Check out a HD video comparison between Battlefield 4 and Battlefield 3.
Does this really matter to compare these two games? What is the point? Even if you take away that they look very similar; they have many different aspects of each other - story, characters, weapons, levels and more. So again I ask, why does this really matter?
WTF is he saying?
All talking in scotch. German. But the game does look better. Lighting is more natural. Explosions are better Water has proper reflections and physics. I want to see a MP map with the water fx in the trailer etc. for below. Killzone does look nice, but it's not realistic, although gun models and anim are very nice. All games have their own style. Which is great, otherwise it would get boring.
what he means is which one is BF4 and which one is BF3 ? they all look the same to him...
I hate when they compare crappy looking video's like you learn anything from it.
Different story? Yeah, probably the only thing that really different.
honeslty it dosent look that good bf4 that is. Maybe its lack of art direstion or atmosphere killzone got down in spades.Maybe bf4 is just about 100 percent destruction nice but i cant wait to see how games without destruction will look.
Games art design is photoreal direction, lol killzone looks like nothing realisitic; just another halo style game. BF4 looks amazing.
You're saying Battlefield 4's Artists and Dynamics of the engine are worse than Killzone 4?!?! BF4 = Realistic Modern Battle Experience Dynamic Lighting Dynamic Sound Destruction 3.0 Engine I saw Killzone 4 gameplay, I say meh because it's lost the Killzone feel. One thing I loved about previous killzones was the destroyed landscape of most multiplayer maps. Now IDK if they'll not have that but they probably won't have a lot of them so it won't feel like Killzone. (IN MY OPINION!)
Lol, Boy... are you serious? Realistic Modern Battle Experience¡ In a real combat your health dont regenerate automatically or you cant shoot down an helicopter attack with a launcher grenade because the attack helicopter fights several miles far from the objetive and are armored. In a real combat If you are hit, you are dead in less of 60 seconds because the bullets of the automatic weapons are 5.56 for Nato or 7.62 for Russia-China and cause a lot of damage a single bullet can cut an entire arm o leg. Lose the life in a combat is very easy. More that 5.000 american brave soldiers lose their lives, much of them for artesanal explosives . The war is the worst, please dont talk about of Realistic Modern Battle Experience. Battlefield is only a exaggerated game. I spent 6 years in the army :(
character models and lighting are worlds apart.
I agree. I didn't realize just how much Better BF4 looked until i saw this. I guess we are going to notice graphical advancements less and less as the graphics get to almost photo realistic quality.
i dont see a big difference in graphics.
What really matters to me, it's that if the games doesn't have big differences in graphics, so my old HD 6870 gonna run... and that's great, i can save my money only for my PS4 lol
You want realism take your ass to the military.
Thats a long way from a lot of peoples moms basements.
i wish someone would do side by side comparison of all the Call of Duty games.... THAT WOULD BE COMICAL....
LOL the two games are the same. This is not Battlefield 3.5 is maybe Battlefield 3.2. EA Scam¡
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.