TNF writes: Overall, this is a terrible title, without a doubt the worst game I’ve played in the past year, and, most likely, in my top 20 of the worst games I’ve ever played.
"I’d give the game a 61, but that’s because 60 and under is a game that is completely broken, which makes it impossible to finish." Anything under 60/100 is a broken game? Um...I'm not quite sure that's how scoring systems work. Personally, I think games in the 20-30 range are broken to the point of unplayability...while games in the 40-60 range are usually "awful" to "average" (but still with one or two redeeming qualities.)
Guess you didn't follow reviews in the past few years? ;) Honestly - >90 score in this time is "very good", >80 is "playable, and probably worth it", >70 "it's okay, I guess", >60 "What is this supposed to be?", <60 "The game won't even start, but the idea is pretty neat, I guess?" The scoring systems are so broken nowadays, I stopped reading the scores altogether. A game needs to be trashed? Just score it below 70.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.