150°
Submitted by CranberryPub 485d ago | article

Battlefield 4: Everything We Know Post-Reveal

GamerZines writes:

Last night we attended DICE's official reveal of the next entry of Battlefield 4 in their home city of Stockholm. The event featured lengthy presentations, interview opportunities and most promisingly a live seventeen minute long gameplay demo.

Now we could hide all this information in a delicately constructed preview offering up opinion the seventeen-minute long live demo we saw of the game in action, but we're guessing our musings aren't the main reason you clicked on this article. Instead we think you probably just want the cold, hard facts about DICE's FPS sequel or more appropriately the ones the developer is ready to reveal and funnily enough that's exactly what we're looking to offer. Take a knee and read carefully, as there's a lot of information to get through. (Battlefield 4, PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

glennco  +   485d ago
I know I wont bother with the SP campaign.
Cutscene --> linear scripted gameplay --> cutscene --> linear scripted gameplay etc. etc.
konnerbllb  +   485d ago
Honestly they shouldn't have done a single player. BF1942 was one of the greatest games ever because they were able to focus on their MP formula and they ended up creating something magical. BF2 didn't need single player either and it did just as well. I feel like the SP is "tacked" on in battlefield games, funny, it's normally the opposite with other games.
Hufandpuf  +   485d ago
I found the Bad Company SPs entertaining.
guitarded77  +   485d ago
They should offer the SP and MP separately, besides the full package. Most games should. I see a lot of people who don't care for the SP, and if they could just buy the MP for $20 less, they may increase sales overall. I actually like the campaigns... I consider them a warm-up before MP.
hesido  +   485d ago
I haven't played the single player in any Battlefield games, more than 5 minutes. I don't think this will change for BF4. I don't care how big explosions they can show me in the SP. All I care about is the MP. I think they better focus on MP and sell it for 45bucks instead of 60. Anyone who wants the single player can pay, let's say 30 usd, or 20usd if they already own the MP. :=)

Uh oh-Guitarded pretty much said the same :)
#1.1.3 (Edited 485d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report
Jayjayff  +   485d ago
I will have to play it just to say I did, but no one goes into Bf for the god damn campaign. Even if Bad company was pretty good. *Bf3's campaign was a mistake*
TheBrownBandito  +   485d ago
"Cutscene --> linear scripted gameplay --> cutscene --> linear scripted gameplay etc. etc."

It's called story telling and it needs to work like that. Some of us enjoy that movie like experience.

BF3's campaign really did feel like it was tacked on, but this looks like a far better effort. I'm really looking forward to it.
#1.3 (Edited 485d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
hesido  +   485d ago
I understand your point, that said, this trailer showed too much of that scripted play. In Uncharted for example, you play a good deal before you get into a cut-scene or scripted event. This is like, shoot two guys, go into script, shoot 5 guys, go into script.

Worst input you can give during a scripted scene causes you to die and start over the same scripted scene, the gameplay wants you to behave in a very specific manner. It's not like "This time I will use the left flank and use the cars as cover". And every time you re-play that scripted scene if you continue to not behave in that specific manner, the scene loses more of its excitement.
IK IR Y IP T  +   485d ago
I dont know what u people expect from a military campaign i think the simplistic campaign of the last battlefield was nice because it was more realistic then other fps campaigns the story is a everyday story that a member of one of our armed services would really carry out and if u play BF for singleplayer your here for the wrong reasons in the first place
spaceg0st  +   485d ago
if ANYTHING else, co op. Especially when rolling in a squad of at least 4 anyway. Otherwise copy and paste formula. It's old
TheBrownBandito  +   483d ago
"if u play BF for singleplayer your here for the wrong reasons in the first place"

No, that's why you are here. The developers obviously don't agree. The campaign will be a particularly labour intensive affair for an already well established multiplayer mechanic. Why would they bother and if so, then do it half heartedly?

Simply put, they wouldn't.
Donnieboi  +   485d ago
Looks like BF 3.5 to me.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Nathan Fillion Misbehaves: Breaks Firefly MMO Site

57m ago - Skyrim Fansite writes: "Do you want to run this ship? The Firefly MMO site is currently broken.... | iPhone
30°

Caffeine - Unreal Engine 4-powered Sci-Fi Horror Title - Gets New Gameplay Trailer

58m ago - Dylan Browne has released a new gameplay trailer for his upcoming sci-fi horror game that is powe... | PC
30°

New MOBA Gigantic Shows off Gameplay Video

1h ago - Gigantic, a new fantasy MOBA title developed by the independent developer Motiga, recently showed... | PC
40°

Five Worst Video Game Translations (Feat. Weird Al) (5x5)

1h ago - Just when you thought it wasn't possible for Weird Al to get any cooler, he randomly shows up on... | Culture
Ad

Study Game Design at DeVry

Now - DeVry University, is an accredited* university offering you the flexibility of over 90 locations, online courses and a wide variety of bachelor's a... | Promoted post
10°

EGL13 predictions: Who will win the CoD tournament?

1h ago - Red Bull predict who will reach the podium in this weekend's UK Call Of Duty Tournament. | Xbox 360
Related content from friends