Top
280°

Battlefield 4, unveiled the cover of game

4News.it written:

Ready for a fight war in the near future?

The March 26, 2013, the date set by DICE for Battlefield 4 show the Game Developers Conference 2013 (GDC) in San Francisco, is approaching. Electronic Arts is not yet willing to release official information on the subject, while the insiders anticipate the debut churning in the network the first images.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
The story is too old to be commented.
krazykombatant1225d ago

This only looks kick ass, better than the previous fake one that was put out yesterday. Now lets see what improvements DICE has done.

ShoryukenII1224d ago

I doubt that they've improved much. The cover style and art style look identical to Battlefield 3. There is also the fact that they are releasing Battlefield 4 so soon after Battlefield 3 (like what Ubisoft is doing to Assassin's Creed). I think that it's safe to say that this is just Battlefield 3.5, shitty single player and DLC heavy multiplayer sold separately.

krazykombatant1224d ago

Actually its been nearly to years come oct/dec, but yes most likely than not it will be minimal improvements

SnotyTheRocket1224d ago

Yeah, Battlefield has always released every two years or so. LAWYER'D!

Nimblest-Assassin1224d ago

So soon after B3?

That came out in 2011

Two years is the typical wait time for a sequel when multiple teams are not involved on one franchise

ShoryukenII1224d ago

I don't think that you guys understand. The mainline Battlefield series is not meant to be released every two years, just like the mainline Assassin's Creed games were not released yearly.

I believe that Battlefield 2 came out in 2004/2005. So, that is at least a six year wait. It is a little shocking and disheartening to see them release Battlefield 4 directly after Battlefield 3. What they should be doing is release another spin-off like Battlefield: Bad Company 3 (which is what I really wanted) or Battlefield 2143.

I feel like they are killing the name and devaluing the mainline series as a whole. They're also digging themselves in a whole. They're that much closer to Battlefield 9 now. This is not Final Fantasy. It just won't work here.

egidem1223d ago

Am I the only one thinking that EA is already rushing the Battlefield series? Why does EA kill everything they touch??? Now they're milking Battlefield as well??

By the way, it's about time they bring back the bad company series! I miss sweetwater and his stupid gang.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1223d ago
Britainz-Fin3st1223d ago

You shouldn't judge a book by its cover.

So what if it looks similar, maybe the same guys drew it.

Muffins12231224d ago (Edited 1224d ago )

The cover teases jets in the image under the "battlefield" part.Its safe to say that we will see more jet in battlefield 4 than battlefield 3.

PSN-JeRzYzFyNeSt1224d ago

game looks good always but i just dont like vehicles in shooters, its a turn off to me. so i never get it

FarCryLover1821224d ago

There are plenty of modes without vehicles if that's what you prefer. You can play team deathmatch and you can go into "infantry" lobbies that include no vehicles.

Britainz-Fin3st1223d ago

I have a friend who says the same thing Muffins..
I like having vehicles in the game, i enjoy causing havoc in a tank or firing down from the apache.

Although i see where your coming from, when someone is "pro" they can be extremely hard to kill

unchartedxplorer1224d ago

I hope they have a proper BF campaign where it is a destructible sandbox with a lot more vehicles with a proper story.
As for the multiplayer I'd really like Battlerecorder with 64 players along with some more modes. I like modes like conquest and rush but I want more variety.

spaceg0st1223d ago

agreed. THey don't need to fix much..

1.graphic improvement (given)
2.Bigger player count (given)
3.more modes... personally i'd love a bomb planting mode. CS style

Show all comments (24)
The story is too old to be commented.