260°
Submitted by doctorstrange 900d ago | news

Publishers Passed on Remember Me Because of Female Lead: “It Has to be a Male Character”

In case you don’t remember Remember Me, it is a third person action game from developer DONTNOD and publisher Capcom, scheduled to release on June 4th in North America and June 7th in Europe. Placing you in the shoes of female lead, Nilin, a memory hunter who lost her memories, your adventure sees you trying to remember your past.
-PSLS (Capcom, PC, PS3, Remember Me, Xbox 360)

Alternative Sources
doctorstrange   900d ago | Bad language | show | Replies(3)
Myst  +   900d ago
Thankfully that mentality doesn't work for everyone.
TrendyGamers  +   900d ago
Exactly.
moegooner88  +   900d ago
Agreed, for instance Beyond Good and Evil had a female lead, and the game was a blast, look how many people enjoyed it and are asking for a sequel.
Relientk77  +   900d ago
I am, cannot wait for Beyond Good and Evil 2
Myst  +   900d ago
I'm still waiting on a sequel as well :(
N4GDgAPc  +   900d ago
I'm looking forward to it to, but I can see some what the developers are thinking. I say most of the time a female lead doesn't do very good.

Beyond Good and Evil was well recieved by everyone, but sales were horrible. Be thankfull that ubisoft listens to the fans because if they did it to make money the game wouldn't even be made.

One question though does anyone know how well Beyond Good and Evil hd remastered did in sales? Better, same, or worse?
Mounce  +   899d ago
Same for Heavenly Sword. I want a sequel.
Simon_Brezhnev  +   900d ago
I guess if you get killed some brutal way Adam Sessler will bitch about it.
#2.3 (Edited 900d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
kostchtchie_  +   900d ago
no that's only if you are Male lead character
Relientk77  +   900d ago
Seriously? it does not need to male main character

Atleast the game is still coming, hopefully its good
TongkatAli  +   900d ago
I'm going to start getting everything with female main characters, dummies making gaming look bad. If game companies tried to lure in females to game, gaming would be much bigger.
#4 (Edited 900d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Rivitur  +   899d ago
Better start with dead or alive then ; )
cyclindk  +   900d ago
So if the main character were an, er.. um, a shemale it would work, right?
doctorstrange  +   900d ago
I would play it
DwightOwen  +   899d ago
That's kinky.
WeAreLegion  +   899d ago
You guys have clearly never played Final Fantasy X.
cyclindk  +   898d ago
What happened in Final Fantasy X??
yweiuoisdf   900d ago | Spam
cyclindk  +   900d ago
Oh yeah, also, Jill Valentine from RE5 was bada$$, that whole jumping on the shoulders neck-break move and tight jumpsuit with revealing bust-line... Whoow..

Much rather look at that than Chris' brawny-self all game long.
#7 (Edited 900d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
aliengmr  +   900d ago
I'm a bit skeptical that it was solely because of a female lead that an unnamed publisher didn't want to fund the game. It may have played a part, as in the entire concept may have been hard to grasp and the female lead was one in a long list of concerns.

Which from a marketing perspective is the harsh reality. Doesn't make it right, but its the reality.

This sounds like sympathy marketing. Play the victim and people want to buy on principle.
#8 (Edited 900d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
TrendyGamers  +   900d ago
I think publishers saw it as a risky new IP and a female lead might hurt the chances of success.

I see it the other way though, I'm more interested in Remember Me because there's a female lead and not just some generic male soldier.
porkChop  +   900d ago
It IS sympathy marketing. They think we're stupid. I'm not gonna fall for this shit. I already lost all interest after the interview where the games director/producer ragged on the industry for stereotypes and sexism, even though this game is full of it. They're a bunch of hypocrites and they won't get a penny from me.
DOMination-  +   899d ago
It couldn't possibly be because they saw the game and thought it wasn't very good. Weren't Sony publishing this originally? What happened to that partnership?
Max-Zorin  +   900d ago
what's wrong with a female being the lead character? This planet is screwed up.
Number-Nine  +   900d ago
tomb raider says hello
NateCole  +   900d ago
I had no problem slicing up people with Nariko.
kostchtchie_  +   900d ago
aww well
#12 (Edited 900d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
BuffMordecai  +   900d ago
Well that's stupid, I always find it to be a refreshing change of pace to have a female protagonist.
snowman2149  +   900d ago
I was planning on buying this game before this but now I'm preordering and buying day 1 just to prove these assholes wrong.
aLiEnViSiToR  +   900d ago
I'm sorry but i cant see anything wrong with female lead character in games (or anywhere else for that matter), this game gone great with few innovations too.
Blacklash93  +   899d ago
I'm not going to exactly blame these publishers, here. A new IP with a female protagonist is a big risk and can easily cause fairly lower sales. The consumer base's inabillity to empathize or look past a female lead is the big reason. These companies just are't willing to take that risk, it doesn't mean they're the ones who are prejudiced.

Capcom did something right creatively, for once. The industry won't evolve if it doesn't take risks.
#16 (Edited 899d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
kostchtchie_  +   899d ago
they will never take risk at that level because all they care about is MAXIMUM profit, not games and certainly not gamers
DragonKnight  +   899d ago
*facedesk* Great, juuuuuuust great. You know we're never going to hear the end of this right? There's already someone in the comments above trying to make this game appear sexist and misogynistic. *sigh* What happened to this world?
knifefight  +   899d ago
What happened to this world?
I ask this every day.
No, they passed on it because it's garbage and completely different than when it was first revealed. They're not going to pass on a game just because of a female character. They may have used that excuse but only because they didn't want to say the game just outright sucked.
Blacklash93  +   899d ago
They said they were outright told she needed to be male. It was at least a factor.

I'm going to trust that over fabricated, conjectured theories and time-machine people who can tell the game sucks.
#18.1 (Edited 899d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
WeAreLegion  +   899d ago
I agree. The game, when first shown, looked like crap. Many great publishers passed on it when the game was in this phase.
ShaunCameron  +   899d ago
Meh. Maybe publishers rejected the game more because the lead character lacked market appeal than it being a female. And despite some novel ideas, the game wouldn't have fared any better with a male lead character.

@ Blacklash93

The industry BEEN evolving and taking risks. This particular developer is just making excuses looking to score some brownie points with feminists and white knights.

<The industry won't evolve if it doesn't take risks.>
Blacklash93  +   899d ago
The industry outside of the indie market hasn't been taking enough risks and I can say that with full confidnece.

We're at the upteenth installment of the CoD franchise. We're seeing tons of threequels and for series like Resident Evil and Halo it's going even further. We have once-innovative franchises like Assassin's Creed getting annualized. Tons of generic new IP's that only run in the tracks of popular long-running franchises. We have developers being ruined by big publishers forcing them to conform to tired gameplay traditions and tack features like multiplayer on so they can say they have them on the box.

Only a very select few, notable games per year really try anything truly new that breaks away from the mold. Desire for profits beat out innovation and originality any day.
#19.1 (Edited 899d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
aliengmr  +   899d ago
Desire to pay for expensive shiny visuals gamers expect, more like.
Wedge19  +   899d ago
Always looking at "what makes the money". It's a bit sickening.
Dagobert  +   899d ago
Well no shit, errbody knows women can't fight shit. Real talk.
twuioisdf   899d ago | Spam
Hicken  +   898d ago
Gotta be the weakest excuse EVER.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Rock Band 4: Full Band Gameplay Video

10m ago - Skewed and Reviewed have posted video of their session on Rock Band 4 from PAX Prime. Two members... | PS4
30°

Quick Tips - Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain

16m ago - In the latest episode of PlayStation LifeStyle's Quick Tips video series, we take the hottest gam... | PC
Ad

Filmwatch Contest Details

Now - Age of Ultron is coming to Blu-ray. And we have something special in store for it's arrival. Come find out details on Filmwatch. | Promoted post
30°

The Resurgence of FMV Games

16m ago - Nerdopotamus.com - Our writer, Irfan Hanjra, delves into the resurgence of FMV (Full Motion Video... | Industry
30°

Mad Max: Jeet’s stronghold upgrade guide

25m ago - At first, a stronghold is little more than a ruin with miserable people in it. Visiting one doesn... | Xbox
40°

Minecraft: Story Mode Isn’t Just a Dirty Cash Grab | XBA

58m ago - XBA: It’s easy to be cynical about Minecraft: Story Mode. A Telltale adventure game set in the w... | Xbox One