matter of buying the parts, putting them together like Legos, installing the OS and drivers from the disc and downloading Steam. "Woh, I'm f@#$ing hardcore for putting together my easy to assemble Lego machine!"

So much ignorance...

MikeMyers1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

People are very vocal sometimes on forums and whether that translates into having an impact at the retail end remains to be seen. How many times do we see comments about Call of Duty and the negative press it gets on the forums yet it sells more than all the other releases? How many times do we see people talking about exclusive games and how much they matter yet at the retail end only a few actually sell that well? Want to know how much impact there was over Diablo III and how it required an online connection? It sold over 13 million copies on a platform plagued by piracy.

Obviously a system that requires an online connection to simply play games will affect people. How much we don't know and all the hoopla on forums don't really give a good indication because the majority of people who buy these consoles don't post on forums and simply aren't as excited about all the things that go on behind the scenes.

Plus on N4G people will give you a disagree for not liking you regardless of your next comment or anything else for that matter.

What is evident is people who are very vocal will usually pounce on every little issue and make a spectacle about it. They are also the ones who truly believe their opinion is more powerful than it really is.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1172d ago
GalacticEmpire1174d ago

Why are so many websites jumping in to defend this stupid idea?

The argument that mainstream gamers won't care is ridiculous in that they probably won't even know about it until they lose their connection and get booted out of game. That's when the penny will drop and the backlash will follow.

Being ignorant of a problem does not make that problem right.

hard joe1173d ago

are they getting paid?
or expecting to get paid?

CraigUK1173d ago OffTopicShow
Th4Freak1173d ago (Edited 1173d ago )

Well in my opinion mainstream gamers will be the most affected because most play to relax after a hard day, some can only play on weekends and some others can only play a few hours in the entire weekend. So its pretty easy to imagine what will their reaction be when the game doesn't work because the servers are overloaded or the internet connection is unstable, etc.

CraigUK1173d ago

Gotta disagree.
"Main·stream:
The ideas, attitudes, or activities that are regarded as normal or conventional; the dominant trend in opinion, fashion, or the arts."

If we look at the "dominant trend" in gaming, by looking at the xbox 360 game sales, we can see it is FPS shooters. These games a pretty much exclusivly played online anyway. Any internet problems the user having playing those games would render them unable to play either with always online or not.

talisker1173d ago

"Gamers doesn't'. Yeah, sure.

Show all comments...
The story is too old to be commented.